Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay analyzing the dark knight
Essay on dark knight
Essays on the dark knight
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay analyzing the dark knight
In the film The Dark Knight, many of Friedrich Nietzsche concepts are shown throughout the film. He reconceptualized ethics by questioning the foundations of good and evil dichotomy, which is shown by The Joker and Harvey Dent. Also, Harvey Dent plays the role of having bad conscience. Throughout the film ressentiment plays throughout the film and characters, from the heart of Gotham City, Harvey Dent, and finally Batman. Cruelty is played throughout with the character of The Joker.
In The Dark Knight the Joker describes himself as a man of action: “I do not have a plan…I just do things,” (The Dark Knight, Health Ledger). The things he does include robbing a bank, kidnapping a fake Batman and killing him, attempting to kill the mayor, chasing
…show more content…
a SWAT van with Harvey Dent in it around Gotham City, having Dent and Rachel Dawes kidnapped and tied to explosives, rigging two ferries with explosives, and lying. He is the man of active destruction. The Joker is the agent of chaos like he states, “it is just like gravity… all you have to do is push,” he is able to manipulate people with “logical” thinking and makes them fall from where they were and basically makes them create chaos. One wonders how these things can be accomplished without plans, however, the Joker explains: “I just did what I do best—I took your plan, and I turned it on itself,” (The Dark Knight). The Joker’s actions are reactions to the plans made by Dent, Batman, and Jim Gordon, but in these reactive actions the Joker puts the forces of law and order in a position where they are forced to be reactive, his reactive force stops them from being active by making them reactive as well, a will to nothingness. The fulfillment of nihilism is the nihilism that destroys nihilism or the will to nothingness entails the negation of nihilism itself so that the man of active destruction wants to be overcome. The Joker tells Batman: “You.
Complete. Me.” If there were no Batman there would be no one Joker would fight against since he knows that the police department will not be able to stop him without the help of the Batman. Batman and Joker are two sides of the same coin, the coin that Harvey Dent uses, at first, to “make his own luck,” and then later in his acceptance of chance as destiny. The reason why I say that Batman and Joker are two sides of the same coin is because he becomes, to society, an uncontainable force in very much the same way of Joker was, even though he is doing good. But the fact that he let 5 or so people die because he “did not” want to turn himself in the same level as Joker. The people believed that Batman couldn’t be controlled, that he has lost all respect for societal norms and the rule of law. But Batman never succumbs to his own dark, like Joker did. In the movie, Bruce Wayne says the line, “I’ve seen what I have become to fight men like him,” and he basically rejects the path he has to take to stop Joker, a man who has no rules whatsoever. For example, in the scene where Batman and Joker had a showdown and Batman was going towards Joker in his vehicle, Joker maniacally screams, “Hit me!” but as much as Batman wanted to annihilate the Joker, he knows he cannot violate his own moral code and almost sacrifices himself to prevent this from happening. Batman does not want to kill the evildoers, but to bring …show more content…
justice. Two-Face is born from the affirmation of destiny the acceptance of the Joker’s role as an “agent of chaos,” because “you know the thing about chaos, Harvey? It’s Fair.” Not only does Two-face plays the role as an “agent of chaos,” he also falls into bad conscience because he falls into his instincts of taking matters into his own hands and providing luck with a flip of a coin. Harvey Dent was the one that put all the bad guys away to clean the streets of Gotham City and keep everyone safe but, in the end, he becomes the “bad guy” and starts killing people for revenge. However, Harvey Dent and the Joker portray the image of “good” versus “evil” dichotomy. Batman and the joker portray an image of chaos versus order. “You either die a hero, or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” These words, spoken by Harvey Dent in the film, portend the inevitable corruptibility of heroes in the Batman universe. In the start of the film, as stated above, he represents absolute good, a goodness that is so pure, that has os much potential to change Gotham, that even Batman is thinking of hanging up his spurs and tells Rachel Dawes that the city needs someone like Dent. Dent is the one that can keep the city safe. Dent is referred to Gotham’s “White Knight,” a term used throughout the course of the film. Dent was able to put 500 or more criminals behind the bars and “cleaned” the streets of Gotham for a couple of months. In the film, people see the transition from light to darkness. Joker had the ability to destroy that, which Dent loves and turn him to the evil that he becomes. The joker does this to Dent and it hits close to home, it makes us realize that we as humans are limited and that our capacity to be good is subject to the vagaries of fate and whatever decides to destroy what we love. He reminds us that duality that lies within each of us. In regards to ressentiment, it is seen everywhere in the film, from The Joker recognizing it at the heart of Gotham, Harvey Dent, and Batman himself. The Joker recognizes the ressentiment at the heart of the slave morality in Gotham City, “Their morals, and their code…it is a bad joke. Dropped at the first sign of trouble. They are only as good as the world allows them to be. You will see – I will show you … when the chips are down, these civilized people… they will eat each other. See I am not a monster… I am just ahead of the curve.” The rules of society, the rules of Harvey Dent and Jim Gordon, are façade, according to the Joker, a reaction to the chaos that is the essential force of reality. So is the Joke the “man of the future, who will redeem us not only from the hitherto reigning ideal but also from that which was bound to grow out of it, great nausea, the will to nothingness, nihilism” (96)? It is the Joker who ultimately defeats the mob, but is not the Joker’s morality based on the syllogism “I am evil therefore you are evil.” The Joker sees in the Harvey Dent the embodiment of society’s ideals and sees that through a corruption of Dent he can bring Gotham down as well. He succeeds, because Harvey Dent becomes Two- Face, as a result of his failure to mourn Rachel Dawes. He embraces the Jokers chaos, “You thought we could be decent men in an indecent world. You thought we could lead by example. You thought the rules could be bent but not break… you were wrong. The world is cruel. And the only morality in a cruel world is chance.” Ressentiment shows in Batman because he gave into his weakness once his parents were killed in front of him, but he did not live a horrible life. He inherited a huge corporation from his parents and became the richest and strongest man in the world. He believed that he has an obligation to stop any and all criminals from making Gotham City an unsafe place and helps the local police department from defeating these criminals and helping Gotham City stay safe and protects the city from all danger to its citizens. I did not realize that The Dark Knight had anything to do with political theory but I stand corrected.
