Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How does socioeconomic status affect education essay
Relevance of sociology of education
How does socioeconomic status affect education essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How does socioeconomic status affect education essay
At certain point in our life, we go to school to learn. We don’t know why, but people told us it’s necessary and useful in our life. Being young, whatever someone said, we follow. We Sit in a classroom and listen to the teacher’s lecture for a few hours before some sort of break. Then we do the same thing again until school is over and we get go home. Althoug444h some might hate it, but school is one of the most important aspects of life. It doesn’t matter if one goes into a working class, middle class, professional class, or elite class school. We still are learning, but the materials we are taught is different according to the journal, “Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work” by Jean Anyon. The brain gets filled with knowledge from all the people around him/her. In the article, “The “Banking” Concept of Education”, Paulo Freire describes the brain as a storage device. Our brains are like a bank and we intake information from others and we store the information deep inside our brains. Whenever the information needs to be released, the brain will search for the information and deposit it into someone else’s brain. I agree with Freire that we are being taught these days by the “banking” concept. However, this banking concept limits our creativity.
The “banking” concept affects two social classes, which are the working class and the middle class schools. I enrolled in a middle class school were we all wrote down what the teacher said. Whatever they write on the board, we would copy down. During my senior year, last semester, I took an Economics class that took no work to pass the class. Our teacher, Mr. Adkins, would simply tell the students, “This is what we’re going to do in class today….” He list the topics out and it w...
... middle of paper ...
... “banking” concept is the way to go. Friere discuss the cons of the “banking” concept in his article and it really does damage our creativity and our aspects of the world. What can we do? We have to store the information that was deposited in our brain and question it. Why did I have to learn this? Can this information help me become successful in life? What happens if the information I was told is false? These questions will help one to be more careful when approaching the “banking” concept again. I certainly do not want to fall into this again as I seem to fail to see reality. Some people don’t care and will never get out of the “bank” approach. Those who do will be more creative and not only that, they will have more knowledge about the reality. Their knowledge and creativity will be limitless and will have no problem living their life on this world of mysteries.
Freire believes that the “more completely they accept the passive role imposed on them, the more they tend simply to adapt to the world as it is and to the fragmented reality deposited in them” (73). Percy claims that this dependency stems from the belief that “sovereignty [must be] surrendered to a class of privileged knowers” (54). Freire believes that due to this loss of sovereignty, the ones with authority attempt to “indoctrinate[e] them to adapt to the world of oppression” (78). Consequences begin to mount as students begin to mold into the world of oppression. Freire’s strongest belief is that, due to the banking system, a student simply becomes “the possessor of a consciousness: an empty ‘mind’ passively open to the reception of deposits of reality from the world outside” (75). This mentality causes students to become constricted thinkers, or mindless robots, only letting the engineer program predetermined ideas that the engineer deems them fit enough to know. “What has taken place,” claims Percy, “is a radical loss of sovereignty” among the students because in the way education is currently being utilized, educators perceive that knowledge can simply be placed into students, however, this method is sorely inhumane
The “banking” concept is one that is completely dependent upon the educational background and experiences of the teacher, and does not allow for feedback and open communication from the students that might vary from the already specified views of the society of the nation which the classroom is held in. Basically, the societal consensus and norms of a nation will dictate the views expressed and taught in the classroom. For example, the Puritans believed that if a woman could read she must be a consort with the devil even if she had only learned so she would be able to read the
Freire, Paulo. "The "Banking" Concept of Education." 1993. Ways of Reading: an Anthology for Writers. By David Bartholomae and Tony Petrosky. 9th ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martins, 2011. 323. Print.
Success. Society tends to correlate “success” with the obtainment of a higher education. But what leads to a higher education? What many are reluctant to admit is that the American dream has fallen. Class division has become nearly impossible to repair. From educations such as Stanford, Harvard, and UCLA to vocational, adult programs, and community, pertaining to one education solely relies on one’s social class. Social class surreptitiously defines your “success”, the hidden curriculum of what your socioeconomic education teaches you to stay with in that social class.
It will deal instead with such vital questions as whether Roger gave green grass to the goat, and insist upon the importance of learning that, on the contrary, Roger gave green grass to the rabbit. The "humanism" of the banking approach masks the effort to turn women and men into automatons -- the very negation of their ontological vocation to be more fully human. – Paulo Freire” This is just as if students were being taught 2+2=4 in class but when it came to the pop quiz or the test the questions would say something like “If john had 2 cars and bought 7 goats how many bananas does he have?” and then everyone in the class is looking at the paper very confused because this is not what was taught in class. The teacher is sticking to a script strictly out of the book that they were given. So when 90% of the class fails and the teacher is very upset because they got in trouble because their fail numbers are so high they take it out on the students. But the teacher is only going out of the book and the students are only receiving what is being taught to
... that a “banking” education is not the better choice for obtaining an education. He does not present both options and allow or encourage the reader to form their own opinions. The style of his writing is direct and straightforward as opposed to analytical. By analyzing Freire’s essay, one can assume that Freire received a “banking” education based on the way he has written his essay. This is another example of how the style of education you receive affects your life and relationships.
