Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The relation between God and man
Essay on slavery in the old testament
Practice of slavery in new testament times
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The relation between God and man
The Evolution of the Relationship of Man and God(s)
The relationship between god(s) and human beings is very ambiguous, and thus can become very complicated. Through analyzing early world literature, such as, the Hebrew Scriptures, the New Testament, and the Qur’an, this paper will work to frame the evolution of the relationship between god(s) and human beings. All of these scriptures have eternal moral principles recurrent to god(s) relationship to mankind. The narrators write from an omniscient perspective, writing even god’s inner thoughts.
In 1500 B.C.E., Israel was caught in between the Egyptians and Mesopotamians struggle for power over Palestine. During 900-100 B.C.E Israel’s great poets, priests, and prophets wrote the Hebrew Scriptures, a collection of religion, literature, and history (Book1 page 131). Sometime between 1500-1300 B.C.E. the Hebrew people were exiled from Israel, and while travelling southward, were enslaved by the Egyptians (Book 1 page 134). The scriptures tell the stories of the creation of the world, the creation of man and woman, the flood, and first murder, the exodus, to name a few. Originally the scriptures were written in Hebrew and later translated
…show more content…
to other languages. The Hebrew Scriptures are included in the Bible, or biblia in Greek, meaning “little books.” The scriptures are compromised of thirty-nine books and are the basis for the religions of Christianity, Judaism, and Islam. And is the most influential book in the Western World. The Hebrew Scriptures includes some of the earliest stories about the relationship formed between god and man. In the The Hebrew Genesis; The Flood, Chapter 6:1-3, 5-8, god is described as upset, a human characteristic associated with God that is done throughout the text. “When mankind began to increase and to spread all over the earth and daughters were born to them, the sons of the gods saw that the daughters of men were beautiful; so they took for themselves such women as they chose. […] When the Lord saw that man had done much evil on earth and that his thoughts and inclinations were always evil, he was sorry that he had made man on earth, and he was grieved at heart. He said, ‘This race of men whom I have created, I will wipe them off the face of the earth –man and beast, reptiles and birds. I am sorry that I ever made them.’” The flood story, describes god(s) reaction to the turmoil of man on earth. “The sons of gods,” is plural implying there is more than one god, polytheism. It seems that god was not happy with man and angry even. The term “god” can be defined as the “creator or ruler or the universe and source of all moral authority” (Webster Dictionary). Mankind was not living up to the expect-ations that god had in mind, thus making him upset. While having an inner conversation, god decides that he will use his moral authority, and power, and do away with all “the evil on earth,” by “wiping them off the face of the earth.” It seems god is so angry with man he wants to start over with a new race of mankind and wipes all others out, hoping the new race will evolve and have a better understanding of their role in respect to god. Here in the flood book, man disappoints god and god shows no mercy for the evil inclinations of man. Later in the book god floods the earth and leaves only one man alive, Noah, The Hebrew Genesis; The Flood, Chapter 8:20-21. “Then Noah built an alter to the LORD. He took ritually clean beasts and birds of every kind, and offered whole-offerings on the alter. When the LORD smelt the soothing odor, he said within himself…” Here “god” is also referred to as “lord,” both words mean supreme authority in this context. Showing god is sovereign. This is acknowledged after the flood subsided and Noah thanked god and offered him beasts. Again, we are reminded that the lord’s identity is made up of some human characteristics. God could smell, making him relatable to the people. This is also a recurring theme, in the preceding story of Cain and Abel; Abel gave the lord the first born of his flock, making the lord happy. This defined what sacrifices god liked and would show favor. In the scripture we see how Noah was earnest in his faith, and followed the lord’s guidance when he was told to build the ark and gather the creatures. This made the lord happy and he states, “Never again will I curse the ground because of man, however evil his inclinations may be from his youth upward. I will never again kill every living creature, as I have just done.” This gives mankind faith in god, if you praise god and do good, god will spare you. This opened the lord’s eyes, and he no longer thought of all men as evil, but now knew that his creation of mankind, could live up to his expectations, if first provided with guidance and principles. The Hebrew Genesis; The Ten Commandments, Chapter 20:3, lays the foundation for the principles mankind must live by in order to be seen as righteous to the lord. “You shall have no other god to set against me. You shall not make a carved image for yourself nor the likeness of anything in the heavens above, or on the earth below, or in the waters under the earth. You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the LORD your God, am a jealous god.” This is a very important turning point in the relationship between god and man. The first point that can be made from this scripture is that there was now to be the belief of only one god. Which was a change in how the ancient Egyptians saw themselves and ruled their dynasties. The influence of the early Egyptian Pharaoh Akhenaten, who ruled over the 18th dynasty in Egypt from 1352-1338 B.C.E., is evident is this text, concerning the evolving relationship between man and god. Akhenaten created the concept of monotheism, worshiping one deity, or god. The second point that can be made, is that god is making a clear distinctions between himself and other deities or