The Importance Of The First Amendment

418 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essay about religious freedom in the united states

Artists should be able to express how they feel but in an orderly manner where the artists are not inciting violence to anyone under any circumstances.There should be public and government restrictions, but very limited on government restrictions.Artists from all around the world have proven that people have been impacted by the artwork and are a big factor of society by breaking barriers and uniting people. Artists should be able to use their first amendment and therefore there should not be any major government intervention.The first amendment lets the people exercise the freedom of religion, or the freedom of speech, the freedom of the press, the right to peaceably assemble, or to petition but if a person is inflicting violence then that's

Show More
Related

  • Breaking The Spell King's Approach To Civil Disobedience

    630 Words  | 2 Pages

    In America the Amendment 1 of the U.S. Constitution gives the American people the right to peaceably assemble and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Most notably Amendment 1 is known for and most often cited as giving the Freedom of Speech. Even before this amendment was ratified people in the U.S. were protesting, as in the Boston Tea Party. Protesting has been a way to effect change in America. A question to ask is this: is there a right way or wrong way to protest.

    Read More

  • Modern Interpretation of The First Amendment

    1663 Words  | 4 Pages

    The first Amendment of the United States Constitution says; “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”[1] Our fore fathers felt that this statement was plain enough for all to understand, however quite often the United States government deems it necessary to make laws to better define those rights that are stated in the Constitution. Today the framers would be both encouraged and discouraged by our modern interpretation the First Amendment the United States Constitution.

    Read More

  • Analysis of the First Amendment

    1702 Words  | 4 Pages

    1. In the First Amendment, the clause that states “Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion” is based on the Establishment Clauses that is incorporated in the amendment. This clauses prohibits the government to establish a state religion and then enforce it on its citizens to believe it. Without this clause, the government can force participation in this chosen religion, and then punish anyone who does not obey to the faith chosen. This clause was in issue in a court case mentioned in Gaustad’s reading “Proclaim Liberty Throughout All the Land”. March v. Chambers was a court case that involved the establishment clause. Chambers was a member of the Nebraska state legislature who began each session with prayer by a chaplain who was being paid the state. The case stated that this violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. However, the court stated that the establishment clause was not breached by the prayer, but was violated because of the fact that the chaplain was being paid from public funds.

    Read More

  • The Second Amendment: Why It Is Important to Our Country

    802 Words  | 2 Pages

    On December 15, 1791, the Bill of Rights was ratified effective by Congress. These first ten amendments to the Constitution of the United States of America promised the states certain rights and freedoms which could not be infringed by the government. After all, the founding fathers knew from experience that men in their weakness were often tempted by power. They had become all too familiar with this when under the control of King George in England. Therefore, in order to protect the future people of their beautiful country, they promised certain liberties which could not be taken away. Every single one of these freedoms is important for the United States of America. However, the second amendment is especially important to our nation because it allows the people to protect their freedom and defend themselves and the common good against an overreaching government.

    Read More

  • The Evolution Of The First Amendment

    977 Words  | 2 Pages

    we had no legally protected rights of free speech in anything like the form we

    Read More

  • Reflections On The First Amendment

    1819 Words  | 4 Pages

    On December 15th, 1971, the first X amendments to the Constitution went into affect. The first X amendments to the constitution were known as the Bill of Rights. The First Amendment was written by James Madison because the American people were demanding a guarantee of their freedom. The First Amendment was put into place to protect American’s freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of assembly and freedom of petition. The First Amendment was written as follows;

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The First Amendment

    1158 Words  | 3 Pages

    What is the First Amendment? According to the “Webster-dictionary” The First Amendment is “an amendment to the Constitution of the United States guaranteeing the right of free expression; includes freedom of assembly and freedom of the press and freedom of religion and freedom of speech.” Since the First Amendment was written by our founding fathers and is part of the constitution it should not be violated. This amendment secures the freedom of individuals to express their thoughts freely. In the essays “First Amendment Junkie” by Susan Jacoby and “Let’s Put Pornography back in the closet” by Susan Brownmiller both authors write about the First Amendment. By implementing ethos and pathos in their writing both authors write about pornography

    Read More

  • Robert Mapplethorpe: Photography, Homoeroticism, and Senator Jesse Helms

    3955 Words  | 8 Pages

    No medium or arena is free from political assimilation. Perhaps this is why the term "the personal is political" is so reverberant in such a multitude of communities. In the fine arts community, every art piece reflects a personal decision or touch; what medium to best describe a subject or idea in, or the physical shape and making of art by an artist, for example, are ways in which each artist has ownership over his or her own work. When art is displayed for an audience, the very act of placing a personal piece into the public sphere creates a forum for interactive and political dialogue and judgment. To present artwork in a public arena authorizes the audience to construe interpretation and assess that art. The policies and politics that dictate the arrival of art for the public purview are not immune to the authority and judgment making that occurs once the art is on display. In order for galleries, museums, or universities to display artwork, their high level officials must approve the works. Furthermore, when the work is on display it reflects back on the institution it is in, the leaders of that institution who approve it, and ultimately the artist who made the work herself. There are foundations and organizations that are funded by the government for the promotion and distribution of fine arts, which of necessity are bound by the legal dictates of the governing bodies and the public it represents for these reasons. When artwork or an artist is controversial, it becomes a political issue due to governmental involvement in funding of --and thus universally approving-- the contentious art or art-maker. For artists who work in the photographic medium, controversies arise more readily due to the realism of the images. Homoerotic photographic art in particular is the site of political and social stigmatization, as exemplified by Robert Mapplethorpe's life and work. Mapplethorpe's photography was the catalyst from which conservative senator Jesse Helms was able to symbolize the misinterpretations of visual representation for "real" or authentic action and criticize his work as "obscene" due to its homoerotic content.

