Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
+ explain the impact of pesticides on the environment
Negative effects of pesticides on air, water, and land
From silent spring by rachel carson analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Rachel Carson came out with her book “Silent Spring” in 1962. It brought huge recognition to the use of pesticides, chemicals, and insecticides. She describes, in detail, the harmful effects these products have on the environment. She explains that everything in the environment is connected and is affected by each other. Her book essentially launched an environmental movement. While each chapter of “Silent Spring” can have an essay done on it, I will try to summarize and analyze several aspects of her book myself. Below is my analysis of many aspects in her book. Not everything Rachel Carson wrote about was met with praise. Some people, even today, still feel Rachel was wrong on some issues. Many scientists do not take Rachel Carson seriously, …show more content…
Aerial spraying of this, among other pesticides, began over small farms at first. With new technology, mainly planes, came a much wider use of these pesticides and they sprayed it everywhere in an almost careless, haphazard fashion. Of course, I seriously doubt the intention was malevolent. The spraying was done in an attempt to exterminate certain species of insects. Unfortunately, people and the sprayed environment had not prior knowledge and they had no way to protect themselves. Nearly everything and everyone was subjected to health risks without their consent. These health risks were considered acceptable in order to try and eliminate these insects. However, many of the insects that the spraying attempted to eliminate still thrive today. They build up a resistance to the pesticides and widespread spraying continues. The result is more environmental damage. What we need is not more spraying of chemicals, but an entirely new approach to controlling insect …show more content…
Her book “Silent Spring” is a no holds barred, honest assertion that directly deals with the truth about how these substances affect our daily lives. She gives real-life scenarios and explains actual outcomes to the actions that we take. She challenged scientists, businesses and the government for either being too lax or producing false and misleading information to the general public. Most situations weren’t done out of malice, but rather total ignorance. She changed all that. She educated the world about the serious health concerns of these chemicals. Many people were totally unaware of the risks and some even make a profession out of dealing with these chemicals on a daily basis. Carson showed the direct correlation between the use of these substances and illness/death. She challenged to world to come up with new ways of pest control instead of using dangerous pesticides and
Silent Spring is one of the most important books of the environmental movement. It was one of the first scientific books to talk about destruction of habitat by humans. As a result, one can imagine that Ms. Rachel Carson needed to be quite persuasive. How does she achieve this? In this excerpt from Silent Spring, Carson utilizes the rhetorical devices of hyperbole, understatement, and rhetorical questions to state the necessity of abolishing the practice of using poisons such as parathion. Carson starts out by using the symbiotic nature of hyperbole and understatement to paint the whole practice as dangerous and unnecessary. She further strengthens her argument by using rhetorical questions to make her readers see the ethical flaws and potential casualties caused by deadly pesticides.
Rachel Carson, before publishing Silent Spring, would major in marine zoology at Pennsylvania Women's College, where she would develop her interest in the naturalism and conservation going on at the time (Lear, 23). After graduating, she would take a job at the U.S. Bureau of Fisheries, where she would write about different issues concerning the environment at the time. After writing several books to some success, she would begin work on Silent Spring, as she would find her naturalist causes to be her impetus. She even later on in her life wrote to her friends, What I discovered was that everything which meant most to me as a naturalist was being threatened, and that nothing I could do would be more important. " (Carson, 17)
To conclude, Rachel Carson is a skilled writer who employs many different rhetorical strategies and formats her information in a deliberate way to maximize the effectiveness of her argument. She appeals to emotion, but supplements her points with facts, examples, and expert opinions. Her book, Silent Spring, surely convinced many of the dangers of poisons like parathion, and inspired some to seek alternatives to aerial
Rachel Carson establishes ethos to begin constructing her argument against poisonings. In lines 8-12, she cites the Fish and Wildlife Service to demonstrate that her concerns extend to credible organizations and are not unfounded. She documents an example where farmers in southern Indiana “went together in the summer of 1959 to engage a spray plane to treat an area of river bottomland with parathion” (lines 12-16). To further establish her ethos and authority to speak on this topic, she also supplements this example by explaining a healthy, eco-friendly alternative to how the farmers could have responded. In lines 17-22, she states that agricultural practice revisions would have sufficed for a solution, making the poisonings unnecessary. By offering a solution, Carson not only
The larger occasion is that the audience needs to take a step forward by preventing the use of dangerous and hazardous chemicals. The immediate occasion Carson is trying to convey is how these harmful chemicals not only affect the insecticides but also
In 1962, the publication of Silent Spring Rachel Carson captivated the American public. Carson wrote about the harmful effects of chemical pesticides in the environment, and her writing was very reflective of the events occurring at the time. There is a strong connection between Carson’s writing and the Cold War. In fact, if it were not for the war, the American public may not have responded in the same way to Carson’s writing. Carson used tone and content as methods of getting her point across to the public. Silent Spring shined a light on the damage done to the environment as a result of the Cold War, and this issue was finally being recognized by American public.
