Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Technology raises moral questions
Introduction To Greed
Introduction To Greed
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Technology raises moral questions
Imagine a world where people treated others as they would like to be treated. Surely a world with no conflict comes to mind. Now think of the way that the world actually is and a big difference will be noticed. The first thing that might be noticed, of course, is that it seems today that there is nothing but conflict in this world. This is because of things such as greed, but that is besides the point. Remember the saying in the first sentence? This idea comes from something called The Golden Rule. The Golden Rule, which is “do unto others as you would have them do unto you” is a rule that evidently is not followed. This rule basically means that you should treat others as you wish to be treated. It is not followed, partly because of all the natural greed found in people. On a daily basis, people are stolen from, killed, intentionally hurt by somebody else’s doing and so on and so forth. Now it is highly notable that all the people that cause this harm to others don’t want these things to happen to them, but they still go through …show more content…
After a while, a group of boys noticed that he would stay longer and eventually debated whether or not to steal the other boys iPod or not. One day they finally decided that they would steal it from him while he was still playing handball. As one of the boys stood outside of the locker room to make sure the other boy wouldn’t come, the others were taking his iPod. Once they had the iPod in their the boys ran to a park across their school. As the owner of the iPod was walking home he was looking for his iPod and noticed that it was nowhere in his bag. Little did the other boys know that they weren 't the only ones in the room while they stole the iPod. The day after in PE, the boy who seemed to be spying on the other boys hid so they wouldn’t see him. The reason why he was hiding was because he had in mind to take something away from the other
Society constantly changing rules and culture is the main reason for conflict between people. This is displayed in “Kindred” were numerous African descending people are enslaved. In the novel Rufus and Dana -the main characters- have a difficult time getting along. This is because they were raised in different societies with different cultural acceptance. In the novel, you can observe Dana struggles with trying to fit in and stay out of trouble, and Rufus frustration in trying to control her. As seen in this novel, the thing people are taught or use to often time interfere with their good judgment and can make overlook things that are morally wrong.
I would hope that everyone behaves as we wish others to behave, because it shows you have integrity. Self-interest is not unethical; if you do not behave as we wish others to behave that is your personal choice and based on your ethical values. Many would think of “The Golden Rule”. However, it is easier to tell others to live by this rule than to actually put this rule into action. According to a newsletter written by William Scott Green, called Parsing Reciprocity: Questions for the Golden Rule, “The Golden Rule is easier to endorse than to enact. As a general moral principle or as an abstract statement of ethical value, the Golden Rule makes intuitive sense and enjoys wide acceptance across religions and cultures. But the generality and abstraction that enable its broad appeal make the Golden Rule problematic as a directive for practical action. Indeed, on Gert’s analysis, it is possible that the Golden Rule must be read figuratively or very expansively in order to be used, surely a challenge for any basic moral principle. The Golden Rule can be accepted unambiguously but applied only after considerable reflection and qualification.” After reading this article, it confirms to me that it is easier to tell others to behave as we wish others to behave than to actually do it. People will live by “The Golden Rule” only if they choose to in certain situations. My answer to this question does not conflict with my answer to question
... when there are no rules, there is no justice in that world. “If a covenant be made wherein neither of the parties perform presently, but trust one another, in the condition of mere nature upon any reasonable suspicion, it is void”(Hobbes 3). I completely agree with this statement. If no one abides in a covenant then it is pointless and should be voided. The nature of justice comes from valid covenants. Covenants are kept valid by fear of higher power punishing those that break it.
Compassion, also known as “The Golden Rule," is what brings every human being together. Compassion makes it possible to feel other humans sufferings not just our own or of our concern. It 's about putting yourself in someone else 's shoes and walking around in
Gandhi argues that the golden rule of conduct is mutual tolerance, because of everyone's varying thoughts and views of the subject. Gandhi also argues although conscience is a good guide that everyone's conscience is not the same and it should not be used to interfere with someone else's way of thinking.
... the Biblical rule that states, “Do unto others as you would have done unto you.” Instead, we continually show that there should be no tolerance or understanding of any wrongdoing committed against us.
explain my thoughts. The Golden Rule in my opinion is a major norm in our
Last but not least, injustice does not provide the most good for the most number of people. Just acts spawn other just acts just like unjust acts spawn other unjust acts. If everyone behaved unjustly, mankind would return to a state of nature (everyone is for themselves) which would be very unprofitable for the unjust individual due to a decreased likelihood of survival. An action is clearly unprofitable for the unjust individual if it would eventually create a hostile environment for him. Hence, one should set an example for others by living a just life which would create a better environment for him as well as for others.
...o unto you. Almost every individual has heard or been taught that this was the golden rule. Based on my understanding of altruism I believe that it does exist to a certain extent. I also agree with some of the psychologists who argue that most individuals who perform an act of altruism have alternative motives, whether the act is to make the person feel good about his or herself or because the person wants to receive a pat on the back or maybe the person has a guilty conscious. I came to these conclusions after evaluating my own scenarios.
In the bible it says that we should treat each other as we would want
relevant to life, such as do not kill and do not steal. The bible also
The Chinese Philosopher and originator of Taoism, Lao Tzu, once said, “Treat those who are good with goodness, and also treat those who are not good with goodness. Thus goodness is attained.” This, precisely, is where mankind derives what it means to be good. In a culture where goodness is often defined vaguely, there is a sort of universality attributed to the virtues of compassion and integrity. Compassion is the quality of love and mercy for fellow man, a merit that works in accord with integrity, one’s unfaltering commitment to their innate morality. To be stated briefly, if one is to walk the road of life, these values in tow, the brand of goodness will surely follow.
We had to ask ourselves, would we accept the actions of others if they were placed in our predicament. His philosophy mirrored the “golden rule” of doing unto to others, as you would have them do unto you. However, on the same note: one cannot base everyone’s actions on the actions of one person. These actions are used when determining moral right and wrong. Categorical imperative determines moral rights based off universalizability and reversibility. Universalizability speaks to the reason for one’s actions must be reasons that everyone would act on, or principle. The other hand, reversibility speaks to how the action reflect on a whole. Would you be willing to have others treat you the way you were going to treat someone
Have you ever wanted a hug? Or a surprise cookie? Or a “Hey, you look great today!” I know have. Or how about this, help with personal struggles? Advice on how to mend a broken relationship? Or true forgiveness from you a friend you really hurt? We can all identify with these situations. We have all, not expected, but wanted to be treated in this manner, in a manner of love. So, we all know that it is inherently in all of mankind to want validation and acceptance that is found in love. We have a desire to be shown such great love. So, if our desire is this, and many say that they live out the Golden Rule, why do we not see this mighty compassion in our daily lives? Think about it, when do you feel like you have truly treated another the way you really want to be treated. If the command itself entails that much love, then I’d say that few really follow
When considering morality, worthy to note first is that similar to Christian ethics, morality also embodies a specifically Christian distinction. Studying a master theologian such as St. Thomas Aquinas and gathering modern perspectives from James Keenan, S. J. and David Cloutier serve to build a foundation of the high goal of Christian morality. Morality is a primary goal of the faith community, because it is the vehicle for reaching human fulfillment and happiness. Therefore, great value can be placed on foundations of Christian morality such as the breakdown of law from Aquinas, the cultivation of virtues, the role of conscience in achieving morality, and the subject of sin described by Keenan.