Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Consequences of the no child left behind act
No child left behind consequences
The aftermath of a nation at risk of no child left behind
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Consequences of the no child left behind act
Since the passing of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), legislators have been holding teachers accountable for the success of their students based upon reading and math scores. Last month President Obama signed The Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 ending the controversial NCLB era. Instead of having a national system judge teachers and schools, states are permitted to develop their own methods for judging school quality. However, states are still mandated to test students annually in math and reading in grades three through eight and once in high school and to publicly report the scores according to race, income, ethnicity, disability and whether students are English-language learners (Layton, 2015). Regardless of whether the federal …show more content…
“Pedagogical content knowledge is a special combination of content and pedagogy that is uniquely constructed by teachers and thus is the "special" form of an educator’s professional knowing and understanding” (Solis, 2009). This is not a novel idea. Lee Shulman, a teacher education researcher, reintroduced the term as he was interested in improving knowledge on teaching and teaching preparation. It was his belief that only developing broad pedagogical skills was inadequate for preparing content teachers just as was promoting education that stressed simply content knowledge (Solis, 2009). Shulman suggested key elements of pedagogical content knowledge including knowledge of representations of subject matter, understanding of students’ conceptions of the subject and the learning and teaching implications that were associated with the specific subject matter, general pedagogical knowledge which are teaching strategies or techniques. His definition of the knowledge base for teaching encompassed other elements: curriculum knowledge; knowledge of educational contexts, and knowledge of the purposes of education (Shulman, 1986). Without the appropriate teacher preparation, many new teachers feel overwhelmed and leave the profession. In the summary report “No Dream Denied: A Pledge to America’s Children” (2010), Ingersoll analyzed the results of a survey …show more content…
A teacher must first know the information in order to facilitate student learning. Most states have teacher subject matter tests, or teacher certification, in which teachers must prove he or she can pass a minimum level to be considered “highly qualified”. Dan Goldhaber examined the relationship between teacher testing and teacher effectiveness. By using a unique data set from North Carolina that linked teachers to individual students in grades three through six over a 10-year period (1994-95 through 2003-04), Goldhaber determined that a positive relationship between some teacher certification tests and student achievement existed (2007). In another study conducted in mathematics in New York City, Goldhaber concluded the “effects of teacher licensure on student achievement is greater than that of a content major in the field, suggesting that what licensed teachers learn in methods/education coursework/practice adds to their abilities in the classroom” (NCATE). Having content training helps ensure teacher effectiveness and student
This required each state to develop a set of standards that each child would need to know in math and reading. The NCLB also required almost all of the students to be tested annually throughout elementary and middle school grades (Webb, Metha, Jordan 2013). The act also strived that all students would test at a proficient level by 2014. The impact of this decision was that the government would be more involved than ever before in how a school taught, what the school taught, and the requirements of outcomes. The downside impact of this was that states changed the proficiency levels over the years and there has been inconsistent data given when reported. In a report with control groups it is shown that there were changes before and after implementation of the NCLB (Ladd 2010). With that information one could conclude that the act was successful and should be further pursued along with
Even with the negative and positive functions of No Child Left Behind, there are many areas that still need to ironed out. Under the Obama administration several states have received a waiver from No Child Left Behind, “with this waiver students will still be tested annually. But starting this fall, schools in those states will no longer face the same prescriptive actions spelled out under No Child Left Behind” (Feller & Hefling, 2012). Since 2007, the law has been up for review, but due to opponents of the law there has not been an agreement reached and the law continues to stress our schools and children out. We can only hope that when this law is reviewed and agreed upon that it really is in the best interest of our children and the nation as a whole.
Since the U.S. Congress passed the No Child Left Behind program, standardized testing has become the norm for American schools. Under this system, each child attending a school is required to take a standardized test at specific grade points to assess their level of comprehension. Parents, scholars and all stakeholders involved take part in constant discussions over its effectiveness in evaluating students’ comprehension, teachers’ competency and the effects of the test on the education system. Though these tests were put in place to create equality, experts note that they have created more inequality in the classroom. In efforts to explore this issue further, this essay reviews two articles on standardized testing. This essay reviews the sentiments of the authors and their insight into standardized examination. The articles provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that standardized tests are not effective at measuring a teacher’s competency because they do not take into account the school environment and its effect on the students.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) is currently the educational policy in the United States. Prior to NCLB the educational policies in effect were “A Nation at Risk, in 1987 America 2000, and a few years later with Goals 2000” (Eisner, 2001, p.21). No Child Left Behind is a test based accountability system used in schools to measure their performance holding the districts, administrators and teachers liable and accountable for the outcomes. Supovitz (2009) States that No Child Left Behind was a major reform initiative intended to bring about widespread improvements in student performance and reduce inequities between ethnic groups and other traditionally under-served populations like economically disadvantaged students, students from major racial
At a time of wide public concern about the state of education, the legislation sets in place requirements that reach into virtually every public school in America. The law emphasizes accountability, teacher quality, parent choice, improved teaching methods, and flexibility. (Correa) Strict requirements and deadlines have been set for states to expand the scope and frequency of student testing, revamp their accountability system and guarantee that every classroom is staffed by a ?highly qualified? teacher in his or her own subject area. (I ed) The plan also mandates annual student testing in reading and math by 2005, and requires all school districts to allow students in consistently low-performing schools to transfer to higher performing schools, at the districts expense. (Hull) From year to year, states are required to improve the quality of their schools. No Child Left Behind has expanded the federal ...
