Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia relationships
A essugy about mesopotamia
A essugy about mesopotamia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia relationships
In world history, periodization can be extremely controversial due to the argument between the Paleolithic and Neolithic eras. Historians have different perspectives and opinions about these eras that make periodization a dilemma many historians face. In the Strayer book, it addresses reasons why periodization can be contentious in world history. “ Some historians identify ‘real history’ with writing and so dismiss the Paleolithic and Neolithic eras as largely unknowable because their peoples did not write.”(12) This means that some historians skip the Paleolithic and Neolithic eras because their people did not have written records. Therefore, they believe that the lack of writing during the eras means that it is unnecessary to inform others …show more content…
These historians only like major events that transformed things. Yet, people cannot change history, history happens the way it does and it can’t change. However, in the Strayer book, it does say that the Paleolithic and Neolithic eras are important to periodize. “ Although written records are absent, scholars have learned a great deal about Paleolithic and Neolithic peoples through their material remains: stones and bones, fossilized seeds, rock paintings and engravings and much more.”(12) This means that even though the Paleolithic and Neolithic eras didn’t have written records, they did leave behind their materials that we can learn and get an idea what they did back then. The Paleolithic and Neolithic people didn’t get a chance to develop a form of writing, they did utilize their resources correctly and left us these amazing artifacts that we can reflect on and decipher. The periodization of the Paleolithic and Neolithic eras did cause controversy in world …show more content…
Egypt and Mesopotamia are two different civilizations that are pretty far away from each other. They began to have long-distant trades amongst each other that benefited both civilizations. “Its agriculture drew upon wheat and barley, which likely reached Egypt from Mesopotamia...”(85) Wheat and Barley was used in Mesopotamia and it was the main plant that they grew in their climate and it fed people. Since Egypt and Mesopotamia have a similar climate, Egypt was probably inspired by the Mesopotamians in the usage of the plants and it probably benefited them too. “... as well as gourds, watermelon, domesticated donkeys, and cattle, which came from the Sudan to the south.”(85) Sudan most likely utilized their donkeys for easier transportation which assisted them with many things, Egypt was activated by this idea and they probably used their donkeys for transportation as well. Some of the civilizations in Mesopotamia were Hebrews. Many people like the Phoenicians were influenced by them. “ Their sacred writings, recorded in the Old Testament, showed the influence of Mesopotamia in the ‘eye for an eye’ principle in their legal system and in the story of a flood that destroyed the world.”(86) The Mesopotamians shared this belief with other regions and civilizations and many were intrigued by it. This religion probably spread in Lebanon after this
The ancient cultures of Mesopotamia and Egypt developed into successful civilizations. One civilization the Egyptians developed was in the Nile River valley. Based off the "Mesopotamia and Egypt DBQ" packet, "Ancient Egypt was an advanced civilization in many areas including religion, architecture, transportation, and trade. Ancient Mesopotamia was one of the first civilizations that developed a form of government as well as organized people in political states." Based on the documents, Egypt and Mesopotamia developed into successful and advanced civilizations by effectively using the resources that surrounded them to solve problems and live happily.
I can infer that the Egyptians and the Mesopotamians were similar in the way that they had a written language, both of them were polytheistic, and they both built pyramid type things. The differences between the Egyptians and the Mesopotamians were their different views on what happens to you in the afterlife and how to bury people after they die.
There are many similarities between the four civilizations Egypt, Mesopotamia, Indus Valley, and Ancient China. One of the similarities is that all of these civilizations were located near rivers. These rivers were essential for surviving. The rivers would provide not only fresh water, but the rivers would flood and bring fresh soil for crops. Egypt used the Nile River. Mesopotamia used the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers. Indus Valley used the Indus River. Ancient China used the Yellow and the Yangzi Rivers. Another similarity is that all the civilizations believed in multiple gods. Religion played a big role in developing these civilizations. In these civilizations there was a hierarchy in which religious people were in charge. In Egypt, there
The Ancient Egypt and Ancient Mesopotamia grew up to be successful civilizations. The surroundings of where they are located assisted them in survival. Although their lifestyles were different, both civilizations became successful in their own ways. Finally, their similar belief was a very helpful guidance when their rulers governed. Without these factors, the two civilizations might not have been
What similarities and differences did Egypt and Mesopotamia have and why was Egypt more politically unified than its neighbor, Mesopotamia? I think in order to answer these questions it is important to look at how both societies lived. Egypt and Mesopotamia were two civilizations existing during the time period of 2000-1200 BCE.(text, 97) These civilizations were shaped by their environment, involved with trade, and faced changes in government after the 100 year drought; however, they differed in that Egypt was shaped by the Nile, traded goods for goods and changed their outlook on the pharaoh who was ruler of all; whereas, Mesopotamia was shaped by the Tigris and Euphrates, traded money for goods, and had a ruler over rulers. The governed harmonic life style of Egypt led this society to be more politically unified; whereas, Mesopotamia’s government led to many different ways of structure, thus creating a less unified society.
