America is renown for being a land opportunity; however, there were moments in the country’s history where opportunity was not always available. America’s poor often played the game of survival of the fittest. This game featured immigrants coming to America with hopes to live the American Dream and farmers moving from one agricultural landscape to another during harsh growing seasons. Few mediums have been able to capture the entirety of the weary immigrant and the lowly farmer’s experience like the novels The Jungle by Upton Sinclair and The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck. These books contain an undeniable similarity in its tragedies and injustices, which are portrayed through the parallel philosophies of Tom Joad and Jurgis Rudkus;however, these books also contain differences in Jim Casy and Phil Conner that show the mirror image strife and struggle thrown upon the impoverished. Tom Joad from The Grapes of Wrath and Jurgis Rudkus from The Jungle are similar due their search for social justice and the change to their character due to their strong beliefs in change. Tom is seen getting to become an advocate for the migrant workers when he is talking to Ma Joad in the cave near the boxcars when Ma asks Tom what he is going to do with Tom replying, “What …show more content…
Casy done” (Steinback 419). Jurgis also becomes an advocate for change during a political rally when he realizes truth in the words of the orator and realizes that “ he would be a man, with a will and a purpose; he would have something to fight for, something to die for, if need be!” (Sinclair 330). As shown in these quotes, both Tom and Jurgis learn about a better life that will in change the structure of their current society along with the character becoming more defined by the change they will bring. Jim Casy and Phil Conner are contrasting character due their roles as a complement and as a foil, along with them both having complete different natures.
Jim Casy is the complement to Tom dues to his lasting effect on even after his death, while Phil Conner is a foil to Jurgis, as Jurgis’s usually caring nature is contrasted by Phil’s manipulation and greed. Throughout the novel, Jim has been characterized as self-sacrificing, selfless man who figured that the migrant workers deserved better and that through their individual struggle; they are one, which reflected when Tom states: [Jim] Says he foun' he jus' got a little piece of a great big soul...But I know now a fella ain't no good alone. (Steinbeck
418) Phil is the representation of the evils capitalism. He not only takes advantage of his employees, but he has also commits many crimes that have gone unnoticed due to his influence. This is embodied in Ona’s confession to Jurgis about what he did her as she states: [Phil Connor]—he wanted me. He used to speak to me—out on the platform. Then he began to—to make love to me. He offered me money. He begged me—he said he loved me. Then he threatened me. He knew all about us, he knew we would starve. He knew your boss—he knew Marija's. He would hound us to death, he said—then he said if I would—if I —we would all of us be sure of work—always. Then one day he caught hold of me—he would not let go—he—he— (Sinclair 159-160) These quotes reveal that effect that Casy had on the protagonist, which is due to his selfless nature; on the other hand, Ona’s statement paints Phil in his true colors as an influential man who can do what he wants when he wants. the mirror image the novels are represented through the similarities of Tom and Jurgis in their beliefs and actions, while the contrast of Casy and Phil in their influence and action towards the protagonist.
“And they stand still and watch the potatoes float by, listen to the screaming pigs being killed in a ditch and covered with quicklime, watch the mountains of oranges slop down to a putrefying ooze; and in the eyes of the people there is a failure; and in the eyes of the hungry there is a growing wrath” (Steinbeck 349). John Steinbeck, the author of The Grapes of Wrath, portrays the migrant’s resentment of the California land owners and their way of life and illustrates that the vagrants from Oklahoma are yearning for labor, provisions, and human decency. Similarly in To Kill a Mockingbird, Harper Lee elucidates the concept that people should be treated with inclusive human dignity and be affected by good aspects rather than deleterious behavior. In addition to both novels, “Suffering with Them”, “Evil’s Fate”, and “To Hope” share the same concurrent theme. To Kill a Mockingbird and The Grapes of Wrath and “Suffering with Them”, “Evil’s Fate”, and “To Hope” illustrate a synonymous, thematic message that evil’s inhumanity, during corrupt times, induces a perception of hopefulness for good to conquer immorality.
When times get tough, many people turn away from everyone and everything. It must be part of human nature to adopt an independent attitude when faced with troubles. It is understandable because most people do not want to trouble their loved ones when they are going through problems, so it is easier to turn away than stick together. Maybe their family is going through a rough patch and they reason they would be better off on their own. This path of independence and solitude may not always be the best option for them or their family, though. Often times it is more beneficial for everyone to work through the problem together. It is not always the easiest or most desirable option, but most times it is the most efficient and it will get results in the long run. In The Grapes of Wrath, John Steinbeck makes this point very clear through several characters. Many characters throughout
People just don’t seem to give up, they continue fighting till the very end rather than lay down and succumb to the challenge faced. In “The Grapes of Wrath”, John Steinbeck uses symbolism and religious allusions as unifying devices to illustrate the indomitable nature of the human spirit.
Most of Steinbeck’s work conveys a deeper meaning or message to the readers, and The Grapes of Wrath presents no exception, as redemption’s prevalence influences the growth of each character. Although the book ends with a tragic flood after the family has faced the loss of Rose of Sharon’s newborn baby, the novel still ends in happiness, since characters such as Jim Casy, Uncle John, Tom Joad, and Rose of Sharon attain redemption and in doing so, become saviors for migrant families. Steinbeck manifests the idea the migration did not necessarily implicate the Joads would find prosperity in the promised land of California, but would instead fulfill the quest for absolution, which results in their heroic
Ma Joad in the Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck In the 1930s, America’s Great Plains experienced a disastrous drought, causing thousands of people to migrate west. As their land was devastated by the Dust Bowl, deprived farmers were left with few options but to leave. The Grapes of Wrath depicts the journey of the Joads, an Oklahoma-based family which decides to move to California in search of better conditions. Coming together as thirteen people at the start, the Joads will undertake what represents both a challenge and their only hope.
