Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Abortion to not be banned
Two contrasting views about abortion
Two contrasting views about abortion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Abortion to not be banned
Abortion The debate of abortion and it's morality has been around for quite some time. Usually the arguments for this topic are either that the fetus has a right to life and the others say that every women has a right to have a say what goes on in and to her body. The research opened my eyes to see that there is way more to consider for this debate. It is not black and white like most debatable topics. I have always been a person who did not support aboriton and was very closed minded to those who are pro-choice. This assignment helped me grow to let me open up to listen to what people who believe that abortion should be allowed although I disagree. The strongest argument supporting why abortion is immoral is because an abortion takes away the endless possiblieties of life from the fetus that can potentioally become a person if left to grow to term. This argument is presented by Don Marqui, a moral philosopher and journalist, in his response in “ Why Abortion Is Immoral” (88). In standard form, his argument could be expressed: 1. If a fetus gets aborted , it takes away the possiblieties and experiences that a potential person could have had. 2. The fetus gets aborted :. The fetus does not get to experience the endless possiblieties of life. This argument is deductive because in defenition the conclusion is suppose to necessarily follow rather than present a high possibility which would be an inductive argument. This deductive argument is painfully obvious but it is what it is. The premises are are exactly what they are, they are facts. If the fetus gets aborted, there is no longer a possibility of a life experience. Simple argumet but just as strong. Taking away anyones possible life experiences is awful and it could apply ... ... middle of paper ... ... to get an abortion in the first place, I do not think they need the world judging them for their choices. All in all I now feel that there is more to a topic than what we want to be right. Work Cited Marquis, Don. "Why Abortion Is Immoral." The Right Thing to Do: Basic Readings in Moral Philosophy. New York: Random House, 1989. 85-91. Print. "Family Planning Program." Prevention Services -. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 May 2014. "Result Filters." National Center for Biotechnology Information. U.S. National Library of Medicine, n.d. Web. 9 May 2014. "Prolife OBGYNS – AAPLOG – American Association of Pro-life Obstetricians & Gynecologists » Induced Abortion and Adverse Mental Health Effects." AAPLOG RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 May 2014. .
Nelson, H., Walker, M., Zackher, B., & Mitchell, J. (n.d.). Result Filters. National center for biotechnology information. Retrieved February 9, 2014, from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?LinkName=pubmed_pubmed_pmh_cited&from_uid=15233153
Patrick Lee and Robert P. George’s, “The Wrong of Abortion” is a contentious composition that argues the choice of abortion is objectively unethical. Throughout their composition, Lee and George use credibility and reason to appeal the immorality of abortions. The use of these two methods of persuasion are effective and compels the reader to consider the ethical significance. Lee and George construct their argument by disputing different theories that would justify abortions. They challenge the ontological and evaluation theories of the fetus, as well as the unintentional killing theory. This article was obtained through Google, in the form of a PDF file that is associated with Iowa State University.
In this paper I will discuss Don Marquis’s essay “Why Abortion is Immoral” and Judith Jarvis Thomson’s objections to Marquis’ argument against abortion.
Works Cited Warren, Mary Anne. On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion. Trans. Array Exploring Ethics: An Introductory Anthology. . 2 nd.
In Dan Marquis’ article, “Why Abortion is Immoral”, he argues that aborting a fetus is like killing a human being already been born and it deprives them of their future. Marquis leaves out the possible exceptions of abortion that includes: a threat to the mom’s life, contraceptives, and pregnancy by rape. First, I will explain Marquis’ pro-life argument in detail about his statements of why abortion is morally wrong. Like in many societies, killing an innocent human being is considered morally wrong just like in the United States. Second, I will state my objection to Marquis’ argument through examining the difference between a human being already born future compared to a potential fetus’s future. Thus, Marquis’ argument for his pro-life
Abortion is an important and rather popular topic in the philosophical world. On one side of the argument, pro choice, Judith Jarvis Thomson argues that abortion is permissible because the pregnancy might not have been voluntary or the mother’s life is at risk if she continues on with the pregnancy. On the opposing side of the argument, Don Marquis argues that abortion is wrong because it takes away all the potential things a fetus could value in their future life. In this paper, I will argue against Don Marquis view of abortion. I will begin by explaining that Marquis does not take into consideration the effect the pregnancy may have on the mother, and I will talk about how Thomson does take the mother into consideration. Next, I will criticize
The standard argument against abortion claims that the fetus is a person and therefore has a right to life. Thomson shows why this standard argument against abortion is a somewhat inadequate account of the morality of abortion.
