Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of lowering the drinking age to 18
Impact of lowering the drinking age
Impact of lowering the drinking age
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of lowering the drinking age to 18
Bridgette Baer
Professor Nina Uppal
ENG 1520
11 April 2016
From 21 to 18
As an American, when you turn eighteen years old, you’re legally allowed to enlist in the military, get married, buy tobacco, and have the right to vote. With having these responsibilities under your belt, many would assume the age to drink alcohol would be 18, but in America, you are not allowed to legally drink alcohol until you are 21. As many people turn 18 and enter adulthood, they should be able to make their own decisions about alcohol consumption. It should not be up to the government to dictate whether what age is appropriate to drink legally at, or let alone tell an adult what he or she can/cannot consume. From college parties, painful break-ups, the stress of
…show more content…
Tucker. I found this article on Newsweek.com, and found it to be resourceful. This website has many articles dealing with the upcoming election, and other news that was parallel with a similar news site, CNN. Tucker has written many articles for this website, and also a publisher for Laissez Faire Books. The audience intended are young adults, who are either 18 or in their 20’s. This piece of writing displayed the reality of underage drinking among adults, and explained in detail how young adults are being rebellious, getting away with drinking under 21, consequences they face, and movements that have been taken to lower the drinking age. His main claim is that the drinking age should be lowered to 18 years old. “Most of the rest of the world has settled on 18 for liquor and 16 for beer and wine” (Tucker). So what is America waiting for? America is one of few countries with the highest drinking age, according to Tucker. He organized his writing by the reality of young adults drinking, (no matter how young) to the statistics of majority of other countries having lowered drinking ages, to movements that have been taken into actions to help lower the legal drinking age. Since Tucker is a publisher for Lassiez Faire Books, and writes many other articles, he is projected to be quite intelligent, and therefore very credible. He builds his logos by backing up his claim with …show more content…
I located my last article on CNN, “Should the U.S. lower the drinking age?” and it was written by Brandon Griggs. Griggs is a senior producer with CNN Digital. The audience of this article also are adults. This piece of writing discusses many opinions of professors of different universities, and how many of them agree the age shall remain at 21 (supporting each opinion with hard facts). Griggs states “When the law was raised to 21, alcohol-related deaths for young people decreased, when the drinking age was lowered, deaths increased.” To decrease the number of deaths in young drivers, we need to educate young adults to warn and show them the devastating and potentially fatal effects of drinking and driving. Griggs builds his ethos by being a highly educated, senior producer for CNN. CNN is another high-profile news channel. It is reliable, updating individuals with the latest, most important information every day. He also quotes and includes highly rated people, similar to my other articles. His logos is solid is also solid, backing up his claims with facts from many different credible sources. The writer did not invoke any emotional response to
This article advocates for the drinking age to be lowered. It presents the arguments in a very clear manner, with a bulleted list of 18 statistics that prove why it is unnecessary for the drinking age to be 21. The main argument of this article is that it is ironic that “Someone can join the military and die defending their country, but they can’t legally have a beer.” The first few examples use logos to appeal to the audience by giving legitimate statistics that prove how it makes sense to lower the age. It then uses pathos, by giving scary statistics that talk about drunk driving and other harmful behavior that actually prove to worried parents that statistics are lower in for these things in states that allow drinking at 18. Obviously parents
"Americans Still Oppose Lowering the Drinking Age." Gallup Poll Briefing. (24 July 2014). Web. 19 Feb. 2016. The article provides the views of those who wish to keep the legal drinking age at 21. It states that almost 75% of Americans are still against lowering the drinking age. They believe that the higher age has reduced drinking and driving accidents. Also stated is the belief that since it has been in act for thirty years it should be left the same. The articles also provides statistics based on the specific classes of Americans who are for or against the issue. The purpose of the article is to show readers the benefits of keeping the drinking age as is. It was published on a website that is used to report new and political issues, therefore, allowing it to draw the attention of many people. It is unique in the fact that it provides surveys and information about the specific kinds of people that were surveyed. This article helps me with my thesis because it provides me with the views of people who do not agree with it, therefore, allowing me to show both sides of the
