The Kite Runner Movie Vs Movie Analysis

1500 Words3 Pages

The Kite Runner Motion picture Vs. novel The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini is a novel based in Afghanistan that shows the betrayal between two boys with two different social backgrounds. Four years later “The Kite Runner” was filmed by David Benioff, which shows the meaningful message that the book delivers in a movie. Throughout the book and movie, Amir the protagonist must live the rest of his life with guilt from his childhood. Although the movie gave the same meaningful message that the book delivered, the book was further developed, which had more detail and kept the readers wanting more. Ultimately these details that were present in the novel gave the readers a better understanding of the characters, which led to the relationships …show more content…

In The Kite Runner, many characters were portrayed differently than in the movie. These differences among character appearances changed some aspects of the movie. In the novel Amir and Hassan were much older than in the movie, which made things feel off. The first thing I noticed was how Hassan did not have a cleft lip like in the watching the movie feel off. The cleft lip was something that was important because it was something that symbolizes Hassan 's social status, because his father couldn 't afford to fix it. Hassan is a very loyal character who often takes the blame in both the movie and novel. When Hassan and Amir get in trouble Hassan takes the blame, or when Amir hides the watch in his room to get him kicked out of his house Hassan said that he stole it. In when novel Ali has a condition called Polio, which makes him walk with a limp whereas in the movie he doesn 't have this condition and walks normally. Assef in the novel is a blonde haired boy with blue eyes with a German background. He is someone who is very harsh, demanding, which mades him seem very threatening. He wore brass knuckles which mades him seem very …show more content…

In the movie Hassan’s cleft lip was left out, which made his birthday present he received in the novel impossible in the movie. Although he couldn 't receive surgery to fix his cleft lip, he got a kite instead. The kite was something that didn 't seem as important as the surgery, so leaving out Hassan’s cleft lip in the movie just took away from the fact that Hassan’s father couldn 't pay for it, and what their . Also not including the cleft lip took away from Baba and Hassan’s relationship because in the novel having Baba pay for this surgery showed how much he cared for Hassan. The scene where Hassan and Amir flew the kite was just as I imagined it, beautiful and breathtaking. It was something that brought them closer, and when they won it just made it a more enjoyable scene. As Hassan went to go get the kite he got badly beaten and raped. This scene was present in both the novel and movie, but the novel had more detail. Not including this detail in the movie was better, because it would be so in depth that it would traumatize the audience. In the novel Assef who raped Hassan was the same age, but in the movie he seemed three or four years older, which made the rape scene a lot more scarring on the audience. The part where Hassan goes and watches over Amir’s house while he is living in America is similar to the novel, which shows how the Taliban had complete control over

Open Document