Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The influence of society on the behavior of the individual
Relation between humans and society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The question about human nature has been debated through the beginning of time. By using the following sources it was concluded that society is what influences your human nature. The book “Skinny” by Donna Cooner provides information about a girl named Ever who battles through an image society withholds her to be. The short story “The Last Judgement” provides evidence of how a man was made to a criminal by society influences. A documentary named “Can We Eliminate Evil?” provides information on Jim Fallon and his finding about himself through a brain test. The news article shares how easily people can be influenced to do the right thing. While using the following sources it was concluded that human nature is determined by the way society …show more content…
has impacted the person to be. Society is what influences people to change.
This is shown through the book “Skinny” by Donna Cooner. After the main character’s mother died, Ever gained weight and began to change her personality due to society’s influences. This is shown through the change in Ever’s personality before and after the story. Even when her mother died, Ever continued being herself to make her mother proud. Ever was kindhearted and put others in front of herself . When she began school however, people began to make fun of her weight, and the way she acted. Society taught her that the way her personality was to be ashamed and that it had to be changed. Slowly as her life progresses she began to act like a jerk. Although she knew that being bad wasn’t the person she wanted to be, it was what society influenced her to become. This is shown through an event that happened in a school dance. Ever was the main attention however, it quickly diminished after another girl threatened her spotlight. Ever yelled out, “You can paint a pig, but it’s still a pig” just to make sure she wouldn’t feel like she was prettier than her (Skinny). The novel “Skinny” by Donna Cooner provides evidence to support this claim by the way society impacted the main character to change her personality. This claim can also be related …show more content…
to a short story named “The Last Judgement”. After dying from a gun wound that was given from a police officer, the main character must experience a judgement that determines whether or not he goes to Heaven or to Hell. It was shown through his experiences that although he committed bad deeds when he was a child the main character did it for the right reason. It was determined after a few evaluations of his bad deeds that, “It was during his prison term for his crime that he became completely corrupted” (The Last Judgement). After prison his ways of life changed completely. This shows how society has impacted this person to become corrupted. Society is what influences people to change and it is shown in “Skinny” a book by Donna Cooner and “The Last Judgement” a short story. How society influences people can also be shown in their childhood.
On a Documentary named, “Can We Eliminate Evil?” Jim Fallon was against the assumption that, “if you have the genetics of a killer and the brain anatomy of a killer you are destined to become a killer” (Can We Eliminate Evil). After analyzing his brain study Jim Fallon was tested positive of having a brain of a psychopath. However, Jim Fallon is not a killer. He relates that the way his childhood was had affected him to become the person he is now. This topic relates to the fact that the way society can determine your moral because as Jim Fallon stated in the documentary, “It’s funny how different I would of been if I didn’t have my family influences affect me the way it did” (Can We Eliminate Evil) .Your childhood can affect the way you
become. People can be influenced easily. This is shown through a news article which was adapted by Associate press and by the Newsela staff. . The autistic boy was named Bo and people from his grade bullied him because he was different. When the soccer player visited Bo’s middle school Paske saw Bo sitting by himself in a lunch table and decided to join him. A security officer took a picture of this action and it began to get viral. The article states, “The next day, Bo had many lunch companions...Everyone was super welcoming to him. He was at a table full of girls, which I thought was funny”(Newsela). The soccer player’s actions influence others to do the right thing and not bully him. Some may argue that the soccer player only did this for fame. However,the soccer player Paske states,"I just wanted to go say hi to the kid, because I saw him eating alone. I didn't even know anybody took a photo of it"(Newsela). With one good deed, it can inspire others to commit the same action. Some may argue that society influences does not determine anything. This is shown by an article named “Are We Naturally Good or bad” by Tom Stafford. Stafford conducted an experiment on babies to find out whether there first initiative is to choose the helping shape rather than the problematic shape. Through his experimentation it was proven that babies having no knowledge of what society is, picked the helping one over the bad one. The article states, “The way to make sense of this result is if infants, with their pre-cultural brains had expectations about how people should act. Not only do they interpret the movement of the shapes as resulting from motivations, but they prefer helping motivations over hindering one's”(CNN). However, this experiment doesn’t prove anything. As stated, “This doesn't settle the debate over human nature. A cynic would say that it just shows that infants are self-interested and expect others to be the same way”(CNN).This statement proves that although it was able to make this assumption, it doesn’t completely identify that humans are good or bad. This is explained because the baby hasn’t experienced society yet, and by not having experience in society the baby can’t be identified as a good or bad person. Human nature is determined by the way society has impacted the person. This is shown through the book “Skinny” by Donna Cooner, the short story “The Last Judgement, the documentary video “Can We Eliminate Evil?”, and the news article involving the soccer player and the autistic kid. Through the following sources it is proven that society is what impacts your personality. The book “Skinny” and “Judgement” provides evidence that society was the reason why it made the characters cruel, the documentary “Can We Eliminate Evil?” provides support of how childhood influences can affect the type of person people become, the news article provides information of how easily society is influenced to do the right thing. Some may argue that people are just born good and society has no impact in that. However, in order to find people’s true nature they must undergo the trials presented from society.
