Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How does scientific development affect society
The impact of technological advancement on literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Over the past few decades, society has been ceaselessly advancing in the field of science. From smartphones to genetic modification, humans have been consistently developing new technologies. But how often have we stopped to consider the future implications these technologies can bring? While they generate profit, technology can also unevenly distribute wealth as a result of this profit. In the novel “Oryx and Crake”, Atwood shows the possible economic aftermath of an uncontrolled scientific journey that leads to the downfall of the human race through examples such as genetically modified crops, synthetic diseases, and miracle pills. On example of scientific advancement in the novel is the genetically modified coffee bean: Happicuppa. Atwood writes: “Until then, the individual coffee beans on each bush had ripened at different times and had needed to be handpicked and processed and shipped in small quantities, but the Happicuppa coffee bush was designed so that all of its beans would ripen simultaneously, and coffee could be grown …show more content…
Even though scientific advancement can improve living conditions and solve global issues, it can create them as well. As seen through the genetic modification of coffee beans, the creation of profitable diseases, and the development of the BlyssPluss Pill, the profits generated through technology trigger human greed. This greed leads to extreme capitalism that feeds the economic gap of society and puts the world in control of gigantic corporations. The growth of technology is only beneficial up to a certain extent, otherwise it could lead to catastrophic results through misuse. Atwood’s novel can serve as a warning against intense scientific progression. We as a society must heed that warning to control the potentially destructive technology civilization is so eager to
Atwood takes many of today’s potential scientific developments and illustrates the worst possible outcome of what may happen if we continue the unregulated pursuit of knowledge. In reality, the scientific advances of today will yield a higher standard of living for the majority of the world tomorrow. We will continue to push for the best in everything including science, medicine, and technology; we will not allow any single person to make the sole decision to develop an idea. Scientific progression will save many lives; therefore, it should and will always be there for us.
In the technology driven society of Fahrenheit 451, where books are banned and everyone’s favorite pastime is the mindless task of watching T.V, it is rare for anyone to have any intellectual curiosity. However, pale skinned Clarisse is different. She has a different view on society and is a breath of fresh air to fireman Guy Montag. Clarisse acts as a window to the path of knowledge and understanding to Montag and opens his mind to the idea of books and intellectual awareness.
Have you ever sat at a table surrounded by friends whose eyes were glued to their phones? According to ABC News, kids spend an average of seven and a half hours on technology and only 38 minutes of reading in a day. In Ray Bradbury’s novel, Fahrenheit 451, the society is very similar to ours. Technology has taken over and has made society very closed minded. People are unwilling to remove their eyes from large TV screens to see why things happen, and to notice all the little things in life that make it worth living. Without open-mindedness and curiosity, society would corrupt like in Fahrenheit 451, all because of an overuse of technology. Technology causes society to become a dystopia and once the society is one, there comes a point where you cannot reverse it. Bradbury emphasizes the importance of paying attention to the world and what happens when you become addicted to technology.
Predictions can be made by looking at the patterns that occur in history. One pattern that takes place in many years of the past is the idea of eugenics. Margaret Atwood discusses the topic of “eugenics, which is about encouraging and increasing the reproduction of healthy humans and decreasing the reproduction of people with genetic defects” (Au Par 1). Crake, also known as Glenn, is one of the main characters of her book. He turns from a brilliant teenager to mad scientist, proposing the idea of the Paradice project. “Paradice” is the dome where Crake completes his work; he creates the BlyssPluss pill and the Crakers. He plans to give out his killer BlyssPluss Pill, and replace the flawed humans with the ideal and immortal Crakers. This concept in history is first seen in Charles Darwin’s belief of “survival of the fittest,” where in nature, the stronger animals continue to exist; however, the weak do not. Hitler, taking Darwin’...
Technology is supposed to be seen as such an advancement and great accomplishment. What others may not always know is sometimes it isn’t all fun and games, it could be dangerous. As seen when we created the atomic bomb and guns, their only purpose is to destroy and cause pain to others. Although they are not always in use they are a constant threat to our well being. We need to take into consideration the positives and the negatives of the technology we create now in present day. Many people change their position on this overarching question: What responsibility do people have when developing new technology? In the texts “Frankenstein” by Mary Shelley, “the Immortal life of Henrietta Lacks” by Rebecca Skloot, and “De-Extinction” answers the questions that it may impose. Each of these texts share one same belief: Society holds
The further science advances, the more complex the ethical dilemmas in this field become. We often view scientific advancements, particularly in relation to our health, as beneficial. Health care involving stem cells or other cutting edge technology can save lives. However, although these advances are made with a noble goal in mind and can be advantageous, they do not come without consequences. Margaret Atwood uses diction in her dystopian novel “Year of the Flood” to address the ethical dilemmas that arise in the interaction between scientific advances, healthcare, the environment, and human nature to provide a modern perspective of a dystopian world.
