Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Frankenstein critical analysis
Interpretation of mary shelleys frankenstein
Mary Shelley's portrayal of the monster in Frankenstein
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Frankenstein critical analysis
The classic gothic novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley details the relationship between two significant figures, Victor Frankenstein, and his unnamed monster. The critical relationship between such characters causes many literary critics to compose the idea that they are bound by nature – inadvertently becoming a single central figure (Spark). This provides provoking thoughts on the duality of mankind, revealing the wickedness of human nature. The role of the monster as an alter ego to Victor is an ideal suggestion, as their characteristics in the story consistently change; from predator to prey, depressed to angry, pitiful to cruel, these are all characteristics shared between both characters at different times of the novel. These characters are both complementary and contrasted beings (Spark). Critics have supported their claims of the relation between Victor and the monster. Primary characteristics shared amongst both figures can include ignorance to those around them, an inner darkness that dictates their principles, a conscience that consequently causes them to regret their actions, and a strong lust for knowledge. Critics also believe the alternate title of the novel The Modern Prometheus is an indicator of the connection between Victor and the monster.
Victor and the monster are both ignorant to the people around them. Victor Frankenstein has a life full of domestic love, and affection. His father Alphonse, his best friend Henry Clerval, and his lover Elizabeth – an orphan of significant beauty and talent, were all nurtured in the same home as him. All these people were able to provide Frankenstein with joys of companionship, and love. Nevertheless Victor had sought more than a prosperous, affectionate life, and instead ch...
... middle of paper ...
...s "Remarks on Frankenstein" in Bloom, Harold, ed. Mary Shelley, Bloom's Classic Critical Views. New York: Chelsea House Publishing, 2008. Bloom's Literature. Facts On File, Inc. Web. 8 May 2014
.
Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft., and Michael Kennedy. Joseph. Frankenstein or the Modern Prometheus: The 1831 Text. London: Oxford Univ., 1969. Print.
Spark, Muriel. "The Shifting Roles of Frankenstein and His Monster." In Mary Shelley: A Biography. EP Dutton, 1987. Quoted as "The Shifting Roles of Frankenstein and His Monster" in Bloom, Harold, ed. Frankenstein, Bloom's Guides. New York: Chelsea House Publishing, 2007. Bloom's Literature. Facts On File, Inc. Web. 8 May 2014
.
Works Cited Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. 1818. Ed. J. Paul Hunter. Norton Critical Edition. New York: Norton, 1996.
Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft, and Maurice Hindle. Frankenstein, Or, The Modern Prometheus. London: Penguin, 2003. Print.
in Frankenstein: Contexts, nineteenth century responses, criticism. By Mary Shelley. Ed. J. Paul Hunter. Norton Critical Edition.
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein or the Modern Prometheus. Edited by: D.L. Macdonald & Kathleen Scherf. Broadview Editions. 3rd Edition. June 20, 2012
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein: A Norton Critical Edition. Ed. J. Paul Hunter. New York: W. W.
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein or the Modern Prometheus. Edited by: D.L. Macdonald & Kathleen Scherf. Broadview Editions. 3rd Edition. June 20, 2012
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. Ed. D.L. Macdonald and Kathleen Scherf. Orchard Park, NY: Broadview Press, 1999.
Works Cited Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein: A Norton Critical Edition. ed. J. Paul Hunter. New York: W. W. Norton, 1996.
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein or the Modern Prometheus. Edited with an Introduction and notes by Maurice Hindle. Penguin books, 1992
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein or the Modern Prometheus. The 1818 Text. New York: Oxford UP, 1998.
"Frankenstein By Mary Shelley Frankenstein at a Glance." Frankenstein at a Glance. N.p., n.d. Web. 05 May 2014. .
Brachneos. “Frankenstein – a Literature Essay on Social Context Comments.” Writinghood . N.p., 3 Mar. 2011. Web. 24 Apr. 2011. .
The monster of the novel is often misattributed with the name, “Frankenstein.” However, Victor Frankenstein can ultimately be considered the true monster of this tale. His obsession would lead to the corruption of his soul and the creation of two monsters—one himself, and the other, the creature. In attempting to take on the role of God, nature would become a monster to Victor and destroy his life. These elements of monstrosity in Frankenstein drive the meaning of its story.
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein or the Modern Prometheus. Edited with an Introduction and notes by Maurice Hindle. Penguin books, 1992
Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley’s Frankenstein (sometimes also known as The Modern Prometheus) is the classic gothic novel of her time. In this eerie tale, Dr. Victor Frankenstein – suffering from quite an extreme superiority complex – brings to life a creature made from body parts of deceased individuals from nearby cemeteries. Rather than to embrace the Creature as his own, Frankenstein alienates him because of his unpleasant appearance. Throughout the novel, the Creature is ostracized not only by Frankenstein but by society as a whole. Initially a kind and gentle being, the Creature becomes violent and eventually seeks revenge for his creator’s betrayal. Rather than to merely focus on the exclusion of the Creature from society, Shelley depicts the progression of Dr. Frankenstein’s seclusion from other humans as well, until he and the Creature ultimately become equals – alone in the world with no one to love, and no one to love them back. Frankenstein serves as more than simply a legendary tale of horror, but also as a representation of how isolation and prejudice can result in the demise of the individual.