Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How to express conflicts in essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Laramie Project written by Moisés Kaufman and the Members of Tectonic Theater Project is a play about Matthew Shepard, a twenty-one-year-old student at the University of Wyoming who was killed and tied up to a fence in Laramie, Wyoming during October 1998. Unlike most plays, this was written very differently, but the result was breathtaking. Besides reading this play, I have also been an actor in this show. This play has really affected me throughout the years, and I thoroughly enjoyed reading it once again.
The first question for this play is what is the conflict? In fact, the entire play is one big conflict. The play is set in Laramie, Wyoming, which just became famous for a twenty-one-year-old student named Matthew Shepard who was beaten and hung on a fence to die because of his sexuality. Another conflict is Laramie before Matthew Shepard was murdered and the after effects of what happened. There are many more conflicts in this play; however, I believe the main conflict is the homophobia that still exist in America.
…show more content…
If this play is about the events with Matthew Shepard, then why did Moisés Kaufman choose not to have Matthew Shepard appear as a character in the play?
I believe the reason Moisés Kaufman did not include Matthew Shepard into this play is because it was written using the interviews that Kaufman and the members of tectonic theater project conducted. Shepard passed away by the time Kaufman and his team started to write, so they were unable to talk to Shepard. They wanted the play to be honest and not make it up, and if they included Matthew into the production, they would be making everything up, which is something they did not want to do. If I wrote this play the way Kaufman did, I would not include Matthew ether because it would not be honest and
bias. There are so many characters in the play, but how do the characters in the play stand up to hate and bigotry? Throughout The Laramie Project, many characters had to stand up to hate and bigotry. The most memorable one for me was Romaine Patterson who was one of Matthew’s best friends. During the trials of Russell Henderson and Aaron McKinney, Fred Phelps of the Westboro Baptist Church decided to protest with anti-gay messages. Romaine decided to do something about this because they thought that Matthew’s parents and their anti-gay message should not be seen. I also believe that Romaine is the bravest as well because she was not afraid to stand up for something that she believes in. This play fits in with the class theme of Performing and Reforming Society because it is taking a controversial topic and bringing it to light in order to show people what is going on. When this play was performed, people were astonished and well informed about the event that went on. The Laramie Project was also able to get both sides of the story and other prospective as well, which many plays do not do. This play had a difficult topic, but they wanted to share it with the world to make sure that this never happens again. So how do events like those from this play, inform our understanding of current events? In 1998, the LGBTQIA movement was not as predominant as it is today, by showing us what this one town thinks about this subject, it really informs us what is happening in the United States. By bringing these topics to the stage, people are able to understand what is going on and it is able to create discussions about how we are able to deal or fix these problems. For example of another show, Dear Evan Hansen brings the topics of depression, suicide, grieving, PTSD, drug use, and more. Because these topics are shown in the musical, people are able to discuss them and help change what is happening. Like I said earlier, I have read this play before and have actually performed this play years ago, so I responded very different this time around. The first time I ever read this play, I was almost in tears. I did not know who Matthew Shepard was or that his death became a huge revolution for LGBT rights. It affected me by wanting to get more involved. After I read this play, I joined my schools gay-straight alliance and became an activist in LGBT rights. However, when I first read this play, I was so confused because how it was structured. I was not use to it being an interview, I was used to having a story where you really get to know a character and not have so many people. I was very sympathetic with Matthew and his family; I wish that this never happened. However, I am happy that it did happen because the LGBT movement would not have been as strong as it is today. If this happened in my hometown, I would be like Romaine and been an activist trying to get justice for Matthew. In conclusion, The Laramie Project is a powerful play with a story that needed to be told. It was able to bring a controversial topic to light in an entertaining way. I highly recommend this play to everyone who wants to get involved with the LGBT community, but also anyone who loves theatre and wants to use it as a medium to change the world. Overall, I would rate this play as an eight out of ten.
The play that was chosen to be read for the actor’s analysis was, “The Norwegians” which was written by C. Denby Swanson. As there is no specific style for this play, it is known to be categorized as a contemporary comedy as well as a character driven play.
Explain how the conflict arises and go on to discuss in detail how the writer uses it to explore an important theme.
For my second article critique I chose to attend a play at the CORP Theatre in Rowlett to watch Steel Magnolias. Throughout the play my eyes were immediately drawn to many aspects of the play such as the characters and use of spectacles. My overall opinion of the play was positive. Although, unless you have seen the movie before it could be hard to follow along with.