Carson writes with meticulous detail with almost all of her scientific facts and explanations. She compels her readers with keywords and phrases to gravitate her audience towards her side of the argument. Carson gives an example explaining that “in this now universal contamination of the environment, chemicals are the sinister and little-recognized partners of radiation in changing the very nature of the world –the very nature of its life…chemicals sprayed on croplands or forests or gardens lie long in the soil, entering into living organisms, passing from one to another in a chain of poisoning and death”(43). To begin, Carson skillfully argues her point by describing chemicals as “sinister” which grabs her reader’s attention, and presents her evidence comprehensibly so that her variety of readers feel well informed, rather than stunned and confused. Carson could have simply stated that chemicals can transfer from soil to living creatures and save time without disclosure; however, she instead reaches the decision to describe the process with powerful, yet understandable vocabulary that provides emotional appeal in her argument. By presenting scientific evidence and explanations in a compelling and sentimental manner, Carson’s audience is able to connect with her argument. Every fact and description that she gives deems useful in her argument that pesticides should not be used for the treatment of
In the article "The Obligation to Endure", an excerpt from "Silent Spring", Carson focuses on her major concerns with the environment. For millennia, Mother Nature was the lone modifier that possessed the ability to shape the environment. In turn, this caused species to adapt for survival. However, with the birth of man, the delicate balance has shifted. Humans now possess the ability to alter the makeup of their environment. This is a power that shouldn 't be taken lightly or abused. However, humans are often blind to corruption until it 's too late, and so the inevitable happened. Man abused its power and failed to see the consequences. This is an overarching concern of Carson, "The most alarming of all man 's assaults upon the environment is the contamination of air, earth, rivers, and sea with dangerous and even lethal materials (Carson)." The chemicals dumped into rivers the pollution pumped into the air. The toxic radiation released from nuclear explosions in the form of Strontium 90. The endless pesticides sprayed on crops and trees. All of these are the weapons used in "man 's war against nature
Birds dying, leaves covered with deadly powder, chemicals floating through the air. These were all issues faced globally in the 1950’s and 60’s due to the use of dangerous pesticides such as DDT, chlordane, and heptachlor. Though several scientists conducted studies that proved the issues with pesticides, the first person to make a lasting impression on America was Rachel Carson, author of Silent Spring. Her writing not only discussed the environmental issues that Americans faced in the 1960’s, but also served as the catalyst for the environmental movement as we know it today.
...ortation of plants, fruits, vegetables, and animals. Indiscriminate pesticide use kills the good with the bad. Long term and wide spread pesticide use poisons underground water sources, which, in turn, poison plants, animals, and humans. And, finally, by our uninformed actions, new super races of pests continue to evolve and create even greater dangers than the original.
damage was done by poisons that farmers used to kill insects. The worst poison was DDT.
One of the thing that Carson accomplishes quite well is establishing credibility. She brings in a multitude of facts and real events that make it known that she knows what she’s talking about. Carson writes about a specific event in which a group of farmers came together to engage a spray plane to treat an area of river bottomland with parathion. She writes: “The problem could have been solved easily by a slight change
Rachel Carson is well known for writing the book, Silent Spring. This book, which was written
Through her book, Rachel Carson spoke out against the use of pesticides and technology to control nature. At the time, her book was revolutionary and her words had the power to cause a shift in public awareness about the environment. This one person speaking out helped start the environmental movement that impacts so many areas of our life today.
Carson was the only environmentalist and the only woman featured in the entire issue. Evidently, her impact in the world of "scientists and thinkers" was a tremendous one, and, as mentioned in Matthiessen's Time article, her book, Silent Spring, is "nearly 40 years later . . . still regarded as the cornerstone of the new environmentalism."1 Matthiessen goes on to write that "one shudders to imagine how much more impoverished our habitat would be had Silent Spring not sounded the alarm."2 This is indeed a worthy claim by Mr. Matthiessen, but he correctly uncovers a bigger and more alarming truth when he says, "the damage being done by poison chemicals today is far worse than it was when she wrote the book."3 In fact, since 1962, pesticide use in the US has doubled.4