The Importance Of Separation Of Powers

1251 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: 3 branches of government

The legal term Separation of powers originated with the Baron de Montesquieu, a French enlightenment writer but however, the act can be traced to ancient Greece. Separation of powers is a fundamental doctrine of the United States government, in which the powers and responsibilities to govern are being distributed between the Legislative (parliament or senate), Executive (president or prime minister and the cabinet), and Judiciary (Chief Justice and other judges) to ensure that no one branch can gain absolute power and the issues about public policy and welfare would be given severe consideration before actions are taken. Separation of powers is common in many democratic countries of the world (Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., 2014). Through the system of checks and balances, the officials of each branch are selected by different procedures and serve different terms of office and each branch may choose to block action of the other branches.
The executive branch:
Fundamentally, the executive branch of U.S government was established to enforce and execute the laws that the legislative branch makes. The executive is made of many parts each with their different specific responsibilities. The President is the head of the executive branch and acts as both the head of state and commander-in-chief of the armed forces. As the head of state, the president has the responsibilities of appointing the heads of all executive agencies and federal commissions, holding the power to veto bills whenever the Congress ordains laws, issuing executive orders, supporting diplomacy with other nations signing pardons and international treaties and also presenting a State of the Union address to the Congress regularly. The Constitution requires that each Presid...

... middle of paper ...

...eparation of powers
1. The main draw-back regarding the matter of division of power is the long nature of decision making. This eventually brings about delayed change. Every one of the three arms of government must be ready for a law to be accepted and enforced.
2. The role of government has expanded so greatly that many decisions which affect people’s lives must be made quickly, and some of these decisions require specialized knowledge which is not possessed by judges or magistrates. Many of these decisions are made by administrative tribunals established by and answerable to Ministers. Hence the Executive branch is increasingly given judicial powers. This is not necessarily undesirable so long as the tribunal obey the basic standards of fairness laid down by the law and so long as the courts are able to review their decisions.
It has likewise gotten unrealistic

Show More
Related

  • Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Dbq Analysis

    548 Words  | 2 Pages

    The separation of powers separates the central government into three branches. The three branches are the executive branch, the judicial branch, and the legislative branch. All of the different branches have power over specific things. This guards against tyranny because it doesn’t allow any of the branches to do whatever they want. In Doc B, it says that the great departments of power should be separate and distinct. This helps because if they all had the same power, they would have control over anything they wanted to.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of President Herbert Hoover

    1638 Words  | 4 Pages

    The President of the United States is instrumental in the running of the country. He serves as the chief executive, chief diplomat, commander in chief, chief legislator, chief of state, judicial powers, and head of party. Article II of the Constitution states that the President is responsible for the execution and enforcement of the laws created by Congress. He also is tasked with the authority to appoint fifteen leaders of the executive departments which will be a part of the President’s cabinet. He or she is also responsible for speaking with the leaders the CIA and other agencies that are not part of his cabinet because these agencies play a key role in the protection of the US. The President also appoints the heads of more than 50 independent

    Read More

  • Separation Of Powers Dbq Essay

    515 Words  | 2 Pages

    The same things go to the three branches of government; they don't have too much power because of checks and balances. So each branch has its own powers split evenly. This is another reason why separation of powers protect America from tyranny. Checks and balances help protect America from tyranny. Checks and balances protect America because each branch can cancel out one another.

    Read More

  • Separation Of Powers Dbq Essay Power

    556 Words  | 2 Pages

    To start out with, the constitution divided power so no one branch or person had complete power over the nation or others. In document B it states, ¨Liberty requires that the three departments of power are distinct and separate.¨ This means that in order to prevent and guard against tyranny we must have different and separate branches holding power if there is only one or they are too similar that could create a small group with close to complete power creating a tyranny. Power must be separated into three branches so that they may check and limit each other so that no laws are passed that will harm the nation and are unconstitutional. The three branches are very separate but can

    Read More

  • Separation Of Powers Dbq Analysis

    742 Words  | 2 Pages

    Separation of powers means what it says. Power id distributed among the three branches of government: the executive branch, the legislative branch, and the judicial branch. In Document B of the DBQ Packet, James Madison quotes, “’the accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands… may be justly pronounced the very definition of tyranny…. (L)iberty requires that the three great departments should be separate and distinct.’” In other words, if one person or group owns too much power in a government, then they are considered a tyrant, whether the person (or group) who gained the power was elected into power, born into it, or declared themselves ruler. If the government was not divided into three branches and was only a single department, then too much power would be granted to that government, defying Madison’s ideals of a tyranny-free country. With the government split into different departments, each branch owns its own set of powers. The legislative branch creates laws, the executive branch administers the laws, and the judicial branch interprets laws. Separation of powers guards against tyranny because it helps prevent the development of a branch of government that may ratify, carry out, and portray laws as they wish. Power is distributed among branches ensuring that all offices play a role in the United States’

    Read More

  • How the Constitution Guards Against Tyranny

    642 Words  | 2 Pages

    The separation of powers keeps any one branch from gaining too much power by creating 3 separate, distinct branches power can be shared equally among. According to Madison, “Liberty requires that the three great departments of power should be separate and distinct.”(Document B) In other words, to avoid tyranny and achieve liberty, the three branches of government (executive, legislative, and judicial) must be separate and diverse. The purpose of a separation of powers is to divide the powers of the government so there is not only one central source of power. The three branches must be as distinct as possible to avoid falling into the hands of one individual leader. There are also checks and balances between these three branches. Checks and balances are a system of each branch monitoring an...

