When were naïve children, we might have been fearful of the monsters in our closet, but in reality there were no monsters. Our fear of the unknown, coupled with our imagination, caused us to believe that there was actually a monster. Fear is an innate emotion that all humans have expressed. Monsters in movies and novels that we consume should be considered as tangible creature that encapsulates our fears. These stories make us imagine a world in which a fictional character defeats and conquers things that we ourselves might not venture to do. In essence, we let ourselves vicariously live through the life of these characters and we share the same fear of the fictional threat. In addition, Brooks makes argument on whether to fight their “monster” …show more content…
or run away from it. Zombies have become a part of the mainstream culture through movies, television shows, video games and various other forms entertainment. Originally, zombies were corpses that were revived through witchcraft in many regions of Africa. Likewise, we have embraced this monster and let it become epitome of our fears. We often see the hordes of zombies slowly approaching and transforming humans into mindless monsters. To some they are nothing more than the fear of mortality and the loss of one’s self-identity. Essentially, they signify physical real world threats that we cant really categorize or quantify in some regards. In addition, zombies are often portrayed as a constant and pervasive threat to humanity. As humans, we can imagine and observe these situations, which allow us to project and face our fears without any risk. Therefore, to truly understand our fascination and horror of monsters we must define the basic underlying characteristic that define monster. In the article “Horror and Humor”, Noel Carrol defines a few of the qualities of the horror genre and the monster itself. Firstly, the existence of monsters is often denied by science. For example, it is genetically impossible to create a virus that causes zombification and since you would have to combine various viruses to create it. (Narisuddin). In addition, we know that no current disease that exists that signifies symptoms of a zombie. Another characteristic that the author argues about monsters is that they are impure and repugnant creatures that cause fear and disgust among the fictional characters in the story. For example in World War Z, a man in Rio shot a zombie with “bloody meat falling from [its] open mouth” started walking toward him (Brooks 25). The repugnant creature made him fear causing him to shoot the zombie. Thirdly, these horror fiction stories are often meant to “guide our emotional response” to the monster. Ideally, the fictional characters shape our emotional response when they first encounter this scary monster. The article also stated the monster has to be a “fearsome” creature that would cause physical harm to the character. For example, when Dr. Kwang described “Patient Zero” as cold, gray frail boy who’s “movements were violent” so that he had to call for help (Brooks 7). This young boy is described as a fearsome zombie which “truly scared” the doctor. This event highlights the sheer fear that the monster sparked in peoples' hearts. In addition, the juxtaposition of our world with an apocalyptic scenario where an inadequate government led to the death of millions of people makes the story more realistic and horrifying. Although monsters represent our tangible fears, they also signify certain events. Monsters are often times things that “occur outside the course of nature” and they are “sign of some forthcoming misfortune” (Sheehan 7). For example, when the first small outbreak mentioned in in the village of China, symbolized a widespread pandemic that would follow. This makes us fear whether our own government would be effective in such a widespread pandemic. Therefore, our fear of infectious diseases can rationalize the plague of the zombie. In the book, the government told the public that Phalanx was the cure for the disease, but instead it was just a placebo. The government did not try to help the people, but instead keep them from fearing the death. Similarly in an interview with Arthur Sinclair, the head of “DeSTRes” talks about creating a safe zone. In addition, he mentions how the people have gone through “starvation, diseases, [and] homelessness in the millions because of zombies” (Brooks 137). Brooks tries to represent zombies as a symbol of a natural disaster that swept through America leaving behind pure carnage. Not only are the zombies portrayed as impure, repugnant creatures, but also associated with war, disease and destruction. Similarly, Hurricane Katrina was one of the deadliest hurricanes in American history, leaving behind billions in damages and killing about 1,836 people. The storm destroyed several thousand homes and buildings in several states(Staff) .This natural disaster is similar to the one mentioned in the book because thousand were homeless and many did not have any food or shelter. The government was blamed for not preparing the residents for evacuations and essentially causing such a high death toll. Likewise, Brooks maybe trying to draw parallels between our world and stories in the book. Zombies are similar to natural disaster in that they are both a constant threat the survival of humanity. Therefore, zombies could be a larger allegory to the similar threats we face in our world. In addition, there could be an argument made that people that do not prepare will not survive similar to the characters in the novel. The symbolizations of these unprepared people during the zombie apocalypse in the novel should be used as lesson to be better prepared for events such as natural disaster. When humans are in desperate situations in which they need to fight to survive, they often bring out the worst within us. In a world in which it is only the survival of the fittest, often times the monsters are the humans. Nietzsche the philosopher stated, “Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And when you look long into an abyss, the abyss also looks into you” (146). Sometimes the monster we need to fear is not the one we fight, but it is own inherent and selfish desire to survive. An interview reveals the story of a girl named Sharon who was taken to the church by her mother in order to keep her safe from the zombies. When the zombies broke in, the mom starts choking her to death instead of protecting her daughter from danger. The real monster in the story was not the zombies, but instead the mother who tried killing her own daughter in the panic of the moment. Another example is the mercenary who worked for a cruel boss who only wanted fame and power (Brooks 83-89). He allowed celebrities to stay in his safe house away from the zombies. When normal people tried to enter the house, he would order his men to shoot them down. This man was the real monster that people had to fear because his arrogance and his pure disregard for human life. Even in a crisis when people needed help, he decided to turn his back in order to have fame. Several encounters in the book show that people would kill others in order to ensure their survival and let fear blur their conscience. For example, the Donner Party is an example in history where harsh circumstances of survival led to some horrible decisions.
