Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The first three crusades
The first crusade events
World history 02.03 the crusades
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
1. The Crusades were a military campaign that began in 1095 CE when Christian armies waged a holy war against Muslims in the holy land of Jerusalem, at the urging of Pope Urban II. The Muslims began to seize and capture land of the Christians causing a multitude of battles and conquests by the Muslims. The once powerful Roman Empire, known also as the Byzantine Empire, was conquered by the Muslims and reduced in size to little more than Greece. It was certainly out of desperation, that the Emperor Constantinople asked the Christian armies of Western Europe to help their Christian brethren from the East. This was a time when the Christian faith and culture had to either defend its own self or submit to Islam; the Crusades were the only line of defense for the empire. The Crusade fighters were seen as errands of mercy on a mission to right the terrible wrong that had been done to their nation by the Muslims.
2. During the middle ages, the church and the
…show more content…
government were often ruled together, with the same persons in leadership roles of both, therefore the church’s focus was typically of a political/military interest in land acquisitions and promoting the stronghold of the church and the government. There were a total of seven Crusades which were all focused on gaining back the power of the Roman Empire from and against the Muslims and holding on to the power of the Roman Catholic Church. During the first of these Crusades the Christians successfully took Jerusalem from the Muslims in 1099, and the Roman Christian kingdoms built strong fortresses along the coast of Palestine and Syria, to defend their lands from invading Muslims. The Church used guilt and the society’s loyalty to the religion to continue to wage war against the Muslims.
Consequently people of all social classes and ages were volunteering, fighting, and waging war out of a sense of duty to the church, without regard for the toll these battles would have on lives lost and damage to land. Even though the subsequent Crusades were encouraged by the Roman Catholic leaders, the battles were failures because the Christians ended up quarreling among themselves and the Muslims were able to take back land that had previously been fought over. Sadly, the Crusaders took advantage of the opportunity to rob and pillage in faraway lands, all under the self-serving sentiments of piety, self-sacrifice, and their love for God. The irony of the Crusades is that the Roman Catholic Church’s original focus was to rescue the disciples and reunite the Roman Catholic kingdom, when instead it divided the religion and allowed for weaknesses that the Muslims were able to use in their
favor. B. 1. The Umayyad and Abbasid Dynasty had varying ideas of expansion. The Umayyad Dynasty was focused on military expansion and conquering territories to expand their power. The Abbasid Dynasty was more focused on the areas of expanding knowledge and less about conquering lands. During the Umayyad Dynasty, the empire began to expand with military raid from Egypt westward and across the Mediterranean coast of North Africa. The emperor, Constantinople, sent his military across the Mediterranean to defend his territory, but they were quickly defeated by the Muslim armies. Even though defeated, the navy of Constantinople remained in North Africa at Tunis, in an attempt to again enforce the hold of Umayyad Dynasty. The reign of the Umayyad Dynasty was filled with waging war over land territories, losing ground, and regaining ground. From so many conquests can wealth, primarily from the people that lived on the conquered lands. A large percentage of the ‘booty’ went to the warring soldiers as an incentive to continue fighting and pushing forward into new territories, while the remaining would be distributed among the state officials or the adversaries that offered assistance in the capture and conquering of new lands. In review of the history of the Umayyad Dynasty, it’s evident that their greed for power and wealth were driving forces in their conquests and eventual downfall. The Abbasid Dynasty expanded from Eastern Iran to Spain and Greece, and maintained extensive growth with the recapturing of Jerusalem. Jerusalem proved to be an important conquest both politically and culturally. As will all empires, their growth was based upon military conquests and gaining territories. However, the Abbasid Dynasty strengthened their reign with evolving academia, schools of law and medicine, as well as philosophy. The schools of law from Abbasid Dynasty are considered the basis for the current day legal system throughout the Middle East and Africa. With so many new areas of progression and advancement within this dynasty, the most influential area of expansion and growth was within the advancement of the Islamic culture which further expanded into varying groups of Islam. Through their empirical conquests, the Abbasid Dynasty was beneficial in expanding the Islamic religion across three continents with lasting effects in modern societies. 