The Divine Attributes of God

1626 Words4 Pages

The argument to side with in this paper is that of Anselm’s “Proslogian” where he argues for the existence of God in a less complex way as compared to the Monologian. Inevitably, the Proslogian received criticism from other notable philosophers, some of which will be addressed in this paper as well. Once the fool understands that than which nothing greater can be thought, he will comprehend the existence of God. The divine attributes of God will also be discussed to aid in the fool’s understanding of God’s existence. The premises of the ontological argument are as follows:

1. If that than which nothing greater can be thought can be thought, then it exists in reality.

2. It can be thought.

3. Therefore, That than which nothing greater can be thought (it) exists in reality.

The main reason for the writing of the Proslogian was to offer a standalone argument that would explain the existence of God but also the various attributes that Christians believe God has. Some of these attributes belong only to God while some He shares with His creatures. The attribute of All-Powerful complements Anselm’s argument “that than which nothing greater can be thought”. God is the creator of the universe, He is present everywhere, He is Infinite and Unchanging. A fool may not fully comprehend God’s essence, but Anselm offers the Proslogian as a more simple argument to aid in the understanding of the existence of God.

There is a difference in the object existing in the mind as compared to the object actually existing. For example when a movie director plans beforehand what he or she is going to film, he has the idea in his mind, but he does not yet think that it actually exists because he has not yet made the film. However, when he has actua...

... middle of paper ...

..., 2014. http://www.aquinasonline.com/Topics/godtalk.html

B Magee, Joseph M. Aquinas Online.2013. May 4, 2014. http://www.aquinasonline.com/Topics/godtalk.html

N Meg Wallace, “The Ontological Argument,” University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, May 4, 2014, http://www.unc.edu/~megw/OntologicalArg.html

B Wallace, Meg. “The Ontological Argument, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, May 4 2014, http://www.unc.edu/~megw/OntologicalArg.html

N Thomas Williams. "Saint Anselm". Edited by Edward N. Zalta. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2013 Edition): Section 2. May 3, 2014 http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/anselm

B Williams, Thomas. "Saint Anselm". Edited by Edward N. Zalta. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2013 Edition): Section 2. May 3, 2014 http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/anselm.

Open Document