Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Income inequality in the us paper
The effects of economic growth
Income inequality in the us paper
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Income inequality in the us paper
The global economy is a complex and multi-faceted system. When one variable changes, such as a dramatic increase in the New Zealand dollar; the spin-off effects can be detrimental to some while increasing the wealth and living-standard of others. This essay will discuss the global economic system we have in place today, and the consequential distributive injustices as a result of this structure. The start of the capitalist economy we have today can be linked back to the industrial revolution between the 1750s-1850s as the economy began to display signs of rapid growth, global population grew by as much as 6 times and average income grew tenfold (Maddison, 2003). This occurred through the advancement of machinery and an actual economy as factories, mills and new technologies provided the British population with new products more quickly and cheaply. The industrial revolution was also the beginning of cities as we know them today, as well as the start of inequality, though this essay will touch on that later (Dodd & Miller). Currently, on European Geostrategy’s (Rogers & Simón, 2011) list of the 15 most powerful countries in the world, the United States of America are the world’s lone Superpower while China is the only other country that is a potential Superpower. It is no coincidence that these two states are seen to be the primary economic sites in the world. Of course, these counties have not just become economic leaders by chance. The rise of globalisation has seen countries such as China become prominent, as global trade, solid policy making and controlled growth rates have allowed them to quickly rise through the ranks and now have a seat in the UNSC permanent-5, a signpost of how economically powerful they have become. The... ... middle of paper ... ...b) The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics (third ed.). Oxford University Press. Rogers, J., & Simón, L. (2011). World’s fifteen most powerful countries in 2012 Retrieved 02/05/2012, from http://europeangeostrategy.ideasoneurope.eu/2011/12/29/worlds-fifteen-most-powerful-countries-in-2012/ Spagnoli, F. (2010, 02/05/2012). What’s the Best Approach to Distributive Justice? Retrieved from http://filipspagnoli.wordpress.com/2010/11/28/whats-the-best-approach-to-distributive-justice/ International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights § 6.1 (1994). Williamson, J. (2002). What Washington Means by Policy Reforn Retrieved 02/05/2012, from http://www.iie.com/publications/papers/paper.cfm?researchid=486 Woodward, D., & Simms, A. (2006). Growth is Failing the Poor: The Unbalanced Distribution of the Benefi ts and Costs of Global Economic Growth.
"Top Ten Most Powerful Countries in the World." Maps of World. N.p.. Web. 3 Dec 2013. .
The Industrial Revolution began in England during the late 1700s, and by the end of its era, had created an enormous amount of both positive and negative effects on the world in social, economic, and even political ways. The revolution began to spread across the world, raising the standard of life for the populations in both Europe and North America throughout the 1800s. However, even with all of its obvious benefits, its downsides are nonnegotiable, forcing workers into horrendous living and working conditions, all inside of unkempt cities. While some might argue that Industrialization had primarily positive consequences for society because of the railroad system, it was actually a negative thing for society. Industrialization’s
Robinson (1984) affirms that there exists a close relationship between the growth of capitalism and slavery. Slaves were the property of slave owners; slaves were dehumanised because they were commodities that were sold and they represented unfree labour (Robinson, 1984). According to Marx (1984, 45), the profits made by the slaves were prime to the primitive accumulation which then led to the growth of manufacturing and industrial capitalism. The value created by slave labour was appropriated by the metropole, and this created immeasurable disparities of wealthy between the colonies and the metropole, both historical wealth and contemporary wealth (Robinson, 1984). For example, the raw material used in production of textiles, which led the Industrial Revolution in Britain, was slave-produced. Robinson (1984:46) argues that the economic footing of slave labour and slavery formed the economic basis of the political ideologies that emerged from the French Revolution, i.e. liberty, equality and fraternity – thus the economy and politics are inseparable. One may thus argue that when colonialism (politics) was established, then capitalism (economy) was expanded, for example, the more colonies Britain had, the more capitalism grew. Slavery, says W.E.B du Bois, was a significant subsystem of capitalism and that at the centre of the economics of slavery was the idea of the racial superiority of non-black people (Robinson, 1984: 61). The underlying principle for the development of capitalism was slavery and it was thus not coincidental (Robinson, 1984: 47).
The publishers of this book date the origin of capitalism back to the 16th century. This was the time when commercial activities in the industries and farms were gaining momentum and hence there was a drive to make more profits so as to open up more new factories. In this regard, a lot of capital began to be accumulated at the expense of the work force. Consequently, this marked the beginning capitalism. The author(s) of this piece are also of the view that this era did not only initiate capitalism, but also set a standard that influenced subsequent development and growth of capitalism. The growth of capitalism was also intensified by search for gold and silver. This book has its setting England and hence prior to capitalism customary rights was followed to the latter. However, through new legislations rampant privation of property began and trespasses become highly punishable. The effect accentuated the element of capitalism. It is noted in this book that capitalism did not just make its way into the workings of free market. It is a concept that faced strong resistance from the peasants and workers in the factory. Peasants and factory workers did have property because the rich had used legislation acquired large tracks of land. Since they did not have economic strength, they were forced to work in factories by all means, which included being subjected to famine, torture and transportation. This marks the ugliest
O'Brien, Patrick, and Roland Quinault, eds. The Industrial Revolution and British Society. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1993. Print.
