The Crucible

521 Words2 Pages

Arthur Miller's play, The Crucible, has often been described as a tragedy by both critics and the playwright himself. This categorization can be easily justified when looking at the traditional elements of a literary tragedy and how they manifest in the play. According to Aristotle, a tragedy involves the fall of a noble protagonist due to a combination of fate, hubris, and the manipulation of external forces. In The Crucible, the protagonist, John Proctor, fits this description perfectly, making the play indeed a tragedy. One of the key aspects of a tragedy is the presence of a tragic hero, a character who possesses noble qualities but has a flaw that leads to their downfall. John Proctor, the protagonist of The Crucible, embodies this archetype. He is a respected member of the community, known for his integrity and moral values. However, his tragic flaw is his pride and inability to admit to his own mistakes. This flaw ultimately leads to his downfall as he is unwilling to confess to practicing witchcraft to save his own life. Proctor's tragic flaw not only brings about his destruction, but also contributes to the tragic fate of many others in the play. …show more content…

In The Crucible, the Salem witch trials serve as the external force that drives the tragic events of the play. The hysteria, paranoia, and false accusations that characterize the trials are fueled by power-hungry individuals like Abigail Williams and Reverend Parris who manipulate the situation for their gain. Proctor's fate is intertwined with the broader fate of the community, as he battles against the corrupt system of the trials and ultimately loses his life in the

More about The Crucible

Open Document