One teacher may adopt the banking concept while the other may utilize the problem-posing concept. However, while problem-posing education generates creativity by giving students the ability to communicate, banking education does not. Freire asserts that in the “banking” concept of education, “the teacher chooses the program content, and the students (who were not consulted) adapt to it” (217). Freire indicates that students, who are victims of banking education, have no control over how an instructor chooses to teach. Therefore, creativity is destroyed by the fact that it was not even permitted in the first place. Students are not able to express their opinions or solve problems using their own methods because in order to pass the class, students not only need to adapt to the teaching style of their professors but think like them too. Freire’s quote relates to experiences I have had with “banking” teachers throughout my twelve years of formal education. Those teachers only taught using textbooks, therefore, they insisted that the textbook was always right. If I were to solve a math problem using a technique different from the book, then I would not get points for the problem even though my answer was right. And if I were to interpret an open-ended essay different from how my teacher would then my interpretations would be wrong. By doing this, my teachers destroyed my creativity. I was prohibited from my own thoughts and penalized if I expressed them. The only alternative for me was to become a “robot” that followed the orders of authorities, but being a “robot” was not something I was ashamed of. In fact, my role as a “robot” led me to better understand the “drama of Education” in which teachers attempt to “regulate the way the world ‘enters into’ the students”. I was able to figure out that my own teachers had tried to handle the way the world “entered into me” by
The banking concept is “ a gift bestowed by those who consider themselves knowledgeable upon those who they consider to know nothing'; (Freire 213). The goal of the ‘banking’ concept is to deposit as much information into the students as possible. This results in disconnected memorization without the real understanding and discouragement of creative thought.They cannot think for themselves. As Marx writes, just as there are two types of learning, ‘banking’ and problem-posing, he explains that society is this way also. There is the upper class and subordinate classes. They both struggle for economic and political power and the primary way the upper class keeps its power is through their beliefs and values. They are allowed to think. The subordinate classes believe they are subordinate due to the upper classes prestige and way of thinking. Like Freire’s ‘banking’ concept, education is the way to keep students down and this works because the students accept all knowledge from the teacher, just like the dominant class in Marx’s ideology, keeps the subordinate classes submissive.
The decision of Brown vs. Board affected education nationally in 1954 by dismantling racism in schools. For this reason, segregation did not produce affirmative results for implementing equal opportunity in society. Citizens of the United States should receive a suitable education regardless of an individual’s race or class. Unfortunately, society is continuing separation because of the injustice of race and the location of poverty stricken individuals by not upholding a certain stature. “Compounding and reinforcing this educational inequality is the startling socioeconomic inequality and residential segregation in the United States” (Rist 4). Isolation of African American, Hispanic, and other minorities are affected because of their lack of prosperity, and it continues to influence society negatively by reducing the equality and opportunity to succeed. Race and class are the main issues of concern affecting education’s infrastructure; to change this misfortune, people will have to stand to fight for proper education within the United States and not depend on the government. Education is being affected by the lack of proper parenting skills, scarce economic resources in school systems, and society’s misinterpretation of individual’s environment affecting learning capabilities.
Since the beginning of time, social class and race have been paramount in society. Back in the time of caveman, roles and traditions were passed down based on gender. The man was responsible for protection and collecting food while women were responsible for cooking and keeping house. That belief has traversed time and slowly changes with each era. But throughout history, men and women have lived with preconceived notions of their duties to their families. These notions have been passed down generations and have affected how people live within their society. In the novel “Like Water for Chocolate”, social class is revered in the story of the De la Garza family. As we see through the personal journey of Tita, the main character, these distinctions are evident.
The education system has been a controversial issue among educators. Requirements of school do not let students choose what they want to study for their future. It’s a big issue to force students to study specific curriculums, which don’t help them improve, and what they like to create. Educators choose a general system of education for all students based on general knowledge. Intelligent or genius students have to be in that system of education, which doesn’t let them improve their creativity.
The Relationship Between Social Class and Educational Achievement Many sociologists have tried to explore the link between social class and educational achievement, measuring the effects of one element upon the other. In order to maintain a definite correlation between the two, there are a number of views, explanations, social statistics and perspectives which must be taken into account. The initial idea would be to define the key terms which are associated with how "social class" affects "educational achievement." "Social class" is the identity of people, according to the work they do and the community in which they live in. "Educational achievement" is the tendency for some groups to do better or worse in terms of educational success.
Social class assumes different definitions based on an individual’s view on the topic. The definition may take the 20th Century assumption of sociological strata and one portrayed by the imperialist understanding of class. The sociological perspective of social class highlights an individual’s or group’s classification, as well as their position in societal standing, as predetermined by history, economy, and the role that they are expected to play as a result of being in that stratum (Jereb and Ferjan 155). While social class may take different interpretations, the interpretation adopted in this study is that of social strata that one occupies in a socially stratified society. The argument here is that social class is increasingly becoming less important in our society.
Before I read the chapter on social class, I thought social class was a category about people who are put into class by how much money they make; you are either poor or rich. However, there is much more regarding social class than I had originally thought. Social class it separated into a four tier criteria. Beginning at the bottom is the “lower class”, or “underclass” which is referred to by poverty, homeless, and unemployment. This class, usually hasn’t finished high school, doesn’t have medical care and can’t afford sufficient housing. Many people mischaracterize these poor people as mothers who abuse the welfare system by baring several babies that they can’t afford and fathers who are able to work but do not due to drug addiction or their
Social class has a major influence over the success and experience of young people in education; evidence suggests social class affects educational achievement, treatment by teachers and whether a young person is accepted into higher education. “34.6 per cent of pupils eligible for free school meals (FSM) achieved five or more A*-C grades at GCSE or equivalent including English and mathematics GCSEs, compared to 62.0 per cent of all other pupils” (Attew, 2012). Pupils eligible for FSM are those whose families earn less than £16,000 a year (Shepherd, J. Sedghi, A. and Evans, L. 2012). Thus working-class young people are less likely to obtain good GCSE grades than middle-class and upper-class young people.