The Crusades: A Holy War

1095 Words3 Pages

The Crusades was a standout amongst the most conspicuous occasions in Western European history; they were not discrete and immaterial pilgrimages, but rather a persistent stream of marching Western armed forces (Crusaders) into the Muslim world, ending in the creation and in the end the fall of the Islamic Kingdoms. The Crusades were a Holy War of Roman Christianity against Islam, yet would it say it was truly a "holy war" or would it say it was Western Europe battling for more land and power? Through Pope Urban II and the Roman Catholic Church's activities, their proposed inspirations appear to be vague, and even unchristian. Before the Crusades, Urban supported that Western Europe battle for their religion yet all through the campaigns the …show more content…

Ibn-al Athir depicts the crusaders and leaders as political due to their unholy activities amid the crusade. Ibn al-Athir uncovers that their thought processes were unlawful and unholy, in light of the fact that the Christians had controlled the Turks to open the entryway of Jerusalem. The crusades was a blend of a journey and a holy war. The reason a pilgrimage was on account was because there were many voyages to sacred shrines. The Holy war was because there was another religion rising and the Turks were gradually taking the Holy land from the Christians. The Muslims divided into numerous areas which brought on disagreements and lead them to be feeble. This made it simpler for the Turks to be defeated. "Sunni Muslims had taken over Islamic and infidel regions (Hunt, 332)". The Seljuk Turks assumed control of Baghdad and began to control the Abbasid caliphate and began to debilitate Byzantium. Since the Turks were debilitating Byzantium, ruler Alexius I had approached Pope Urban II for some assistance to pick up an armed force. Pope Urban II had taken this triumph into his own particular course, which lead his influence procedures for individuals to join. In this crusade there was solidarity with Christians, the knights were adjusted to the poor to conflict with the Turks to battle for God and obtain back the Holy land. The First Crusade was various armies with different rulers under the pope to assume control over the Muslims The Second Crusade was not based off religion but rather it was based off of contracting states and the ascent of government. This shows it was not a sacred war but rather a magnificent extension and

Open Document