Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparative analysis essay
Comparative analysis essay
Comparative analysis essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the novels Like Water for Chocolate by Laura Esquivel (1989) and The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck (1939), both authors explore the enduring strength of the human spirit, complex family dynamics, and the power of hope to create change in one’s world. The message of both texts is that people are both big and small; they can enact powerful change in the world around them, but even the most righteous change enacted by one person alone cannot affect great numbers.
Esquivel’s Tita, bound to her home by family tradition as she falls in love, and Steinbeck’s Tom, forced from his home by the Oklahoma Dust Bowl Crisis, both live in what are possibly the most trying times in their lives, but they both endure against frightful odds. Tita is trapped
…show more content…
in her family home for years, not being able to tell anyone of her hidden love, however she finds outlets for her grief; caring for her lover’s child, cooking meals with her emotions, and crying privately. However, her strength crumbles away when her lover leaves town with his wife; although he still loves her, it breaks her heart to be apart from him. So Tita becomes heartbroken - however she still continues caring for her mother and completing her duties at the family ranch. When Tita did allow herself to cry, it was empty and tearless: “…she cried without tears, which is said to hurt even more like dry labor.” (Page 160). In carrying on, however, Tita learns to become numb to her own pain, and shows her ability to move on and continue to have hope. In the Joad family, there is a faith in all people to survive and rely on one another. This concept of the symbiotic survival of the human life force is shown in Ma Joad's comment, "We're the people — we go on.” (Page 359). In the tireless migration from dusty Oklahoma to lush California, many families perish or give up - but every person relies on each other. They are all searching for a better life than the one they left behind, and they all experience the same tragedies. These people find the ability within themselves to keep on moving forward, day after day, and not allow their spirits to be broken. The familial communities that Tita and Tom live in are completely different; Tita’s mother and sister are harsh and unfeeling towards her, and often cause her emotional pain; Tom’s large family is loving and open to all, and his mother is often what gives everyone hope to continue to California.
In Like Water for Chocolate, it is mostly female figures that dominate Tita’s family life: her cold and sometimes violent Mama Elena, her jealous sister Rosaura, and Nacha the family cook, who raised Tita and is essentially her mother figure. Within her own family, Tita feels out of place and alone, and feels most comfortable with the one member of the household not related to her. This speaks volumes about how her mother and sister treat her - while Tita strives for freedom to love, freedom to be an individual, and freedom from the family ranch, her mother and sister are the direct opposition to her fulfilment of these goals. Mama Elena still grieves her dead husband, and thus denies Tita any chance to love when she herself cannot. Tita is also forced to care for Mama Elena, and is therefore unable to leave the ranch or form experiences of her own. Tita’s sister Rosaura marries Tita’s lover and attempts to take him away from her for good - in the process breaking Tita’s heart. However, by the end of the novel Tita’s mother and sister are dead, and Tita has the freedom to do all the things she wanted. From this, Tita emerges stronger, because her family’s treatment made her strong enough to be able to change her own
destiny. Love will most often be expressed by the mother figures in The Grapes of Wrath: Ma, Sairy Wilson, and Rose of Sharon. Ma, the titular mother figure, loves all as though they were her children. She is the first to extend food and shelter to strangers, and she is willing to welcome Casy the ex-priest (and social pariah) into her family, and is willing to feed the hungry children at the Hooverville camp, even though they are unclean and branded by the others as undesirable. Sairy Wilson's compassion during Granpa's death, despite being sick herself, is another example of basic human love extending outside the family, and then becoming that of family - the love that accepts all humans in need as family. Ma expresses this when she observes, "They was the time when we was on the lan'. They was a boundary to us then. …We was the fambly — kinda whole and clear. An' now we ain't clear no more.” Rose of Sharon is slow to embrace this ideology, focusing instead on her own comfort and well-being for the majority of the novel. In the end, however, she, too, becomes part of this embracing of all humankind when she offers her milk to the starving stranger after she suffers a miscarriage. This change in Rose of Sharon occurred because she saw the hope that she could give to other people, and how one small action could change a less fortunate person’s life. Tita wanted