Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Dystopian characteristics in 1984
1984 and dystopian society
1984 and dystopian society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Dystopian characteristics in 1984
Technology has great benefits, one could listen to music anywhere at anytime, one could search anything in their pocket. However, people who use technology blindly agree to give up their privacy. Without knowing, the technological world is advancing and adapting to newer methods that define humanity. For example, 1984 by George Orwell describe a dystopian world controlled by one authoritative figure, Big Brother. In this world, everyone is monitored by telescreens, giving them no privacy, relationships are strictly for the purpose of procreation, and are only to love Big Brother. Based on 1984, our modern, advanced technology is taking our world closer and becoming identical to the world of Big Brother such as artificial relationships, governmental …show more content…
control on technology, and diminishing our English language. An indicator that our technology is creating a world similar to the world of Big Brother is that today, society has become less and less socially interactive. For example, Sharon Johnson shows the many indicators of how the modern world today has become less and less socially interactive in dating. Sharon Johnson describes Drew Johnson’s social life that consists mostly of instant text messaging over face-to-face interaction. Johnson also points out that technology has given technological people a “safer way to flirt” and “hiding behind the technology” to avoid the live awkwardness. She says that “we really see this generation as having a huge handicap in communication. We have our heads down in our smartphones a lot. We don't know how to express our emotions and we tend to hide behind technology, computers and social media” (Johnson, par. 20). With technology rapidly advancing more than human beings can keep up, our humanity diminishes. Humans are social beings, it’s how we are able to create such inventions like technology and make most things possible. However, as we adapt to the world of technology, we lose the social interaction. People lose the meaning of true love. Johnson does point out the fact that finding relationships through the internet is a “safer way to flirt,” but only to lose the best experiences. Although many believe that younger generation still has the social interaction, just a different way of expressing it, the generation still is lost in personal socialization. A person may express their true feelings on through means of technology, but how about to those who don’t have access to technology? How can one express their passion and their true emotions to someone in person? So many relationships today were made through dating apps and randomization. And many of those relationships were not made from love or made from trust or human connection.
It was only appealed to what was presented and skipped the bonding to truly know the person that is about to become the committed partner for life. With technology this advanced, the world today we have is very much alike to the Oceania. Winston’s feeble relationship with his wife, Katharine, is one of the many couples that demonstrate how technology is bridging our world closer to their world in Oceania. In Oceania, the Party’s rules were that no couple shall love each other, only for the purpose to bear children. Winston had been arranged with Katharine for the sole purpose to “serve their duty to the Party” by creating children. However, because the relationship existed not out of love, both Winston and Katharine mutually felt dejected and agonizing awkwardness. Winston felt indifferent “as soon as he touched [Katharine] she seemed to wince and stiffen. To embrace her was like embracing a jointed wooden image. And what was strange was that even when she was clasping him against her he had the feeling that she was simultaneously pushing him away with all her strength. The rigidity of her muscles managed to convey that …show more content…
impression. She would lie there with shut eyes, neither resisting nor co-operating but submitting” (Orwell, 66). In Oceania, the Party is to rule that no relationship shall be based on love. Although it is not exactly like our dating culture, it is certainly getting closer to the idea. With technology this advanced, we are progressing to unable to express our feelings, and instead to be committed without knowing. In this situation, Winston had sexual intercourse with Katharine when both do not have mutual feelings for each other. The same can be witnessed in many of today’s relationships. They were formed from just with a click on a screen. The technology we have today shapes the world we have similar to Oceania’s world because in their world, relationships are formed without the socialization and mutual feelings. The same thing could be identified in the relationships that were formed over the Internet; society peer pressure them into expectations when feelings aren’t mutual. Technology in both the modern world and the world of Oceania create artificial relationships and demonstrate the similarities the society today is becoming closer like Winston and Katharine, fake and live in a lie. In the world of modern technology, almost all tech users have instant messaging to connect with people anywhere in the world. As a result, the creation of short language, or slang, has brought the modern world to be almost identical to the world of Big Brother. Oceania’s language, Newspeak, is an example of how our world is closer to Big Brother’s world. In Oceania, the outer Party members, like Winston and Syme, are held responsible for altering the facts of history and diminishing the English language. Although many don’t understand why must Newspeak consist of a couple of words, Syme explains to Winston its