Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Murder as self defense essay
Innocent until proven guilty monster
Murder as self defense essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Murder as self defense essay
The Johnny Cade Case
Have you heard the saying “innocent until proven guilty?”That is not right. Especially in the Johnny Cade case, saying has been defeated for its purpose. Johnny is guilty for killing Bob because he killed him out of despite and anger. He was not defending himself and he fled the scene. Johnny should be in jail for killing Bob. If he was innocent, he would not of ran away and he would have stayed in town.
Johnny had hatred for Bob because in the past, he was beaten up by Bob and he let all of his anger out that night he killed Bob. If he did not have hatred for him then why would he have killed him if he did not hurt him. Johnny noticed the rings and he knew then was that the Socs who beaten him up and so he killed him. If he did not remember he might not of killed him. Johnny is guilty for killing out of anger. “He would kill the next person who jumped
…show more content…
him”(internet page 34) Johnny was not getting harmed it was Ponyboy that could of killed Randy not vise versa.
Ponyboy was the only one being hurt. If Johnny was getting beat up, he would have the right to defend himself, but if Bob was just there he did not have the write to kill Bob.Also Bob did not even swat or try to hit Johnny, so it was not self defense. “Johnny was breathing heavily and I noticed that he was staring at the socs hand.He was wearing three heavy rings.”(page 44 internet)
After the killing or murder of Bob the Socs Johnny and Ponyboy fled the scene or skipped town. If he was not guilty, he would of stayed there or called out for help not try to do it by himself. This was not just an accident or defending this was murder. Why would he need to run away if he was innocent. It makes him look worse when he changed the way he looked when he skipped town too. It was an unnecessary act of crime. “There is an old abandoned church on top of Jay Mountain.There is a pump in the back so do not worry about water.Buy a week's supply of food as soon as you get in there.”(page 61
internet) Johnny did not use self defense like you think he did because if he used self defense he would not run away. Also, most evidence is that he was not the one to get drowned Ponyboy was. If Bob was to harm Johnny he could of used self defense, but Bob did not so you are wrong about him using self defense. Johnny is guilty for the murder of Bob the socs because he did not have a right to kill Bob. Why would an innocent person flee from a scene like that unless they are truly guilty. In conclusion, Johnny is guilty of murdering Bob the socs. He ran away from the seen, killed Bob out of hatred, and he was not harmed. Johnny did not plan this but he also had hatred for Bob because he beat him up, but that does not give him reason to kill him. Ponyboy was the one being harmed by Randy the socs so Johnny only could of killed Randy for self defense not Bob. So the saying “innocent until proven guilty” is wrong because you are not always innocent. Sometimes you are guilty just like Johnny.
Johnny’s father, an alcoholic who had thrown a flat-iron at his head, was clearly unsafe for Johnny to live with. As a result, Johnny had run away. After a brief stint living on a farm, Johnny returned to New York City (it is suggested that Johnny still loved his father, despite his abusive nature, prompting his return). Johnny had even tried attending school, but found it too difficult to balance homelessness with the demands school places on a person. This condemned Johnny to a life in the streets, boot blacking. However, from the way Dick speaks to Johnny, repeatedly calling him lazy either to his face or as an aside to the reader, one would think he had chosen this life.
I, Ponyboy Curtis, will appear in court to state that Johnny Cade is not guilty.
The death of Johnny is a noble death. He dies from saving children and also Ponyboy. His death means something. Near the end of the story, he is still looking out for Ponyboy, telling him to “‘stay gold’”(148) and writing him the letter. Ponyboy says “Johnny was right. He died gallantly” (154). He dies still thinking of other people, he dies a hero. Conversely, Dally dies selfishly and only looking out for himself. He dies under the street lamp, happy with how things turn out, while Johnny dies in a bed, scared and wishing he had done more. Ponyboy says ¨Dally didn't die a hero. He died violent and young and desperate¨ (154). He does not die peacefully like Johnny, he dies a harsh death, just because he breaks for not being a hero like Johnny. Ponyboy and the rest of the gang all know he would someday die like this. Ponyboy went on to saying ¨two friends of mine had died that night, one a hero, the other a hoodlum¨ (154). Their death shows a clear difference between Johnny and
As juror number one, I had to research why Johnny should, or should not be tried for the murder of Bob Sheldon, the Soc. I also had to research murder among teens and what happened during the killing of Bob Sheldon. During my research, I found that murder was considered a premeditated killing, and I also found that Johnny can only be tried for murder in Connecticut, New York, and North Carolina because of his age. Johnny was planning on saving, Ponyboy Curtis, who at the time was being drowned by David, the Soc Bob had told him to “give Ponyboy a bath.” In trying to save Ponyboy he pulled out his pocket knife and stabbed Bob Sheldon in the back therefore causing David to release Ponyboy and flee the scene. After finding that information I also found that Bob Sheldon and his group of friends had stopped their car on The Greasers side of town and got out to show them a lesson for taking out their girls. ...