Abortion has so many different viewpoints on the topic, some positive, some negative. Roe and Wade played a huge part in the decision making process on abortion. Everyone has their own opinions about abortion, but the opinions concerning when life begins have a significant effect on a person’s views concerning whether they are for or against abortion. Studies of the long-term effects of abortion on women are traumatic and devastating. They can include mental, physical, and emotional problems after an abortion.
... of their motives, many times it is what the woman truly wants so who are we to stand here and say what women should or should not do with their lives. After all, this country was founded on freedom. Taking the right of millions of women to choose what to do regarding abortion would akin to taking somebody’s identity away. In doing so, we are taking all that they have as unique individuals in society and leaving them with no choice. It can be agreed that social conflict is everlasting and ever-changing in our society and as long as choice is incorporated into our community, freedom will prevail.
...point as well. The essay knows that before a woman is pregnant, that even being willing to have sex she is taking a chance. Health wise, society does not hold a concern to how abortion emotionally and physically damages a person, their only reasoning given to what causes their pain after abortion is guilt, which seems to be stereotypical. The case of Roe v. wade holds a logical point by being optional to consider abortion, and if so, will only be safely done through the first trimester of pregnancy to avoid, health issues. My perspective to oppose abortion is similarly relative on the analysis of health reasoning, but my views are also opinionated by the environment I grew upon by. Each abortion guideline is openly acceptable to live by, but the moral of the perspectives carries on what our society as a free citizen lies between: healthcare and freedom of speech.
In our society, there are many ethical dilemmas that we are faced with that are virtually impossible to solve. One of the most difficult and controversial issues that we are faced with is abortion. There are many strong arguments both for and against the right to have an abortion which are so complicated that it becomes impossible to resolve. The complexity of this issue lies in the different aspects of the argument. The essence of a person, rights, and who is entitled to these rights, are a few of the many aspects which are very difficult to define. There are also issues of what circumstances would justify abortion. Because the issue of abortion is virtually impossible to solve, all one can hope to do is understand the different aspects of the argument so that if he or she is faced with that issue in their own lives, they would be able to make educated and thoughtful decisions in dealing with it.
Baird, Robert M., and Stuart E. Rosenbaum. The Ethics of Abortion: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus, 1989. Print.
The permissibility of abortion has been a crucial topic for debates for many years. People have yet to agree upon a stance on whether abortion is morally just. This country is divided into two groups, believers in a woman’s choice to have an abortion and those who stand for the fetus’s right to live. More commonly these stances are labeled as pro-choice and pro-life. The traditional argument for each side is based upon whether a fetus has a right to life. Complications occur because the qualifications of what gives something a right to life is not agreed upon. The pro-choice argument asserts that only people, not fetuses, have a right to life. The pro-life argument claims that fetuses are human beings and therefore they have a right to life. Philosopher, Judith Jarvis Thomson, rejects this traditional reasoning because the right of the mother is not brought into consideration. Thomson prepares two theses to explain her reasoning for being pro-choice; “A right to life does not entail the right to use your body to stay alive” and “In the majority of cases it is not morally required that you carry a fetus to term.”
All things considered, abortion will always be a controversial issue in which there will always be a debate on; however, it is crucial for women to have other options rather than to only be able to have children that they cannot afford, or to allow more children to be placed in an adoption system that can essentially prevent them from having a full and happy life. It is atrocious to keep forcing people to endure unwanted pregnancies that may cause them to turn to unsafe abortion methods if their reproductive rights are abolished.
Yet, I have clearly shown that the fetus is a separate person with its own heart, lungs, brain, and all different body organs. The oppositions would say that it is the woman’s right to terminate her own pregnancies. Yet, in the eyes of the law two charges are filed when someone kills a woman and her fetus, so how is it her right to kill another human being? A woman doesn’t have four arms, four legs, two heads, four kidneys, two hearts, and two brains… so how is it only her body?