Webster-Mirriam defines stature as the natural height (as of an individual) in an upright position. Estimating stature is important for individualization in forensic cases and mass disasters. Along with assessments of age, sex, and ancestry, stature estimation assists a forensic anthropologist in building the biological profile of an unidentified decedent (DiGangi, Moore). Research has shown that measurement of the lengths of the long bones is the most useful for estimation of living stature of an individual when the full skeleton is not available (DiGangi, Moore). According to DiGangi and Moore, the following generalizations can be made when considering stature estimation:
• Stature in humans increases until adulthood and tends to decrease with advancing age after about 45 years
• There is considerable variation within a single population
• On average, male stature is greater than female stature
• Studies by Li et al., 2004; MacGregor et al., 2006; Perola et al., 2007 have shown that 65% to 90% of stature is due to inheritance
• Living stature should be estimated only after age, sex, and ancestry have been assessed due to varying levels of sexual dimorphism, growth, skeletal generation and population variation
The need for reliable methods for identification of unknown remains became clearer in the aftermath of WWII when attempts were made to identify the remains of deceased soldiers. Extensive work in estimating stature from skeletal remains was done using remains of WWII as sample sets.
The two main methods of estimating stature from skeletal remains are the anatomical and regression methods. The anatomical method measures all bones that directly contribute to stature and then uses a correction factor to account for so...
... middle of paper ...
... by Raxter et. al., indicate that stature estimations using the anatomical method are strongly correlated to living statures, however due to systematic bias, underestimations of nearly 2.4 cm are often seen (Raxter et. al., 2006). The major disadvantage of Fully’s anatomical method is that all of the contributing skeletal elements must be present for measurement which is not always the case in mass disasters, archaeological or forensic casework. When nearly full skeletons are available, however, this method is strongly correlated to living stature and gives a closer estimation to actual height than other methods (Raxter). Even with the disadvantages of this method, Ousley has stated that “…the best possible estimate of biological stature from the skeleton would be the Fully method or a variation thereof, since it incorporates all skeletal components of stature”.
The skeleton had a hideous impact to the community and was predicted by local investigators to be reasonably modern. To get better understanding and avoid confusion, a bone sample was sent to a laboratory in the USA for investigation and analysation using series of scientific
Text Box: Table 2. Humerus length and height of female student in the classText Box: Table 1. Humerus length and height of male student in the class
Although the scientific use of anthropometrics in not abused in modern day society, scientists still incorrectly draw conclusions from data and statistics. Many statically fallacies occur where scientists will try and bend the statistics to prove their own personal opinion. For example, a scientist may deem his new invention or product to be 100% successful, but it could have only been tested 5 times. Even though the abuse of anthropometrics has been abandoned, scientific data abuse is still apparent in modern day
Paleontologist L.B. Tarlo said that it was very difficult to ascertain the length of Liopleurodon. This was so because no complete skeleton was found. He then predicted from the skull, the skull was approximately one-seventh of the total length of the body. When we apply this ratio to the largest skull specimen of L. ferox, the total length of the body comes out to be a little more than 10 meters. The normal size from this calculation would be around 5-7 meters in length. The weight of it was estimated to be around between 75 to 150 tons. The more recent study and the finding of the complete skull of Liopleurodon. It showed the total size of the body was actually five times more the length of the skull. Thus, reducing the expected body size of it furthermore. The maximum size that a L. ferox could reach is just up to 6.4
The perceived goal of children, or their parents, in Bailey’s article is to be of normal height at adulthood; but what is normal? The average height for American men is 5’9” and for women it is 5’4” (Bailey). According to Robert W. Steele, M.D., “alterations [in growth] may be in the form of a growth slow down, accelerated growth, or disproportionate grow...
closer the line of best fit is to 1; the more evidence there is to
World Archaeology, 31:3:329-350. Mitani, J.C. et al 1996 Sexual Dimorphism, the Operational Sex Ratio, and the Intensity of Male Competition in Polygamous Primates. The American Naturalist, 147:6:966-980. Rogers, Alan R. and Arindam Mukherjee 1992 Quantitative Genetics of Sexual Dimorphism in Human Body Size.
diet and medical care, the average-sized man was between five and five-and-a-half feet tall (“Middle
At one time it was thought that after a certain age the brain stops growing but, “scientists have recently shown that adults can grow the parts of their brains that control their abilities, such as the ability to do math or even to juggle” (“You Can Grow”). There is no true plateau as Gawande once believed, new connections coming from the neurons which “allows people to think and solve problems” (“You Can Grow”). can be made even later in life. Good strategy and taking on new challenges that are difficult for the individual is the key (“You Can
His hypothesis suggests that the distance from fingertip to fingertip or the arm span is the same distance from head to heel or height. The hypothesis made to demonstrate the “Vitruvian Man” explained that if the distance from heel to hip is X ft, then the distance from hip to fingertips when the arm is extended straight above the head is also X ft. Making conclusions from the final results reveals that the hypothesis was incorrect. Measurements from heel to hipbone were shorter than hipbone to fingertips when the arm was extended straight above the head. Potential modifications to improve test results could require all test subjects to have bare feet to get more accurate results from the measurements as well as measuring more accurately with a tool not including string. If demonstrated with the minor modifications, results could change, possibly supporting the “Vitruvian Man” more
Homo erectus is also known for its larger body compared to earlier ancestors. "Past estimates of Homo erectus stature frequently were in the 5-5 1/2 feet (152-168 cm) range for adult males and arou...
In many species, the offspring are just smaller versions of the adult species. However, in humans drastic growth is observed. Newborn humans, as compared to adults, are helpless when they are born. In other mammals, the offspring are born ready to go off into the world. Humans must go through many changes in size and stature before they can fend for themselves. In this experiment, the group measured the different ratios of human body parts. The results were measured by using yardsticks and comparing the measurements to those of a newborn child. The group hypothesized that if humans are allometric, then the head to hand ratio would be different, and if humans are isometric, then the head to wingspan ratio would be the same.The experiment showed
A simple formula may be used which gives a correlation to the 95th percentile of BP for the 50th percentile for height up to 16 years of age.[7]
15. Vuori, Ilkka (1996). "Peak bone mass and physical activity: a short review". Nutrition Reviews, 54, S11-17.
In order to be able to compare girls and boys in each year, I will