Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Hitler as a dictator essay
Hitler as a dictator essay
Hitler as a dictator essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
I chose among the list, the speech of the fabulous comic actor Charles Chaplin. When I started the video of him talking, I got surprised, because I know him as the movie without conversation. This speech wasn’t exactly from Charles Chaplin, but from his character of the movie “The Great Dictator”. The Great Dictator was Chaplin’s first film with dialogue. “Charles Chaplin came up with the idea to make this video, when Alexander Korda, his friend, noticed the physical resemblance between Charles Chaplin and Adolf Hitler. Later Chaplin discovered that he and Hitler were born only a week apart, had the same height and weight and were stillborn in poverty and then ascended. Chaplin decided to use this similarity to attack Hitler when he learned of the policy of racial oppression that the ruler was implemented in Germany” (Faquetti, 2018). When Chaplin announced the production of the movie, England soon disclosed that he would banish the film from his cinemas. At the time the country was seeking a conciliation with the Nazi government. By the time the film was released the situation had changed drastically since England and Germany were at war. The film was then used as a Nazi propaganda …show more content…
It warns the populations and soldiers not to be influenced by the idea of Superiority. He challenges men, women, soldiers, children not to hate each other, to love and challenge soldiers to fight for peace and freedom and not to be commanded by those who do not tolerate and do not love. From his speech, we can conclude that the dictators do completely what they want from the population, dictating their deeds, their ideas and their thoughts, despising them, enslaving them and controlling their lives, which led to young people to be soldiers in order to obey to the functions intended by them thus emerging the war. His speech was a message for all of
Adolf Hitler, born in 1889, is an Austrian born man who is known for his instigation and participation in the Nazi Political movement, or genocide, known as the Holocaust. Throughout his later life, Hitler spent the majority of his time organizing discriminatory laws that prevented Jewish citizens’ basic rights and ultimately their demise. However, before he advanced such laws and politics, he served as the Head of State, Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces, until he became the Fuhrer of Germany’s Third Reich which began in 1933 and ended in 1945 (Jewish Virtual Library). His actions were fueled by an unrelenting and strict hate for the Jewish community, better known as anti-Semitism, much like the vast majority of Eastern countries. Both
The speech I chose was Cal Ripken Jr.’s it was given at the Orioles home ball park, Camden Yards at his last home game before retiring. It is a special occasion speech and was given in front of over 48,000 fans. He used a tried and true opening sentence that although a little altered had a very familiar ring. He opened with “As a kid, I had this dream” a very loose but familiar take on MLK’s “I have a dream”. This was a great attention getter and probably had people on their feet immediately. This audience was already motivate to hear his speech so that was not an issue. Most of the fans were there for the purpose of hearing his retirement speech. He did not preview his points in the introduction he addressed those in the body of his speech one at a time. He did not try to establish credibility as he was speaking about himself so who knows more about him than himself.
The speech that I have chosen is of Lieutenant Colonel Harold in the 2002 movie We Were Soldiers. The speech occurs in the beginning of the movie prior to the soldiers heading into war in Vietnam. I chose to deliver this speech because its message is very powerfully and meaningful. Due to it encouraging soldiers to look beyond their identity and unit to accomplish a
You may be thinking how did the constitution stop tyranny? Well we have the answer. Let's start of with what tyranny means, that a leader or king abuses their power. How did the constitution guard against tyranny? Well they abuse their power bad deeds. The constitution guard against tyranny in these four ways. Federalism, separation of power, checks and balances, and small states vs. large states.
In the Summer of 1787, fifty-five delegates representing 12 out of the 13 states in Philadelphia to fix the Articles of Confederation. They met in philadelphia because the Articles of Confederation was too weak. Shay’s rebellion was the end of the Articles of Confederation bringing down the whole network calling for a change of government. They did this to prevent a tyrant or tyranny. A tyrant/tyranny is when someone or a group abuses their power. The Constitution guarded against tyranny through Federalism, Separation of powers, Checks and Balances, and The Great Compromise.
Eidenmuller, Michael E. Great Speeches for Better Speaking: Listen and Learn From America’s Most Memorable Speeches. New York: Mcgraw Hill, 2008. Google Books. Web. 4 September 2010.
Constitution and Tyranny Tyranny is cruel, unreasonable, or arbitrary use of power or control. This one act could ultimately be the downfall of a people, of a government, of a nation. Chaos ensues and the structure of the country collapses. The colonial United States required a plan of protection from tyranny, which led our Founding Fathers to institute the Constitution. The Constitution, written in 1787 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, provides a backbone for our country.
An Imperial Presidency Writers of the constitution intended for congress to be the most powerful branch of government. They invested in the president: the powers of the monarch, but subjected him to the democratic principles of accountability which was ensured by a complex system of parliamentary and judicial checks and balances. For over a century the US got along fine with a relatively weak president whose major role was simply to carry out the laws and policies made by congress, however, there has been erosion in this system. Presidential power only started to grow after the 19th century when the US set out on its path to empire.