2. After the death of Mohammad, Umayyad was the second Islamic caliphate that was defeated and replaced by Abbasid caliphate in 750. These two caliphates approached imperial expansion very differently through their ruling techniques, their treatment of non-Muslim citizens, and their eventual demise. The Umayyad Dynasty’s reign began with conquering neighboring lands and eventually over took Saudi Arabia while moving east to conquer the Persians and then moving west to defeat Egypt. The model of imperial structure was learned from the Byzantine and Persian Empires while trying to mix in the ideologies of Islam. They put into practice a bureaucratic administration, created massive and impressive architecture, and promoted wealthy royals. A major difference between the two dynasties was in their interests towards land and sea; while the Islamic capital of the Umayyad Dynasty was in Damascus, the Syrian capital had shifted to Bagdad during the Abbasid Dynasty. In contrast, the Abbasid Dynasty had a cosmopolitan and centralized administration, while still trying to hold on to its control of local societies. In an effort to prevent any one region from creating and maintaining a dominant leadership, the officers rotated their positions of power. Additionally, taxes were regulated and the Abbasid Dynasty relied on spies, military troops and armed guards to protect their strong hold. Interestingly as societies were conquered by both dynasties, any conquered lands would be classified as Arab Muslim, non-Arab, and non-Muslim, and they did not try to convert them to Islam. Umayyad’s did not favor conversions, but eventually Umayyad started converting these conquered lands more aggressively because they were fearful they could not continue to rule over such a large majority of lands that were not under Islamic rule. The non-Muslim citizens were classified as ‘dhimmi’ and given second class citizenship status. The dhimmi were not allowed to actively practice their religion, were required to wear a distinguishing garment, and had to pay taxes. The Abbasids’ accepted the non-Muslim citizens into their societies and as a consequence of this, the Muslim faith expanded. Just as in all societies, modern or ancient, the treatment of women has long been a point of both interest and contention. During the Umayyad Dynasty, the role and power held by women was quite significant. Women were treated with respect and importance; they were not secluded like wives or concubines and slaves during the Abbasid Dynasty. Even though both dynasties shared the Muslim faith and basic ideology, their fundamental practices of government and treatment of their citizens allowed for huge variances in the future Islamic states of the world. C. The Silk Road was a trade route approximately four thousand miles long, consisting of a group of interconnecting caravan routes that ran throughout central Asia, during the Han Dynasty. The Silk Roads were used by traders to transport silk from China to western Asia and eventually on to Rome. Not only was this trade route beneficial in carrying goods, it became a way to share knowledge among cities and empires in Asia, the Middle East, Europe, and Northern Africa; these routes were far reaching and impactful on a multitude of people. However, as beneficial as the Silk Road was, it also had a negative impact with the spread of disease, particularly the Black Death. The spread of this disease in these regions was significant for all who traded and traveled along these routes. There are four different forms of The Black Death; septicemic, pneumonic, enteric, and bubonic. All of these forms are caused by the bacteria, Yersinia pestis; each form is identifiable by their distinct symptoms and deadly. All forms of this disease during the 14th century were spread through a host, usually by fleas transported by infected rats. Systematically, rat populations tend to increase with the human population and disease is spread quickly in highly populated areas. The societies living along the Silk Road were not exempt from the spread of this deadly disease. The trade routes were heavily traveled and the city-states had grown up around these routes were susceptible to the infectious diseases as the rat population increased. During this time, the Silk Road was heavily used and controlled by the Mongol warriors and trading caravans consisting of horses and livestock which produced large amounts of waste, which in turn attracted the infected rats. As the infected rat population continued to grow, it was easy for the fleas to spread the bacteria as they were well hidden on their hosts, the infected rats, or inside of the traveling caravans. The fleas would then bite the humans and in this manner the Black Death was spread to humans in significant proportions, thus causing innumerable deaths across Northern Africa, Asia, the Middle East and Europe.
The First Crusade was a widely appealing armed pilgrimage, and mobilized a vast conquering force at a time when the Christian Church was moving towards centralization and greater political influence in Europe. The Church gained a wider audience more accepting of its leadership, benefitted economically, and developed its own militarily force. These outcomes, along with the Church’s documented ambition to expand and its reversal of prior teachings, support the idea that the First Crusade was a deliberate political maneuver, intended to to expand and consolidate the authority of the
The Crusades took place in the Middle East between 1095 and 1291. They were used to gain a leg up on trading, have more land to show hegemony, and to please the gods. Based upon the documents, the Crusades between 1095 and 1291 were caused primarily by religious devotion rather than by the desire for economic and political gain.