He is smart, and gets good grades in school. This is purposefully mentioned several times within the story, and people tend to be surprised to learn that he is a Greaser. In addition, some Greasers are nicer than people tend to think. When the church burned down, Ponyboy and Johnny run in to save the children without a second thought. They acted with selflessness, putting the safety of the children above their own. In the ambulance on the way to the hospital, Ponyboy is asked if he and Johnny are "professional heroes". He responds by telling the entire story of how they're Greasers and Johnny is wanted for murder, shocking the man in the ambulance. It is difficult for him to believe that a group of Greasers would do something so heroic. Johnny dies as a direct result of their actions, but neither Ponyboy nor Johnny regretted what they
At least the father could realize that fact on his own. The only good thing that could possibly come out of this father-son relationship is that Johnny will learn a lesson from it, and will never treat his son this way, that is if he has a one. When the father finally realizes that he and his son’s bad relationship is all his fault it is too late. The damage had already been done. All his son wanted was to have a caring father and he realized this too late. At least Johnny had a good mother, who really cared about him. All though I think that Johnny’s mother should have confronted her husband about his actions. Johnny will be scarred for life from his childhood and will never be able to trust someone fully. This is all his dad’s fault, and I hope that Johnny’s father regrets and feels the pain of losing his son’s truth for the rest of his life. He deficiently deserves to after all of his careless actions,what he did was unforgivable. I cannot relate to Johnny and how he must have felt, but I can imagine it was horrible. His dad was selfish and reckless and Johnny deserved better. He deserved a dad who was
I understand that I am going to attempt to keep Johnny out of jail because what he had done in my perspective was self defense. This happened in The Outsiders book. Hinton, S. E. The Outsiders. New York: Viking, 1967. Print. I feel that you may think that Johnny is guilty of homicide because he had killed Bob during the evening by the park. He had not attempted to kill him, he was using self defence, as the novel had stated in chapter 4, Johnny warns the socs that showed up that they were in a part of town that they were not supposed to be in but the socs ignored the warning and still provoked the fight. Later in chapter 4 it also informs us that the socs were starting to drown Ponyboy so Johnny had used his switchblade without really meaning to kill anyone. Johnny has informed me that he and Ponyboy Curtis were walking in the park in the evening and that a vehicle had shown up and some boys had gotten out and threatened them. These boys had pulled out a knife and threatened to use it against them. One of the boys then started to assault Johnny and another attacked Ponyboy. The one attacking Ponyboy then decided to move him to a fountain and tried to drown him. When Johnny realized what they were doing he had turned to them and pulled out a knife and flung at them without meaning to kill Bob. But keep in mind that Bob was drowning Ponyboy so this act was used in defense. I feel that Johnny is innocent because he was using self defense, but he should not have ran from the crime scene. Another thing in chapter 4 was that a little while later when Ponyboy came conscious again Johnny said, "I had to. They were drowning you, Pony. “They might have killed you. And they had a blade... they were gonna beat me up...." I found this informat...
