The Inequality Of Marriage In The United States

552 Words2 Pages

I feel the pursuit of life, liberty and happiness are not inevitably defined by marriage for everyone. The unity of marriage is a brilliant thing, but there are more common law marriages, divorces and blended families than anything. “For 16 centuries Christianity also defined the validity of a marriage on the basis of a couple wishes.” (Coontz, 2007) Then in the 16th century Europe began to require marriages be under states legally or auspices. This was to deter young adults from marrying against their parents’ wishes. Mid- 19th century state supreme courts even allowed cohabitation as evidence of a binding marriage.
There even came a time common-law marriage was not allowed. And whites were basically prohibited to marry outside their race. In the 20th century the institution of marriage was born to licensing, which was thought to help allot resources such as social security, pensions, and health insurance. But nearly 40% of American children are born to unmarried parents. Some of these individuals just don’t believe in allowing a state to tell them on paper they are married. Maybe, they just hold dead 15th century values that are not recognized today. …show more content…

But I don’t think that all that it has evolved to be necessary. The application, being recorded in court records, having a marriage license that only valid for a certain period of time before paying a new fee. Can be a pain, but who are these guidelines for? To guard the marrying individuals from each other ex: a polygamist, or untruthful person. Or are the statues to help the government control the masses. “The welfare state is a case of crippling by the government of the functions that should be performed by families and localities.” (Himmelfarb,

Open Document