From the late eighteenth century and early nineteenth century major historical events such as the Industrial revolution had occurred. During this period of time Europe was switching into an economy that is focused mostly in the industrial field. From this emerged two social-economic classes, the rich bourgeoisie and the poor proletariats. Furthermore tension brewed from the two groups since the bourgeoisie source of wealth was from the exploitation of the proletariats. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels’ book The Communist Manifesto responded to the situation and created a vision of an equal communist society. The Communist Manifesto was defined by the abolishment of the bourgeois sovereign rule that followed to a revolution against capitalism
Benito Mussolini’s major problem was that he was twisted in the mind. Mussolini really thought he could change Italy by using violence, which was wrong thinking. I do not personally think it is all Mussolini’s fault because it was the way he grew up. Do not get me wrong he was raised in a household were abuse was going on but his father did not show him any type of affection. I believe that if Benito’s father would have showed him love and told him be a wise person he would have been better off in my opinion. However, since that did not happen Benito had to put this façade on for the public to mask his insecurities, and his darkest thoughts. I think that Benito would have been able to fix this if he would have had good men friends to teach him the ways of being a powerful figure without beating people over the head to make his point.
The Cuban Missile Crisis Speech by John F. Kennedy, broadcasted on 22 October, 1962: available on http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOnY6b-qy_8
Each and every individual country has its own ideologies, economies, and ways of governing. In the early 1900’s Italy had developed its own ideology that had a huge impact on the lives of the Italian people. This ideology was known as Fascism. Fascism was not only a way of governing, but it was also known as a social organization. Fascism became what it was in response to the movement of social theories. There is much more behind the idea of fascism such as where it came from, who the creator of Fascism was, and why it was popular among many civilians.
An Analysis of the Absolute Monarchy of France in the 17th Century This historical study will define the absolute monarchy as it was defied through the French government in the 17th century. The term ‘absolute” is defined I the monarchy through the absolute control over the people through the king and the royal family. All matters of civic, financial, and political governance was controlled through the king’s sole power as the monarchical ruler of the French people. In France, Louis XIII is an important example of the absolute monarchy, which controlled all facts of military and economic power through a single ruler. Udder Louis XIII’s reign, the consolidation of power away from the Edicts of Nantes to dominant local politics and sovereignty
For a historian, the 20th century and all the historic events that it encompasses represents a utopia with endless sources of inspiration for the analysis of political figures, events and their consequences. Political figures such as Benito Mussolini of Italy, Adolf Hitler of Germany, Mao Zedong of China and Joseph Stalin of the Soviet Union are all names we are familiar with due to the time period that they influenced; this time period after the trauma and atrocities of World War I and the Great Depression led to completely new forms of government in Europe and beyond. These “manifestations of political evil”, commonly known as totalitarian states, should not be considered as mere extensions of already existing political systems, but rather as completely new forms of government built upon terror and ideological fiction. Therefore, this was also a time in which political philosophers such as Hannah Arendt, the author of the standard work on totalitarianism, “Origins of Totalitarianism”, could thrive. When looking at totalitarianism as a political philosophy, two initial questions have to be dealt with: what is totalitarianism and what kind of effect it had on countries ruled by totalitarian regimes. The reasons for its occurrence have briefly been mentioned above, although there are much deeper ideological, social and economic reasons including imperialism and anti-Semitism. In order to fully understand it, we must also contrast it to other political systems like authoritarianism and dictatorship, which are similar to a certain extent, but lack crucial elements that are in the core of totalitarian ideology. Out of the many examples of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century, Nazi Germany, Communist China and the Soviet Union stan...
“I should like to help everyone if possible…We all want to help one another, human beings are like that.” (Chaplin) What appears to be a simple statement continues to inspire the world even 70 years post production. Still appreciated for more than a decade, Charlie Chaplin’s well-known speech in The Great Dictator makes for one of the most thought-provoking and inspiring film speeches of all time. Like all of his other films, Charlie Chaplin wrote, directed, and starred in The Great Dictator, which is a satirical piece on Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party. Chaplin plays a double role in this film, one of a Jewish barber and the other of Adenoid Hynkel (Adolph Hitler), who both look alike. The barber, who has been mistaken for Hynkel, is taken to the capital to make a speech upon their victory over Osterlich. Instead of speaking about slavery, inequality, and other outdated ideas like Hynkel would have, the barber speaks about having free speech, a democracy, and declares Osterlich a free nation. (Charlie Chaplin –Official Website) The speech also expresses that to have a free world, people must “do away with greed, hate and intolerance.” (Chaplin) The barber’s great speech not only reached out to Hynkel’s soldiers in 1940 but also to the viewers of the film even 70 years post-production. It calls for a new era of science, progress, and reason that will eventually lead to the happiness of all people. Charlie Chaplin uses the speech in The Great Dictator as a medium to recuperate the state of humanity that has been lost to power, greed, and hatred by stimulating an emotional atmosphere with the help of style and speaks for the common good that rallies his people to “fight to free the world” (Chaplin) and in turn provide the world a r...