The Formative Years of The Louisiana Purchase

954 Words2 Pages

To buy or not to buy, that is the question. Although it was the greatest “real estate” deal, the Louisiana Purchase of 1803 was perhaps one of the most controversial events in American History. President Thomas Jefferson, although he was a Founding Father and the primary writer of the Declaration of Independence, faced major opposition with his decision to purchase the Louisiana Territory from the French. Most of the opposition he faced, however, was domestic. Jefferson was the founder of the Democratic-Republic Party and believed in an agrarian society with strong local governments (i.e. a weak central government). He thought that the states should yield most of the power so that the citizens could control what happens to them (i.e. citizens wouldn’t have to follow the potential dictatorship of the central government). Soon enough, Jefferson’s Democratic-Republican policies clashed with the Federalist policies of Alexander Hamilton, who believed in an urban-based society and a strong central government. In addition, Jefferson was a believer in a strict interpretation of the Constitution. When he decided to buy the Louisiana Territory from France, however, he had to compromise his beliefs—the Constitution didn’t have a provision for the purchase of land. Therefore, the first major question that arouse from the purchase of the Louisiana Territory was whether or not the purchase was constitutional. There are two methods one can use when interpreting the Constitution. The first method includes not doing something unless the Constitution says that one can (i.e. unless the Constitution says one can do something, then one cannot). The other is where one can go ahead and do something if the Constitution doesn’t say one can’... ... middle of paper ... ... own. The purchase of the territory also caused riffs between the United States and Spain because France promised Spain that they would never sell the territory to a third party. The United States tried to justify the purchase to the Spanish, but it didn’t work. Although the Louisiana Purchase did cause negative results, the purchase seemingly brought more positive results to the people of the United States. First off, the Louisiana Purchase doubled the territory of the United States. Subsequently, the United States experienced a new sense of national pride (rise in nationalism). In addition, without the Louisiana Purchase, the United States would have never experienced westward expansion or manifest destiny. The purchase added more farmland to the United States, which allowed many people to follow their dreams about leaving the city to live off the land.

More about The Formative Years of The Louisiana Purchase

Open Document