purpose. Syme tells Winston, “Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it. Every concept that can ever be needed, will be expressed by exactly one word, with its meaning rigidly defined and all its subsidiary meanings rubbed out and forgotten” (Orwell, 52). Ever since the Internet was created, people are commonly using slang more often. In Oceania, the members are adapting to their form of language called Newspeak. Newspeak is to diminish words to express the same thought. However, according to Syme, Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought so that no person would be able to express any of their emotions or desires because there would be no words. No person in Oceania would able to have control in anything, they’re not able to rebel against their government, choose who they want to love, or think for who they are. Similar to the technology that today’s world has, the “Newspeak” that technological users use are such like “LOL” (laugh out loud) or shorten “you are” for “u r.” In society, many use slang to conserve time, but it also indicates the person’s level of intelligence. So when the citizens Oceania use Newspeak, many of them are diminishing their intelligence and oblivious to the Party’s totalitarian rule over them. In comparison to our world, when tech users are becoming more adaptive to slang, we are curtailing our expansion of knowledge and our thinking to become who we are, and as a result, we let ourselves become ignorant from who rules over us, our government, and we allow them to take advantage. Although the slang culture is not exactly like Oceania’s Newspeak, society is progressing towards the dystopian world. Lastly, the most important indicator that conveys how our technology creates similarity in both our world and the world of 1984 is that the government always has total authority over most uses of technology for the desire of power. For example, O’Brien arresting Winston by secretly monitoring him, and explaining Winston the Party’s principle, Ingsoc, shows how today’s government is closer to Big Brother. After breaking the Party’s law, Winston gets caught for having intimacy and forming a bond with Julia, a fellow outer party member. O’Brien, an inner party member, tries to “fix” Winston’s “insanity” for believing in such democratic values like the Party ruling over Oceania’s citizens because, according to Winston, “human beings are not fit to govern themselves.” However, O’Brien believes otherwise. O’Brien explains to Winston that “the Party seeks power entirely for its own sake. We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power. Not wealth or luxury or long life or happiness: only power, pure power. What pure power means you will understand presently” (Orwell, 263). O’Brien is a Party member who explains to Winston the purpose of the Party. Although Winston believes in such democratic values, O’Brien states that its sole purpose of the Party was just for power. It had no interest in the people. On the other hand, in today’s society, Edward Snowden is one of the prime examples of demonstrating the government control over technology by exposing confidential, yet disturbing information of invading people’s privacy. Edward Snowden worked under the United States government only to discover that the National Security Agency runs global surveillance into people’s privacy without them knowing. Snowden leaked this information to the public and has been seeking asylum ever since because the United States Justice Department pressed charges against Snowden for violating the Espionage Act of 1917 and theft of government property. Ever “since Snowden's leak, intelligence agencies have continued and even increased their surveillance -- doubling their warrantless searches for information on Americans in an NSA database from 2013 to 2015, for example -- with little backlash” (Sendik, par. 5). Snowden and Winston are alike. Both believe of the democratic values of government representing and leading in the interest of the people. However, both discover the truth about their own government. Winston discovered that the Party’s principles had no interest in ruling for the people, but instead, existing for its selfish purpose of power. Alike to Snowden, he believed in America’s most basic rights and democratic principles to only find out our own National Security Agency to be violating their own laws. He discovered that the government implemented surveillance globally, spying into people’s private life without them knowing. The reason behind is because the government desires for total control over our technological uses; although they state it’s for “our safety” reasonings, it also gives them total power over society, just as the inner Party could control all of the telescreens that monitor every member. With both the Party and our government having total control over our technological uses, it brings us closer to become one and live in a dystopian world. Technology has bridged the world we live in and Oceania to become similar over time and almost be identical.
The fabricated relationships like Winston and Katharine live in as to Internet dates, is an example of how the modern world is like the world of Big Brother. The diminishing English language is also how our world is similar to Oceania because society is narrowing their expression of freedom of control. This ties into how government has totalitarian control over the people through surveillance in all forms of technology. Society must be aware of what other factors are played into the technology we use. When we sign the Terms and Conditions without truly knowing what the conditions are and believe the world is safe, society lets the government have totalitarian power in their selfishness. Society must live in a world to be aware of their government and their decisions to make a difference to avoid the dystopian world Orwell predicts us to
be.