In the contents of this paper, four points of view will be discussed on an extremely controversial issue that has an effect on a large percentage of citizens in the United States. The issue at hand is whether the legal age to consume alcohol should be lowered from 21 to 18, and will state a pro and con side, as well as 2 stakeholders for each side of the argument. The stakeholders on the pro side are as follows: Underage consumers of alcohol, businesses that sell and the companies that produce alcohol. The people on the con side of the argument that would want the legal age to remain at 21 include State and Federal Law Enforcement Agencies, as well as the demographic of Parents that would prefer to keep their children from being exposed to alcohol at a potentially young age. As you continue to read the stakeholders opinions and arguments will be explained, after which the author’s personal opinion will be advanced. After doing my own in depth research on the topic, the legal age to consume alcohol should remain at 21 as set by the United States Congress when they passed the National Minimum Drinking Age Act (NMDAA) in July of 1984. This act punished every state that allowed persons below 21 years of age to purchase and publicly possess alcoholic beverages by reducing its annual federal highway apportionment by ten percent. (National Minimum Drinking Age Act) This caused all fifty continental U.S. states to set their legal drinking age to 21, and it has remained there for thirty years.
Eastman III, Donald R. “Lowering the Drinking Age: Let’s Keep the Dialogue Open.” St. Petersburg Times. 25 Aug. 2008. Print.
Primarily, the drinking age should be lowered to teach responsibility and safety in young adults. The idea seems paradoxical; however, the high drinking age that is present in the U.S. today has only pushed underage drinking underground (Balko 458). In fact, America has the highest minimum drinking age in the world (Balko 459). Even though the American drinking age remains high, America still remains with an astonishingly large number of alcohol-related accidents and deaths. Is this statement a coincidence? Throughout the years alcohol has become more and more of an issue in young adults, but the correct actions are not taking place. If alcohol were to legally be put in the hands of Americans eighteen and above, these individuals would likely be forced to learn a sense of safety and responsibility. As stated by Caryn Sul...
There has been an ongoing controversy in the United States on whether the drinking age should be lowered to eighteen like most of the world or if it should stay at twenty-one. Underage drinking has been a major controversial issue for years, yet why is it not under control? Teenagers are continuing to buy alcohol with fake identification cards, drink, get into bars, and drink illegally. As a teen, I have proof that these things are going on not only in college but in high school as well. There are a lot of factors that come together to why the drinking age should be lowered to eighteen; the most obvious reason is that too many people are drinking before they are twenty-one.
Both CNN and Fox News influence these immense populations with how each utilize pathos, ethos and logos in the topics discussed during the broadcasted show. For example, Fox News 's audience seems to be primarily conservative, while CNN’s audience seem to be more liberal (Engel). So each network’s stories “focus on the issues that” conservatives or liberals “want to watch and talk about” (James). These topics are used to develop a more conservative or liberal fan base in the respective news networks. As the dominant news network on cable television, Fox News impacts the greatest quantity of citizens, bringing in an audience of over two million for primetime (James). Therefore, Fox News influences the largest percentage of Americans listening to news networks by effectively using these manipulative literary techniques. However, CNN has a younger audience than Fox News (Carter), which contributes to CNN’s audience growing from 350,000 a night, in 2013 (Agee), to 629,000 viewers a night (James). CNN and Fox News compete with each other to influence the greatest amount of people and the public’s opinion of current events. Each network appeals to pathos, logos and ethos differently and similarly to coax the greatest amount of listeners each night.
