Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Arthur miller on writing crucible
Essay about The Crucible by Arthur Miller
Dramatic device in the crucible
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Emma Gulliford once said,”Reading a good book is like taking a journey…” and that is what Arthur Miller has done in his novel The Crucible. Arthur Miller has helped us take a journey with his novel for 64 years. He has done this by creating his own style, which is the author's use of word choice, sentence structure, figurative language, and sentence arrangement to establish mood,tone, and meaning in the text. Arthur Miller’s novel, The Crucible, has been around for so long ,but it is still loved because of his amazing use of culture, sociology, and allegories. The definition of culture is arts and other manifestations of human intellectual achievement regarded collectively. Culture changes how many people handle different situations such …show more content…
as they did in The Crucible. Such as on pages 166-167 they describe the religious aspects that are set up in their society. The prologue states “...a holiday from work meant only that they must concentrate even more on prayer.” and “The parochial snobbery of these people was partly for their failure to convert the Indians. Probably they also preferred to take land from heathens rather than from fellow christians.” This shows that their culture is very much based on god and their religion.Another example of this is on page 170 when Parris states “...Tell him I have sent for Reverend Hale of Beverly and Mr.Hale will surely confirm that…” and “ ...Now tell me true, Abigail. And I pray you feel the weight of truth upon you , for now my ministry’s at stake, my ministry and perhaps your cousin's life…” also on page 170. Readers learn through these quotes that their focus on God is a major role in their daily lives. Miller’s use of culture not only shows how their lives were made up, but also how their religion made everything more structured and methodized. Miller also held his readers with his use of sociology. Sociology, the study of the development structure and functioning of human society, play a major role in the success of The Crucible.
Arthur Miller uses sociology in his novel during the trials when they are trying to prove if the town folk are witches or not. Such as on page 207 when Hathorne talks about the evidence they have against Martha Corey. Hathorne states, ” Now Martha Corey, there is abundant evidence in our hands to show that you have given yourself to the reading of fortunes. Do you deny it?” This shows how they are studying the functioning of their society because they are showing the fact that they have gathered her doing these things when they studied her actions. Sociology can also be shown on page 211 when they are going back and forth to see if Proctor is honest based on his actions with the church. Such as when Parris says, “such a christian that will not come to church but once a month!” and when Cheever says, “He plow on sunday sir.” This quote also shows that they watch and study how credible and functioning a person is based on their actions toward and with the church. The Crucible shows the use of sociology very often through the many acts, but mostly take place within the acts of the witch trials. Arthur Miller not only uses culture and sociology he also uses a wide array of …show more content…
allegories. The dictionary defines allegory as a story, poem, or picture that can be interpreted to reveal a hidden meaning.
Arthur Miller uses allegories throughout his entire novel The Crucible. Even though he uses allegories throughout his entire novel there are a few point in the novel that are majorly evident in their connections such as on page 101(smaller novel) when Hathorne and Giles are talking about the evidence that really isn’t true and they want the names of the people and for them to be called in, this is an allegory with the Red Scare. The dialogue goes as follows,” Hathorne: And the name of this man? Giles: What name? Hathorne:The man that gave you this information. Giles: Why, I - I cannot give you his name. Hathorne: And why not? Giles: You know well why not! He’ll lay in jail if I give his name! Hathorne: This is contempt of the court, Mr. Danforth!” This is like how it was during the Red Scare trials. The accused could have evidence to help themselves but didn’t want to share names for fear of others going to jail. Another evident example is on page 44 (smaller novel) when Abigail blames Tituba for the bewitching. Abigail says, “I never called him! Tituba, Tituba…” also in the stage directions it says, “Mrs.Putnam enters with Tituba, and instantly Abigail points at Tituba” and also says, “she made me do it! She made Betty do it!” These quotes show how quick others were to point fingers to save themselves. Both people existed during the Red Scare trials, those who
didn’t want others to get in trouble and those who would turn the evidence on others to get the accusations of of themselves. These were just the few examples that show a deeper and hidden meaning in the novel. The crucible was an amazing piece of literature that has stayed with us for over 60 years and has taken us on a journey in a small amount of pages. It has used many devices to stay relevant, but the most helpful were culture,sociology and allegories. Now what do you think made Arthur Miller’s The Crucible such a timeless piece?
The focus of Miller’s The Crucible is an appalling witch trial that morfs the once-peaceful town of Salem into a cutthroat slaughterhouse. As a lucrative playwright and a not-so-subtle allegory author, Miller is a seasoned wordsmith who addresses people akin to himself, and is not secretive about that information. The Crucible best serves its purpose as a learning device and a social statement, especially at the time of its publishing. Miller‘s piece showcases the appeals in an easy-to-identify manner that is perfect for middle or high school students who are new to the appeals, or for English majors who have no problem pinpointing them, making this play ideal for a classroom setting.
The Crucible was a rather strong book, it had battles both internal and external, there were also betrayals and vendettas… but a few stuck strong to their morals of what was wrong, and what was right. After the girl’s acts were, undoubtedly, in the eyes of the law, seen as entirely real, people who would not otherwise have been accused of witchcraft were now eligible to be under Satan’s spell. One John Proctor, saw himself above the nonsense, that witches could not exist in Salem, his wife, his children nor him; But, when Mary Warren said to the court that he used his spirit to drag her into court to testify against the girls, the judges deemed her word more truthful than his. After actively and repeatedly denying the claims, he was sentenced to death, for only a witch could lie in the face of god.
