Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of bill of rights
Fourth amendment analysis
Fourth amendment analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of bill of rights
On December 15th, 1971 the Bill of Rights was incorporated into the United States Constitution. The Bill of Rights is where one can find most of the procedural or due process rights given to criminal suspects in the United States of America (Bohm & Haley 2012). The United States Constitution is the foundation of which America was built on and is what grants Americans freedom. When I joined the United States Military I took an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States from all enemies foreign and domestic and it is something I would die for. The fourth, fifth, sixth and, eighth amendment are very important to each United States citizen including criminals. The Fourth Amendment establishes a right that assures the security of the people in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unconstrained governmental searches and seizures (GRAY 2016). This means that an officer must develop probable cause that a crime has been committed and therefore must acquire a search warrant to conduct a search of a person, houses, papers, and effects. The government must also possess probable cause to seize any person or property. There is a rule that helps discourage the government from violating peoples fourth amendment rights called the exclusionary rule (Bohm & Haley 2012). This rule …show more content…
came into effect by the Supreme Court in 1914 in a case of Weeks v. United States where the Supreme Court held that evidence that was obtained illegally must be excluded from trials in federal court (Bohm & Haley 2012). The Fifth Amendment protects the American people against, double jeopardy, self-incrimination, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of the law (Bohm & Haley 2012).
According to (Khan 2016), when an individual’s Fifth Amendment right has been violated on double jeopardy, a flaw exists in the criminal justice system. The Fifth Amendment also guarantees that a criminal or defendant does not have to testify against himself therefore, self-incriminating himself. In the Supreme Court case, Miranda v. Arizona (1966) the government increased the protection against self-incrimination that mainly was focused on police interrogations (Bohm & Haley
2012). The Sixth Amendment assures criminal defendants the right to a speedy trial, the right to a lawyer, the right to impartial jury, the right to face your accuser and know the evidence against you as well as the nature of the charges (Bohm & Haley 2012). The Speedy Trial act of 1974 which is regulated by the Federal courts states there are two different time limits: the period between the arrest and charging, and the period between the charging and the trial (Bohm & Haley 2012). Criminal defendants also have the right to an unbiased jury as well as a jury trial (Bohm & Haley 2012). Finally, the Eighth Amendment protects criminals or defendants in so that there will be no excessive bails and fines placed upon them as well as protects them from cruel and unusual punishments (Bohm & Haley 2012). There are fines imposed on different types of crimes depending on the severity. A large fine will not be placed on somebody that committed the smallest of crime. Basically, cruel and unusual punishment, excluding capital punishment, would be considered anything of a malicious nature and is prohibited. Capital punishment is still utilized for the most heinous crimes and in my opinion should be used more often. There are a vast number of procedural rights for people that are accused of crimes in America. The most important reason the America has so many procedural rights is to protect the innocent people from being arrested, charged, convicted, or punished for crimes they possibly did not commit (Bohm & Haley 2012).
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures. A warrant, a legal paper authorizing a search, cannot be issued unless there is a reasonable cause. Courts have rules that a warrant is not required in every case. In emergencies such as hot pursuit, public safety, danger of loss of evidence, and permission of the suspect, police officers do not need a warrant to search a person’s property (Background Essay). In the case of DLK, federal agents believed DLK was growing marijuana in his home. Artificial heat intensive lights are used to grow the marijuana indoors (Doc B). Agents scanned DLK’s home with a thermal imager. Based on the scan and other information, a judge issued
BACKGROUND OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS The United States Bill of Rights came into being as a result of a promise made by the Fathers of Confederation to the states during the struggle for ratification of the Constitution in 1787-88. A great number of the states made as a condition for their ratification, the addition of amendments, which would guarantee citizens protection of their rights against the central government. Thus, we have a rather interesting situation in which the entrenchment of a bill of rights in the American Constitution was done by the virtual demand of the states, themselves fearing a central government which was not legally constrained and restricted as far as its powers were concerned. The resulting Bill of Rights is appended to the American Constitution as the first of ten amendments.
The Fourth (IV) Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses paper, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized" (U.S Constitution, Fourth Amendment, Legal Information Institute). The fourth amendment is a delicate subject and there is a fine line between the fourth amendment and 'unreasonable search and seizure. '
The 4th amendment provides citizens protections from unreasonable searches and seizures from law enforcement. Search and seizure cases are governed by the 4th amendment and case law. The United States Supreme Court has crafted exceptions to the 4th amendment where law enforcement would ordinarily need to get a warrant to conduct a search. One of the exceptions to the warrant requirement falls under vehicle stops. Law enforcement can search a vehicle incident to an individual’s arrest if the individual unsecured by the police and is in reaching distance of the passenger compartment. Disjunctive to the first exception a warrantless search can be conducted if there is reasonable belief
The Exclusionary Rule made its first appearance in the judicial system when it was put there by the Supreme Court thanks to Weeks v. United States. At first the Exclusionary Rule was only used in federal cases, only after fifty years of being adopted by the Supreme Court was it used in state cases as well. Before Weeks v. United States, any and all evidence that was acquired illegally or that violated the peoples constitutional rights was still used, if it was practical to the circumstance. The definition of the Exclusionary Rule is, “a rule that forbids the introduction of illegally obtained evidence in a criminal trial (The Free Dictionary, 2014).” The Fourth Amendment reads “…the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized (Law, 2008).”