In the 1960s, the drinking age was set as 21, to match the voting age. However, around the time of the Vietnam War, the public began to argue that if an 18-year-old was old enough to fight and die for his country, then he should be able to vote as well. As a result, the voting age was lowered to 18. Between 1970 and 1976, 29 states lowered their legal drinking age as well. In the words of Carla Main, author of Bulldozed and various other published works concerning law and society, the results were “catastrophic,” as “[h]ighway deaths among teenagers and young adults skyrocketed” (Main 33). Many states began raising the legal drinking age up again. In 1984, under the supervision of Ronald ...
Lawmakers should not consider lowering the drinking age from twenty-one to eighteen. Despite the deep value this country places on freedom, personal liberties, and personal responsibilities, the data shows that public safety is greatly at risk if the drinking age were to be lowered to twenty-one. A variety of groups believe that the drinking age should be lowered to eighteen deeming that the twenty-one law is unconstitutional. On the opposing side, people agree that the law helps to protect our young people and the communities where they live.
Despite the problems that would arise, many people are beginning to feel that the drinking age should be lowered from twenty-one to eighteen. Studies have been made; however, no hard evidence suggesting lowering the minimum drinking age would help have surfaced. Although there are countless studies of how alcohol has many harmful effects on teenagers, there is a great deal of negative criticism about what if the drinking age is lowered. Some would say the morally right decision is to not allow teens the chance to hurt themselves. Everyone is entitled to having his or her own opinions and beliefs. However, the overall health of the youth of our country seems a little more important than some personal belief. The drinking age should not be lowered due to the fact drunk driving, juvenile delinquency, and alcohol-related medical issues related to teens will increase.
Brown, Kyle. ?Pros and Cons of Lowering the Drinking Age to 18? The Odyssey. Olympia
Pete Coors campaigned extensively in Coors country during the recent election, in which he was ultimately defeated by his cowboy counterpart Ken Salazar. One reason that may have led to his defeat was his strong stance on lowering the drinking age to eighteen. The reasoning behind Coors’ proposition comes in the form of government sanctions that are currently in place. He claims, “18-year-olds should be able to drink legally if they can vote and go to war.” However, his argument was quickly shut down by Salazar as he reminded Coors of the recent tragedies at CSU and CU. “Thousands of young people die every year in alcohol-related accidents,” exclaimed Salazar. This information was compiled by CNN.com during coverage of the 2004 senate race.
Do you enjoy being told what to do after you turn an 18 and you become an adult? I know I don’t. As you transition into that adult phase you get to enjoy adult activities such as voting and joining the military. As an adult there comes responsibility and at some points you have to make tough decisions. One of those decision include are you going to drink under age. What if I could tell you that the drinking age use to be 18 years old in 30 states. Should the drinking age go back to 18 years old? I am one who believes that as an adult you should have the ability to make those decisions. Lower the drinking age to 18, but we need to enforce the laws and educate our youth.
Although the United States conflicts with other countries in many ways, one of the most controversial is the legal drinking age. Over the years, there have been many arguments on whether the age should be raised or lowered. Some citizens feel that twenty-one is not mature enough to handle the effects of alcohol, while others feel that twenty-one is too long to wait. Should the legal drinking age of the United States be raised to try and ensure more responsibility and maturity? One could think that the drinking age of twenty-one should be old enough for everyone to be responsible enough to handle the effects of drinking. However some people are also not against lowering the drinking age because if eighteen is old enough to vote on decisions in your community and country, why is it not old enough to decide if you want to consume alcohol or not?
In trying to attract new audiences, news media have begun to transition from reporting to becoming a form of entertainment. With the meteoric rise of social media’s role as a news source, the fight for an increase of diversity in the media, and the ever-growing desire of immediate content, the future of responsible journalism is more important than ever. Ask yourself, why do I think the way I do? Where do my political views originate? How do I prove them? Most likely, it is due to the biased portrayal of issues in the media and the politicization that accompanies what we consume. Now, compare your views to your preferred news reporting entity. More than likely, they are the same.