Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The crucible abigail williams
What are abigail williams motives in the crucible
Morality in the crucible
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The crucible abigail williams
The Dilemma of Conscience that Proctor Faces in Arthur Miller's The Crucible
Conscience is the awareness of right and wrong. In the Crucible, the
idea of conscience is strongly emphasised.
Throughout the play, John Proctor is faced with situations regarding
his family, friends, himself and moreover his moral conscience. The
idea of conscience in The Crucible is based very much on Christian
concepts, firstly the idea of morality, or conscience of right and
wrong, secondly the idea of the confession of sin, and finally the
idea of guilt and penance for sins.
Proctor is so patently the victim of hysteria that his very existence
is a challenge to the fanatic temperament, and he is consumed by its
malice.
Although Proctor is seen as a good man he is racked with guilt after
his lecherous affair with Abigail Williams. We learn that Abigail can
be very manipulative and continues to try and regain the affections if
Proctor. "Give me a word John, a soft word." Abigail refers to John
that he had "sweated like a stallion" Horses are often used to
represent passion and sexuality. Also, the verb "sweated" indicates
intense physical attraction. John however is tempted to reciprocate
the affections that Abigail has given to him, but is only held back by
his love for Elizabeth. "I will cut off my hand before I reach for you
again. Wipe it out of mind. We never touched Abby". This shows that
Proctor is a man of moral conscience who is determined not to repeat
his mistakes.
Never the less this has an effect on his conscience. "He is a sinner,
a sinner not only against the moral fashion but against his own vision
of decent conduct."
...
... middle of paper ...
...t his intentions were for the good of his
family. Because John came to the conclusion, on his own and because it
was a righteous and un-selfish act, John Proctors decision to tell the
truth and be put to death for it is true and justifiable.
Such a courageous decision can parallel John to many martyrs as these
martyrs died for what the believed in, so to did John. John can also
be compared in some ways to Jesus Christ who is greatly remembered as
a saviour as he sacrificed himself to confirm his devotion to God and
faith in what he believes. Like Jesus, Johns views were went against
many peoples previously 'set in stone' series. We've always regarded
Jesus actions as moral and principled; similarly, we can regard
Proctors actions as pure and sufficient proof that he had a high
spiritual level and a strong conscience.
The year 1692 was full of lies in Salem, Massachusetts. With a few exceptions, one of them being John Proctor, farmer and husband to Elizabeth Proctor. In all, 19 people were hanged during the Salem Witch Trials caused by lies in The Crucible. John Proctor tried to make things right by being a man of truth, was willing to stick up for innocent people, even if it meant his life and reputation diminished, and by being a man of pride.
Pride in itself, can be seen as a positive attribute, however, when it is expressed as arrogance it becomes a fatal flaw that leads to one’s downfall. In the play The Crucible, written by Arthur Miller, John Proctor allows his excessive pride to get in the way of his decisions. John Proctor would rather die honest than live a lie. In order not to tarnish his good name, John makes the corrupt decision of being hanged. Although this act can be seen as noble, it is ultimately foolish because he allows his excessive pride to put him to death. John's corrupt decision to be hanged to save his family’s name and protect his wife was the result of excessive pride.
Proctors Grave Mistake Corruption has always existed in our society since the beginning to present time due to conspiracies such as the witch trials and the communism era. The Crucible by Arthur Miller was written during the era of communism to mere the hysteria. The Crucible is about the Salem witch trials in Salem Massachusetts in 1692. It’s a corrupt witch trial in Salem that’s due to false accusations of witchcraft for personal gains. John Proctor is the protagonist in the story The Crucible who goes through the ultimate test by choosing his reputation over integrity.