In 1846, a group of immigrants led by George Donner went west and they decided to stop along the way to make repairs to their wagons (History.com). A harsh winter storm brought lot of snow and they began to slowly run out of food. Once they ran out food people resorted to other humans in order to survive. They resorted to cannibalism in order to ensure the survival of the group. The circumstances were so harsh that people were willing to let their own family members die in order to have food for the group. This was gruesome examples of people would do almost anything in order to ensure their survival. In addition, this ties back into the larger theme of primitivism of humans in World War Z. In addition, in an effort to stay alive humans will kill, steal, fight and run. In our lives we might consider the things that we might have done in order to …show more content…
survive. Consequently, the fight or flight response is a primitive and automatic response that prepares the body to either fight or run from a perceived threat to our survival (Neimark). Many of the characters in World War Z are facing this same type of dilemma when fighting for their survival. Brooks tries to highlight that most people choose flight rather than fight because of their fear. When Sharon decided to run away rather than fight, she survived but the rich man in the West Indies died trying to stand and fight. Although, if he had decided to not draw attention to himself he could have stayed alive (Brooks 83-89).In addition, people who blindly took Phalanx could be considered as running away from their problems by blindly believing that the vaccine was real. Brooks is not endorsing either a flight or fight response, but rather a circumstantial stance in which you would make the right choice based on situation at hand. In conclusion, monsters allow us to project our fear and face them.
The zombies in book satisfy the characteristics that define a horrific monster. An event that is associated with a monster caused great misfortune. The zombies are fearsome beings that want to bring harm and are fear into the lives of the fictional characters. The existence of the monsters would be incongruous with reality, but we let out minds escape. Brooks tries to teach us that we need also be smart when we are put in “fight or flight” situations because our decisions will determine our survival. In addition, zombies are made an allegory to many of the bad things of the world and human are in constant battle with them. In addition, the zombies symbolize a natural disaster, a threat that is uncontrollable and perpetual in our world. Zombies have become an intrinsic part of the World War Z and people must adapt and learn to survive despite their fears. Humans are at an all-out war with zombies and they cannot lose or they risk the eradication of the human
race.
No book has captivated the zombie apocalypse better than World War Z. Max Brooks creatively presents “a worldwide zombie pandemic from outbreak to aftermath” (Boyd, Tristan). His book encompasses many social and political themes in the world today. The book reveals true fear and shows the strength of the human race.
Torie Boschs “First eat all the lawyers” appeared in Slate october 2011. Her piece was to reach out to horror fans and to explain to them why zombies are a great monsters in current media. Zombie fanatics who read this short essay will love her vast knowledge of zombies while others who still do not understand why zombies are horribly terrifying can get behind her argument. Bosch explains that the current zombie craze has to do with our current society and how white-collar workers would be left defenceless in a world over run with a rampant horde of zombies. While blue-collar workers can flourish in this current state as they have more skills suited for survival.