    Read More

  • The First Amendment

    886 Words  | 2 Pages

    The First Amendment is the first section of the Bill of Rights and is often considered the most important part of the U.S Constitution because it guarantees the citizens of United States the essential personal freedoms of religion, speech, press, peaceful assembly and the freedom to petition the Government. Thanks to the rights granted by the First Amendment, Americans are able to live in a country where they can freely express themselves, speak their mind, pray without interference, protest in peace and where their opinions are taken into consideration, which is something not many other nationalities have the fortune of saying. The Founding Fathers were the framers of the Constitution of the U.S., and the responsible for the elaboration of the First Amendment. The majority of the Founding Fathers were enlightenment thinkers who were in love with liberty, and thought that basic political rights were inevitable for man’s nature. After having experienced the tyranny from their mother countries, the Founding Fathers carefully constructed the Constitution of the United States in a way where tyranny was avoided and a government for the people, by the people and of the people was developed, which is clearly reflected in the Constitution. At the time of inception of the United States, the Founding Fathers created the First Amendment in order to ensure that the government would not interfere with Americans’ basic civil rights. The rights outlined on the First Amendment were considered so important by these leaders that many states refused to ratify the Constitution of the United Sates until there was a conjecture of amendments that would protect individual rights in the future.

    Read More

  • Iconoclasm In Art

    1118 Words  | 3 Pages

    In just this year alone, American society has been divided by political views that have affected our common sense. Destroying property and disobeying laws has been a way people use to revolt against their political views. An alternative to ruining art could be moving it, and unless the state where the artwork is located allows it, art should not be taken down or vandalized. If the artwork is handled lawfully, then it would be appropriate to move the artwork and this way it is not promoting hate or illegal acts. It is understandable why someone might become offended by artwork that is contradicting to their culture and values. Sometimes the phenomenology of a piece of artwork can impact the effect it has on a person. If a statute makes you feel inferior, you might feel critical towards it. However, destroying the piece is not a good way to handle the situation because it doesn’t show a moral or lawful way of resolving the conflict. Instead, when someone destroys artwork, it just causes more hate to develop and grow, instead of handling the situation peacefully. Overall, if our collective culture used peaceful protest, it would be more effective and moral, because no illegal acts or emotionally driven consequences will destroy

    Read More

  • Music Censorship is a Violation of Free Speech

    1617 Words  | 4 Pages

    In today?s society, we value and learn to tolerate different cultures and people. Sometimes people end up expressing themselves differently as well. This country is based on the idea that we may express ourselves any way we want to, be it religion, organizing, writing, or speaking. Music has been a popular form of expression for centuries. These days, in the country best known for freedom, some people are trying to censor it the freedom of music. Music should not be censored along with any other form of expression otherwise what we and artists say are being controlled. If we value freedom, then that includes what we may say and how we say it even in musical form.

    Read More

  • censored

    1162 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech.”(United States Constitution) However, it seems almost everywhere; many forms of art are being unfairly censored. One such form that is often overlooked as art is music. “Music is probably the most censored of all art forms”(The Economist; p 73) There are hundreds of artists who have been unfairly censored, ranging from popular music from artists such as Eminem, 2 Live Crew, and NWA, to classical music, such as Mozart’s Figaro. However unfair and unconstitutional this censorship is, the fact is that questionable music and lyrics are encouraging impressionable young children to follow their messages. Rappers like DMX or NWA, preaching gang violence often are “the straw that breaks the camel’s back,” and finally pushes a child looking for guidance into the world of gangs. The truth is that these children need to be protected from the harsh realities of the world surrounding them, but is censoring music the right way to do it?

    Read More

  • Early Childhood Art Activism: Failing Walls

    702 Words  | 2 Pages

    In general, when people hear the word art, they envision an artist painting on a canvas. Likewise, when people hear the word activism, they imagine loud protest in the streets. If the two words are put together, we have a topic that society knows little about. Art activism has been a silent but powerful voice for countless political clashes, human rights, animal rights, and social change throughout the years. It has taught tolerance and compassion towards countless issues the general public chooses to turn a blind eye to. As a result, this form of activism has opened the door for activist to reach their targeted audience in a more creative nature and through a multitude of creative expressions.

    Read More

  • Being Well Educated In Plato's The Republic

    1182 Words  | 3 Pages

    Within my grade school the only form of art we had was art class where we painted and built sculptures. Conversely, Plato states “Good people and gods do not deceive — but painters constantly deceive us by trying to make their fake imitations look real [598c, 602d]. If in fact these artists are not good people are we ultimately teaching our youth to inherently be bad and deceive everyone that they cross? To be well educated, children must be well educated and to be well educated we must shield they youth’s minds from the unjust and bad material. If the youth are not shielded from the bad material then our future politicians and leaders will have been raised on immoral and bad material. It is the duties of the state to censor the bad material from polluting the minds of the youth. We have recently seen this censorship within the graduate schools in the forms of eliminating some of the books that have previously (50 shades of grey) allowed within the libraries of the state of Florida. Usa Today online states that, “this is absolutely censorship. Just because it is on the shelves does not mean that you must read it”. However, to fight this claim we must think back and wonder what justice is. Is it giving to others what they deserve, because that was proved false by Plato by the example of the man not within his own state of right mind wanting his knife back. Must we censor this form of

    Read More

  • Nudity in Art: A Personal Opinion

    1010 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...e artists that use nudity in their artwork. We should allow them the freedom to expose us to the unknown. People should not condemn artist like Sally Mann and people need to embrace the words of Robert Henri. The people of America need to dispose of their fear of nudity for good.

    Read More

More about The Importance Of The First Amendment

Open Document