Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The significance of ethics in social life
Ethical theories golden rule
Ethical theories golden rule
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The significance of ethics in social life
The Golden Rule is a rule I have been taught ever since I can remember. The rule as I was taught goes like this:
Treat others the way you want to be treated.
There are many other interpretations of the rule based on religion and beliefs, but all of these interpretations have the same underlying message. Everyone is equal and deserves to be treated as such. Treat others with the kindness that you would like in return. The moral of this law is not one sole lesson but several smaller lessons hidden within. No matter how one goes about interpreting it, there is a consensus we can all agree on — if society as a whole believes this to be an important moral, the world we live in could become more helpful than harmful.
My parents began instilling
…show more content…
The Golden Rule exemplifies this because sharing our knowledge for the good of society and helping others understand what we understand is crucial for societies to appreciate and sympathize with one another. On Education and E.T. by Peter Kreeft supports this statement in an exchange between Socrates and Peter Pragma. The notion of “understanding” is spot on in this line from Socrates:
“Alas, I often fail to see what others see, and see things others cannot see.” 2
Everyone who lives in their own world and never tries to grasp the beliefs of others has never been taught or does not choose to follow the Golden Rule. This aspect of the Golden Rule could solve a lot of worldwide issues by teaching society to look at others’ points of views.
Acceptance and equality is another major piece that I associate to the Golden Rule. If the world can accept everyone for who they are, what they do, and where they come from it would be a new place. Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. is a story about a society where everyone is “equal,” though their personalities, looks, and intelligence are basically swiped from them. 3 Equality does not mean handicapping those who excel to be like those who don’t. Equality is acceptance and treating people the same as you wanted to be treated. THIS is the Golden
In “The Matthew Effect”, Canadian journalist and author Malcolm Gladwell claims that circumstances determine who is and isn’t successful. In “Mind-sets and Equitable Education”, Stanford psychology professor Carol Dweck argues that those with growth mindsets are more eligible to obtain and experience success than those with fixed mindsets. Although these texts may seem to contradict one another, they are actually similar in many ways.Gladwell’s and Dweck’s texts may differ in the sense that one regards to the circumstances leading to success, meanwhile the other claims that believing in oneself can lead to success, but are quite similar due to the fact that circumstances could help motivate and encourage one to accomplish their goals.
The essay, “Standing Up for the Power of Learning,” by Jay Mathews explained how one of many students was accused of academic dishonesty. During the regular school session of the year 2001, three fourths of 187 students at Georgia Institute of Technology (GIT) were found guilty of cheating. This was because they collaborated on an assignment in a computer science (CS) course with friends. By communicating with others about the project, the students violated the course honor code that prohibited the discussion among students for that particular class.
The ability for all children from varying walks of life to receive a well-rounded education in America has become nothing more than a myth. In excerpt “The Essentials of a Good Education”, Diane Ravitch argues the government’s fanatical obsession with data based on test scores has ruined the education system across the country (107). In their eyes, students have faded from their eyes as individual hopefully, creative and full of spirit, and have become statistics on a data sheet, percentages on a pie chart, and numbers calculated to show the intelligence they have from filling out bubbles in a booklet. In order for schools to be able to provide a liberal education, they need the proper funding, which comes from the testing.
It is evident that Gerald Graff’s article is bias because he avoids talking about acquiring academic intelligence through academic learning rather than non-academic ways. For instance, Graff shows bias when he generalizes our way of seeing educated life and academics. He said that, “We associate the educated life, the life of the mind, too narrowly and exclusively with subjects and texts that we consider inherently weighty and academic. We assume that it’s possible to wax intellectual about Plato, Shakespeare, the French Revolution, and nuclear fission, but not about cars, dating fashion, sports, TV, or video games.” (Graff 264-5). Graff clearly thinks that everyone associates educated life with academics, when in reality this is not true. He believes that
Louis Menand, a professor of English and American literature at Harvard University presented three different theories for higher education in an article for The New Yorker named, Live and Learn: Why We Have College. Menand (2011) claims that the reasons for college are meritocratic, democratic, and vocational. These theories are great models for the purpose of higher education in our culture, at different points in our history. As a nation, there are definite intentions behind the way that instruction is conducted in our colleges and universities. The techniques adopted by institutions of higher education are no mistake and they are designed to serve a purpose. These methods evolve with time and shape the way that generations think and reason. In our generation, the purpose of higher education in our culture is to sustain the nation atop of the worldwide economy.