Both White Zombie and “Dead Men Walking in the Cane Fields” represent the early zombie and both of them embody Cohen’s first thesis “The Monster is a Cultural Body” Both the story and the film have zombies and both of these works make their zombies appear scary with dead like characteristics, however the real reason why they are scary is that, at the time, they tried to change society and that scared people. The people that liked society the way it was didn’t want another group to gain power or righ...
In most novel and movies monsters are known to be evil, committing numerous crimes against humanity and are normally the ones that we don’t sympathize with. However, this novel carefully shows the reader that monsters can be good creatures, with a decent heart and act based on the actions of others. The novel shows how the monster should be pitied, rather than criticised. Mary Shelley's “Frankenstein” manages to create sympathy for the creature through speech, actions and mistreatment the creature suffers.
Monsters are symbols and representations of a culture. They exist because of certain places or feelings of a time period. Monsters are “an embodiment of a certain cultural moment”. Author of Grendel, John Gardner, and author of Frankenstein, Mary Shelley, both create a monster to represent something larger than itself in order to have the reader reflect on their “fears, desires, anxiety, and fantasy” in society, which is explained in Jefferey Cohen's Monster Culture (Seven Theses). The latest trend in monster media, zombies, also fit into Cohen's theses on what a monster is.
James Parker essay “Our Zombies, Ourselves,” informs readers that the zombie has almost outranked the vampire, and why they’re so popular. This undead monster originated from a Caribbean folk nightmare and was adapted over time by, the Halperin brothers, William Seabrook and George Romero and numerous others. Much like the vampire, zombies owe their fame to the progressiveness of technology, allowing them to consistently invade various media forms. The zombie has infested countless tv shows, movies, video games, and books, throughout the 21st century. Zombies themselves are soulless corpses who were regurgitated back into the world of the living. This making them rejects from the underworld, this presents the zombie as rejected yet inexpungable. What makes the zombie so popular, however, is that symbolizes everything that is rejected by humanity. “Much can be made of him, because he makes so little of himself. He comes back, He comes back, feebly but unstoppably” (Parker). The zombie represents humanity itself as well as what is rejected by humanity. Much like individuals today, the zombie is burdened by life’s demands, converting to nothing but a rotting, groaning human shell that stumbles through life without a purpose. The zombie is symbolizer of the real world, and all things irrepressible, whereas the vampire is a symbol of an alternate world and all things
Asma, Stephen. On Monsters :An Unnatural History of Our Worst Fears. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009. Print.
In order to scare us, books, movies, and television shows will take the most ordinary things and make it into a monster. For instance, the movie IT takes a clown and turns it into
Title: Metaphors in Cinema: Gigantic Monsters Proposed Research: The metaphors in films like Godzilla, Big Bug Movies (Them, Tarantula), and King Kong. Trauma and fear of war, science, and humanity. Question: Develop an argument about how humans deal with their fear of death through the use of one or more monsters (zombies, vampires, etc.). Monsters like Godzilla are important for humans who are coping with a fear of death. The use of monsters is to lessen the fear of imminent threat and or distress of waiting for a catastrophe to happen.
Though fictional, this novel illustrates the fear surrounding disease, viruses, and contamination and how if uncontrollable, could lead to a global spread that could jeopardize the human race. Traveling internationally, World War Z represents a zombie epidemic that brings forth infection, which can be considered an unconscious actor during this time of confusion and destruction. Scientifically, fear is defined as a natural response found in almost all organisms that revolve around the emotions and feelings induced by perceived threats and danger. Max Brooks illustrates the societal interaction with fear, “Fear of aging, fear of loneliness, fear of poverty, fear of failure. Fear is the most basic emotion we have. Fear is primal. Fear sells. That was my mantra. ‘Fear sells.’” (Brooks 55). The fear of a zombie virus spreading in fact just produces more fear into the mind of the individual. Through research and scientific advancements, fears and anxieties have been proven to put an individual more at risk of developing health issues. How ironic, right? Our fears and anxieties surrounding diseases and the spread of them cause our society to be more susceptible to obtain and contract more health related problems. The fight against the zombie metaphor within World War Z gives the reader a purpose for finding a way to hold