to change her family tradition so that no daughter would have to suffer as she did, and Tom wanted to change the power that the banks had over farmworkers - both protagonists wanted to change the inequality they saw in their own microcosmic world. Tita saw and recognised what was problematic in her world, but could do little to change it so long as her mother was alive. However, generations later, Tita’s great-niece finds Tita’s cookbook in the ruins of the old ranch, and thanks her for the abolishment of the family tradition binding the youngest daughter to caring for her mother. The reason Tita was able to eventually abolish it, after her mother’s death, was because she never let the hope inside her die. As one of the characters says on Page 104: “Each of us is born with a box of matches inside us but we can't strike them all by ourselves…A pleasant warmth grows within us, fading slowly as time goes by, until a new explosion comes along to revive it. Each person has to discover what will set off those explosions in order to live…” As Tita finds singular moments of beauty and love in her largely unhappy life, this keeps her inner flame of hope ignited until the day she is ultimately reunited with her lover. Tom observed that losing the farm "took somepin' outa Pa," and one displaced tenant stated, "I am the land, the land is me.” (Page 216). Since the men - the Joad men and all the displaced men - were all a part of the land, when that land was taken away the men lost a part of themselves. They lost their livelihood, the thing they had grown up on, but also the pride of being able to provide for their family. Tom’s strongly individual nature, and his years away from the farm, gives him the strength to fight for the social welfare of all people. The other men had spend their entire lives in the same agricultural town and were somewhat lost and weak without it. Throughout the novel, Tom becomes increasingly aware of the injustices around him and tries, in little ways, to obstruct and prevent them. In Chapter 20, Tom prevents and innocent man from being arrested even though his actions put himself in danger. After his friend’s death Tom plans to spread the concept of everybody being a small piece of a bigger family. Tom finds a fellowship with humanity: a deep identification with others and the human situation in general. Tom leaves the novel on page 463 by telling his mother to take each day as it comes. Ma goes back to camp with Tom's wisdom and tells the rest of the family that all they can do is "jus' live the day." In this way, Tom has changed his family’s view on life and living. In conclusion, while Esquivel’s De La Garza family and Steinbeck’s Joad family are very different in tradition and dynamic, both provide insight into how the human mind works under intense and strenuous situations; as well as the protagonists’ ability to overcome hardships and tragedy within the families because they have hope for a better life. Further, the change each protagonist has been able to create within their own small community may not be important to huge numbers, but the few it does affect, it affects deeply.
John Steinbeck’s novel, The Grapes of Wrath is one of the most influential books in American History, and is considered to be his best work by many. It tells the story of one family’s hardship during the Depression and the Dust Bowl of the 1930’s. The Joads were a hard-working family with a strong sense of togetherness and morals; they farmed their land and went about their business without bothering anyone. When the big drought came it forced them to sell the land they had lived on since before anyone can remember. Their oldest son, Tom, has been in jail the past four years and returns to find his childhood home abandoned. He learns his family has moved in with his uncle John and decides to travel a short distance to see them. He arrives only to learn they are packing up their belongings and moving to California, someplace where there is a promise of work and food. This sets the Joad family off on a long and arduous journey with one goal: to survive.
When times get tough, many people turn away from everyone and everything. It must be part of human nature to adopt an independent attitude when faced with troubles. It is understandable because most people do not want to trouble their loved ones when they are going through problems, so it is easier to turn away than stick together. Maybe their family is going through a rough patch and they reason they would be better off on their own. This path of independence and solitude may not always be the best option for them or their family, though. Often times it is more beneficial for everyone to work through the problem together. It is not always the easiest or most desirable option, but most times it is the most efficient and it will get results in the long run. In The Grapes of Wrath, John Steinbeck makes this point very clear through several characters. Many characters throughout
In two differing stories of departure, The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck and The Road by Cormac McCarthy, Steinbeck’s standard for a writer is met by the raw human emotions exhibited in the main characters’ success and defeat.
