Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Merits and demerits of representative democracy
The importance of representative democracy
Merits and demerits of representative democracy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Merits and demerits of representative democracy
The Danish political system
The Danish Political System is democratic. Something special about the Danish democracy is that the States administration is established on a voluntary agreement between the citizens of the country and the constitutional monarchy.
The citizens use their influence indirectly through voting for parties, which is also know as a representative democracy.
Folketinget is the danish Parliament and is the legislative assembly in Denmark, which means that it passes the Acts that apply in Denmark. The Folketing is also responsible for adopting the state's budgets, approving the state's accounts, taking part in international cooperation and exercising control of the Government. As a possible result of its control, the Parliament may decide to unseat the Government at any time. But in practice, it is extremely rare for the Parliament to resort to this measure.
The Government performs the executive functions of the country. The affairs of Government are decided by the Cabinet, headed by the Prime Minister. Members of the Cabinet are given the formal title of "minister" and each hold a different part of government duties, for example the Minister of Children and Education - Christine Antorini. Altogether they are 19 Ministers incl. the Prime Minister. These ministers are all elected by the parliament.
The Danish system of government is known as negative parliamentarianism, which means that the Government doesn’t need to have a majority in the Parliament – but it mustn’t have a majority against it. If there is a majority against it, the Government must resign. The system of negative parliamentarianism means that Denmark can be run by a minority government. In fact, most Danish governments have been minority governm...
... middle of paper ...
...ws a way the new laws can be adopted. An example would be the law regarding tax on fat. There was a demand for the Danish people to eat less fat, and therefore a new taxation was put through the legislation system. But after the adoption, it went straight back to the political environment and new adoptions were put into effect. This was caused by what we can see in the model as a feedback loop.
Society was affected by the new fat tax law and that created both an opposition and a support group to the new law. The opposition tried to affect the politicians to abolish the new taxation, since it might have had a bad effect on either their business or another matter, and the supporters tried to either strengthen or keep the law as it was, due to their political interest and/or benefits. All this was done through lobbyism, and it resulted in an abolishment of the fat tax.
Powerful. Representative. Influential. These are some of the various words that are utilized to describe how political parties have been and continue to be a dominating force in American politics. Political parties have established organization throughout society by creating a two party system, the Democrats and the Republicans, within institutions as well as the general public. Over the years, political parties have been an essential aspect of American politics and have given American citizens an opportunity to express their opinions. Political parties provide all eligible citizens the opportunity to participate in politics by selecting a party that best defines and implements their views. In addition, political parties play an important role in educating American citizens and encouraging them to vote. Political parties also allow America to sustain a democratic form of government, in which the people have a voice that matters. The formation of political parties has contributed to America becoming a democracy and has helped to ensure that America does not develop into a dictatorship. Therefore, political parties are beneficial for American politics and have a positive impact on society by uniting and organizing Americans with similar political viewpoints, mobilizing voters, and striving to maintain a democracy to protect America from a dictatorship.
The first ideal concept from the constitution is a representative democracy. A representative democracy is a system where the citizens elect officials to serve on their behalf. A representative democracy is a form of “Republicanism”(Marks;9/8,16). This form of democracy shouldn’t be mistaken with direct democracy. Where all of the citizens vote on public policies and what the country does. On the
A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result
The way that a country is controlled by the government depends on the relationship between the legislative and executive authority. Most democratic nations, today, generally use one of two governmental systems, either a parliamentary system or a presidential system. Today most of Europe prefers to use a parliamentary system, whereas the presidential form of government is preferred in places such as South Korea, South America and the United States. The differences between these two governmental systems are not obvious at first, but there are some key differences. However, neither one of them is necessarily superior to the other.
Most democratic countries have a multi-party system where many different ideologies are represented in government. Multi-party systems provide a broader representation of the people and give voters more choices at the polls, however, can lead a party to form a coalition, which can dissolve easily causing instability in the government. The United States electo...