The 4th amendment protects people from being searched or having their belongings taken away without any good reason. The 4th amendment was ratified on December 15, 1791. For many years prior to the ratifiation, people were smuggling goods because of the Stamp Act; in response Great Britain passed the writs of assistance so British guards could search someone’s house when they don’t have a good reason to. This amendment gave people the right to privacy. “Our answer to the question of what policy must do before searching a cellphone seized incident to an arrest is accordingly simple - get a warrant.” This was addressed to officers searching people’s houses and taking things without having a proper reason. I find
The 4th amendment protects US citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. If it is violated by the government, all evidence found by the unlawful search and seizure must be excluded as per the exclusionary rule which serves as a remedy for 4th amendment violations. Before a remedy can be given for violation of the 4th amendment, a court must determine whether the 4th amendment is applicable to a certain case.
On December 15, 1791, the Bill of Rights was ratified effective by Congress. These first ten amendments to the Constitution of the United States of America promised the states certain rights and freedoms which could not be infringed by the government. After all, the founding fathers knew from experience that men in their weakness were often tempted by power. They had become all too familiar with this when under the control of King George in England. Therefore, in order to protect the future people of their beautiful country, they promised certain liberties which could not be taken away. Every single one of these freedoms is important for the United States of America. However, the second amendment is especially important to our nation because it allows the people to protect their freedom and defend themselves and the common good against an overreaching government.
The Constitution of the United States of America protects people’s rights because it limits the power of government against its people. Those rights guaranteed in the Constitution are better known as the Bill of Rights. Within these rights, the Fourth Amendment protects “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable search and seizures […]” (Knetzger & Muraski, 2008). According to the Fourth Amendment, a search warrant must be issued before a search and seizure takes place. However, consent for lawful search is one of the most common exceptions to the search warrant requirement.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” –U.S. Constitutional Amendments
When the Second Constitutional Convention wrote the Constitution in 1787, there was a controversy between the federalists and the anti-federalists surrounding whether or not to have a Bill of Rights. The anti-federalists claimed that a bill of rights was needed that listed the guaranteed rights that the government could never take away from a person i.e. “inalienable rights.” A Bill of Rights was eventually deemed necessary, and has worked for over 210 years. There are many reasons why the ten amendments are still valid to this day, and the best examples are the First Amendment, concerning the freedom of religion, the Fifth Amendment, and the Sixth Amendment.
In the summer of 1787, delegates from the 13 states convened in Philadelphia and drafted a remarkable blueprint for self-government, the Constitution of the United States. The first draft set up a system of checks and balances that included a strong executive branch, a representative legislature and a federal judiciary. The Constitution was remarkable, but deeply flawed. For one thing, it did not include a specific declaration, or bill, of individual rights. It specified what the government could do but did not say what it could not do. For another, it did not apply to everyone. The "consent of the governed" meant propertied white men only. The Bill of Rights did not come from a desire to protect the liberties won in the American Revolution, but rather from a fear of the powers of the new federal government.
A-58). It also requires “a warrant that specifically describes the place to be searched, the person involved, and suspicious things to be seized” (Goldfield et al. A- 58). The Fourth Amendment protects the privacy of the people by preventing public officials from searching homes or personal belonging without reason. It also determines whether “someone 's privacy is diminished by a governmental search or seizure” (Heritage). This amendment protects citizens from having evidence which was seized illegally “used against the one whose privacy was invaded” (Heritage). This gives police incentive to abide by the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment protects a person’s privacy “only when a person has a legitimate expectation to privacy” (FindLaw). This means the police cannot search person’s home, briefcase, or purse. The Fourth Amendment also requires there to be certain requirements before a warrant can be issued. The Fourth Amendment requires a warrant “when the police search a home or an office, unless the search must happen immediately, and there is no opportunity to obtain a warrant” (Heritage). The Fourth Amendment protects the privacy of the people, but also the safety of the people. When there is probable cause, a government official can destroy property or subdue a suspect. The Fourth Amendment prevents government officials from harassing the public.
Unlike many other foundational documents written by other counties, the US Constitution has held strong from the start. The Constitution is at the center of our everyday lives and is the reason we are able to live with the freedom and security that we do. As the Constitutions author, contents, and effect on the US are evaluated it is very clear why America holds so strongly to the foundation the Constitution set in place.
The Bill of Rights has had a huge factor on what separates us from other countries. The Bill of Rights are basically the laws that our very country was founded on. Now that we understand what the Bill of Rights are, we can get to the big question. What are the most essential rights for the preservation of democracy? This question rather easy to answer. The Most essential rights in keeping our democracy in tact is the First Amendment, the Fourth Amendment and the Sixth Amendment, and here is why.