The Law of One Price

2185 Words5 Pages

The “Law of One Price”, as described by Isard (1977), appears to be empirically invalid, yet there are conflicting evidences such as gold prices as at 24 February 1995 (Rogoff, 1996), suggest that the Law seems to hold true. This essay shall evaluate the argument using both theories and empirical evidences related to Law of One Price and Purchasing power parity (hereafter PPP).
In essence, Law of One Price (hereafter LOOP) states that “the price of identical goods that are traded is the same in all geographical locations” (Persson, 2010, p. 221). To begin the investigation, preliminary observations can be made using market information with the Eurozone where the same currency is used within the currency union. Consequently, effect on differences in currencies “real purchasing value” is eliminated. In an ideal world where LOOP is applicable, if a car cost €10k in Paris, the same car should also be priced at €10k in Berlin. However, Wittendorff (2010) commented that despite the introduction of the single currency, substantial pricing differences are still observed amongst member states of the currency union. Indeed, this view is supported by an analysis on price differences of identical vehicles sold within the Eurozone across 3 years (Appendix 1) produced by the European Commission. The analysis suggests the above hypothesis does not hold good and pricing differences of up to 44.3% on the same car has been observed within the Eurozone.
In a nutshell, when there is a pricing difference on the same commodity in two different markets, prices should return to equilibrium. This mechanism is described as “if the same asset is selling for two different prices simultaneously, then arbitrageurs will step in, correct the situation and make ...

... middle of paper ...

...mbridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rashid, S., 2007. The "Law" of One Price: Implausible, yet Consequential. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 10(1), pp. 79-89.
Rogoff, K., 1996. The Purchasing Power Parity Puzzle. Journal of Economic Literature, 34(2), pp. 647-668.
Segura, J. & Braun, C. R., 2004. An Eponymous Dictionary of Economics: A Guide to Laws and Theorems Named after Economists. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing .
Taylor, A. M. & Taylor, M. P., 2004. The Purchasing Power Parity Debate. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(4), pp. 135-158.
The Economist Online, 2012. The Big Mac index. [Online]
Available at: http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2012/01/daily-chart-3
[Accessed 2 January 2014].
Wittendorff, J., 2010. Transfer Pricing and the Arm's Length Principle in International Tax Law. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.

Open Document