The Role of Canada in the Global Village
Over the years, ICT, information communication technologies, has lead to a smaller world. A world where information can be transmitted instantaneously, a world where the quality of the information received has vastly improved. This information highway era has become so efficient that it has created a "global village". Canada is placed in a rather unique societal position today in this global village. It stands out from the rest of the world with its culturally diverse population, community networking and experts in the field. From representing its multicultural citizens through broadcasting programming, to creating successful community networks, and having leading experts in the field of communications, Canada must be considered one of the leading model communication innovators to the rest of the world.
Multiculturalism in Canadian Broadcasting
Canada is an ethnically diverse country. The notion of "multiculturalism" began circulating in Canada in 1971 and is a word that is now commonly used to define this country, unlike the word "melting-pot" which is used to describe Americans' loss of ethnic identity. The broadcasting system in Canada is pressured by the government to acknowledge the culturally diverse society by broadcasting a fair representation of the population in terms of ethnicity. This is achieved through the many acts that have been passed through parliament: the multiculturalism policy of 1971, the Canadian Multiculturalism Act of 1988, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms of 1982, the Ethnic Broadcasting Policy of 1985, and most recent, the Broadcasting Act of 1991. These legislative and policy frameworks have provided guidelines for the management of Canadia...
... middle of paper ...
...global context, Canada is one of the most unique countries on the globe.
Works Cited
Attallah, Paul and Leslie Regan Shade. Mediascapes: New Patterns in Canadian
Communications. Canada:Thomson Nelson, 2002.
The Acacia Initiative. www.idrc.ca/acacia/outputs/op-snet.htm. April 1, 2003.
The Delicate Acts of "Colour Balancing": Multiculturalism and Canadian
Broadcasting Policies and Practices.
http://cjc-online.ca/title.php3?page=5&journal_id=4&document=1. April 1, 2003.
McLuhan, Marshall. "Gutenberg Galaxy", 1962.
http://www.quotationspage.com/quotes/Marshall_McLuhan. April 1, 2003.
McLuhan, Marshall (1911-1980). www.regent.edu/acad/schcom/rojc/mdic/mcluhan.html.
April 1, 2003.
Roughing It in the Electronic Bush: Community Networking in Canada.
http://cjc-online.ca/title.php3?page=3&journal_id=31&document=1. April 1, 2003.
Multiculturalism policy was first adopted in Canada in 1971, which reaffirms the dignity and value of all its citizens regardless of ethnic origins, race, religious affiliations, or language. Part of this policy, Canada confirms the rights of all the aboriginals along with the recognition of two official languages. Indeed, multiculturalism has great importance since its main purpose is to give equal treatment to all the citizens (Daniel, 2010). It ensures that all individual citizens could still maintain their identities, and have pride with their ancestry. Through this initiative, the Canadian government was able to give their citizens a feeling of self-confidence, making them more open to their diverse cultures. The multiculturalism policy
Although Quebec is in Canada, a majority of Quebecers do not identify with the national identity of Canada. Both societies create a sense of identity as well as nationalism (Hiller, 295). Hiller mentions two approaches to assessing Canadian identity; the unitary approach and the segmentalist approach (Hiller, 277). The unitary approach suggests that society consists of people who regardless of their ethnic back ground, identify as belonging to the national society, while the segmentalist approach concentrates on groups and communities that share racial, linguistic, occupational, or cultural similarities (Hiller, 28). While most Anglophones are more unitary or pan-Canadian, Quebec heavily identifies with the segmentalist approach. This dissimilarity of identity perspective may be problematic for the country, at the same time however, it can also be viewed as a struggle where contradictory parties find a way to compromise and reshape Canadian society together (Hiller, 277). Canada’s former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau made it his objective to unite Quebec with the rest of Canada. In 1969 Trudeau’s government implemented Bill C-120, otherwise known as the Official Language act, which made French an...
The current use of soft money in the US Governmental elections is phenomenal. The majority of candidates funding comes from soft money donations. Congress has attempted to close these funding loop holes; however they have had little success. Soft money violates standards set by congress by utilizing the loop hole found in the Federal Election Commission’s laws of Federal Campaigns. This practice of campaign funding should be eliminated from all governmental elections.
As a variety of people from different cultures, religions and ethnic backgrounds migrate into Canada, more perspectives, ideas and opportunities arise. As for immigrants status, they make up only 20% of Canada’s population, although at least 35% of Canada’s Research Chairs are Foreign born. Also, it is recorded that immigrants win more prestigious literary and performing arts awards than Canadian-born citizens.Thus, proving that multiculturalism benefits through innovation and creativity for Canada's education and future. Continuing onward, our culture influences us to see things around us a certain way. A variety of viewpoints and perspectives, along with a wide spread of personal and professional experiences offers new perspectives that can inspire others as well to see the world differently. Hence, multiculturalism gives others new tactics and an inspiration to work better together and an insight to create new things. Furthermore, Foreign direct investments into Canada is greater from countries that are well-represented in Canada through immigration, thus showing the advantage of multiculturalism from an innovation perspective of economy. Also, diversity of thoughts and ideas has been shown to generate creativity and drive innovation, thus helping to solve problems and align customers needs in a fresh and
Taras, D. (n.d.). Constructing canada: Do we need a public broadcaster to enhance democracy?. Communication and Canadian Society, 4-10.