Prevailing Purposes in “The Crucible” Playwright and essayist, Arthur Miller, in his play, “The Crucible”, utilizes pathos, symbolism, and irony to convey his purpose of how the events of the Salem Witch Trials had detrimental effects on the society and how far the elites went to protect their reputation . Miller’s reasoning is to expand Parris’ and Danforth purpose for their side of the argument during the witch trials. He adapts a contrasting tone in order to appeal to similar feelings with reasoning in his american readers.
Miller’s life paralleled The Crucible in many ways. The characters in the play had many traits that resembled his. He and the people of Salem were censored by the frenzy of the times they were living in. The hysteria and the mob mentality exacerbated the anticommunists’ and the witch-hunters’ philosophies. The Red Scare affected Miller in the same way the witch hunts affected the people of Salem. As long as there are people with authority in the world, there will be challengers of authority. Censorship will always be used to make others conform. A majority of the public is and always will be easily influenced by hysteria and the mob mentality. Miller used his own experiences to write The Crucible, a play that describes universal behavior and the human condition.
Through time it can be seen that the world’s history has a nature of repeating its self. Author Miller, was aware of this as he experienced a repitition of history of society’s flawed government. In the text The Crucible, the writer, Author Miller has identified and illustrated the problems society faced during the 1950’s setting by drawing parallels with the setting of the 1962 Salem witch hunt. This setting helps readers to understand the characters of John Proctor and Giles Corey.
The title of the play, The Crucible by Arthur Miller is appropriate because it refers to various themes that are critically explored throughout the play. A crucible by definition, is a metal or ceramic container or pot in which substances or objects may be melted in. Also, a second definition of a crucible is severe tests or trials. Both these definitions can be applied to the title, The Crucible. The title has a metaphorical meaning which connects it to the play’s conflicts. Some conflicts that are in the play is, witchcraft, hysteria, theocracy, land disputes, blackmailing, and the dangers of scapegoating.
Authors often have underlying reasons for giving their stories certain themes or settings. Arthur Miller’s masterpiece, The Crucible, is a work of art inspired by actual events as a response to political and moral issues. Set in Salem, Massachusetts in 1692, The Crucible proves to have its roots in events of the 1950’s and 1960’s, such as the activities of the House Un-American Committee and the “Red Scare.” Though the play provides an accurate account of the Salem witch trials, its real achievement lies in the many important issues of Miller’s time that it dealswith.
Miller, Arthur. The Crucible. Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes. Kate Kinsella, et. Al, New Jersey: Pearson Education, 2002. 1233-1334. Print.
Explore Miller’s dramatic presentation and development of the theme of power and authority. Even though The Crucible is not historically correct, nor is it a perfect allegory for anti-Communism, or as a faithful account of the Salem trials, it still stands out as a powerful and timeless depiction of how intolerance, hysteria, power and authority is able to tear a community apart. The most important of these is the nature of power, authority and its costly, and overwhelming results. “But you must understand, sir, that a person is either with this court or against it,” says Danforth conceitedly. With this antithesis, Miller sums up the attitude of the authorities towards the witch trials that if one goes against the judgement of the court
Throughout the play, The Crucible, playwright Arthur Miller displays various themes. He uses real life events that took place during the late 1600’s to show how many individuals choose to participate in oppression in society while others choose to stand against it, and how this can play an affect on social order. The events displayed are a tribute to the hearings and prosecutions of the Salem Witch Trials. This theme, of many, is displayed today in many social events as well as various political confrontations in the past.
What is meant by the word culture? Culture, according to Websters Dictionary, is the totality of socially transmitted behavior patterns, arts, beliefs, institutions, and all other products of human work and thought. These patterns, traits, and products are considere...
The Crucible is a famous play written by Arthur Miller in the Early 1950’s. It was written during the “Red scare, when McCarthyism was established. Many anti-communists wanted to prevent communism from spreading just like in The Crucible many wanted to get rid of witchcraft. Many would accuse others of witchcraft in order to not be accused just like many would accuse people of communism. In The Crucible witchcraft would be punishable by death. Many were scared to be accused; therefore many would admit practicing witchcraft in order to save their lives. The Crucible is considered a good play because it is based on real life events during the Salem witch Trials and shows how fear played a role in the individual’s life just like during the “Red” scare.
“Well, all the plays that I was trying to write were plays that would grab an audience by the throat and not release them, rather than presenting an emotion which you could observe and walk away from.” by Arthur Miller. All great works provide a way to reach in and grab the audience through the reoccurring themes like, greed, jealousy, reputation and hypocrisy. Arthur Miller had one of those great works and it was called “The Crucible”. The play was based off of the witch trials that happened in Salem in the year of 1962. Some of the characters were actual characters involved in the witch trials. Arthur Miller wrote this play during the time of the “Red Scare”. Miller wrote The Crucible because he wanted to turn the The Salem Witch Trials into
In Arthur Miller's essay "Why I Wrote The Crucible” Miller brings up key points he was trying to make through his play The Crucible. In Miller's essay we learn that The Crucible was not just for entertainment, The Crucible was a lesson, a warning about human nature. Miller warns people of the dangers in being controlled by fears, consumed in lies, and unchanged in history. He demonstrates this through the pain and panic caused by the stupidity of how the witch trials were performed.
What is culture? Culture refers to the cumulative deposit of knowledge, experience, beliefs, values, attitudes, meanings, hierarchies, religion, notions of time, roles, spatial relations, concepts of the universe, and material objects and possessions acquired by a group of people in the course of generations through individual and group striving