“Zombie killings are similar to reading and deleting 400 work e-mails on a Monday morning or filling out paperwork that only generates more paperwork, or following Twitter gossip out of obligation, or performing tedious tasks in which the only true risk is being consumed by avalanche” (41). These are all similar to zombie killings because zombies will never go away unless you turn to really harsh tactics like aiming for one’s brain with a shot gun and repeating this for every zombie you come in contact with. In order to clear those 400 emails after reading them you must repeat the steps for each and every one, which is time consuming and can be very frustrating. Completing paperwork is very tedious, and can sometimes become overwhelming you may begin to feel as if it will never end which is common well it can feel similar to that when it comes to zombie killings as well because there will be one zombie followed by another one and many more to come. “Battling zombies is like battling anything….. Or everything” (42). Never assume the war is over because it is not, there will be one or more zombies hiding out, the war is never over. “The zombies you kill today will merely be replaced by the zombies of tomorrow” (44). Zombies are a “live-stock” they are brain dead but they travel in packs and have no limit as to how far they will go. In the movie Dawn of the Dead the zombies actually
The horror genre is synonymous with images of terror, violence and human carnage; the mere mention of horror movies evokes physical and psychological torture. As remarked by noted author Stephen King “the mythic horror movie…has a dirty job to do. It deliberately appeals to all that is worst in us. It is morbidity unchained, our most base instincts let free, our nastiest fantasies realized.” (King, 786). At manageable intervals, we choose to live these horrific events vicariously through the characters in horror movies and books as a means of safely experiencing the “what if”. The horror genre allows us to explore our fears, be it spiders, vampires, loss of our identity, or death of a loved, under the most fantastic and horrible circumstances conceivable. King also points out that by watching horror movies we “may allow our emotions a free rein . . . or no rein at all.” (King, 784). According to psychiatrist James Schaller, by vicariously “experiencing contrived fears, a person develops a sense of competence over similar types of fears.” (Schaller). Horror films allow the viewer the opportunity to safely examine their fears safely and to the depth and extent they wish to do so. Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 provides the opportunity for the viewer to consider a diverse range of fears, with a little humor thrown in for balance, from the safety of a darkened room, a comfortable seat and in less than 120 minutes.
Finally, Brooks' argument of "What Is a Monster?" explores how we negotiate the core "lack" of meaning in life, and how our transfer from the wholeness of the imaginary order and our mother spawns a search for completion. Through what we think are meaningful connections and uses of language to fulfill our needs, we really are pushing ourselves away from our goal by putting excess meaning between ourselves and our unconscious desires.
They use a lot of information that is overwhelming, and does not add a lot of validity to the point they were trying to make. Throughout the article, the authors take from various other zombie pieces, such as movies, books, and TV shows and use them to add to their ideas. In some cases, they also use other pieces and discredit them as a way to prove their own point. For example, they talk about the “Cyborg Manifesto” by Donna Haraway. This essay presents the idea of the cyborg, which is an organism that is part human and part machine. Throughout the essay, Haraway gives examples of where we see the cyborg throughout media, and how humans might be connected to it. The authors in “A Zombie Manifesto” stated how they were influenced to title their piece after her, but they go on throughout the essay constantly trying to prove the piece wrong. They argue that the idea Haraway is presenting is not truly what humans connect to, and the authors think their ideas are more relatable. They believe their zombie interpretation is more relatable than Haraway’s cyborg interpretation. The authors are trying to make their interpretation more valid by invalidating another interpretation. This makes the piece hard to agree with, for an interpretation is relative to each person, and tearing apart another interpretation is an unproductive way to persuade readers to agree with you and your ideas. Another reason the article is difficult to agree with, is the fact that it is very difficult to understand. With the piece being as persuasive as it is, the authors did not take the time to ensure the writing would be easy to understand for all. In reading the article, it felt as though the authors had a specific group of readers in mind and didn’t accommodate to others who might find interest in zombies. The article is written in such a way
I had never intended to read World War Z before this class began. In fact, I did not realize there was a text version in addition to the film version. This collection of personal stories from different aspects of the zombie wars was a mixed bag for me. There were some recollections that pulled on my heartstrings, and others that I could have gone without ever reading. In times of great turmoil, people are shown to be exactly who they are, their true colors shining through all of the masks and deception they have created. The entire world lived in fear during the time period of this novel, and watching their loved ones disappear or become part of the army of the undead had to be terrifying. The author might have chosen this topic because the threat of zombies invading the world is a fear that is as real to some as the war overseas is to others.