Reformation on the funding of political campaigns has been an ongoing battle between trying to create an equal and democratic balance of representation for the people and the rich and powerful who have succeeded in using the media to control those people. With The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1972 and the establishment of the Federal Election Commission in 1975, steps were taken to hold the wealthy and public officials accountable for corruption and to try and prevent it. Though the act could be viewed as a positive sign of peaceful evolution in the direction o...
There have been laws put into place to reform the campaign finance system in the United States. It is apparent that money greatly influences American elections and it has massive effects upon the outcome of recent elections. The laws encourage citizens to participate in elections. Although it may be unknown to many, money greatly influenced the outcome of the 2012 presidential election.
Campaign Finance reform has been a topic of interest throughout the history of the United States Government, especially in the more recent decades. There are arguments on both sides of the issue. Proponents of campaign finance limits argue that wealthy donors and corporations hold too much power in elections and as a result they can corrupt campaigns. Those who favor less regulation argue that campaign donations are a form of free speech. One case in particular, Citizens United vs. The Federal Election Commission has altered everything with pertaining to Campaign Finance.
Although it has varied in its forms, punishment is largely influenced by the theories and socially constructed views of criminal activity. It is important to acknowledge how the forms of punishment have progressed from public humiliation and executions to solitary confinement and into today, with forced labor and firmly established routines. Even how the structures have changed with the number of those incarcerated. From initially only being two-story houses to being massive communities hidden behind penitentiary walls, it becomes important to question what their true purpose really is. Although it can be argued that prisons are still a form of rehabilitation for offenders, when you examine what it is that the inmates are actually doing, they are benefitting the economy more than they are benefitting themselves. Making budget cuts towards education and counseling services, which are necessary to reform offenders, is only going to continue to increase rates of incarceration. Instead, that money is currently being invested in ways to further expand the prison enterprise and displace those who are marginalized. Racism and economic greed has been embedded into prison functioning. In order to reduce recidivism rates there needs to be more of a focus on decreasing crime and the rates of incarceration by focusing more heavily on resources and
Canada is internationally renowned for its commitment to multiculturalism. In fact, Canada was the first nation to officially adopt a multicultural policy. However, while the Canadian government has developed a broad-based multicultural mandate that includes a national human rights code and increased penalties for hate-motivated crimes, and most Canadians oppose overt forms of discrimination and hate, racism continues to exist in Canadian society, albeit in a subtle fashion.
Campaign Finance Reform has become an increasingly discussed topic due to the events that have occurred throughout the 2016 election thus far. Democratic Presidential Candidate Bernie Sanders and Republican Presidential Candidate Donald Trump have both used the Campaign Finance Reform (CFR) debate as a means to garner additional support from people who feel that “big money” i.e. corporations and the super wealthy, have influenced politics for far too long. “Big money” in politics is an issue that needs to be addressed. With each new election cycle the amount of money being poured into campaign funding continues to grow. The majority of this money is produced by large donations from Political Action Committees (PACs) which are funded by the
I’ve loved politics since I was in 6th grade, I didn’t always have the best understanding of it all when I was younger but I was able to recognize that there were a lot of citizens who were disgruntled with their government’s progress. For example, as of August 2014, congresses’ approval rating is only 14% (Riffkin, 2014). As I’ve aged I realized that the recent Supreme Court decisions regarding corporate money and personal spending limits have made the government a less effective tool for the American citizens and that is why I’ve chosen to write on the influence of money in politics. I believe this is the most important political issue that we currently face because we are unable to pass the bills that reflect the views of the American people
With the prison system structured as it currently is, incarceration fails to rehabilitate prisoners, effectively forcing those impacted to re-offend. This failure allows for negative impacts within society. While is does also provide some with a positive outcome, the larger scale society suffers while this social issue goes without a
Nationally, every 7 minutes, another person enters prison. And every 14 minutes, someone returns to the streets, beaten down and, more often than not, having suffered a great amount of violence during his or her incarceration. Professionals will tell you that incarceration really does very little to stop crime, but we go on spending billions of dollars in order to lock up more and more people. We have become the country with the highest incarceration rate in the industrialized world. (National Criminal Justice Commission)
One thing that cannot be refuted by either side of the PAC argument, however, is the tremendous influence PACs have had on the American Political stage since their conception and growth during the 1970s. With the continued volume of money moving from PACs to candidates without major regulation, it is safe to say that PACs will continue to seriously influence the path of the American legislative process.