Most of Steinbeck’s work conveys a deeper meaning or message to the readers, and The Grapes of Wrath presents no exception, as redemption’s prevalence influences the growth of each character. Although the book ends with a tragic flood after the family has faced the loss of Rose of Sharon’s newborn baby, the novel still ends in happiness, since characters such as Jim Casy, Uncle John, Tom Joad, and Rose of Sharon attain redemption and in doing so, become saviors for migrant families. Steinbeck manifests the idea the migration did not necessarily implicate the Joads would find prosperity in the promised land of California, but would instead fulfill the quest for absolution, which results in their heroic
In literature as in life, people often find that they must make difficult choices in order to survive. The reasons behind their decisions and the results of their subsequent actions affect our opinion of them. In the Grapes of Wrath, written by John Steinbeck, the author portrayed situations where two main characters became involved. The nature of their choices, the reasons behind their decisions, and the results that followed affected them greatly. However, the choices that they made were surmounted successfully. Ma Joad and Tom Joad are two strong characters who overcame laborious predicaments. Their powerful characteristics helped to encourage those that were struggling.
John Steinbeck’s novels The Grapes of Wrath and Of Mice and Men reveal and confront the struggles of common individuals in their day-to-day lives. The Grapes of Wrath creates a greater verisimilitude than Of Mice and Men as it illustrates the lives of Oklahoma farmers driven west during the Dustbowl of the late 1930’s. Of Mice and Men deals with a more personal account of two poor men and the tragic ending of their relationship. Steinbeck expresses his concern for multiple social issues in both The Grapes of Wrath and Of Mice and Men. Tightly-knit relationships appear prominently in both books and provide the majority of the conflicts that occur. The decency of common people is written about to a great extent in The Grapes of Wrath and is also prevalent through numerous examples in Of Mice and Men. As in all effective writing that bares the soul of the author, each novel reveals Steinbeck’s core beliefs.
The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck had many comparisons from the movie and the book. In 1939, this story was to have some of the readers against the ones that kept the American people in poverty held responsible for their actions. This unique story was about the Joad’s family, who were migrant workers looking for a good decent job. They were also farmers from Oklahoma that are now striving to find some good work and success for their family in California. This novel was one of Steinbeck’s best work he has ever done. It was in fact an Academy Award movie in 1940. Both the movie and the novel are one of Steinbeck’s greatest masterpieces on both the filmmaking and the novel writing. Both the novel and film are mainly the same in the beginning of the story and towards the end. There were some few main points that Steinbeck took out from the book and didn’t mention them in the movie. “The Grapes of Wrath is a
In conclusion the Grapes of Wrath is a literary masterpiece that portrays the struggles of man as he overcomes the adversity of homelessness, death, and the wrath of prejudice. Steinbeck fully explores each faucet coherently within the boundaries of the Joad family’s trials and
Steinbeck's The Grapes of Wrath is a realistic novel that mimics life and offers social commentary too. It offers many windows on real life in midwest America in the 1930s. But it also offers a powerful social commentary, directly in the intercalary chapters and indirectly in the places and people it portrays. Typical of very many, the Joads are driven off the land by far away banks and set out on a journey to California to find a better life. However the journey breaks up the family, their dreams are not realized and their fortunes disappear. What promised to be the land of milk and honey turns to sour grapes. The hopes and dreams of a generation turned to wrath. Steinbeck opens up this catastrophe for public scrutiny.
John Steinbeck wrote the The Grapes of Wrath in 1939 to rouse its readers against those who were responsible for keeping the American people in poverty. The Grapes of Wrath tells the story of the Joad family, migrant farmers from Oklahoma traveling to California in search of an illusion of prosperity. The novel's strong stance stirred up much controversy, as it was often called Communist propaganda, and banned from schools due to its vulgar language. However, Steinbeck's novel is considered to be his greatest work. It won the Pulitzer Prize, and later became an Academy Award winning movie in 1940. The novel and the movie are both considered to be wonderful masterpieces, epitomizing the art of filmmaking and novel-writing.