In a world filled with technology we must ask ourselves, is technology taking us closer to the world of Big Brother? In the novel 1984 by George Orewell, Orwell has generated this unbelievable world in which no one would ever think to be possible, but then again pondering upon it our worlds are quite similar, it is slightly alarming. It was not noticed till recently that perhaps our technology is pulling us closer to the world of Big Brother. The technology used in the novel 1984 are correlated to the technology we use currently.
Everyday, our world gains a new technology advancement. At first it began with a computer being created in the year of 1822 by Charles Babbage. Which now turned into having an everything being held on a 4.7-inch screen device. Engagements with other individuals are different now. Preferably teenagers would rather create a group message than start a conversation. The amount of terrorist attacks and technology consumed on a daily basis created a suspicion upon the government. Fahrenheit 451 and Minority report authors both demonstrate their concern on the effect of technology and government have on our future.
Imagine living under a complete totalitarianism government, where everything is controlled by the government, all political, social and economic activities. The movements by the people in the society will be monitored by telescreens, people who have thoughts against or who are speaking out against the party or government will be prosecuted by the thought police. In George Orwell’s book 1984, the party has multiple methods of how to control the people using big brother to create fear, the telescreens to watch the movement of the people in the society and lastly the thought police to prosecute anyone who is against/speaking out against Big brother and the party. In the book 1984, the author uses the futuristic setting to craft the theme that
Fear, an emotion that takes control over you, forces you to act in a certain way and refrain from taking certain risks. Fear takes over us day after day. We fear dying, losing, and failing. In the world of 1984, fear not only controls people individually, but human kind as a whole. Leaders of the Inner Party, and the ultimate leader Big Brother controlled the people of Oceania by their fears. Through revolt, love, technology, and control over history Party members became restricted in every aspect of human nature.
Today’s modern world may not be exactly like 1984, but there are some issues that are very similar to it. Some of the biggest issues that is becoming compromised today is the issue of privacy, which in the book 1984 was something that the people did not have much of because of things like telescreens. Not only is our privacy compromised but the government is also being too controlling. Ways today’s privacy is being compromised are through things like game consoles, phones, social media, and drones and not only is our being compromised through these things but the government is also gaining too much control by compromising our privacy.
It is becoming very clear that the world is becoming overpowered with electronic devices, and it is no one but the people’s fault for the privacy loss that has and will continue to happen. The amount one spends on their phone or computer a day could be described as outrageous and to some a waste of time. People wonder why privacy is becoming an issue and it is clearly because the more technical we get with technology, the more power the government has over the people. Many people do not even realize that they are being watched. When they are on their electronic device they have no idea that the government can very easily be monitoring what they are doing. This is very similar to what happens in the
What drives fear in people? Maybe it’s a depraved person, death, heights, or the spider on the wall. Either way, everyone is afraid of something. In the book 1984 by George Orwell, the characters fear someone whom they don’t know the existence of called Big Brother. He is the symbol of fear, torture, and persecution in the eyes of the citizens of Oceania. In the following paragraphs, Big Brother’s impact of fear on people’s lives will be discussed. Also, a great leader of Germany by the name of Adolf Hitler will also be gone over.
George Orwell foresees a nightmarish-future for the world in his book 1984, where individualism loses precedence to "the good of society," and with it goes the individual's private life. "The [controlling] Party" in the socialist government knows the intimate details of all citizens, and prosecutes those who violate social orders through threatening speech, behavior or thoughts. The omnipresent visual warning "Big Brother is Watching You,” reminds citizens that no personal information is safe from the "Thought Police." While this may seem far-fetched to some, Orwell envisioned technology facilitating government's abuse of power in 1950; in the twenty-first century, progress has left one's private life susceptible to interested parties in both the public and private sectors. In 1997, Ralph Nader cautioned, "The people are not organized not equipped with the knowledge, tools or skills to confront the invasions of the self they can see, let alone the far greater, more subterranean kinds of surveillance" (viii). With the rise of computers to their current capabilities, collecting, storing, accessing and sharing personal data has become easier than ever before: governments and companies no longer keep files of paper records on individuals, which accessing, stealing or sharing would be too arduous a task, but rather electronic databases that they can easily create, access and link. Ellen Alderman and Caroline Kennedy note in their book The Right to Privacy, "From a privacy point of view, we are in the midst of the most unsettling period in [the computer] revolution" (326). Computers do not threaten personal privacy, though, nor violate any right granted to Americans: the word 'privacy' does not appear in the Constitution, nor does the p...