2) What is the main conflict in the book? Is it external or internal? How is this conflict resolved throughout the course of the book?
The central conflict of Lover’s Quarrel occurs between Ash and the Carsons over Ash’s desire for Sarah, which becomes clear through Ash’s bizarre interactions with Sarah and Michael throughout the play. This conflict was interesting because it was not something that would occur in the average household, so it provided the audience with a glimpse of an extraordinary American life. It held my attention because there was a lot of action that kept me waiting in anticipation of what would happen next. It also interested me because it was emotionally
Central Conflict: The major conflict is the external conflict between townspeople and Tom Robinson & Atticus Finch. The conflict is the trail of Tom Robinson. He was accused for something he hasn’t done but nobody believed him because he was black. Atticus , who was his lawyer, defended him against others. He had shown evidence that Tom Robinson was innocent and Bob Ewell was the one who beat Mayella. But the jury wasn’t convinced so they delivered a guilty verdict.
Firstly let us consider conflict. In each act of the play, we see the overpowering desire to belong leading to a climax of conflict amongst the characters, which has the consequence of exclusion. Conflict is a successful literary technique, as it engages the audience and focuses our attention on the issue of conflict and exclusion, brought about by the characters’ desires to be accepted by their community.
I. Conflicts in the Play - There are many types of conflict evident in this play. Some are as follows:
characters. But the theme and conflict that is most exemplified in this play would have to be jealousy.
This play addresses many social issues. It ties in family, truth, righteousness, community, and politics. It really demonstrates how one issue can have many “truths” to it and how different people, even within ones own family, can see the same thing in total different perspectives; and in doing that act out against one another in an attempt to prove that one’s own perspective is the “right” or only one. In human nature, we are not one to compromise. We see so many things as one way or another, right or wrong; rarely do we seek to find the common ground between the two. In this play, common ground is never found, and in the end leaves a family broken up and a society left to wonder.
The first way that the play shows that the people in Laramie, Wyoming have a social issue with gays is through their personalities. When the members of the Tectonic Theater Project go to a church in Laramie, they find that there are a lot of people who do not support gay rights.
life in the mid to late twentieth century and the strains of society on African Americans. Set in a small neighborhood of a big city, this play holds much conflict between a father, Troy Maxson, and his two sons, Lyons and Cory. By analyzing the sources of this conflict, one can better appreciate and understand the way the conflict contributes to the meaning of the work.
Have you ever wonder how writers come up with a movie, or how long it takes them to come up with an idea? Eugenio Debres is a Mexican comedian, actor, film direction as well as a screen write and an author. He was born on September 2,1961. Debres was one of the writers who wrote instruction not included. The movie Instructions not Included (No Se Aceptan Devoluciones) is a family affliction drama that shows how a dad goes from being a so called playboy and enjoying life to now becoming a father to a little girl who was left by the mom.
The theme of the play has to do with the way that life is an endless cycle. You're born, you have some happy times, you have some bad times, and then you die. As the years pass by, everything seems to change. But all in all there is little change. The sun always rises in the early morning, and sets in the evening. The seasons always rotate like they always have. The birds are always chirping. And there is always somebody that has life a little bit worse than your own.
In the play, The Piano Lesson, music played an important role. The piano in the play represented the African American history and culture. The ghost of Sutter represented the pain and trauma that had been endured throughout the generations in the Charles family. Berniece did not play the piano because she associated it with pain and the bad things that happened to her family members. She did not want to accept the things that had happened in her family’s past. She thought that she could deny everything and act like it never happened. She believed if she continued to run from everything and everybody that the pain would go away. Berniece was burdened and haunted by the ghost of Sutter until she gave in and played the piano after all of those years. After playing the piano, Berniece was no longer burdened or haunted by the past. She was free from all of the denial. She escaped the pain through the music and reflecting on the carvings on the piano, which represented her heritage. Berniece’s brother, Boy Willie, told her “Berniece, if you and Maretha don’t keep playing on that piano… ain’t no telling… me and Sutter both liable to be back” (Wilson 108). By saying that, he meant that if she did not allow her daughter to continue playing the piano and learning about her culture that she would end up going through the same things that Berniece had gone through. Music has a huge impact on the African American culture in several ways and many things about the past can be learned through it.