When you look at yourself in the mirror, probably, you are wondering what is human nature, how does it affect us? We all say that men’s nature at birth is good. But the truth is we realize more and more darkness of humanity along with we grow up, and that changes us inattentively. Today, I would like to present human nature base on the transition of Charlie who is the main character in Craig Silvey’s ‘Jasper Jones’.
Morals are set standards of right and wrong for society as a whole. One ’s self image of morals are what the individual thinks is right and wrong according to what he or she learns; however, this “Internal compass” can be influenced because society controls most of what they learn. One’s self image of morals allows an individual to provide compelling arguments, provides emotional stability and allows for an individual to have predetermined views of right and wrong; on account of the fact that said individuals choose to follow the revolutionary figures who provide a strong base for the creation of one’s self image of morals. In most cases, religion plays a major role in the creation of this aspect of identity; made evident in Martin Luther King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” in which, through use of historical and religious examples, Dr. King justifies his participation in a non-violent protest to expedite the process of integration. Also, “Young Goodman Brown” by Nathaniel Hawthorne shows how an individual’s self image of morals provide a strong emotional base and an unwavering sense of right and wrong. Even my own experiences have led me to believe that having a strong self image of morals allows an individual to be emotionally stable, and have a strong sense of right and wrong.
Many people have different views on the moral subject of good and evil or human nature. It is the contention of this paper that humans are born neutral, and if we are raised to be good, we will mature into good human beings. Once the element of evil is introduced into our minds, through socialization and the media, we then have the potential to do bad things. As a person grows up, they are ideally taught to be good and to do good things, but it is possible that the concept of evil can be presented to us. When this happens, we subconsciously choose whether or not to accept this evil. This where the theories of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke become interesting as both men differed in the way they believed human nature to be. Hobbes and Locke both picture a different scene when they express human nature.
The case of whether serial killers are born with the lust to kill or if they are truly victims of their environment has been a hot debated question by both psychologists and the FBI today. A serial killer is traditionally defined as one that kills 3 or more people at different times with “cooling off” periods in between kills. Both psychological abuse as a child and psychological disorders are to blame for the making of a killer. The nature vs. nurture debate is best applied to the mysterious behaviors and cases of serial killers and their upbringing and environment. Nature is the genetic and biological connections a person has, personality traits, and how genetic make-up all relates to a killer. Nurture is examining the upbringing and environment that a person is around that affects what a person becomes. In some cases however, the effects of only upbringing or only biological problems were the reasons certain serial killers committed crimes. Although there is no definitive answer to what plays the bigger role: nature or nurture, they both are contributing factors that make a serial killer. These deviants of society are afflicted with problems in either their upbringing or have psychological disorders, and are able to blend into our everyday lives with no apparent differences, yet they wreck havoc through their unremorseful killings.
The question “What makes us who we are?” has perplexed many scholars, scientists, and theorists over the years. This is a question that we still may have not found an answer to. There are theories that people are born “good”, “evil”, and as “blank slates”, but it is hard to prove any of these theories consistently. There have been countless cases of people who have grown up in “good” homes with loving parents, yet their destiny was to inflict destruction on others. On the other hand, there have been just as many cases of people who grew up on the streets without the guidance of a parental figure, but they chose to make a bad situation into a good one by growing up to do something worthwhile for mankind. For this reason, it is nearly impossible to determine what makes a human being choose the way he/she behaves. Mary Shelley (1797-1851) published a novel in 1818 to voice her opinions about determining personality and the consequences and repercussions of alienation. Shelley uses the ideas of Jean-Jacques Rousseau to make her point. Rousseau proposed the idea that man is essentially "good" in the beginning of life, but civilization and education can corrupt and warp a human mind and soul. In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus (hereafter referred to as Frankenstein), Victor Frankenstein’s creature with human characteristics shows us that people are born with loving, caring, and moral feelings, but the creature demonstrates how the influence of society can change one’s outlook of others and life itself by his reactions to adversity at “birth”, and his actions after being alienated and rejected by humans several times.