worship. God, again, is portrayed as showing human characteristics of jealousy, relating to mankind. Here god sets his expectations of man. The people of the ancient Hebrew society believed if a man lived righteous they would live in the kingdom of heaven in their afterlife. In order to live righteous a man must lived by the principles of the Ten Commandments. Going forward god make sure his expectations were clear, if man kept faith, like Noah, he would protect them. During great turmoil in Israel these scriptures gave society faith in something greater, something sovereign. As society progress from the ancient world, and Christianity expanded across the Near East, there was a need to revise the current Hebrew Scriptures and create The New Testament. The roman Emperor Constantine, gave Christians his protection and in 330 C.E. he built the Eastern imperial Capital in Constantinople, on the southern edge of the Black Sea, in the Mediterranean. Since the books of the Hebrew Scriptures, was taken as a literal representation of a convent between Jews, Moses, and God, symbolizing god’s favoritism of Jews it needed to become inclusive. Written in 50 C.E., beginning with Paul’s early letters, was completed in less than a century. The New Testament is a book comprised of five sections. The first section tells the story of the life and death of Jesus, the apostles, and the missionary activities of the fifth decade of the first century. It would be more inclusive to all of mankind, “meeting the growing need in these early churches for historical, ethical and theological documents” (Book2, Page 23). The moral principles outlined in The New Testament would not only enforce the eternal moral principles, but there would be new principles outlined by Jesus when he gives the sermon on the mountaintop. The New Testament: The Sermon on the Mount, Matthew 5:1-2 “When he saw the crowds of people he went up on the mountain. There he seated himself, and when his disciples had come up to him, he opened his lips to teach them and he said…” We don’t exactly who makes up the “crowds of people,” but we can assume the people are from Jerusalem, and near by.
The absence of a description of the crowd makes it inclusive to all. Now any man can relate to the text. These new principles outlined by Jesus are the foundation of Christian worship today and expresses a new covenant between god and all of mankind. Here Jesus is speaking to the people; god is no longer directly talking to mankind. This indicates another shift in the relationship between man and god. God now decides who he feels is worthy of receiving his knowledge, only a prophet. Jesus, portrayed as a prophet, is enlightening the people to god’s commands. Here he gives his own words merit and power by enforcing god’s original Ten Commandments (Matthew
5:17,38-39). “Do not suppose that I have come to do away with the Law or the Prophets. I have not come to do away with them but to enforce them… You have heard that they were told, ‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.’ But I tell you not to resist injury, but if anyone strikes you on your right cheek, turn the other to him too.” Here Jesus is telling the crowd to be forgiving and tolerant of others. With the spreading of Christianity, there was a need to incorporate acceptance for others. If the goal was to spread, the relationship between god and mankind needed to grow too. The New Testament was written in Greek, the language of commerce in the Near East. This way many could read it and embrace the message sand morals. Christianity was thieving under the Roman Empire. Although god seemed to be physically distancing himself from mankind, he was getting spiritually closer and more people were practicing faith. In Mecca, a different perspective of the Hebrew Scriptures was coming to fruition, with the creation of the Qur’an. Islam, a new religion, would be lead by the prophet Muhammad (c. 570-632 B.C.E.), and the Qur’an would be come the holy bible of Islam. The Qur’an is a compilation of biblical dreams the prophet Muhammad had over a period of 22 years (610-632 C.E.). Muhammad a man that couldn’t read or write had Zaid Ibn Thabit, his secretary, transcribed it in for him. This was done during 651-562 C.E., and was written in Arabic, known in Islam as god’s true laguage. Muhammad created the religion of Islam and fought to expand and protect it. (Book2, Page 100). The fight for expansion, jihad, went on for 100 years after Muhammad’s death. Due to the spread of Islam the idea of one god was important and needed to be enforced. We see that in this in Sura 96 of the Qur’an. The Qur’an: Sura 96:1-5, 112:1,4 “Recite in the name of your Lord who created –created man from clots of blood. Recite! Your Lord is the Most Bountiful One, who by the pen taught man what he did not know. Indeed, man transgresses in thinking himself his own master: for to your Lord all things return… Say ‘God is One, the Eternal God. He begot none, nor was He begotten. None is equal to Him.’” Here Muhammad is speaking and in enforcing the belief of one gold, monotheism. He is also denies that Jesus, as believed by Christian and Jews, is god’s son, as noted in the New Testament. He states that man has forgotten who has the sovereign power. This is change in the relationship witnessed in earlier ancient texts. Although incorporating beliefs and principles from the Hebrew Scriptures, The Qur’an aims to expand upon it. This book reminds man that god is everlasting and eternal, and has taught man all he knows. For without the relationship with god, man would be nonexistent. It is evident god’s relationship with mankind has evolved over time. From mankind having a direct relationship with god, to having a distant, more spiritual, relationship with god. The relationship between mankind and god as presented through the Hebrew Scriptures, the New Testament, and the Qur’an, is complicated and ambiguous. But one conclusion can be made, the same eternal moral principles are evident throughout these books, lead a righteous path and follow the principles put forth by god in the scriptures and you shall live in the Kingdom of Heaven, beside god.
