Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of freedom of speech in higher education
Freedom of speech on campus
Freedom of speech on campus
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of freedom of speech in higher education
Free speech on college campuses has been a heavily debated topic in academia and in recent years it has made a comeback. There are many perspectives to the restriction and allowance of free speech. From the past court cases the rulings decided student’s speech can be punished if it disrupts school, is indecent, and if it is associated with the school. (Ross 176). However, this was in the case of high school students and during that time the court had ruled that there is a difference between a high school environment and a university environment. “In 1981, the Court declined to protect university students from religious messages because university students are young adults who are ‘less impressionable than younger students’” (Ross 176). Not …show more content…
Many college campuses adapt the use of speech codes to shield their students from vulgar and offensive language that reside in college campuses. The typical speech codes that are used on college campuses is to prevent the use of racial, sexist, and homophobic slurs. Speech codes originated from the regulation of fighting words on university campuses. The regulation originated from the Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire court case. However, this regulation was to prevent the use of offensive speech leading into violent actions. “…the doctrine as narrowed by the Supreme Court covers only speech that is likely to cause the listener to do violence…some campuses have sought to broaden its scope to include references to certain specified characteristics such as ethnicity or sexual orientation” (McGowan and Tangri 826). Speech codes on campuses not only apply to out of class events, but also in class work or assignments. In one case, a student wanted to discuss a controversial topic, but was afraid of violating speech codes. “Doe, who was also a teaching assistant, stated that he wanted to teach certain controversial theories positing biologically-based differences between sexes and races, but feared that doing so would make him liable to sanction under the policy” (McGowan and Tangri 832). This example demonstrates how the strict regulation of certain speeches affect a student’s opportunity to learn. So, why are speech codes enforced on college campuses? One of the main reasons why speech codes are enforced is to shield young adults from subjects that they could find
In her op-ed, "In College and Hiding From Scary Ideas", Shulevitz discusses the idea behind freedom of speech on college campuses and how safe spaces are snuffing it out. Shulevitz uses multiple examples of problems that have arisen because of safe spaces at universities such as Brown University, Columbia University, and Oxford 's University 's Christ Church college. Debate cancellations, essay opinions that caused protest, and other situations involving freedom of speech that Shulevitz uses to back up her opinion that safe spaces are nothing but harm to college campuses. According to Shulevitz Op-ed, safe spaces are nothing but an incubator that grows a festering amount of weak individuals who are destroying their social skills and developing
Imagine a time when one could be fined, imprisoned and even killed for simply speaking one’s mind. Speech is the basic vehicle for communication of beliefs, thoughts and ideas. Without the right to speak one’s mind freely one would be forced to agree with everything society stated. With freedom of speech one’s own ideas can be expressed freely and the follower’s belief will be stronger. The words sound so simple, but without them the world would be a very different place.
The purpose of this paper is to explore the topic of freedom of speech and free speech zones on college campuses. This paper will answer the questions: Why have so many Universities who protect academic freedom, retreat into fear of freedom? Are school officials afraid of debate and disagreement? Are they trying to keep people (outside the zone) from hearing words that may offend someone? These questions will be answered through analyses of previous court cases, journal articles and news articles.
In the United States, free speech is protected by the First Amendment in which it states, “Congress shall make no laws respecting an establishment of religion … or abridging the freedom of speech.” Now, nearly 250 years into the future, the exact thing that the Founding Fathers were afraid of is starting to happen. Today, our freedom of speech is being threatened through different forces, such as the tyranny of the majority, the protection of the minority, and the stability of the society. Now, colleges and universities in the United States today are also trying to institute a code upon its students that would bar them from exercising their right to speak freely in the name of protecting minorities from getting bullied. This brings us into
College campuses have always been the sites where students can express their opinions without fear. There have been many debates about the merits of allowing free speech on campus. Some students and faculties support allowing free speech on campus, while others believe that colleges should restrict free speech to make the college’s environment safer for every student. Free speeches are endangered on college campuses because of trigger warning, increasing policing of free speech, and the hypersensitivity of college students.
The Free Speech Movement protested the ban of on campus political activities and speeches. Thousands of students became involved in this protest and together they displayed how much power there was in student activism. In the fall of 1964, the Regents of the university enforced a new ban that blocked students from holding political activities at Sproul Plaza on Bancroft and Telegraph. This was unsettling to them because the Bancroft Strip was a key location that students occupied when trying to reach out, raise funds and speak up for what they believed in. Previous policies suggested that student life outside of the university wouldn't be tampered or interfered with, so this was an outrage to the students of UC Berkeley. When the regents took time to revise and tweak the ban, students were still unhappy with the decision, so a sit in at Sproul Hall was organized and it lasted for nearly 10 hours.
