The Dream And The Inequality Of The American Dream

814 Words2 Pages

For many, the American Dream is associated with the ability to make gains based on hard work, in much of a rags to riches way. However, the dream now associated with equal opportunity to get ahead is dead, in same ways regressing the country to the early 19th century in which there was a small circle of extremely wealthy robber barons and the majority of people were very poor. The Progressive Era changed all of that, and throughout the mid and late 20th century the American Dream was very possible. Regardless, due to the fact that most of the resources vital to success are now owned by the top 1% the traditional American Dream is a concept that is only accessible to the wealthy of American society. This allows the affluent to make investments
The opposite claim, as it were, is that the gap in income levels does not necessarily prevent the lower and middle classes from achieving the American Dream and that the supremely rich are a necessary fixation in the United States because they employ so many people. Therefore, the stability of the economy requires this inequality. In an essay written by Brandon King, who believes that the American Dream is still fully obtainable by all classes, he says, “...We should keep in mind the ways in which large businesses and financial insti-tutions enable many others to attain economic stability and security.” Although this view is very understandable and yes, the economy does partially rely on people of wealth for business, the excess wealth of those that own most of the money in the United States (not those of moderate wealth, but those who own the majority of it) is unnecessary and unbeneficial to the rest of the country. The majority find themselves unable to gain enough footing to provide themselves with the requisite materials to catch up to a world in which the list of imperative resources for success keeps growing longer and the ability to acquire these things keeps getting

Open Document