Ethics of War: Evolution and Impact of the Geneva Convention

496 Words1 Page

Ethic of War are the rules of engagement in war, and, the basic rules of war. War Ethic protects basic human rights and needs. Things like the Geneva Convention banned all sorts of inhumane gases that inhibited and took basic human needs away from people. War Ethic has really changed the way war is fought. Some things in war I agree with, and other things I don’t. For instance, You can’t use certain weapons because they are too dangerous. I don’t understand that, if you’re fighting a war, why not use every dirty trick in the book to win? Every dirty trick in the book except killing and rounding up civilians. The Geneva Convention drastically changed how war was fought. “The Geneva Conventions is a body of Public International Law, whose purpose is to provide minimum protections, standards of humane treatment, and fundamental guarantees of respect to individuals who become victims of armed conflicts.” The Geneva Convention banned gases like mustard, phosphine, nerve gas. Mustard gas gets its name from its yellow-brown color it also smells faintly of horseradish. Mustard gas is more dense than air, therefore it proved very efficient in clearing trenches. Mustard Gas causes the lungs to fill with fluid and causes soldiers to drown in their own fluids. …show more content…

Nerve gas causes your entire nervous system to malfunction, like an electrical system full of short circuits. Death generally comes as a result of a shutdown of the respiratory system, but not before blisters, boils, and internal hemorrhaging happen. Things like plastic land mines are banned too. Doctors can’t detect the plastic shrapnel in the soldiers bodies. And bio-weapons are banned for the most obvious of reasons, bioweapons can wipe out entire species at a time. There aren’t any victors of war if we're all

More about Ethics of War: Evolution and Impact of the Geneva Convention

Open Document