The Danger of Nuclear Weapons versus the Necessity of Nuclear Weapons

836 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Nuclear weapons as threat to the world

Nuclear weapons continue to present a real threat to humanity and other life on Earth. Scholars of international relations and policymakers share in the belief that the sheer power and destructiveness of nuclear weapons prevent them from being used by friends and foes alike. Then the real question becomes; what is the need for nuclear weapons? Nuclear weapons are defined as, volatile device that originates its destructive force from nuclear reactions, either fission or a combination of fission and fusion. Both reactions release massive amounts of energy from fairly small amounts of matter. Nuclear weapons have greatly changed the way war is fought. Along with these more dominant weapons come ways to control and countermeasure such power. Nuclear weapons have changed the way the world thinks about war. The development of nuclear weapons started rather innocently as a physical wonder but has become a basis of constant fear among many nations. It is understandable how some countries believe that it is necessary to continue with nuclear proliferation. Basing the security of one’s country on the threat of killing tons of millions of innocent people perhaps billions, and risking the destruction of civilization. This reliance has no moral justification and deserves the strongest condemnation. Nuclear proliferation is the distribution of nuclear weapons, nuclear technology and information to states not acknowledged as "Nuclear Weapon States" by the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons. In my opinion when a country develops nuclear weapons everything becomes heightened, the economy, military, and you could even say paranoia is also heighten .With this continuous endeavor for nuclear proliferation countries began to fall int... ... middle of paper ... ...is understandable the attraction that nuclear weapons for those seeking power for manipulation or blackmail. Terrorists may either seize an existing weapon which is extremely difficult to do. Or they could set up a facility to make one. Obtaining nuclear weapons by individuals or groups is doubtful because the materials are difficult to gain and to handle. Also military weapons and nuclear power plants and facilities are guarded heavily. It might not be necessary for terrorists to obtain a weapon. Instead, they could create immense fear and panic if they obtained the information on how to create these weapons. Between ten countries there are an estimated 17,134 nuclear warheads armed and ready to be launched on the whim of these countries. The United States alone has an estimated 7,650 warheads each with the strength of twenty times that of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Show More
Related

  • Christians' Justifications of Using Nuclear Weapons

    549 Words  | 2 Pages

    We are told, "To love thy neighbour" and "To treat." our enemies, as we would want to be treated. " If you were to look at these commandments you would see that nuclear warfare could never be justified, and if you do provoke a nuclear war, you should be punished. That brings me into the second reason why countries retain nuclear weapons and that is a threat. It is a way of protecting your country, but you will protect yourself and retaliate if provoked.

    Read More

  • Nuclear Weapons in Iran and North Korea Should Be Ended

    545 Words  | 2 Pages

    Nuclear weapons are a problem that the world is facing today as countries want to have their

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Nuclear Power

    1250 Words  | 3 Pages

    The continuous spread of nuclear technology and nuclear weapons is a threat for national security and the safety of the entire planet. The inextricable link between nuclear energy and nuclear power is arguably the greatest danger of nuclear power. The same low-enriched uranium that is processed in a nuclear power plant is the same uranium used to make nuclear weapons. Nuclear power plants are the contributors to these mass destruction weapon capable of wiping out the human race. An article published by the World Nuclear Stockpile Report says, “ Nine countries in the world posses a total of 15,375 nuclear weapons.

    Read More

  • Ethical Perspectives on Nuclear Warfare: An Analysis

    1702 Words  | 4 Pages

    When it comes to nuclear war, most people will have mixed feelings on it. Nuclear war is a difficult area to touch on. Whether or not someone sees it as ethically right or wrong, all depends on the person and their moral values. The reason I chose this was because I don’t think it is necessarily right to engage in nuclear warfare even if it is the only means to end war. Just-war theory, utilitarianism, and Virtue ethics all help show a different perspective on nuclear warfare. There are many solutions to it, however. Some solutions are getting other nations to place embargos on the country and forcing peace talks without resorting to military action. Significantly, it is important that nuclear war is addressed in the world so that nations

    Read More

  • Nuclear Brinkmanship

    545 Words  | 2 Pages

    An idea that has not sunk into the politicians and generals of the nuclear powers skulls is the fact that nuclear weapons are expensive. In 1983, a missile submarine cost more than the education budgets of twenty-three 3rd world countries. A comparison for nuclear weapons would be akin to that of computers: It becomes obsolete very quickly, and the state of the art technology used is astronomically maintenance expensive. Building nuclear weapons is like dumping your money in a hole: It is not going to be coming back.

    Read More

  • Hiroshima Bombing Essay

    826 Words  | 2 Pages

    Also today is the danger that life is extinguished on earth through such a horrible weapon , not over. Many states are in possession of nuclear bombs , because that means for them power. Even dictatorships and unjust regime like China and North Korea have nuclear weapons.

    Read More

  • Essay On Nuclear Arms Race

    1033 Words  | 3 Pages

    The nuclear arms race was a race for nuclear dominance between the United States and the Soviet Union. It took place during the cold war. The definition of an arms race, made famous by nuclear arms race during the Cold War is a rapid increase in instruments of military power. A nuclear arms race is one where the instruments are nuclear weapons. The designs and testing of the first nuclear weapons during WWII by the US was called the Manhattan Project. The USSR was not officially informed about the Manhattan project until about 3 years later when Stalin was briefed at the Potsdam Conference on July 24 1945, this conference was 8 days after the first successful US test of nuclear weapons. They soon regretted telling the USSR from a fear that the USSR would inform German spies of the Manhattan Project or that the USSR would expect some insight on the technology of these weapons. In August 1945 a month after the Potsdam conference President Harry Truman ordered two bombs two be dropped on Japan, one hit Nagasaki and one hit Hiroshima. In the years after WWII the US had a monopoly on information about nuclear technology. Behind the scenes the USSR began work on their nuclear weapons but they were limited because of a lack of uranium. Then, the USSR discovered uranium in Eastern Europe which boosted their technology. nuclear experts predicted the Soviets would not have their first nuclear weapons until about 1955 but they detonated their first test nuclear weapon in 1949. The US tested their first hydrogen weapons at the Bikini Atoll in 1954. Both countries spent massives amounts on the quantity and quality of their weapons. For many decades the amounts of nuclear weapons and technology for the USSR and the US went back and forth. Curre...