Warning: your technology may be working against you. Our technological devices are seen everywhere and before we know it, they will control every aspect of our lives. This discussion has been discussed a plethora of times before. Such as George Orwell, author of the novel “1984.” According to Orwell’s novel, as new technology is developed, the more accessible it’ll be to control us. Who are these people controlling us you may ask? Well, that could be a long list of people. Some examples include the government, advertisers, hackers, corporations and more. The parallels of the technology we see today and the technology we see in Orwell's novel is undeniable. The parallels of our technology to the technology of 1984 include the infamous telescreen,
" From utopia to dystopia: technology, society and what we can do about it." OpenSecurity, 20 Dec. 2013. Web. The Web.
George Orwell’s novel 1984, which is still known as a best seller today, is often seen in many topics of discussion in our new age. As it was published in 1949, it had brought up many topics that associate with the main theme of 1984 such as, surveillance, privacy of others, and totalitarianism. 1984 becomes a warning to all about the the consequences that come from giving the government to much power of the nation. Given the advent of the NSA surveillance leaks in 2013, it has become a common exercise for political pundits to compare the fictional events of 1984 to the present day (Crouch). Surveillance has brought up many issues as for the violations of humans rights and has had brought in more racism and made it as an everyday thing.
As technology as advanced, so has our society. We are able to accomplish many tasks much easier, faster, and in effective ways. However, if looked at the harmful impact it has had on the society, one can realize that these are severe and really negative. One of the main concerns is privacy rights. Many people want that their information and personal data be kept in secrecy, however with today’s technology, privacy is almost impossible. No matter how hard one tries, information being leaked through technological advancements have become more and more common. With personal information being leaked, one does not know exactly how the information will be used, which validates the statement that privacy rights have been diminishing and should be brought to concern. Many people do not realize that their information is being used by third-parties and to consumer companies. In conclusion, technology has had a significant effect on privacy
The inevitable truth about our technological advances has become an ongoing controversial dilemma. It begs to question whether or not our technology is taking us closer to the world of Big Brother. It even subjects us to address all the pros and cons this said technology, as a whole, has to offer. These days when people talk to each other, some no longer share eye contact because they are too busy on social media, texting, checking emails, looking for the next big thing, and so forth. Many people are blinded by the fancy & entertaining applications, availability of gps, and most importantly, being able to surf the web at the palm of their hands, but little do they know that those
As technology penetrates society through Internet sites, smartphones, social networks, and other modes of technology, questions are raised as the whether lines are being crossed. People spend a vast majority of their time spreading information about themselves and others through these various types of technology. The problem with all these variations is that there is no effective way of knowing what information is being collected and how it is used. The users of this revolutionary technology cannot control the fate of this information, but can only control their choice of releasing information into the cyber world. There is no denying that as technology becomes more and more integrated into one’s life, so does the sacrificing of that person’s privacy into the cyber world. The question being raised is today’s technology depleting the level of privacy that each member of society have? In today’s society technology has reduced our privacy due to the amount of personal information released on social networks, smartphones, and street view mapping by Google. All three of these aspects include societies tendency to provide other technology users with information about daily occurrences. The information that will be provided in this paper deals with assessing how technology impacts our privacy.
Slowly technology has been disintegrating many aspects of our society, the internet especially. Although the internet has its positive effects such as its wealth of resources it has led to the loss of privacy. For example social networking sites give their users easy access to share information about themselves however, due to the explosion of technology it has made hacking easier to online predators. The government has attempted to help people regain their privacy online by passing the Consumer Internet Privacy Protection Act of 1997, although this law has been difficult to enforce due to the fast advances in technology and the web. In the novel 1984 by George Orwell, a society described to be constantly watched “Big Brother is watching you” (Orwell 4) , where there is no such thing as privacy or freedom of speech and the government is in control of everything. Orwell in this novel foresees the advancements of technology to be harmful to our future society, if we continue to let our privacy be taken away from us it will make us one step closer to living in a society where the government/large corporations control all.