Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on arthur millers life
Literary analysis essay the crucible
Literary analysis essay the crucible
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Crucible was a very excellent book.The book had many great features that played very well to the story. History is one of the things that played a big rule.Arthur Miller kept the story historically correct while adding his own perspective into it.Another things that played a big role was depth.Miller was able to give the reader a in depth feeling for the story.As a reader depth is important and, miller showed it in his story and characters.Something else that played a big part was interpretation .Any person who read the crucible could interpret different things than others. One such thing that could be interpreted is theme.Some readers can get one theme while another reader sees a different theme. One theme that is fit for the crucible is history repeats itself.The reason Arthur Miller wrote the crucible was because of what was happening during his time. What was going on during his time was the massive hunt for communist in America.This resulted with a lot of people being blacklisted.After evaluating what was happening was he needed a way to reach the people .the way Miller saw fit was by providing an example that is similar to the situation they are in now.And the crucible was that example. That example was a story very similar to what was going on at the time, which the Crucilble in the story describes how like people hunting for communist …show more content…
people in the crucible were hunting for withces. If you got caught the way you world take the edge off is you would give up someone else. This way was the same in the Crucible, but instead of Communist if you were accused of being a witch. The next thing similar was if you were accused you were able to get to get some heat of you. The thing to do was put some of the blame on someone else so you might some slack. What Mr. Miller saw in this was a way to show that even though this is different. This event that happened a long time ago was very similar to what was happening during his time. Arthor Miller saw this event as a way to show people to look this has happened before. To show that like how some people blame other people. In the book, Abigail also did use this tactic to get out of trouble which was to blame Tituba. It also described this tactic in both the movie and the documentary. Both explained that something else that people did was use the situation to get enemies in trouble. More likely that was also done and Mr. Miller wanted to see that like the Crucible people were acting like kids. Like little kids to blame other people to get reverse or act upon grudges and he use the crucible to show no onlyh people of his time, but also the government people. He just wanted it to stop like how in the ending of the crucible people wanted the hanging and the accusation to stop due to how peoples life were being ruined. Mr. Miller wanted to get people to stop blacklisting people is basically in ruins those people's lifes and he just wanted it to stop. The way he solved this was him writing the crucible. Another theme is there is nothing to fear but fear itself.
One of the most important things that affect the crucible was fear. Most of the problems and situations were caused due to people and their fears. An example of this is how people were getting caught out of trouble. This is something that happened in both the and in America during Arthur Miller's time. One thong that helped contribute to the fear was the power people have. For example the power people in the crucible were the priest and the judges. These people used their reputation and power to strike fear into the people which made them act the way they
did. In Miller's time the power people were the government and its representatives used their power and propaganda to put fear into its people. This caused people to change from a little on edge to anything out of the ordinary into accusations. For example in act 1 of the crucible Giles wa asking Mr hale on his opinion about his wife's books later on as people grew more secured things went from went from strange to demonic. Like giles wife people saw her conciling her books from something thought of strange to demonic. These change of feelings due to fear eventually lead to the accusation of giles wif an later death of giles himself. No to forget what happened with abigail. In the begginning of the crucible abigail is caught dancing with other women, in the woods out of fear of getting in trouble she threw the blame on tituba. After this was done it set the chain of reactions to the end of the play. People began to overcome this fear by not conffessing. This did indeed was something that miller want people to see an feel during his time. Miller want tot purseude people to overcome their fear and stand against the government like in the crucible. In conclusion the two most important themes are supported throughout the crucible. Plus many examples can be used to support both using the movie can be used ot support both using all the movie, book, and documentary. I did enjoy seeing how Arthor Miller used the characters actions, attidudes, and feelings to show how certain things affected the story in the future. For example Mr. Giles, in the story, it went from his wife being suspecious to things being constricted and then lead to the death of Mr. Giles later on. Many things did play into the future. He even showed it in his main characters. He showed this change in feelings. Overall, I did enjoy Mr. Miller's book and cause.
In conclusion The Crucible book and movie were very much the same and the differences that were present don’t have much of an effect on the viewer. All of the scenes that were added were put there for a dramatic effect. Especially the outdoor scenes in the movie gave a different presence than all indoor scenes would have. Overall, the movie and book were very similar, but the differences added to the movie gave it extra
In the story The Crucible, the plot and structure add meaning to the play. Arthur Miller does this by connecting the events of the Red Scare to the Salem Witch Trials. He does this by making the comparisons of how easily it is to trust false things, jump to conclusions too quickly, and believe irrational fears.
The Crucible was written to show people living during the Cold War how ridiculous their thoughts, actions and beliefs were. The sense of panic inspired by the accusations of one girl were very similar to that of the time when Senator McCarthy began claiming that he had evidence that certain people were Communists. For both Abigail Williams and the senator, the “evidence” each accrued was unable to be neither proven nor disproven by authorities due to the nature of the accusations, but was considered truthful as so many people supported it. The support mainly came from those who hoped to gain from the downfall of others, or as to not be accused themselves. This is furthe...