The four fundamental claims of the Catholic Intellectual Tradition, Human beings exist in a relation to a triune God, God’s presence in the world is mediated through nature and reality, faith and reason are compatible, the dignity of the human being is inviolable and therefore the commitment to justice for the common good is necessary. However, the great books in the Catholic Intellectual tradition show that they represent these fundamental claims in a broad distinctive way. This essay will show that these readings better represent one of the fundamental claims, human beings exist in a relation with a triune God, from the view point of three great books from the bible, Genesis, Exodus and the Gospel of Matthew. The Bible clearly supports the
In the first chapter of God Behaving Badly, David Lamb argues that God is unfairly given a bad reputation. He claims these negative perceptions are fueled by pop culture and lead many to believe the lie that the God of the Old Testament is angry, sexist, racist, violent, legalistic, rigid, and distant. These negative perceptions, in turn, affect our faith. Ultimately, Lamb seeks to demonstrate that historical context disproves the presumptuous aforementioned. In addition, he defends his position by citing patterns of descriptions that characterize God throughout the Old Testament. “Our image of God will directly affect how we either pursue or avoid God. If we believe that the God of the Old Testament is really harsh, unfair and cruel, we won’t want anything to do with him” (Lamb 22). Clearly, they way Christians choose to see God will shape their relationship with Him.
Throughout many of Paul’s letters there are many debates pertaining to the authorship, destination, date, and the purpose. In the book of Ephesians many scholars debate on the authorship and if Paul actually wrote the letter, or if it was a scribe. Although there are some debates on whether Paul actually wrote it or not, he does refer to himself twice in the letter. In 1:1 and in 3:1 Paul states himself, 1:3 states, “For this reason, I Paul, the prisoner of Christ Jesus for the sake of you Gentiles” (NIV) In verse 1:3 Paul states that he is a prisoner, therefore it is debated that he did not specifically write this because he was imprisoned in Rome at this time. According to Wallace “This, of course, is not to say that the letter must be by Paul, but it is to argue that without such internal testimony, no such claim could be made” (Wallace). Many scholars also debate on the vocabulary usage and the structure of the letter. Some believe that the structure is similar, but the vocabulary seems to be different than his New Testament epistles. Hoehner claims that,” Though the book has a close affinity with Colossians, critics claim that Ephesians is uncharacteristic of Paul” (Hoehner 613). The destination of Ephesians is somewhat debated, but many do believe that the letter was sent to the church of Ephesus. “Some to claim that Ephesus is a better starting point, others suggest Caesarea.” (Wallace) Although this is an argument that has many valid points, it is obvious that Paul was imprisoned in Rome while he wrote Ephesians. It is said by Hoehner that “Ephesians was probably delivered by Tychicus (Eph. 6:21-22), who also took Paul’s letter to Colossians (Col. 4:7-9)” (Hoehner 613). As for the date goes m...
The Old Testament and the Bible itself has been studied extensively for centuries. Archeologists and Scholars have labored and pondered over texts trying to decipher its clues. It does not matter how many times the Old Testament has been studied there will always be something new to learn about it or the history surrounding it. In the book Reading the Old Testament: an Introduction, the author Lawrence Boadt presents us with a few different authors of the Old Testament that used different names for God and had a unique insight into the texts. These four sources are titled P for priests, E for Elohim, J for Jehovah, and Y for Yahweh (95). These four unique sources help us realize that there is more than one author of the Pentateuch. These authors took the text and adapted for their culture. This independent source is used by scholars to help gain insight into what was behind the texts of the bible so we are not left with an incomplete picture of what went into the creation of the bible. Julius Wellhausen used these four sources to publish a book to able us to better understand the sources and to give it credibility with the Protestant scholars at the time (Boadt 94). These sources that is independent of the bible as in the DVD Who Wrote the Bible? and the Nova website aide in shedding light on the history that surrounded the writers who wrote the text and what inspired them to write it in the first place. The DVD shows the discovery of The Dead Sea Scrolls and the extensive history of the texts and all its sources in an effort to try to find exactly who wrote the bible (Who Wrote). These scrolls have aided scholars immensely by giving us some of the oldest known manuscripts of the bible in the world today. It shows that the bible w...