Many things that we see throughout the day can potentially be connected with many of the concepts that political theorist explain in their books. Comparing Nietzsche concepts of the function of the ascetic ideal, ressentiment, bad conscience, the “good” versus “ evil” dichotomy and cruelty can reality to a film that I truly enjoy watching and have watched many times. Knowing that in the film people can be portrayed as good but society will still see them as chaos and seeing that good people can change to bad people because of a traumatic incident is astonishing. Also, seeing that bad conscience is in play in our daily lives and just with a push we can fall into
it.
In “The Devil in White City” Erik Larson’s juxtaposition of Burnham and Holmes, and the Black City and the White City, contributes to the understanding of the duality of human nature, that one cannot be good without having done evil, and the duality of good and evil, that are viewed as complementary in their mutual dependence. The respective stories of both Daniel Burnham and H.H. Holmes formed an entirety that encompasses both good and evil. Within several blocks of each other, two great men created a lasting legacy, one of radiance and good, the other of evil and sin. Similarly the stories of the Black and White City served to portray good and evil as a complementary relationship. Because when something exists, it exists only in contrast to its opposite.
It has been eight years since the ending of the previous movie, The Dark Knight. At the end of this movie, Batman took the blame for the people killed by Harvey Dent, the district attorney who set out a war against crime. During The Dark Knight, crime had decreased dramatically because of him and Batman. Numerous criminals were placed in prison because of him. Therefore, Batman took the blame for his murders because he understood that a discovery of Harvey Dent’s killings would allow the numerous criminals that he imprisoned to be set free.
... studying these four texts based around Survival of Society in Post-apolitical Environments, I have found significant connections between these texts. These connections have been very beneficial to study as each illustrates a different aspect of this topic, which can all be related to society. These films show us as the audience that often scarifies have to be made for the better of another and the will to survive in humans can encourage morally wrong/unethical actions. We can learn from these connections as in every day life we can make the small sacrifices that will make a big difference. Also, they make us think twice about when we make decision in our society as morally wrong unethical Act are punished for accordingly. We can use this knowledge to better us as a society in our daily lives. This startling idea appeals to the audience of these films thrill of post-
But I do know one thing, Batman was there for us when we needed him the most. He separated us from our darkest nightmares every night. He guarded our houses and protected our families, our friends, and our children. Batman stood up for what he believed, he always had us, the people of Gotham in his best interest. What more could we have asked Batman to do? I could stand up here and say "I never knew the man," but that might not be the truth. During my life, I have known many men, many men who are full of strength, courage, and virtue. Any of these men could have been the Batman and I would have never been aware. However good men still walk among us today, even without Batman. These good men and women are my hope, my consolation for
Additionally not only knowing the historical, social, and political background of a film and how the ideas in this film were form,but also how this film affected the society and the point of view of individuals,because after all film is not only affected by the context in which it is created ,but the film also affects individuals are catalyst for change in societies and cultures.
Interestingly, the movie puts a twist on the the true Batman origin. By having the Joker create Batman by killing Bruce’s parents, the Batman was created to avenge evil. This being said, the traumatic experience has created a hero whose definition of justice is left to the character’s moral. Traumatized, it is clear that the Batman seeks revenge not only because the Joker murdered his parents, but also for interfering with love interest Vicki Vale. By putting Vicki Vale at risk, the Batman’s traumatic experience is tested to the limits. The origins of Batman describes a hero who will not kill, yet in this movie, the Batman easily slaughters villains with a machine gun while flying his plane. A Batman who is willing to kill cannot be justified but is seen as justified to the character as a permanent way to resolve his traumatic experience with the Joker. In the climax of the movie, Batman is hanging on the edge with Vicki Vale. Instead of just saving Vicki, Batman interferes with the Joker’s escape which ultimately leads to the Joker’s death. Through Bruce’s eyes justice was the Joker’s death when he could have just saved Vicki. Although this movie was the most entertaining, it depicts a hardened character faced with the true reality of life. Not all heroes can be pure, and this movie explicitly shows this through Bruce’s actions. Notably, Bruce
Heath Ledger takes up the role of the Joker, the main antagonist in this film. In his role, he played a side of the Joker never seen before – a psychotic, ruthless, sadistic killer who does not care for money, but wants to establish fear and anarchy into Gotham. His performance is outstanding, unlike anything ever seen. A part of you almost wants him to defeat...