Earlier this month in April, student protestors rioted at Berkley University because they did not want certain Conservative guest speakers to be able to give speeches at the university due to some of the speakers comments being inappropriate. According to the nonprofit organization committed to defending civil liberties named The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), "One worrisome trend undermining open discourse in the academy is the increased push by some students and faculty to 'disinvite' speakers with whom they disagree from campus appearances" (The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education). While the protesters were practicing their first amendment right to petition, the students were infringing upon the Conservative speakers freedom of speech which is unconstitutional. Just because the protesters may have disagreed with the speakers comments, does not mean that theys hould have prevented them from being able to express them. This is similar to the novel 1984 because the protestors controlled and censored what was able to be said at Berkeley University, just like how in the novel the Thought Police controlled what citizens said just because The Party disagreed with certain perspectives and didn’t want certain information to be
Martin P. Golding, the writer of Campus Speech Issues, examines the difference between freedom of speech, which is an american right by the first amendment, compared to speech codes, which are implemented in university rules and regulations to monitor and police certain unsavory speech on school grounds.
On November 15th I attended the CHASS event, “Liberty in Peril: Threats to Free Speech on Campus”. I learned the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) was formed when political correctness was getting out of control on college campuses and it’s known for rating speech codes at colleges across the nation. I learned what speech codes are. Speech codes are punishments that apply if a student or faculty member says something on campus they’re not supposed to, but they can say it off campus without punishment. I discovered NCSU has a yellow speech code rating, which means we have at least one ambiguous policy that easily encourages administrative abuse and arbitrary application. Mr. Shibley explained the 6 groups of people that have political interference threatening free speech. Political interference comes from, administrators, the public, trustees, faculty, politicians, and students. What I noticed about myself was how little I knew about free speech cautions that students and professors need to have on college campuses and how many cases universities nationwide have handled regarding threats to free
I chose to examine the ways in which safe spaces, as well as trigger warnings and microaggressions, violate free speech on college campuses which led me to my question: Do safe spaces limit other students’ and professors’ rights to free speech? The article I originally read argued that safe spaces and the oversensitivity of students are limiting their academic growth. Oversensitivity is preventing professors from teaching or saying what they want, and safe spaces are keeping students from hearing the ideas of others, whether or not they agree with them. Three of the additional five sources I looked at had the same perspective. A common understanding between these sources was that “universities are, first and foremost, designed to encourage
Freedom of speech is the right to express or communicate an individual’s ideas, views and opinions without any obstructions or fear of punishment. It is not limited to speech alone, and includes written and other forms of communication such as freedom of press which gives one the right to question, criticize and voice their opinions. Freedom of speech (or expression) is a fundamental human right which is also recognized by the constitution of India.
“College campuses have become fascist colonies of anti-American hate speech, hypersensitivity, speech codes, banded words and prohibited scientific inquiry.” (Ann Coulter). Safe-space is a term used to show that an educator, instructive establishment or under study does not endure free speech as a result of students being over-sensitive or feel offended. Shockingly as a consequence of safe-spaces, free speech has become endangered and intolerable. A speech code is a principle and regulation that bans speech afar from the strict laws of speech, their function is to stop badgering, criticism, defamation, and hate speech. These types of codes are most commonly used in Universities and private companies. Unfortunately, these speech codes have thwarted the urge to seek truth as well as influenced academic freedom, made students’ self-censor themselves, made the youth more fragile and oversensitive.
Freedom of speech in the United States provides countless benefits; however, free speech can also be problematic if not controlled or if controlled too much. Even if a seemingly perfect balance between too much and too little control could be reached, problems would still exist. Freedom of speech works conjointly with freedom of the press. When freedom of the press is considered it becomes necessary to take into account the policies of other nations, since freedom of the press is a global issue.
The smell of freshly trimmed grass pervades the quad on campus while walking to a 9am class. A few birds spring from the winding pathways onto tall trees craning over bustling students. Flowers are beginning to bloom, and while on this stroll at a college that students are so proud of attending, something disrupts the tranquility. Screams and yells come from a group of raging students; trying to get past the rowdy crowd, they shove their opinions down your throat. But this is just another day at school that is becoming too familiar. As time goes on, free speech proves to be more disruptive than affective on college campuses.
Freedom of speech is the right given to every individual. Everyone has been given the right to speak their mind and share their opinions. This right is always important but in higher learning, it is essential. Without freedom of speech the whole idea of higher education would just be a contradiction. When an institute of higher education tries to resist this right the whole purpose of the institute becomes contradicted. One needs their right to freely speak their mind for higher education to be a successful venture. The right to free speech is essential in higher education because it gives the individual the chance to fearlessly be who they are, the mind substance to develop and, the opportunity to bring better ideas about.