The Debate Regarding the Freedman's Bureau
Historians and political theorists have delineated the concept of equality into two categories: the competitive individualist notion of equality of process and the egalitarian ideal of equality of results. The former is concerned with providing a level playing field for all, while the latter focuses on a just distribution resulting from the process. Richard Ellis, in his book American Political Cultures, challenges the Hartzian thesis that historically Americans favored equality of process over equality of results, making them competitive individualists. Ellis argues that “what is exceptional about America is not that it lacked a results-oriented vision of equality but that those who favored equalizing results believed that equal process was a sufficient condition for realizing equal results” (Ellis 1993: 44). In other words, the egalitarian spirit was not absent from American history, but Americans believed that justice would best be served through competition. Ellis is correct in making this fine distinction, yet it is important to note that historical evidence suggests that some factions clearly emphasized equality of results regardless of equality of process. In The Souls of Black Folk, W.E.B. Du Bois’ recounting of the political debate regarding the Freedman’s Bureau, clearly highlights this ideological difference.
Du Bois poignantly captures the necessity for a legal equalizing measure in his description of the tragedy of slavery and the ragged, conflicted nature of the black consciousness that resulted. He writes, “the facing of so vast a prejudice could not but bring the inevitable self-questioning, self-disparagement, and lowering of ideals which ever accompany repressio...
... middle of paper ...
...ows, that given dire circumstances, Americans indeed turn to measures to ensure equality of results rather than relying on equality of processes. Of course, suffrage left much to be desired for African American equality. Jim Crow laws and other forms of racism continued to plague American society for many decades to follow. Nonetheless, the legacy of the Bureau remains an important part of American political history. It may require extreme instances of human misery, tragedy, and utter inequality (such as the institution of slavery) to highlight a push for equality of results regardless of the processes. This egalitarian ideology clearly is evident in post-Civil War American legislation.
Works Cited:
Du Bois, W.E.B. 1997. The Souls of Black Folk. Boston: Bedford Books.
Ellis, Richard. 1993. American Political Cultures, New York: Oxford University Press.
The role of the Freedmen Bureau in African-American development during the Reconstruction era has been a polarizing topic since the Bureau’s inception. While most concur that the Bureau was well intended, some scholars, believe that the Freedmen’s Bureau was detrimental to African-American development. One such scholar was W.E.B. Dubois, who in his book The Souls of Black Folk, expressed his discontent with the actions of the Bureau and suggested that the Bureau did more harm than good. Upon further probing, research refutes the position that the Freedmen’s Bureau was chiefly detrimental to Black development. While far from flawless in its pursuits to assist the newly freed Negroes, the actions of the Freedmen’s Bureau did not impede African-American progress; instead, these actions facilitated African-American development.
In this paper I will show that the Freedmen’s Bureau was able to affect positive transition of blacks after the civil war despite the lack of support from the federal government. I will first give you a description of the Freedmen’s Bureau. I will discuss what the Freedmen’s Bureau was created to do and the social environment they operated in. Next I will talk about some of the programs the Freedmen’s Bureau operated that positively impacted the transition from slavery for many black people. Finally I will show how those programs helped black transition.
When it all comes down to it, one of the greatest intellectual battles U.S. history was the legendary disagreement between Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois. This intellectual debate sparked the interest of the Northerners as well as the racist whites that occupied the south. This debate was simply about how the blacks, who just gained freedom from slavery, should exist in America with the white majority. Even though Washington and DuBois stood on opposite sides of the fence they both agreed on one thing, that it was a time for a change in the treatment of African Americans. I chose his topic to write about because I strongly agree with both of the men’s ideas but there is some things about their views that I don’t agree with. Their ideas and views are the things that will be addressed in this essay.
Du Bois argues in this quote that “basic racial difference between human beings and had suffered not change,” meaning that racism is still a pressing issue. In this quote he essentially asks the questions, why wont the idea of racism die? Du Bois then links the persistence of racism to economic incentives when he states, “and clung to it… the modern African slave trade a tremendous economic structure and eventually the industrial revolution had been based on racial differences.” As illustrated in this quote, the link between economics and racial indifferences is one reason Du Bois offers as an explanation for why racism has been able persist even until today. The perpetuation of racism and racial difference is how society allocates status and wealth, while socialization maintains the idea of racism Du Bois argues
During the late 19th and early 20th century, racial injustice was very prominent and even wildly accepted in the South. Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois were two of the most renowned “pioneers in the [search] for African-American equality in America” (Washington, DuBois, and the Black Future). Washington was “born a slave” who highly believed in the concept of “separate but equal,” meaning that “we can be as [distant] as the fingers, yet one as the hand in all things essential to mutual progress” (Washington 1042). DuBois was a victim of many “racial problems before his years as a student” and disagreed with Washington’s point of view, which led
... collective consciousness of the Black community in the nineteen hundreds were seen throughout the veil a physical and psychological and division of race. The veil is not seen as a simple cloth to Du Bois but instead a prison which prevents the blacks from improving, or gain equality or education and makes them see themselves as the negative biases through the eyes of the whites which helps us see the sacred as evil. The veil is also seen as a blindfold and a trap on the many thousands which live with the veil hiding their true identity, segregated from the whites and confused themselves in biases of themselves. Du Bois’s Souls of Black Folks had helped to life off the veil and show the true paid and sorry which the people of the South had witnessed. Du Bois inclines the people not to live behind the veil but to live above it to better themselves as well as others.