In Diane Ravitch essay “The Essentials of a Good Education,” argues about testing students in schools on basic skills that led to many public schools to abandon the importance of social skills and life choices. In her essay, it states that the federal law has demanded that all students must be proficient in mathematics and reading and that every state has been required to test those two specific subjects. Why do they demand that we are tested on mathematics and reading? Well in our lifetime, we will have to know how to do the math and also have reading skills for our career jobs. In the “No Child Left Behind” was an act in 2001 passed by congress that requires states to test children’s basic skills to qualify for federal funding. All students
life: the Golden Rule. The Golden Rule states “do unto others as you would have them do unto
the Golden Rule is equivalent to utilitarianism if the premise that everyone strives for pleasure though helping their neighbor. One could argue that a deranged killer follows the Golden Rule by doing as they would be done by slaughtering their neighbor. They do not take into account any sort of utility or the wellbeing of their neighbor, but simply followed the Golden Rule. However, murder would not be seen as utility in the eyes of a utilitarian, it is causing suffering to the neighbor in this case. This would not result in an increase in sum happiness, thus this situation would not be utilitarian. However, was the killer both utilitarian and to take the neighbor’s happiness into account, then he must come under the conclusion that by causing harm to his neighbor, there would be a decrease in total pleasure. This would lead to a Utilitarianism to be equivalent to the Golden Rule. This could be achieved by dividing the two statements of the Golden Rule. The first rule of “do as you would be done by” sets out what one wishes others to act as and not how they themselves should act. Therefore, the killer could kill and would be content being murdered themselves in order to achieve their pleasure. However, the second statement, “love your neighbor as yourself” would stop the killer dead in their tracks. This statement takes into
To teach is to choose a challenging life. It requires passion in the profession, genuine love and interest in children, especially when one opts to teach young children. One must have a heart and needs to be ethical, reflective, caring and hopeful. It requires faith in yourself and respect for individual children, willing to work against the odds in order to contribute to an evolving environment. Ayers’s book, To Teach: The Journey of a Teacher is a book, I consider a work that strives for educational reform. Ayers write from his personal experience and then draws his educational philosophy around those experiences. William Ayers writes, as teacher, parent, student and observer, of the children he has known, and of the things that actually
The article titled “Order in the Classroom” goes in depth into the education system; its flaws, strengths, and what needs mending. Author Neil Postman, an educator of New York University includes his perspective on the education system. One remark by contributor William O’Connor, explains that the education in our schools is not inferior, the schools have been getting inferior students (Postman, 309). The students are not inferior in our education system. If we were to look in depth at some of the issues we hold, maybe that mindset would change. What makes us inferior is the fact that we do not teach our children things they need to know before beginning school, we have a horribly structured school day, we believe that socioeconomic status will change a student’s learning and ability and we believe in punishing students who cause disturbances. These are all very low and hurtful perspectives to hold when discussing education.
... the Biblical rule that states, “Do unto others as you would have done unto you.” Instead, we continually show that there should be no tolerance or understanding of any wrongdoing committed against us.
The "Golden Role" The Golden Rule. N.p., n.d. Web. The Web. The Web. https://sakai.luc.edu/access/content/group/PHIL_181_014_5296_1142/Readings/golden-rule-corrected%20proofsLaFollette_188.pdf>.
As I experience college life, I realize my morals are different from others. When crossing the street, I always wait for the cars to pass and if I do cross I make sure they see me. This is also a safety precaution that I was taught because drivers are frequently distracted and do not see pedestrians walking. On University of Northern Iowa’s campus, drivers are used to waiting for pedestrians; instead, I find myself waiting for the cars to go when really they are waving me to cross. Other students mindlessly walk across the street not even thinking about the cars. Another moral of mine is the golden rule; treat others how you would like to be treated. However, other kids did not grow up in a town that taught this. So, I let others in the door first, open the door for others, or let them cut in line. While everyone else takes advantage of what I am doing for them and do not receive a “thank you” back I brush it off because I know better. For my culture system to survive and thrive well we need to treat others well. This is part of the functionalist perspective that Emile Durkheim describes with the Arunta tribe. He understood the role that religion had on
Appropriate application of this information leads human beings to treat others as they would like themselves to be treated (Nivison and David 41). Confucius said a human being takes as much trouble to find out what is correct as a lesser human being takes to find out what will pay. A man pursues knowledge as an end and a means, while the common person sees knowledge simply as a means towards security and wealth (Nivison and David 77). The above illustration would be meaningless and pointless if human nature was not correct and if these illustrations were not leaning toward goodness. For Confucius, the uppermost political supreme was the customary theocracy which requisite that the most righteous be the leader because good features were understood to be similar to human nature.
I believe that the saying “do unto others as you would have them do unto you” would be beneficial to children and families, especially in cases of abuse and neglect. I believe that teaching a child that they should treat people the way they want to be treated could possible stop them from taking their anger from their home life out on others. According to Turning Point, consequences for child victims includes: aggressive behavior towards siblings, peers or non-abusive parent, regressive behaviors, inability to verbalize emotion, and increased anti-social behavior, including lashing out, violence or frequent rule breaking. I believe that teaching children to treat others how they want to be treated could possibly make a difference in the consequences that usually come with being abused. I also believe that teaching children and families to stand up for what is right regardless of the consequences will encourage people to let others know about the abuse or neglect. I believe that if a child or family knows that is okay to stand up for what they think is right, then they will be more likely to ask for help in certain situations. I believe that will allow children and families to experience less abuse or neglect, because they are able to get