Ellen Meiksins Wood suggests that capitalism was originally developed in England and that it is unique to this region. In her body of work, ‘The Origin of Capitalism’, Wood discusses the contributing factors that led England to introduce the social changes required in order for capitalism to become the new standard for trade and economics in that country. According to Wood, capitalism emerged in the West not so much due to what was “present” but more as a result of what was absent, such as constraints on urban economic practices. Considering this, it took only a natural expansion of trade to initiate the development of capitalism to its full maturity. However, it is important to understand the world around England during this time in order to understand why capitalism developed in England in the first
Capitalism dominates the world today. Known as a system to create wealth, capitalism’s main purpose is to increase profits through land, labor and free market. It is a replacement of feudalism and slavery. It promises to provide equality and increases living standards through equal exchanges, technological innovations and mass productions. However, taking a look at the global economy today, one can clearly see the disparity between developed and developing countries, and the persistence of poverty throughout the world despite the existence of abundant wealth. This modern issue was predicted and explained a hundred and fifty years ago in Karl Marx’s Capital.
Gilpin, Robert. Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001. Print.
Whereas China ushered in the 21st Century as member of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and as an economic power, Japan entered the Asian Century with a stagnant economy. And as China transforms its economy into a ‘socialist market economy’ it is held that the attendant social, economic, and political transformations necessitate that its state controlled IRs system is decentralized and more so, it should be converge with international best practice IR sta...
China is one of the world’s most dominant countries but this was not always the case. At the start of the 19th century, China was a struggling country that had problems in terms of keeping domestic stability intact and earning respect from other countries around the world. These problems and many more all culminated into a weaker China that was easily dominated by Western powers such as the United Kingdom and the United States but also the successfully westernized Japan. While the West was advancing technologically, China stagnated and eventually fell behind as a country which was brought to light during the Opium Wars. Through brute force, the United Kingdom was able to coerce the Chinese into numerous trade agreements1.
In the race to be the best, China is clearly outperforming the United States. China has strong economic fundamentals¬ such as “a high savings rate, huge labor pool, and powerful work ethic” (Rachman, Gideon. "Think Again: American Decline). Their economy has grown an astonishing 9-10% over the past thirty years; almost double of what it used to be decades ago. China is also the “world’s greatest manufacturer and its greatest market” (Rachman). The continuing growth of China's economy is a source of concern for not only the U.S. but surrounding nations as well. One could argue that the U.S. need not worry about China’s growth because of the spread of globalization and that western ideologies would influence China to turn to democracy. Yet China has still managed to “incorporate censorship and one party rule with continuing economic success” (Rachman) and remains a communist country. Hypothetically, even if China does resort to a democratic state, this does not gua...
Globalization is a term that is difficult to define, as it covers many broad topics in the global arena. However, it can typically be attributed to the advancement of economic, social, and cultural interactions among the companies, citizens, organizations, and governments of nations; globalization also focuses on the interactions and integration of countries (The Levin Institute 2012). Many in the Western world promote globalization as a positive concept that allows growth and participation in a global community. Conversely, the negative aspects rarely receive the same level of attention. Globalization appears to be advantageous for the privileged few, but the benefits are unevenly distributed. For example, the three richest people in the world possess assets that exceed the Gross National Product of all of the least developed countries and their 600 million citizens combined (Shawki and D’Amato 2000). Although globalization can provide positive results to some, it can also be a high price to pay for others. Furthermore, for all of those who profit or advance from the actions related to globalization, there are countless others who endure severe adverse effects.
Wei-Wei Zhang. (2004). The Implications of the Rise of China. Foresight, Vol. 6 Iss: 4, P. 223 – 226.
In the late 2000s, the World suffered from a big global economic crisis which caused “the largest and sharpest drop in global economic activity of the modern era”, in which “most major developed economies find themselves in a deep recession”, according to McKibbin and Stoeckel (1). Because its consequences have a very big impact to the whole world, many economists and scientist have tried to find the causes of the crisis; and some major causes have been emphasized are greed, the defection of the free market system, and the lack of prudent regulation and supervision. This essay will focus on the global imbalances, one of the most important causes of the current economic crisis.
The macroeconomic environment is a dynamic environment, which could not remain unchanged (Gajewsky 2015). There are many factors influence the global macroeconomic environment, such as interest rate, exchange rate, GDP,aggregate demand, monetary policy and other macroeconomic variable (Oxelheim and Wihlborg 2008). These factors are closely associated with commodity price.