    Read More

  • Preventing Tyranny: The Power of the Constitution

    1370 Words  | 3 Pages

    The separation of powers protects against tyranny because it makes sure that one branch of government can be more powerful and have more say than another so that there can't be any tyranny. This means that the Legislative Branch should be completely different from the Executive or the Judicial Branch. This would separate all the powers needed into three separate parties. The different branches could have different viewpoints to make sure that almost everyone is pleased with the government. This may prevent tyranny by making people not want to try to take over the government because they think it is in good hands and the three branches of government are hard to take over, since there are three whole branches.

    Read More

  • Congress and The Presidency

    370 Words  | 1 Pages

    This position requires the management of the Country by implementing the laws, nominations of officials, grant pardons, serve as Commander-in-Chief of the military, veto lows passed by Congress, and negotiate treaties. The President is also responsible proposing yearly budgets and helping boost economic development. The many divided tasks between Congress and the Presidency has made it

    Read More

  • Power of the Branches

    1126 Words  | 3 Pages

    Our Constitution establishes three branches of government and defines their very existence. The reason for the three branches is to separate the powers. The phrase “separation of powers” isn’t in the constitution, but it best explains the intention of the Constitution. It is essential that the assignment of lawmaking, enforcing and interpreting be spread out among the separated powers to ensure that all power doesn’t fall into the lap of one group, or even a power-hungry individual. The powers of which I’m speaking that were intentionally separated by way of the Constitution are the Legislative Branch, Executive Branch and finally, the Judicial Branch.

    Read More

  • The Underlying Consequence of Separation of Power

    2110 Words  | 5 Pages

    In Donald Robinson’s, Slavery in the Structure of the American Revolution, he eloquently articulates the original purpose of separation of power in the United States of America: to protect private interests and freedom. Considering that separation of power is viewed as a means to prevent a unitary and centralized government, the issue of slavery influenced the adoption of separation of power. While equality is a quintessential reflection of America, the power of states’ rights prevents states from being consistent with American values. In this paper, I will examine the principle concept of separation of power in the context of ensuring private interests, in particular, the institution of slavery and segregation. I will argue how decentralized political power fundamentally prevents unity within a nation because of its intent to protect the private interests in the United States of America.

    Read More

  • Conflict Between the Executive and Legislative Branches of Government

    1742 Words  | 4 Pages

    American politics is often defined by a continuing power conflict between the executive and the legislative branches of the government. This struggle for political power between the two stronger branches of the three is inherent in the Constitution, itself. The concepts of separation of powers and checks and balances ensure that the branches of government will remain in conflict and provide a balance that keeps the entire government under control. As it was first established, the executive branch was much smaller and weaker than as we know it today. Consequently, the legislative branch was unquestionably dominant. Over the course of history, the executive branch grew in both size and power to the point where it occasionally overtook the legislative and today rivals the legislative in a much closer political battle. Today both branches have major factors that contribute to their power, but on the whole the legislative remains the lastingly dominant branch.

    Read More

  • The Difference Between Separation of Powers and Federalism

    308 Words  | 1 Pages

    The principle of separation of powers is laid out in Articles I, II, and III, in effort to avoid tyranny. It is a part of a system called check and balances. The check and balances play the roles of the three branches of government. This system was made so that no one branch will over power the other. The three branches come together and help one another by being independent of the other. The legislative branch consists of the Congress, the judicial branch consists of the courts, and the executive branch consists of the president. For an example, when a bill is in progress and the chief executive (president or governor) does not approve of it, he can reject legislation and return it to the legislature with reasons for the rejection. This is a process called veto power.

    Read More

  • The Importance Of The Separation Of Powers

    500 Words  | 1 Pages

    One of the biggest threats to a thriving country is a tyrannical government. To prevent this, the Founders declared that the power of the government must be separated. This principle, the Separation of Powers, states that, to prevent tyranny, one governmental branch cannot have supremacy over the country. The power must be divided among three branches. These are the executive, judicial, and legislative branches. The Separation of Powers is of equal importance now as when the Constitution was written because it prevents tyranny.

    Read More

  • Ideal Political System Essay

    941 Words  | 2 Pages

    The executive branch includes the head of government/head of state and their cabinet. As the leader of the state, the executive is considered the “top-tier of government.” Their job is to be the political leader of a country. In the case of

    Read More

  • Rule Of Law Essay

    1020 Words  | 3 Pages

    Lisa Webley and Harriet Samuels defined the separation of powers as a theory or doctrine that describes the way in which a state organises the distribution of power and function between its different parties. The separation of powers is divided into three branches which are the executive, legislative and Judiciary.

    Read More

More about The Importance Of Separation Of Powers

Open Document