The purpose of this paper is to elaborate on the No Child Left Behind Act, and how the accountability of testing subgroup provisions may play a major role on the responsibilities of a student’ education. The paper also focuses on what information parents are receiving to actually know how their student(s) are performing in class and whether each student’s performance is within state compliance with NCLB.
“Making the Grade,” which was published in the Salt Lake Tribune in September of this year, is an article arguing the negative sides of the No Child Left Behind Act. Through this article, a majority of the discussion regarded the budgeting involved with NCLB. This article calls No Child Left Behind a “one-size-fits-all formula for improving education in America” (Making the Grade). According to President Bush, the NCLB Act is “’the cornerstone’ of his administration” (Salt Lake Tribune). Like with any legislation, however, come both positive and negative sides.
In 2002, President George W. Bush passed the “No Child Left Behind Act” which tied in schools’ public funding to standardized tests and enforced the tests in elementary and high schools every year by state education departments. This law also began to put more emphasize on standardized tests which has diminished our level of education and the law “made standardized test scores the primary measure of school quality” (Diane Ravitch 28). Bush hoped this law motivated more students to do well on these exams and teachers to help them prepare better, but it ended up hurting many schools in the process. These exams like the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) should not play such a prominent role in schooling and the government should not make tests the main focal point.
Bush on January 8, 2002 in Hamilton, Ohio and was the education standards for the next ten years. This act was designed to update the Elementary and Secondary Education Act that was put into effect in 1965 and to increase the federal government’s role in holding schools accountable for student success and failure. Democrats, Republicans, and the Bush administration signed this bill into law in hopes of advancing American competitiveness internationally and to close the gap between minority students and their advantaged peers. The minority groups that were specifically focused on were English-language learners, special education students, poor children, and children from ethnic minority households. This new act did not mandate the States to comply with its requirements but threatened to take away the state’s federal Title I money if it did not. No Child Left Behind demands schools to test students in grades third through eighth and once in high school in the subjects of math and reading and to report the results on the whole student population and of particular minority subgroups. The end goal was for the schools to bring all of their students, regardless of their minority status, to the proficient level on the state standardized test by the school year of 2013-14. Each state was able to decide what the proficient level looked like and which standardize test it wanted to
Columnist, Guest. "Test Scores and Teacher Competency." The Oregonian. Oregonlive.com, 4 Feb. 2010. Web. 18 Jan. 2014.
Jupp, B., & Education, T. (2009). What states can do to improve teacher effectiveness. K-12
It is expected that the profession of teaching embraces many qualities of any other professional practice. Teachers must possess a combination of many qualities beginning with a strong academic background and wide-ranging knowledge. The National Framework for Professional Standards for Teaching (2003) it is the knowledge of students, curriculum, subject matter, pedagogy, education – related legislation and the specifically teaching context that is the foundation on effective teaching, and a firm foundation on which to construct well educated judgments.
The state’s new evaluation system was in response to administrators who produced, “superficial and capricious teacher evaluation systems that often don't even directly address the quality of instruction, much less measure students' learning” (Toch, 2008). Too often, the “good-ol-boy” attitude would insure mediocre educators would remain employed. Realizing this was often more the rule then the exception, the governor created educational mandates to focus, “on supporting and training effective teachers to drive student achievement” (Marzano Center, 2013). Initially, they expected the school districts and the teachers would have issues and experience growing pains, but in the end the goal was, “to improve teacher performance, year by year, with a corresponding rise in student achievement” (Marzano Center, 2013).
The aim of education is to prepare students as contributing members in a productive society. The essential core values of knowledge, skills, critical thinking capability, and citizenship help students grow into adults who contribute positively to the community. I believe that education’s focus on teaching content matter leads to the development of well-rounded knowledge and skills in reading, writing, speaking, computing, thinking, science, and the social world in which we live. Specific content knowledge in these disciplines contributes to equity in education. Such knowledge becomes an internal asset for an individual and is priceless. Studen...
“…Content knowledge refers to the body of information that teachers teach and students are expected to learn in a given subject….Content knowledge generally refers to the facts, concepts, theories, and principles that are taught and learned…” (edglossary, August, 2013). In contrast, transfer refers to “the ability to learn in one situation and then to use that learning…in other situations where it is appropriate” (Hunter, 1971, p. 2). Moreover, both content knowledge and teaching for transfer are vital aspects in the learning process; especially when it comes to EL (English Learner) students. Thus, teaching core concepts to apply new skills becomes the ultimate goal for instructors.