DuBois presents the question “[h]ow does it feel to be a problem?”, introducing the attitude towards African-Americans upon their emancipation (DuBois 3). The idea of freedom for slaves meant equality, but “the freedman has not yet found in freedom his promised land […] the shadow of a deep disappointment rests upon the Negro people” (6). The challenge faced during this time was how to deal with the now freed slaves who once had no rights. DuBois states that African-Americans merely wish “to make it possible for a man to be both a Negro and an American, without being cursed and spit upon by his fellows, without having the doors of Opportunity closed roughly i...
One particular study in Sweden rated grief before the loss as being even more severe than that taking place after the loss. More than 40 percent of the women studied admitted that the pre-loss phase was more severe than the post-death experience. It is estimated that 22 to 75 percent of patients who are dying experience some clinical depression; however, depression is not clinically considered a normal part of the dying
The Left Descending Artery (LDA) or more affectionately named the “Widow Maker Artery” due to its low survivability rate if blocked, is the vessel in which the deadliest of heart attacks takes place. Due to its location, right in front of the heart, and function, supplying the heart with blood, makes it the hardest to operate on. The Left Descending Artery descends directly from the main portion of the Aorta and, if blocked for too long (due to plaque or surgery), can result in serious side affects for the body because of lack of blood. Like mentioned previously, 735,000 Americans a year suffer from some form of cardiac arrest, depending on who’s research you look at, survivability rates of a widow maker are from 5% to 10%. This blockage is no laughing
...ry stent is a small metal tube that expands inside a coronary artery. The stent is placed during or after angioplasty. This procedure prevents the artery from ever closing up again.A surgery that treats CHD is Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. This surgery creates new paths for the blood to flow to the heart. In this surgery the surgeon takes a vein from the leg or artery from the chest or wrist. The surgeon then attaches it to the coronary artery. The other surgery that treats Coronary Heart Disease is called Minimally Invasive Heart Surgery. In this surgery the artery bypass is done without stopping the heart. They put the patient on a heart-lung machine.
Is there any food on earth that can provide the PERFECT nutrition to a human? Yes, and it is breast milk. Breast milk is the perfect nutrition. This superior food contains hormones, live antibacterial and antiviral cells and essential fatty acids (What Makes Human Milk Special?, Mar-Apr 2006). All of which are helpful in protecting against any harm. Sicknesses in infants are lowered by the help that breast milk gives. Breastfed children are sick less often than children who aren’t breastfed (What Makes Human Milk Special?, Mar-Apr 2006). Breast milk contains all the nutrients that an infant needs as it continues to grow. When the child is brought into the world it has no way to fight off any d...
Are you a pregnant mother or just recently had a baby? All mother’s want the best for their children. Multiple studies have shown that breastfeeding should be highly considered. Although, breastfeeding and bottle feeding are both alike in few ways, the numerous benefits of breastfeeding make it the best optimal for many mothers. Mother’s breast milk partakes over 100 ingredients, which therefore formula milk does not partake. Breastfeeding is better because of the price, the convenience, and all the wonderful numerous health benefits.
It also presents a perfect opportunity for the father to play a role in feeding. Many fathers also find this helps them develop a closer bond with the baby. Bottle feeding is precise and consistent. Mothers who bottle feed never have to worry if their baby is eating enough because they can see exactly how much milk their baby is getting. What's more, the taste and quality of bottled milk is always the same, which means it doesn't rely on a mother's health or nutritional choices. Advantages of Breast Feeding Nursing can be a wonderful experience for both the mother and baby. Because it is such a close and intimate act, it can provide a special bond that many nursing mothers treasure. Breast feeding can also help a new mother feel confident in her ability to take care of her baby as she is the total provider for food. Breast milk is natural and highly recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics. Milk produced during pregnancy is created to provide the perfect amount of minerals and nutrients a baby needs. Breast milk also contains immunities and antibodies to help protect a baby from disease, which is very important during the first few months when a baby's immune system hasn't fully developed. Sucking is important for a baby's
Until the 19th century breastfeeding was for granted, either by the mother or by a fostress. With industrialization the bottled milk came and especially in the 1970s, breastfeeding was not contempo-rary.
On the first point, I am heterosexual. I never CHOSE to be this way. I just never have been physically or emotionally attracted to members of my own gender. Homosexuals represent the reverse side of this coin. They did not CHOSE to have these feelings towards members of their own gender.