    Read More

  • The Atomic Bomb Changed the World Forever

    2532 Words  | 6 Pages

    The development and usage of the first atomic bombs has caused a change in military, political, and public functionality of the world today. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki revolutionized warfare by killing large masses of civilian population with a single strike. The bombs’ effects from the blast, extreme heat, and radiation left an estimated 140,000 people dead. The bombs created a temporary resolution that lead to another conflict. The Cold War was a political standoff between the Soviet Union and the United States that again created a new worldwide nuclear threat. The destructive potential of nuclear weapons had created a global sweep of fear as to what might happen if these terrible forces where unleashed again. The technology involved in building the first atomic bombs has grown into the creation of nuclear weapons that are potentially 40 times more powerful than the original bombs used. However, a military change in strategy has came to promote nuclear disarmament and prevent the usage of nuclear weapons. The technology of building the atomic bomb has spurred some useful innovations that can be applied through the use of nuclear power. The fear of a potential nuclear attack had been heightened by the media and its release of movies impacting on public opinion and fear of nuclear devastation. The lives lost after the detonation of the atomic bombs have become warning signs that changed global thinking and caused preventative actions.

    Read More

  • War: Nuclear Power

    1074 Words  | 3 Pages

    From the creation of nuclear weapons at the start of the Cold War to today, the world has experienced struggles fueled by the want of nuclear power. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Cuban Missile Crisis, and Iran’s nuclear weapon program are some of the most important conflicts over nuclear weapons. Thanks to the use of nuclear weapons in 1945 to end World War II, the world has come extremely close to a nuclear war, and more countries have began developing nuclear power. Unmistakably, many conflicts since the start of the Cold War have been caused by nuclear weapons, and there are many more to come.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty

    1119 Words  | 3 Pages

    Or is better to allow for a binding international treaty to regulate how countries operate with their nuclear firepower advancements? It’s fine, I’ll wait for you to think about that while ICBMs are flying through the air to eliminate your entire country. Creating limitations to any military-based nuclear power has more upside than downside because the more power that is out there in multiple countries, the more chance for balance. “Over time, most countries…referred to the treaty as a ‘cornerstone of strategic stability’ because it facilitated later agreements limiting and reducing U.S. and Russian deployed strategic nuclear arsenals.” (“Arms Control Today”).

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Weapons

    1262 Words  | 3 Pages

    Governments from other countries should be able to work things out and settle business without fearing that someone will be threatened with a nuclear war. These weapons have a very high percent of total destruction, other countries do not think about when they use these fatal weapons as an excuse, of what they will really do when sending the bombs off. They are only thinking of defending themselves no matter what the consequences are, little do they know that it could come back and bite them in the butt. Nuclear weapons will not only cause destruction to one country but all of them. Banning these dangerous weapons will make sure that these excuses will no longer be a problem to the world, countries and nations will not have to fear if they are putting the entire world in

    Read More

  • Nuclear Arms Race Essay

    876 Words  | 2 Pages

    The nuclear arms race was a competition for supremacy in nuclear warfare between the United States, the Soviet Union, and their respective allies during the Cold War.(Nuclear Arms Race, Wikipedia)

    Read More

  • Should The United States Prevent Nuclear Weapons?

    682 Words  | 2 Pages

    Nuclear weapons were made to cause mass destruction, kill and mame other human beings. They were first used to bomb Japan in 1945 in order to end World War II. With the aftermath of the bombs 140,000 people died and detrimental effects lasted after the explosion causing cancer and other diseases (Hiroshima). Not long after the end of World War II, the Cold War arose between the Soviet Union and America and an arms race took place stockpiling more nuclear weapons. While the war lasted forty five years, no bombs were denentated because of the fear that using one would cause mutually assured destruction (Kennedy). The fear of mutually assured destruction from nuclear weapons and other weapons eventually lead the Soviet Union and America signed the INF treaty years after the Cold War, that implemented restrictions and regulations for missiles (Treaty Between The United States). Since missiles

    Read More

  • Kenneth Waltz The Spread Of Nuclear Weapons

    876 Words  | 2 Pages

    The spread of nuclear weapons does not mean the weapons will be used. But the danger and the threat are becoming extremely high. As in facts, the member of countries that possess nuclear weapon

    Read More

  • Nuclear Weapons are a Threat To World Peace

    2373 Words  | 5 Pages

    It is a well-known fact that the dropping of the two atomic bombs near the end of World War II in 1945 ushered in the dawn of the Atomic Age. For the first time in human history, the world was introduced to the awesome power of nuclear weapons. Since that time, there have been several different nuclear threats to the world, and one of those threats can be found along the Pacific Rim, in the country of North Korea. Like the dropping of the atomic bombs, it is also known that the North Korean government has admitted to possessing nuclear weapons, and in doing so, it stands as a silent, potential nuclear danger to the rest of the world.

    Read More

More about The Danger of Nuclear Weapons versus the Necessity of Nuclear Weapons

Open Document