Throughout the novel, The Grapes of Wrath there are intercalary chapters. The purpose of these chapters are to give the readers insight and background on the setting, time, place and even history of the novel. They help blend the themes, symbols, motifs of the novel, such as the saving power of family and fellowship, man’s inhumanity to man, and even the multiplying effects of selfishness. These chapters show the social and economic crisis flooding the nation at the time, and the plight of the American farmer becoming difficult. The contrast between these chapters helps readers look at not just the storyline of the Joad family, but farmers during the time and also the condition of America during the Dust Bowl. Steinbeck uses these chapters to show that the story is not only limited to the Joad family,
In The Jungle, by Upton Sinclair, and The Grapes of Wrath, by John Steinbeck, the characters are forced with economic, social, and political problems that they must cope with throughout the story. Both books are similar in that they emphasize that in this country, one simply cannot win unless they play by nature’s rules.
In Steinbeck's novel The Grapes of Wrath, Tom Joad is one of the main characters in the “The Grapes of Wrath,” years ago Tom was taken into jail because he got into a drunken fight and killed his attacker with a shovel. He has served his time and is now getting a different outlook on the things in life and is realizing everything happens for a reason.
Steinbeck's The Grapes of Wrath is a realistic novel that mimics life and offers social commentary too. It offers many windows on real life in midwest America in the 1930s. But it also offers a powerful social commentary, directly in the intercalary chapters and indirectly in the places and people it portrays. Typical of very many, the Joads are driven off the land by far away banks and set out on a journey to California to find a better life. However the journey breaks up the family, their dreams are not realized and their fortunes disappear. What promised to be the land of milk and honey turns to sour grapes. The hopes and dreams of a generation turned to wrath. Steinbeck opens up this catastrophe for public scrutiny.
In the novel The Grapes of Wrath, by John Steinbeck, a fictitious migrant family, the Joads, travel west in search of a new life away from the tragedies of the Dust Bowl in Oklahoma. Along the way, Steinbeck adds a variety of minor characters with whom the Joads interact. Steinbeck created these minor characters to contrast with the Joad’s strong will power and to reflect man’s fear of new challenges, and to identify man’s resistance to change. Three minor characters who fulfill this role are Muley Graves, Connie Rivers, and the tractor driver.
The novel Grapes of Wrath was one of the first monumental American stories because of the setting, which is the great depression. It followed the working class of America, which at the time it came out was when the working class was becoming more common then the upper class. The whole point of the novel was to show the people who were the workers of America’s economy struggle deeply. The readers of the text appreciated the realistic factors of the novel, and Tom Joade was a great example for those who wanted to help others. He was someone who only cared about others safety, and even though he had done some bad things in the past, he was still a caring man. The moral behind Tom’s character is that even if someone has a troubled past, it does not matter about their past, but instead it matters about their actions in the present.
Tom Joad is an ex-convict that was only into his own self-interest and lived by a mantra of live your life day by day and not concerned with the future, to becoming a man who thinks about the future and someone with morals and an obligation to help others. Ma Joad is a typical woman of the early 1900’s whose main role was a mother only with a role of caring and nurturing. Later in the novel, she becomes an important figure for the family and is responsible for making decisions in keeping the family together and emphasizes the importance of unity. Another important transition in the book is the family starting off as a single close knit unit to depending on other families to survive. This common interest and struggle bonded the community of individual families to a single one. Steinbeck wrote this novel very well, by having great character dynamics and development that displays the characters strengths and also their
Steinbeck depicts the Joads family as migrants who lose their land in Oklahoma. The family is unemployed and homeless. Steinbeck based his story of the Joads' experiences on the real accounts of those living at the Weedpatch camp, built by the federal government as a place of shelter and protection for the desperate migrants who were often unwelcome in California and frequently exploited and abused. The novel succeeds as a gripping story and showing people in the time period. John Steinbeck, who won the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1962, alternates chapters following the Joads’ saga with poetic interludes detailing the larger forces at work against the migrants. His lack of knowledge and understanding reinforces suspicion and hatred of the migrants, who for their part can’t understand why they’re so vilified. It’s an important lesson on perspective, and a fantastic starting point for discussing political, economic, and social issues still very relevant today.
The Grapes of Wrath is a novel written by John Steinbeck, which focuses on an Oklahoman family that is evicted from their farm during an era of depression caused by the Dust Bowl. The Joad family alongside thousands of other refugees (also affected by the dirty thirties) migrates west towards California seeking employment and a new home. John Steinbeck’s purpose for writing this novel was to inform his audience of how many of their fellow Americans were being mistreated and of the tribulations they faced in order to attain regain what they once had. As a result, The Grapes of Wrath triggered its audience’s sympathy for the plight of the Dust Bowl farmers and their families.
The Grapes of Wrath, by John Steinbeck, is a novel depicting the Okies migration to California during the period in history known as The Dustbowl. In this novel Steinbeck attempts to display the tensions between the Okies and the Californians. This display can be closely compared to today’s tensions between citizens born in the US and the Immigrants. Great pieces of literature are timeless in the lessons they teach and the controversy they portray.