“Instinctively, with sudden overmastering passion, at at the sight of her helplessness and her grief, he stretched out his arms, and next, would have seized her and held her to him, protected her from every evil with his very life, his very heart’s blood… But pride
John Proctor plays the leading role in The Crucible by Arthur Miller. He was persistent, honest, and full of integrity. He was simply, a man with pride. A wise woman once said, "Do what you feel in your heart to be right--for you'll be criticized anyway. You'll be damned if you do, and damned if you don't." (Eleanor Roosevelt). Proctor was the protagonist of the dramatic piece of literature.
his heart. She even tries to put a hex on his wife, Elizabeth Procter. When
There are many sides to John Proctor and they occur at different stages of the play, John is a complex character and is very well respected even though he has done wrong things. Arthur Miller was in the same situation as John Proctor in 1956-57 because he refused to give names of people he saw at communist meetings. There was the same trial system. If you confessed you would stay alive assuming you had turned from the communist meetings, however if you denied that you were seen at communist meeting you would have been hanged because there would be no evidence to show you weren’t there. You get the impression that the character of John Proctor was based on the real life character of Miller.
The primary dramatic focus in the play The Crucible is the moral struggle of its protagonist, John Proctor. Certain characteristics of John Proctor's character and also the environment of the Puritanical Salem alleviated this problem for him. The main issues running through out the play are a series of dilemmas that John Proctor faces. The first and foremost of these is his guilt over his adulterous affair with Abigail Williams, the second his hesitation to testify against Abigail to bring out the truth and the third, his final decision to make the ultimate sacrifice.
In The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, the madness of the Salem witch trials is explored in great detail. Arthur Miller was an American playwright, who was born in 1915. He grew up in a Jewish family in New York City. While attending the University of Michigan in the mid 1930’s, he began to characterize himself as a distinguished writer. His first plays were Honors at Dawn and No Villain. The Death of a Salesman, which he wrote in 1949, won him the Pulitzer Prize for literature.
In John Proctor’s sudden confession of committing adultery, Miller used strong ethos and pathos to help further his agenda. He used disinterest, a rhetorical ethos device, to show that he reluctantly confessed for the greater good. By casting away his reputation, he made a personal sacrifice to show that his revelation helped the people of Salem more than it helped him. Throughout the play, Proctor concealed his disloyalty to his wife from the public; however, he finally came to terms with his sin to save Elizabeth and other innocent people from the trials. John used a rhetorical tool called the reluctant conclusion during his confession, which is blatant by the uneasiness/hesitancy he displayed. John Proctor lost his credibility and appeared
The Bill of Rights is dictation of the first ten Amendments to the constitution, written in their inventive form. The most important articles in the Bill of Rights are amendments five and eight, which protect one’s right to a speedy trial and just punishment. In the end of The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, we are able to recognize the necessity of these articles, because combined; they could have helped save Proctor’s life.
A crucible refers to a harsh test, and in The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, each person is challenged in a severe test of his or her character or morals. Many more people fail than pass, but three notable characters stand out. Reverend John Hale, Elizabeth Proctor, and John Proctor all significantly change over the course of the play.
Crucible- a severe test, a hard trial or also could be define as a pot for melting metals. A severe trail could be as other then a physical it also could be mentally a severe trial like person verses self. In The Crucible, Miller reflects the theme that pressure can force people from there can force their morals. The characters in The Crucible have morals that they must up hold to be accepted into the town and church. It is a struggle to keep these values when there are moral hazards like desires, greed, hate, and obsession.
ruinously impact a whole community, is very aptly titled. By definition, a “crucible” is “a severe test,” and the challenges faced by Miller’s characters are many. The historical events dramatized in the play reflect how core human values, including truth, justice and love, are tested under life and death conditions. The trials of the characters and the values they hold dearly come when their simple, ordered world ceases to be black and white and easily deciphered, and is turned upside down in the gray shades of ambiguity.
He wanted to swim through her blood and climb up and down her spine and drink from her ovaries and press his gums against the firm red muscle of her heart. He wanted to suture their lives together.? This quote can portray Johns disturbed mind set, we see that he is consumed with rage ...