These individual states traded with each other. They would most likely trade things specific to that area. They also had a very multifaceted and planned irrigation system. Last but not least they were all tiny domains that were actually well prearranged. On their own they were fairly solid and had a very organized government. Although they were then all united by King Menes. The citizens were fairly obedient and did what they were told to do by their god, the pharaoh. They felt as if bad things would happen if they went against a god. The government became one hundred percent centralized and they controlled every single last one of the resources in the vast region in which we call the Nile River Valley. Just imagine being a part of this structured civilization. Now the Mesopotamia civilizations were a little different, well a lot. Although they had similarities. They did have slight similarities though. Mesopotamia was made of many independent states. They never became united and stayed this way as to what feels like the end of time. In earlier times this probably seemed like a good idea although later they realize that it is now. This separation made the region tremendously susceptible to attacks. The Mesopotamians apparently never heard the saying there is no I in team! Although, despite all of this separation the region worked together in order to do massive projects which included things like
The Egyptian and Mesopotamian religion and society were similar, but their government/leadership was different. Religion in Egypt and Mesopotamia were very similar because both faiths were polytheistic and had priestly authority. Both cultures had powerful priests, both had a belief of an afterlife, and religion was part of their daily lives. Both societies had similar rigid social classes, relied on slavery; both also had a religion which played an important role in their daily lives. Although, their societies were very common, they still had some differences in government. The Egypt, the government was a theocracy, whereas the government in Mesopotamia was run by a monarchy. Despite their similarities, the differences between these two civilizations were most likely a result of unique geographical and topographical conditions.
...xpect nor want historians to agree in their interpretations of the past, for then new discoveries would never be made and our knowledge would be limited. It is through this synthesis of knowledge and constant dialogue between historians that the most comprehensive representation of the Progressive Era, and ultimately history in general, is created.
Periodization is a concept that refers to how one’s training is broken down into discreet time periods called “macrocycles”, “mesocycles” and “mycrocycles”. The Periodization method, or cycling method, is commonly used by many athletes and bodybuilders alike. It is basically dynamic routine that forces you to work on both the fast-twitch fibers and the slow-twitch fibers. However, the common components that influence periodization are: frequency, intensity, duration and volume.
The ancient civilizations of Mesopotamia and Egypt began to develop circa 3,000 B.C. Located near rivers, the lands offered fertile soil and an excess of crops that drew in many people. As more people arrived, the small settlements flourished into large, thriving civilizations. Many aspects of Mesopotamia and Egypt, such as their cities, their strongly organized government, and their religion, greatly contributed to the success of these two civilizations.
Watkins, Jeffery. Regents Prep: Global History: Change & Turning Points:, "Neolithic Revolution." Last modified 2003. Accessed March 23, 2012. http://regentsprep.org/Regents/global/themes/change/neo.cfm
Processual Archaeology, was a movement in the archaeological field that began in the 1960‘s and changed the course of archaeology forever. Anthropologists such as Julian Steward were absolutely influential on many archaeologists and anthropologists during the early 1960s with his theories of cultural ecology which established a scientific way of understanding cultures as human adaption to the surrounding environment (Steward, 1955: 36-38). It was approaches such as Stewards that led eventually led to a rejection of culture-historical approaches to the archaeological record and propelled the ideas of cultural evolution and its reaction with the environment. This approach to cultural systems was essentially a rejection of the culture-historical approach of determinism by suggesting that the environment influences culture but is not a deterministic feature and that both culture and the environment were two separate systems that are dependent on each other for change (Steward, 1955: 36).
The Mesopotamian geography affected their society because Mesopotamia was located on an open plain without protection from foreign intrusions. Egypt, on the other hand, was centered on the Nile River ad protected by natural boundaries. This allowed Egypt?s kingdom for prosper and last for thousands of years. Mesopotamia was not considered a nation or country, it was considered a region between the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers that established a number of highly organized city-states. Since each city-state was independent there was no capital of Mesopotamia.
The study of archaeology today mixes various theoretical approaches and outlooks, many of which grew out of debates that took place during the second half of the twentieth century (from the 10950s). Before then many explanations of change were based on the hypothesis of diffusion and migration which is culture history. It was then in 1950s that then archaeologists became dissatisfied with these explanations which did clearly elaborate on how these changed, therefore to understand prehistoric societies new ways of thinking were formed. This then led to the arise of more archeological frameworks; post processual archaeology being one of them. Post processual archaeology which is also known as interpretive archaeology is a movement in archaeological
The accuracy of the documentation of past cultures, facts, rituals, and timeline of events