In 1095 Pope urban II call all Christians to take part in what would become the world’s greatest Holy War in all of history. Urban’s called Christians to take up arms and help fight to take the Holy Land of Jerusalem back from the accursed Muslims. During this time of war the whole world changed. Land boundaries shifted, men gained and lost and gained power again, and bonds were forged and broken. The Crusades had a great impact on the world that will last forever. There were many major social, political, religious and economic changes that occurred during the crusades. But first, a brief history to give backbone to these reasons.
How did the Crusades affect the Christians, Muslims, and Jews? The crusades impacted them all greatly for they were all a key part of the Crusades. Occasionally A religion may get a positive consequence but most of the time it was a negative one. Why did they all want Jerusalem? They all wanted it because it had a religious value to them. For the Jews, it was their spiritual city where the great temple once stood. For the Christians, it was where Jesus was crucified and rose from the dead. Last but not least for the Muslims it was where Muhammad rose to heaven during the night journey.
The emperor of the Byzantine Emperor was upset with Turks encroaching on his empire. He went to the Pope Urban II and complained. He made up atrocities about the Turks. In 1096, The Pope Urban II promoted the Crusade to reclaim the Holy Land from the barbaric Turks. These crusades lasted till the 13th century. In the process, Jews were persecuted and lots of looting took place. Many countries took interest in the Crusades because they were ready for travel and adventure. They wanted to expand trade with the Middle and Far East and so the Crusades gave them a chance to open up trade routes with those countries. They used Christianity to justify the Crusades. In reality, they wanted to expand trade and gain more territorial land.
The crusades in the middle ages were a long-lasting series of vigorous wars between Christians and Muslims over the Holy Land, Jerusalem. The crusades lasted for almost two hundred years. They began in 1099 and approximately ended in 1291. (What were the motives, and causes of these gruesome wars?) is the first question one might ask. To properly answer this question, I am about to analyze the first four crusades that had began in 1099 and ended in 1212.
The Crusades were one of the most prominent events in Western European history; they were not discrete and unimportant pilgrimages, but a continuous stream of marching Western armies (Crusaders) into the Muslim world, terminating in the creation and eventually the fall of the Islamic Kingdoms. The Crusades were a Holy War of Roman Christianity against Islam, but was it really a “holy war” or was it Western Europe fighting for more land and power? Through Pope Urban II and the Roman Catholic Church’s actions, their proposed motivations seem unclear, and even unchristian. Prior to the Crusades, Urban encouraged that Western Europe fight for their religion but throughout the crusades the real motivations shone though; the Crusaders were power hungry, land coveting people who fought with non Christian ideals and Morales.
A major part of the fighters in the crusades were untrained and unqualified peasants who went out to get back the holy lands for the church from the ?evil Muslims? (Medieval Europe 164-167). This was called the Peasants Crusade. In order to get these peasants, who knew no better, to go and fight the church told them that if they were to go and fight these ?horrible Muslims? then they would automatically get admission into heaven. Of course this automatically appealed to the peasants being that they were so god-fearing. They thought that if they helped the church then they would go to heaven and so they jumped at such an opportunity to get a get-into-heaven-free card. These people in all their religious glory went in and attacked the city of Nicaea (TWW, 104), and got killed. The city of Nicaea was a well fortified city controlled by Seljuk Turks. The peasants went in and attacked and literally got slaughtered. Only 2000 peasants survived their hasty attack. Unfortunately most of the crusades went this way(TWW)
The First Crusade from 1095 to 1099 has been seen as a successful crusade. The First Crusaders carefully planned out their attacks to help promote religion throughout the lands. As the First Crusade set the example of what a successful crusade should do, the following crusades failed to maintain control of the Holy Land. Crusades following after the First Crusade weren’t as fortunate with maintaining the Holy Land due united forces of Muslims, lack of organization, and lack of religious focus.