In the novel The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck the author uses excessive profanity, religion, and migrants to show the hard times family’s had to go through in the 1930’s. Most people believe that Steinbeck novel is too inappropriate for high school students because of its content. This novel should be banned from the high school curriculum.
The Grapes of Wrath is a novel written by John Steinbeck, which focuses on an Oklahoman family that is evicted from their farm during an era of depression caused by the Dust Bowl. The Joad family alongside thousands of other refugees (also affected by the dirty thirties) migrates west towards California seeking employment and a new home. John Steinbeck’s purpose for writing this novel was to inform his audience of how many of their fellow Americans were being mistreated and of the tribulations they faced in order to attain regain what they once had. As a result, The Grapes of Wrath triggered its audience’s sympathy for the plight of the Dust Bowl farmers and their families.
From a more romantic perspective one might be inclined to say the main theme behind this story is choices made by man as a unit when obstacles and circumstances arise, perhaps perseverance through hardship. But this book rarely displays romantic or idealistic interactions among the characters or moments in the plot. Although there is one example of slight romantisicm at end, the book for the most part is an excellent illustration of naturalism in a piece of literature. To shine this main theme under a naturalistic light, the reader must be allowed to examine the deep psychological, emotional and physical connection between man and his land so often demonstrated and greatly emphaisized throughout the book. The cliffsnotes state that this connection is a basic fundament to the Jeffersonian agrarian theory. A great example of when Steinbeck incorporates this philosophy is when the representatives of the bank are telling the tenant farmers that they need to get off the land. They feel that since they lived and died on the land, it is rightfully theirs. "Funny thing how it is. If a man owns a little property, that property is in him, it's part of him, and it's like him (37)." Since the bond between the farmer and his property is so strong, once it is broken the people loose their self-respect, dignity, and meaning. Steinbeck uses this idea to foreshadow and help explain the events of Grandpa's death and to further drive the ideas Casy preaches. Casy suggests at the funeral that Granpa died the moment he was torn from his land. He also speculates that only if the band together and make sacrifices for the unit, the Joads and the Wilsons can they survive. "We on'y got a hundred an' fifty dollars. They take forty to bury Grampa an' we won't get to California (140)." They decide that for the family the best thing to do is to bury him on the road.
“Everybody wants a little piece of lan'. I read plenty of books out here. Nobody never gets to heaven, and nobody gets no land. It's just in their head. They're all the time talkin' about it, but its jus' in their head.” (Steinbeck) The Grapes of Wrath is most often categorized as an American Realist novel. It was written by John Steinbeck and published in 1939. As a result of this novel, Steinbeck won the Pulitzer Prize, the National Book Award, and prominently cited the novel when he won the Nobel Prize a little over twenty years after the text’s publication. This text follows the Joad family through the Great Depression. It begins in Oklahoma, watching as the family is driven from their home by drought and economic changes. Within the introduction of the novel the living conditions is described, “Every moving thing lifted the dust into the air: The walking man lifted a thin layer as high as his waist, and a wagon lifted the dust as high as the fence tops and an automobile boiled a cloud behind it.” (Grapes, 1) This novel is and will remain one of the most significant novels of the Great Depression. Despite its controversial nature it is timeless. In fact, the ending of this text is one of the most controversial pieces of literature written during the time period, and has never accurately made its way into film. The ending to John Steinbeck’s novel The Grapes of Wrath is the most significant portion of the novel due to its historical accuracy as well as its message about the American spirit.
“The grapes of wrath, by john steinbeck, was first published in 1939 and would achieve both the national book award and pulitzer prize that same year. Noted Steinbeck scholar John Timmerman, in summation of the novel’s impact, said, ‘The Grapes of Wrath may well be the most thoroughly discussed novel- in criticism, reviews, and college classrooms- of 20th century American literature. ’”(“Banned Books Awareness”). Despite all of the praises and awards The Grapes of Wrath received, it still produced many outcries and riots claiming Steinbeck used his novel to span the United States’ social and political way of doing things. ”At times the novel literally fuelled the fires of public debate as local communities burned copies in protest.”