People who practice the Abrahamic faiths of Judaism, Christianity and Islam collectively comprise over one half of the world’s population, and while disparities between these three religions are widely spread and politicized, the similarities between their religious texts outweigh their differences. A crucial similarity between these three religions is their view on Abraham as their spiritual patriarch (lecture). The Koran makes use of both the Tanakh and the New Testament, and while minor differences exist between these texts, the perspectives they share are far more significant. The Koran retains many of the core ideas found in the Tanakh and the New Testament, specifically in regards to the perception of Abraham, the status of God, and the role of women. Any religious text can be interpreted in any number of ways, and while it is easy to pull apart texts of different faiths and dissect the differences, finding common ground and similarities is arguably more important.
There are several Egyptian documents that not only mention the Israelites in their texts, but also tie the Bible to historical facts. Egyptian documents such as the Tell el-Amarna letters, a large “stele” of the Menephtah, and the Elephantine papyri not only tell the history of Egypt, they also coincide with biblical scripture. The documents confirm not only dates, certain numbers, and rituals, such as circumcision, but places and event, e.g. The Exodus, of biblical stories.
...n. For years they had been subject to the wrath of the Egyptians. Now that the Hebrew people were no longer secondary in society, they produced writing in which they were the focus of attention instead of some other being or beings.
The “Confessions” by Saint Augustine and “Hayy ibn Yaqzan” by Ibn Tufayl are two significant works in religious and philosophical literature. Protagonists of these stories are similar in the way that they both found God, but each in different way. Augustine leads an unexamined life full of sins, while Hayy reflects on the aspects of life and the divine things. Despite the different religious belongings of two protagonists, Christian God and Islamic Necessary Being have much in common: they both have a neo-platonic conceptions, and they both have their Laws, for violation of which they can punish. The neo-platonic conceptions of God and Necessary Being are in their unity, absence of multiplicity, in their positions, and their power.
The divine command theory is an ethical theory relating to God and how his commandments should guide the morality of humankind. Objections to this theory include objections to the nature or existence of God or to the nature of his character or commands. For the purposes of this paper, I will present the divine command theory, introduce a serious objection evident in Genesis 22, propose and explain an alternative to the divine command theory that is the divine will theory, explain why this theory avoids the objection, and critique and respond from the perspective of a divine will theorist.
The book of Hebrews is a unique portion of the Bible because it is written as though it were a letter, directed at people the writer may have known. However, the book targets a seemingly broad audience of those without faith and also those that could be described as believers that have experienced persecution. A salient message within Hebrews is that people must persevere when they feel persecuted because Jesus Christ is their salvation, regardless of anything else that is happening in the people’s lives. An emphasis on the greatness of Jesus and his role as a mediator between God and those on Earth is dominant throughout the chapters and verses.
Many people state that they do not believe in any kind of god, that the world simply came into existence. However, this belief cannot hold true. Simply by examining nature and all of its intricate details, people stand unable to deny the presence of a Creator. Deep down, people cannot help but to feel that something greater than themselves exists. A Supreme Being- a god, but what kind of god exists? A god similar to Ares, the war-god of the Greeks? One who lusts for blood and destruction? Or a placid god, one parallel to Eirene, the Greek goddess of peace? Fabricated by mankind, these so called “gods” all bear flaws. The Bible, the Word of the Lord, remains the only book on earth that gives an account of the true God and His attributes. Through examination of the Word, readers will come to the realization that a just God exists, that He sends trials to his followers to develop their faith, and that He remains sovereign.
Answering these questions is the purpose of this essay. I begin by arguing that the Bible cannot be adequately understood independent of its historical context. I concede later that historical context alone however is insufficient, for the Bible is a living-breathing document as relevant to us today as it was the day it was scribed. I conclude we need both testimonies of God at work to fully appreciate how the Bible speaks to us.
While the Hebrews and Egyptians creation theories bear resemblances and differences, the study and comparison of both the Egyptian myths and the biblical account allow us to comprehend the religious views of ancient civilizations in a better light. One may come to the conclusion that the Hebrews were influenced by the cultures of Egyptians by creating similarities in their own beliefs, or by drawing a line of defense of what is in their terms true, by separating from the mass ideals of the Egyptians and establishing distinct
According to Christianity, the attributes of God can be organized into two categories: Physical and ethical or moral. Some terms address God’s transcendence of physical ideology, others address God’s Devine intellect and will. There are a multitude of terms from which to choose when labeling the attributes of God. Therefore, this paper will only deal with the fundamental terms that are put forth by the sacred scriptures. God is, according to the Old and New Testaments: Omnipotent, eternal, Immense, Incomprehensible, and infinite in intellect and will