When we hear of the word democracy we think of a system of government where the people are in control or have most of the power. Most system of government tend to use the democratic way of leadership today around the world because of how popular it became in America. There are many influences that lead to this change in democracy that helps to shape it in the way it is used today. many social movements and interest groups has influenced and impacted a positive change in this new and reformed way of leadership. I will further elaborate and discuss what has led to this new democracy in the U.S.
The United States of America is said to be run through the process of representative democracy. This system allows citizens of the United States to elect representatives who make rules for the rest of the people. These officials are held accountable “through periodic elections and the rule of law” (Text, 4). The ideas of majority rule and minority rights give power to the rules made by the officials but also protect the ideas of the minority. This is an important element in democracy as it gives a voice to the minority party.
Representative government: This is a form of government where people elect the people that will represent them in government. People do not directly vote on the laws, but these elected officials will later meet to discuss and make laws.
Sweden is a constitutional monarchy with a parliamentary form of government. According to the Swedish Constitution, all public power derives from the people. Sweden's head of state, the King, has only ceremonial functions. The top branch of the national government is the Parliament, which has 349 members in one chamber.
A political party is a group that supports a candidate to run for office. It helps connect the voters to the government by letting them choose and campaign for who they want to represent them. In order for a democracy to work there needs to be at least two different parties in the election. The difference between a political party and an interest group is mainly that interest groups do not have a nomination process they have to follow. The functions of a party range from nominating candidates/helping them win the election to organizing functions for government officials. Each party brings its own set of ideas and beliefs.
Norway is a constitutional monarchy, with the king having limited authority, except as head of the military and as a symbol of continuity and stability. Executive power is vested in the prime minister, who presides over the dominant party in the country's parliament (Storting). The 165 members of parliament are elected every four years. The Storting has an Upper Chamber (Lagting) and a Lower Chamber (Odelsting). The Labor, Center, and Conservative parties are the largest in parliament, but no party has a majority.
Democracy: a government by the people, in which citizens rule either directly or through elected representatives - the latter description more relevant to today’s societies. Quite evidently, democracy is not perfect; like any other political system, it is subject to a plethora of flaws. For instance, it is no secret that voters tend to make illogical decisions – not out of sheer malice, but as a result of being wrongly informed. Politicians also make erroneous choices, whether they do so because they are dishonest or simply out of touch with the true will of their constituents. Further, anyone who has studied the government of a parliamentary democracy knows gerrymandering can have a powerful say in determining elections. Despite these and other flaws however, democracy still seems to work.
They are all known as the Nordic Welfare States. Especially gender equality and the well-being of the individual are seen as the main characteristics from a foreign perspective. But every Welfare State of the different nations does not fit the perfect social democratic model and has a unique policy. From a Swedish domestic view it all started to increase the living standard of the Swedish people and the number of children to secure the surviving of the state. Using the Danish Welfare State to compare to Nordic countries both started from different points. While Denmark had more agriculture, Sweden had a stronger industry. Nevertheless both countries’ welfare history can be divided into similar periods as described for Sweden before. The second and third period share the most similarities: increasing state intervention, greater social democratic influence, universal social benefits based on citizen rights with a strong public sector and a focus to solve family and gender disadvantages. The oil crisis in the 1970 changed the political landscape differently than in Sweden. The universal support was widely criticized and the power of the market grew again. The focus shifted from the individual well-being towards the duties of the individual receiving state benefits. Another difference was the early EU-membership of Denmark. The special Danish labor market can be described
Similar to most democratic countries the Swedish Constitution acts as a framework for the Swedish government. The Constitution is built upon four fundamental laws. These are; The Instrument of Government, the Act of Succession, the Freedom of the Press Act and the Fundamental Law on Freedom of Expression. There is also the Riksdag Act; however it is classified among being a fundamental law and an ordinary law. Throughout this paper I will analyze these five fundamental laws and show what use these laws have throughout the Swedish society.
It is the branch of government that is most closely related to citizens. They are typically elected by those in the district in which they represent, and they are expected to call to the needs of their district. If the executives represent the countries as a whole, the legislature represents the local areas of the country. They have six functions, each with their own level of responsibility. The six functions are representation, deliberation, legislation, authorizing expenditure, making governments, and oversight. In our political system, we decided on a bicameral (two-chamber)