In “The Dark Knight: An Allegory of America in the Age of Bush”, Ron Briley comparing the terrorist acts of 9/11 to one of America’s top movies, The Dark Knight Rises from the Batman series. Briley gives many different ideas of similarities and a lot of good points, but is not as clear as you would hope someone would be when trying to persuade and convince you to believe such an allegory. Briley is comparing many of the main cast in The Dark Knight to many real people who are not as great as these characters are seemed to be.
Instantaneously, the title of The Dark Knight jumps out as a parallel to Jesus Christ. The title is stating that the dark knight, Batman , rises, just like Jesus arose. A Knight is “a man ,usually of noble birth, bound to chivalrous conduct” Referring to Batman as a dark knight gives off the impression that, although he is good, there is something dark about him. The dark side of Batman can be said to be that he is the one who killed Harvey when in reality later throughout the movie it explains that he did not kill him, Batman is indeed good. Although Jesus would be considered a “good knight” some may have viewed him as a dark knight because he disturbed some of the peace. Jesus was viewed as someone who came about to disturb the peace of the
In the earliest 1940 's superhero films started to become popular on the big screens. One of these popular films is known as Batman, which came out first as a comic book called "The Killing Joke". Batman is considered to be a superhero possessing great talents and for being a true example of hope towards Gotham city. Although these superheroes are one of the main characters in movies, they also have enemies to confront with which are also known as super villains. In this case, the Joker known for his criminal mastermind plays an important role as a villain. Having a huge impact through films, film viewers have had the chance to appreciate different versions of the Batman 's movies. The Joker, being one of the most classical villains in DC Universe is portrayed in different aspects. Analyzing Tim Burton 's Batman (1989) and Christopher Nolan 's The Dark Knight (2008), viewers can assimilate but also differentiate the Joker in couple ways.
For my example of a trickster I am using The Joker from the popular movie franchise by Christopher Noland “Batman Begins”. I will be using the second movie in the franchise “The Dark Knight” for my example of The Joker portrayed by actor Heath Ledger. The Joker is part of the criminal element that is part of the chief city represented in the world of Batman. Although he takes part in criminal acts within this city he was once a soldier in the armed forces and suffers from PTSD as well as other mental health problems stemming from his service. Through this dichotomy we can see that he was once an agent of justice and now acts as though he is a criminal but states himself within the movie that he is only “an agent of chaos”.
Batman (Christian Bale) is hoping to hand on his crime fighting duties to D.A Harvey Dent (Aaron Eckhart) yet when Batman’s cards are on the table the twisted mastermind who goes by the name of the joker (Heath Ledger), forces the masked vigilante to go against everything he ever stood for.
Batman and police commissioner James Gordon try to rid the Gotham of organized crime while combating the rise of the menacing and terrorizing psychopath villain, the Joker. (uci.edu) It’s important to take notice of the other clowns featured throughout the movie as well as their roles in the heist. This is crucial and singles the Joker out as the odd man.
Why so serious? If I were to ask you that question six months ago, you wouldn’t understand the phrase. Now that The Dark Knight has been made though, most people will understand what I am talking about. Ever since The Dark Knight was created, the joker has been thrust back into the public eye. Most people only know the joker from the performances of Heath Ledger in The Dark Knight and Jack Nicholson in the 1989 film Batman. Most people forget that the Joker has been a villain since 1940 in Batman #1 (spring edition). The Joker has been reinvented every decade since his first appearance. He started off as a homicidal maniac, then a criminal that was just a harmless nuisance to becoming a mass murdering, schizophrenic clown that we know today. He has been named number one on the Wizard’s list for one hundred all-time villains. In this speech I will tell you how the joker was created, the criminal career of the joker, and trademark characteristics of the joker.
Why so serious? This phrase often triggers the memory of The Joker in one’s head. For a fictional character, The Joker has managed to effect society more than any other super villain. The Jokers appearance is so bold and chilling that the president and publisher of DC comics said, “I keep coming back to the way he (the joker) incarnates madness” (Camp et al, 2010). The president of DC comics is not the only one that keeps coming back to The Joker. Audiences around the world are captivated by his character. Unlike any other super hero movie, the villain gets just as much attention as Batman. The Joker is such a complex and intricate character that his victims and audiences are easily influenced by his actions but even more manipulated by his