“In the long run, we shape our lives, and we shape ourselves. The process never ends until we die. And the choices we make are ultimately our own responsibility.” (Eleanor Roosevelt). This is just one of the infinite examples of how human nature has been explored by so many different people. Each and every human is born with the capability of making their own choices. The decisions that they will make in the future will determine how evil they are viewed by others. Although one’s nature and nurture do affect their life, it is their own free will that determines whether or not they are evil.
The Road is a phenomenal example of how raw human nature shapes peoples’ decisions. It addresses the behaviors of people neither informed nor controlled by a social order. In the essence of The Road, people’s actions are highly dependent on the person’s basic needs. A lack of basic human needs often results in the more disturbing view of human nature. (Gilbert pg. 43) Betrayal, suicide, and cannibalism are all examples of behaviors that human nature can bring out of people.
Moral development is not completely accredited to one’s genetic makeup, though, theorists such as Lawrence Kohlberg believe that moral development is underlined by the cognitive development of an individual. He believed that moral thinking changes in predictable ways as cognitive abilities develop, regardless of culture (Arnett, 2012). As listed earlier, morality can be affected by many factors including the environment and the parenting of a child. Parenting has a larger effect on the morals of a child than many scholars have described, but this is because the parents of a child in the early times of life are the only exposure to culture and the teaching of norms and how to obey them. Parenting has no real right or wrong way of being done but for over 5 decades, research has been done attempting to find out how parents parent.
To begin with, numerous reasons for why a child acts in the manner he exhibits and why he continues to exert such dangerous and even fatal schemes. Recent research shows that factors ranging from inherited personality traits to chemical imbalances and damages suffered in the womb can increase the odds that a child will become violent (Johnson 234). Experts argue that no one is predestined to a life of crime. They believe that influences such as repeated abuse, extreme neglect, poverty, media violence, and easy access to guns play the major role in molding children into criminals. The father of serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer wonders, "If potential for evil is in the blood that some of us pass on to our children" (Seifert 23).
Human nature is the most debated topic to date. Many people think that mankind is programmed to be evil; on the other hand people argue that it is naturally good. Nathaniel Hawthorne gave his argument with the novel, The Scarlet Letter. The Scarlet Letter showed that mankind is innately good by Chillingworth’s measures, Hester’s capitulates and Dimmesdale’s noble qualities.
How are the perceptions of human nature conveyed by individuals subject to the influence of
The understanding of human nature is the concept that there is a set of inherent distinguishing characteristics, including ways of thinking, feeling, and acting that all humans tend to possess (Winkler, 1996). My basic view of human nature correlates with Charles Darwin’s nature vs. nurture theory. Human nature is influenced by both nature and nurture. Nature is all that a man brings with himself into the world, and nurture is every influence that affects him after his birth. An individual’s morals, values, and beliefs are developed from the nurturing aspect of their life. The environment that an individual is raised in creates their human nature. Then they go through life developing more upon their own morals, values, and beliefs. The nature vs. nurture theory is an every changing concept, and I believe that human nature changes for each individual based on their life experiences.
Are we human if we don’t have a choice to choose between acting good or acting evil? A Clockwork Orange directed by Stanley Kubrick is a brutal film that entails many sociological meanings. Alex DeLarge and his “droogs” (gang) live in a derange society of “ultra-violence” and rape. Alex and his gang cause havoc around the town that leads to the “droogs” turning on Alex during a mischievous act on an innocent women and Alex getting arrested. While in prison he is chosen for “treatment” that is suppose to purify Alex and turn him into the “perfect citizen”. We’ve gone over many sociological concepts in class, but the three that I believe apply the most to this film are socialization, deviance, and resocialization.
Throughout the history of mankind, the question regarding the inherent nature of man (good vs. bad) has split opinions on a variety of different fields. Politicians argue whether or not government should be widespread (humans are inherently bad, need to be controlled by government), or as little a part of people’s lives as possible (people are inherently good, and can take care of themselves). Religious leaders argue humans are inherently bad, therefore needing to turn to God for salvation. Due to the polarization of opinions regarding the topic, could also consider the facts of social experiments to form their opinion on the nature of man, as their results are undisputable. In my opinion, humans are inherently bad, and the rise of many controlling bodies like the government and religion can attest to
Everyone is born to be good, but as we grow up the society or the environment around us influences us. Things we see and do everyday changes our way to act from good to evil. In the society we are living today; crimes are happening everywhere. An example would be in the article, The Reckoning, written by Andrew Solomon interviews the father of the Sandy Hook Elementary killer, Adam Lanza who was 20 years old when he fatally shot his own mother in their home, twenty-six people at his former elementary school, and himself. This article is good example because it shows from my perspective that being absent in your child’s life can lead to horrib...