Arthur Miller wrote "The Crucible" in an attempt to create moral awareness for society. He did so by making a few small changes to the history and creating parallels in the play with racism, human tendencies, and H.U.A.C. Miller completed "The Crucible" in the 1950's. At that time, America was engulfed in the civil rights movement. Racism was a huge issue and people were fighting for equality and respect. African Americans were among the minorities that were persecuted by society.
There are many themes prevalent in The Crucible by Arthur Miller, with all of them manifesting in the actions and decisions of characters at some point in the story. One of the most outstanding themes in the play has to do with the connection between past experiences and future actions. Individuals lashing out at others because they felt they have been wronged, a guilty conscience causing someone to make a drastic decision, or even a person choosing a path due to possible social repercussions are all examples from the play of someone 's past effecting their future.
In The Crucible, the mass hysteria surrounding the witch trials caused paranoia amongst the people of Salem. Miller uses the Salem Witch Trials of 1692 as a symbol and allegory of the fear surrounding the spread of communism during the 1950s in America. The community’s sense of justice was blinded by the mass hysteria and for some, a desire for vengeance and personal gain. The Putnams
...rts them. We can note that all these characters are after the same goal. They concern themselves over issues and possessions that exist in their world. The worst aspect of human relations result from these trials. Although the actions in the book may not have truly taken place, many people fell victim to the horrific consequences of the real trials. The characters within The Crucible struggled with their status in society as did the real people of Salem. Their behavior shows what will happen if we succumb to our desires without realizing the moral wrong that we may subject to others and ourselves. In order to prevent that possibility, we should recognize the consequences of our actions before it becomes too late to do anything. Miller exhibits his understanding of human nature by revealing these characters to our face and forcing us to watch as they warp their values and ideals to uphold the acceptance of this behavior. As The Crucible is read, people are forced to see how wrong it is to place the value material things over the price of a human's life; and by knowing this, hopefully people will start to discover these aspects within themselves, and will gain the courage to change.
The issues of power, that Arthur Miller’s The Crucible, portrays are concerned with, who has the power, the shifts of power that take place and how power can consume people and try to abuse it, for either vengeance, jealously, material gain or sexual desire.
The Crucible by Arthur Miller raises many thought provoking issues throughout the play, including the importance of personal integrity, injustice in society and the rights of the community versus the rights of the individual.
Authors often have underlying reasons for giving their stories certain themes or settings. Arthur Miller’s masterpiece, The Crucible, is a work of art inspired by actual events as a response to political and moral issues. Set in Salem, Massachusetts in 1692, The Crucible proves to have its roots in events of the 1950’s and 1960’s, such as the activities of the House Un-American Committee and the “Red Scare.” Though the play provides an accurate account of the Salem witch trials, its real achievement lies in the many important issues of Miller’s time that it dealswith.
I over all have enjoyed the Crucible, although all of it is pretty ridiculous. It's so weird that people were being sentenced to death because they “saw the devil”, when the court did not have any definitive proof of this. I thought that Act Three was very good and that Act Four was kind of a let down.
In the Crucible, Arthur Miller shows us how fear and suspicion can destroy a community. As the play develops, Miller shows us how fear and suspicion increase and destroy the community. Throughout the play it becomes apparent that the community gets more and more divided as time goes on. In the beginning there were arguments about ownership of land between some of the villagers. As the story progresses people fear for their own safety and begin accusing their neighbours of witchcraft in order to escape being hanged.
The Crucible is a play with many underlying messages and themes. One of which is the idea of power. Power is a very important term in this play in that whoever holds the power, holds the fates of others. The hysteria within Salem has directly effected society. Everything has turned upside down and has gotten distorted. Arthur Miller is telling us that all the power in Salem is given to those who are corrupt and their abuse of it is directly shown through: the actions of Abigail throughout the play, the corruption and desires of Parris, as well as the witch trials held by Judge Danforth.
The Crucible is a famous play written by Arthur Miller in the Early 1950’s. It was written during the “Red scare, when McCarthyism was established. Many anti-communists wanted to prevent communism from spreading just like in The Crucible many wanted to get rid of witchcraft. Many would accuse others of witchcraft in order to not be accused just like many would accuse people of communism. In The Crucible witchcraft would be punishable by death. Many were scared to be accused; therefore many would admit practicing witchcraft in order to save their lives. The Crucible is considered a good play because it is based on real life events during the Salem witch Trials and shows how fear played a role in the individual’s life just like during the “Red” scare.
Throughout the play, “The Crucible” by Arthur Miller, the characters crack under the pressure, face trials they fear they can’t handle on their own, and ultimately turned against one another. There are three known definitions of the word ‘crucible’ and Arthur Miller incorporated all three when writing this play. First, a container used to melt metal or other substances at a high temperature, second, a severe test or trial, and lastly, a situation where great political, social or cultural forces interact or change. All the interpretations of this word apply to the play, they all symbolize an event that took place.