The Essayistic Golden Age

670 Words2 Pages

In the Introduction Franzen is explaining what a real essay is and how it has been changed over the years. He starts of with his definition of an essay, “If an essay is essayed -something hazard, not definitive, not authoritative; something ventured on the basis of the authors personal experience and subjectivity- we might seem to be living in an essayistic golden age.” This definition shows us that the “essays” in magazines are not really essays because an essay is supposed to be written by the same person it is talking about bordering on their shame not someone else's and if it is successful then their might be one person who reaches out with the same shame while others are disapproving. The purpose of this essay is to show how much the meaning of an essay has devolved in today’s society and how much the essay means to the author. Franzen has …show more content…

There are smaller publications that have pure essays and have few readers than Adele has twitter followers. It is mainly because no one wants to take the time to read fully thought out and detailed essays they only want the gist with all the juicy secrets. As stated in the last paragraph, “And then, instead of sharing with a close circle of friends or with a community safely known to be like-minded, you submit the finished written thing to an audience of readers who may or may-not be sympathetic. To publish an honest essay is, always, to risk shame.” A social media post is sometimes only shared with a close group of friends or with people you know will not judge, that is why they are not considered pure essays. A pure essay is something that is written by a author about themselves that is delving deep into a topic that is either shameful or bordering on it and is shared with a plethora of people who the author does not know and the reward for writing their secrets is the people who relate to the authors shame and supports

Open Document