Many people believe that being very technologically advanced is the best thing for society, but not many people know that technology can also be the worst thing for society. In the novel A Brave New World, by Aldous Huxley, technology is shown as a harmful thing. Having too much technology is potentially harmful as shown through the use Soma, the reproduction process in the world state, and the World State's method of determining social class.
He is concerned that humans will lose their individuality and lose who they are. He also fears that humans will lose the ability to think deeper than the surface. Technology has a huge impact on the human race according to Gladwell and Carr; they argue that technology is supposed to be a positive thing to this generation, and even the future, but technology is actually impacting us in a negative way. We have lost so many things due to the advancements in technology that we have made over the years. These losses include the ability to use technology efficiently and the loss of human connection. They also provide recommendations about what they think their peers can do to fix this mess they believe in.
In today's world, technology is constantly changing from a new paperclip to an improvement in hospital machinery. Technology lets people improve the way they live so that they can preserve their own personal energy and focus on the really important factors in life. Some people focus their energy on making new innovations to improve transportation and the health of people that may save lives and some people focus on making new designs of packaging CDS. Technology is significant in everyone's life because it rapidly changes what is in the market. But, some new innovations of technology are ridiculous because they serve no purpose in helping mankind.
The situations of technological flaws he chose as his examples added integrity to his arguments as well as proved his thesis. The author was skilled at explaining these examples profusely, thus further educating the readers and making them aware of how innovation can turn horribly wrong. One of Suzuki’s significant examples was the use of the DDT insecticide. The sole purpose of this chemical compound’s use was to kill malaria-carrying mosquitoes in hope of saving lives of those living in tropical climate countries. Although DDT did assist many, its use created more harm and damage than good. Evidently, that was not the goal of this insecticide; it was created to be helpful and to provide in a difficult circumstance. However, its side effects unmistakably cancel out any beneficial aspects it might have had. This example clearly illustrates the negative impacts technology has had on humanity. Another example Suzuki decided to put forth is the use of the oral contraceptive. Many overlook issues technology creates; they are too preoccupied with the benefits, it is all anyone can see! The oral contraceptive has undoubtedly helped countless women worldwide. However, as the author states in his essay, “ It was only after millions of healthy, normal women had taken the pill for years that epidemiologists could see negative effects. No amount of pretesting could have
“… and yet a true creator is necessity, which is the mother of invention.” (Plato 390c). It’s this ‘need’ that fueled are inventions and innovations to reduce the difficulty of all those scenarios deemed impossible. Over the centuries, mankind has progressed by leaps and bound. Starting from being cavemen who hunted animals by sticks and stones to survive, mankind is now able to live luxurious life with well-built homes, stable food and water supply and efficient communication and travel methods. Just picturing the Stone Age and our current lives side by side will make us realize how technology has changed our society. It has changed how we produce our food, communicate with others and how we travel.
There is no escape from technology. In most cases this is not a problem though. Many people respect and admire technology because it is there to benefit them. Without the technological advances we have had over the years, the world would not be what it is today. What people don’t understand is that technology can actually be a bad thing. In society today, people are looking for more and more ways to be entertained, and all it is doing is causing problems. People are doing less and less thinking and more and more watching, listening, and playing, all because of technology.
In the early years of biotechnology,amateur biotechnologists, had no idea their ideas would snowball into incredible modern discoveries. Early discoveries included the processes of fermentation, pasteurization, and zymotechnology. The products of these processes are wine, cheese, and beer; all of which contributed significantly to the gross national product of their respective countries. However, it wasn’t until the discovery of the structure of DNA by Watson and Crick in 1953, that genetics and biotechnology would be linked together to explain so many of these discoveries.
Now, as I bash technology for some of its downfalls, I am still reminded about its benefits for medicine, and transportation. Isn’t that kind of progress beneficial for our civilization? Again the answer is, well, yes and no. Sure, we can get from point A to point B faster, but we pollute the environment and rely heavily on nonrenewable resources, which we can’t afford in the long run. I foresee my generation having to confront this. I see myself using new technologies, but, like Gomez-Pena, continuing to maintain balance, and staying grounded in a less “virtual” world.
Technology – as defined by the US National Academy of Science (cited in Jones 1996, p.17) –