In 1095, Pope Urban II called the first crusade. Happening between 1096 and 1099, the first crusade was both a military expedition and a mass movement of people with the simple goal of reclaiming the Holy Lands taken by the Muslims in their conquests of the Levant. The crusade ended with the capture of Jerusalem in July 1099. However, there has been much debate about whether the First Crusade can be considered an ‘armed pilgrimage’ or whether it has to be considered as a holy war. This view is complicated due to the ways in which the Crusade was presented and how the penitential nature of it changed throughout the course of the Crusade.
A main cause of the Crusades was the treatment of Christian pilgrims. They were robbed, beaten, and then sold. The main group of Turks, the Seljuk Turks, were threatening and growing in power. The Byzantine Emperor, Alexus I, began to become worried and sent out an urgent plea to Pope Urban II, in Rome. He requested for Christian knights to help him fight the Turks. Pope Urban II did agree to his appeal although Byzantine Emperors and Roman Popes were longtime rivals. He also did agree with Alexus I, in fearing that the Turks were expanding. Pope Urban encouraged French and German Bishops and Nobles to also take part in this. “ An accused race has violently invaded the lands of those Christians and had depopulated them by pillage and fire.” This is when Pope Urban II called for a crusade to free the Holy Land. Urban did agree to this having some of his own motives in mind. He was hoping his power would grow in ...
In the 11th, 12th, and 13th centuries, Europeans embarked to recover the holy city of Jerusalem from the Muslims. These expeditions, Crusades, were a form of war in defense of Christianity that was justified by the papacy. Popes and church officials would promise spiritual benefits and indulgences to those who would fight. With the start of the First Crusade in 1096, thousands of Western Christians of all classes joined the cause and chose to fight against the infidels in order to regain the holy city of Jerusalem. Between 1096 and 1291, when the last of the Crusader states were overtaken, there were numerous expeditions and hundreds of thousands soldiers and civilians were killed. Upon reviewing the two sources, we can see that there are many views in regards to the crusades and their success.
At the end of the 11th century, Western Europe had emerged as a great power, not yet as strong as the Byzantine Empire or the Islamic Empire of the Middle East and North Africa, however, it had substantial growth in political and religious influence during the Middle Ages. At this time the Byzantine Empire was under constant attack from the Seljuk Turks and many losses had lead to a significant decrease in the Byzantine territories. After the wars with the Turks, years of civil war and chaos followed until Alexius Comnenus, a general in the Byzantine army seized the throne in 1081 and took control of what was left of the Byzantine Empire.
Crusading, much like Imperialism in the 20th century, was all about expansion. During the middle ages however, it was more about the expansion of religion rather then power, or at least that’s the way it was preached. Crusading by definition is; “ a holy war authorized by the pope, who proclaimed it in the name of god of Christ. It was believed to be Christ’s own enterprise, legitimized by his personal mandate” (1). This essay examines the background of the crusades to offer a better understanding as to why they occurred. It also examines the effects that the crusades had on the world. It is easy to look at the crusades as a violent meaningless act, but one must understand the type of setting this movement occurred during. This was a time when if you took part in the crusades, you were seen as a warrior of god, recruited by the pope. Any man who fought in the name of god would be rewarded in heaven. Popular belief in the 10th and 11th centuries was that the more you did for god, the less accountable you were for you’re past sins. The more deeds you did, the better your credit in the ‘Treasury of God’ (2). The Treasury of God is a summarization of the good deed outweighing the bad deed principle of the time. Acts of violence in the name of god are far less common in the world today. But, as seen with September 11th, jihad or holy war is still occurring. This essay gives a basic timeline and underlying principles behind the crusading missions. Justification for these acts remains unclear and is simply opinion based.
In order for the crusades to begin, the Christians needed to gather an army to travel and fight the forces of Muslims. With all the power being held by monarchies at this time, the church needed to be cleaver in order to gain troops to put their lives on the line. To gain the support of these warriors and dedication of men, Pope Urban II (1088-1099) challenged those morals of men by telling them to grab their weapons and join the holy war to recover the land of Jerusalem. It was not the challenge that convinced men to take part in this war. The promise of “immediate remission of sins” attracted the men to stand up for their religion and beliefs while at the same time, promising them a trip to heaven when life comes to an end. With this statement, men instantly prepared for battle which in a very short period of time gave the church power which has been held by the monarchies. Men of rich and poor prepared for battle, some wearing ...