He knows that Ponyboy has a chance because he is very smart. How they both reacted to not having parents shaped and effected who they are. “Johnny was high-strung anyway, a nervous wreck from getting belted every time he turned around and from hearing his parents fight all the time(2).” This explains how Johnny was effected by his parents. His parents constantly fighting and beating him made him who he was. A part of him was effected by all the chaos and pain he had to go through every day. “We're poorer than the Socs and the middle class. I reckon we're wilder, too. Not like the Socs, who jump greasers and wreck houses and throw beer blasts for kicks, and get editorials in the paper for being a public disgrace one day and an asset to society the next. Greasers are almost like hoods; we steal things and drive old souped-up cars and hold up gas stations and have a gang fight once in a while. I don't mean I do things like that. Darry would kill me if I got into trouble with the police.” Social roles are a part of self-image that makes a person who they are. In the novel Ponyboy explains the groups that the Greasers and Sochs were split into. This
Johnny how he would not like Johnny to go to jail because he does not
In The Outsiders it is given that through faith and devotion to one another Ponyboy and the gang use their close friendship in troublesome situations for instance when Johnny tells Ponyboy “i had to” he does this as an act of loyalty to Ponyboy to show him that he can trust him no matter what situation they are in. Most of the story is told from first person or Ponies perspective which shows us without exception every aspect of the story. When Johnny dies at the end of the book Ponyboy only then realizes the importance of him, and the gangs need for someone like Johnny to give them a sense of purpose after mentioning “we couldn't get along without him . We needed Johnny as much as he needed the gang.” Throughout all of Ponyboys hardships Johnny was always there to support him even when Ponyboy wanted to run away after darry slapped him, he never asked any questions.
The New York Times bestseller book titled Reasonable Doubts: The Criminal Justice System and the O.J. Simpson Case examines the O.J. Simpson criminal trial of the mid-1990s. The author, Alan M. Dershowitz, relates the Simpson case to the broad functions and perspectives of the American criminal justice system as a whole. A Harvard law school teacher at the time and one of the most renowned legal minds in the country, Dershowitz served as one of O.J. Simpson’s twelve defense lawyers during the trial. Dershowitz utilizes the Simpson case to illustrate how today’s criminal justice system operates and relates it to the misperceptions of the public. Many outside spectators of the case firmly believed that Simpson committed the crimes for which he was charged for. Therefore, much of the public was simply dumbfounded when Simpson was acquitted. Dershowitz attempts to explain why the jury acquitted Simpson by examining the entire American criminal justice system as a whole.
Would you ever consider seeing someone in the hospital, who killed your friend? Well in this book Cherry Valance didn’t want to visit Johnny in the hospital. She thought she would agree with Johnny that Bob should’ve died. So she stayed away from the hospital. Cherry was loyal to Bob’s death because they were good friends and he had been mean, but he was disloyal to the greasers. Johnny was loyal to ponyboy because the Socs were going to drown ponyboy so Johnny killed Bob who was trying to drown him.
John recorded in his journal about religious culture that was pretty major at that time in his community, in Orillia, Ontario. Sunday December 15th, he recorded “a number of the settlers, perhaps 60, met at Newton to attend public worship and hear a sermon from Mr. Brough...” This statement tells the readers that church was the center of people's gathering on Sundays. John did not mention about the town's population, but if he could count how many people attended church on weekly basis, he must have been socially active and a religious man. From the events John recorded in his diary, it is clear that the townsfolk had a very good relationship with each other. The townsfolk also did something called "bees", an initiation which they brought laborers to support their neighbors with their task. Some tasks could not be done by the family themselves, so the "bees" was sort of an action out of courtesy. John often wrote about timbering, which townsfolk helped each other to chop down trees and timber logs for the winter. Such actions of courtesy for each other and asking for nothing back bonded the people together in John's community. In the last entry of John's dairy, he recorded about how the justice system worked. The convict was truly sorry for his crime and was rather eager to have justice, instead of evading it. This tells the readers that people in this time, or it may be just people in John's community, were honest and responsible
Steve Harmon is guilty of felony murder because he participated and had knowledge about a crime that ended up in the death of an innocent citizen. The judge stated the if you believe that Steve harmon took part in the crime than you must return a verdict of guilty. I believe that Steve went into the drugstore on that day for the purpose of being a lookout. Some of Steve’s journal entry’s lead to him feeling guilty or like a “monster”.
The most important lesson Ponyboy learnt throughout the novel was that his actions affects those around him. An act of irresponsibility can end in minor results, but every so often the lives of others rely on that act. While the boys rush to the burning church Ponyboy says “we must have dropped a lighted cigarette or something” (p.90). Such minor act of recklessness possibly caused the church fire. If he had acted responsibly, and thought twice the church may have never caught on fire, and no one would have gotten hurt. Ponyboy’s behaviour seems to cause an endless chain affect. The slightest issue can result in a superior conflict, the chain goes on. Johnny stands there holding a bloody knife and he says “ I had to. They were drowning