Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Socrates attitude towards death
Socrates attitude towards death
Socrates attitude towards death
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Socrates attitude towards death
Throughout history, euthanasia has always had a place in law; starting as far back as the Axial Age in Ancient Greece. Although the views and laws surrounding euthanasia have changed time and time again, the fact remains that where there is sickness, there is death and some individuals will choose to end their life instead of suffer.
In Ancient Greece, euthanasia was seen as acceptable by some and unacceptable by others. The government in Athens kept a supply of poison for any individual who obtained official permission to commit suicide. In Rome, suicide was punishable if deemed irrational. Socrates and Plato valued a man’s ability to reason: Plato believed that suicide was acceptable for people that fell into four categories: 1) Those
who take their lives by legal order of the state; 2) Those who are incurably ill; 3) Those who are disabled; 4) Those who have disgraced themselves beyond any hope of self-forgiveness and choose to atone for their actions through suicide (Roberts & Gorman, 1996). It is debated by researchers when the Hippocratic Oath came into existence, who wrote it and the extent of its use in ancient times, but it appears to forbid euthanasia: “To please no one will I prescribe a deadly drug, nor give advice which may cause his death” (Roberts, 1996) During A.D. 330, the Rise of Christianity brought on the belief that there wasn’t a distinction of an emotional act of suicide and choosing to die, even if the choice was because of a prolonged, terminal condition. Individuals who chose to end their life because they were sick were denied a Christian burial. During A.D. 562, the Catholic Church began to excommunicate anyone who committed or attempted suicide. The term euthanasia comes from the Greek words “Eu” (meaning good) and “Thanatos” (meaning death). There are many interpretations and meanings to the term euthanasia. The acting definition of euthanasia is “any action undertaken for the direct purpose of ending another person’s life (i.e., deliberately causing someone else’s death” (Euthanasia, 2011). Some definitions also include the voluntary and involuntary terminations of life; such as Passive Euthanasia, Active Euthanasia, Physician Assisted Suicide, Voluntary Euthanasia, Involuntary Euthanasia, and Natural Death. Passive Euthanasia refers to withdrawing or withholding life-giving means of support. This could be removing life support equipment, stopping medical procedures or medications, stopping nutrition and hydration or not delivering/stopping CPR. Active Euthanasia causes the death of an individual deliberately. Physician Assisted Suicide refers to when a physician supplies an individual with the medications needed to end their life. Physician Assisted Suicide is more commonly called voluntary passive euthanasia (VPE). Voluntary Euthanasia refers to when an individual has initiated the request to end their life. Involuntary Euthanasia refers to a situation where an individual’s life is ended without their consent. This is more commonly used when a patient is in a Persistent Vegetative State and the chance of regaining conscientiousness is sparse. Natural Death occurs when there was no intentional act to cause an individual’s death.
In Sullivan versus Rachel’s on euthanasia I will show that James Rachel’s argument is logically stronger than Sullivan’s argument. I will present examples given by both authors regarding their arguments and also on their conclusions about it. I will explain both of the author’s logical strengths and weaknesses in their arguments. I will give the examples given by both authors on how they prove their arguments to be true and later I will decide whose argument is stronger based on their strengths and weaknesses. I will give one of Rachel’s main strong arguments and one of Sullivan’s very weak arguments. I will also show if both of the author’s premises follow from the conclusion. And at the end I will give my opinion on my personal reasons on whose I think makes more sense in presenting their arguments.
The war between the Athenians and the Spartans as written by Thucydides was a great one that no other that had ever occurred could be compared to, so says Thucydides. Thucydides views the preparations on both sides to have been perfect and that the Hellenic race was joining the war as well. He considers it the greatest faction yet recognized in history, of the barbaric world rather than to the Hellenes alone. From the second chapter of his book, it is clear that the war between these two groups was not to the advantage of the Athenians. They lost in the war and most of their people were killed. An ancestral funeral ceremony is performed to bury those who had died in the war.
Socrates was a great Philosopher and thinker who were able to take his knowledge to greater heights from Ancient Athens. Due to Socrates great thinking and open-mindedness he was accused by many but persecuted with two charges, which were brought against him. In Plato’s Euthyphro, Socrates challenged Euthyphro for a solid definition of ‘what is piety’. In Apology Plato goes on to state the charges which had been set against Socrates, but while doing so Plato juggles the readers mind whether Socrates was guilty of any of these charges. Plato brings the reader to and argument between Socrates and Crito in the Crito dialogues. This argument is to determine whether Socrates should run away or face the death penalty/during the argument Socrates
Ancient Greece has always been known as the civilization that created the mold of the Western society that we live in today. It had influenced the world in a way that no other civilization had. However, such a great civilization didn’t last long. The reason for this is its people failure to form unity.
The concept of physician-assisted suicide has been a topic of debate since the birth of medicine. Controversy even surrounds its name as the term “suicide” is associated with a form of mental illness and irrational behavior, both of which are to be prevented it if at all possible according to medical obligation (Quill and Greenlaw). Physician assisted death/suicide occurs when a physician provides a medical means of death and instruction to a patient but does not administer the actual cause of death (Lonnquist and Weiss 389-91). This is quite different than the concept of active euthanasia in which a physician directly administers the cause of death. Recognized as far back as the 5th century BCE in the ancient Hippocratic Oath, the origin of this practice cou...
The ethical debate regarding euthanasia dates back to ancient Greece and Rome. It was the Hippocratic School (c. 400B.C.) that eliminated the practice of euthanasia and assisted suicide from medical practice. Euthanasia in itself raises many ethical dilemmas – such as, is it ethical for a doctor to assist a terminally ill patient in ending his life? Under what circumstances, if any, is euthanasia considered ethically appropriate for a doctor? More so, euthanasia raises the argument of the different ideas that people have about the value of the human experience.
When it came to suicide, ancient Greeks often regarded male suicide as honorable and female suicide as disgraceful. The ancient Greek culture regarded war as one of the most important aspects of the society and could not stand dishonor. As a result, most ancient Greek warriors committed suicide out of valor. If all other fellow warriors were killed in battle and one warrior returned home, that warrior would be viewed as pusillanimous and ignominious for not dying in battle or fighting to the death with his fellow warriors.3 Such was the case in the suicides of Orthydas and Pantities. “Fearing the charge of cowardice, the Spartan Orthrydas committed suicide out of shame at being the lone survivor among three hundred of his fellow warriors in a battle against the Argives.”3 Like Orthydas, “Pantites, a Spartan survivor of the battle of Thermopylae, took his life when he returned home.”3 Honorable suicides like these could also be seen throughout the entirety of the Peloponnesian War. Honorable death by suicide was so significant that there were consequences if the warriors did not
Natural Law theory and Deontology agree on the grounds of abortion, because Natural Law theory says life is important and valued. Deontology is the rules of our land say after a certain period of time abortion is illegal and it agrees that abortion is wrong in structure. Deontology would say that the parents has a duty to care for the child, not abort it. Natural Law theory says life is the most precious thing and euthanasia is illegal as a medical practice in many countries because it is taking of a life. Deontology agrees with Natural Law theory on euthanasia because of the laws and rules of medical practices and the criminal laws say that it is wrong. In the medical profession their duty is to heal a life and restore life not to take someone’s
The first law explicitly prohibiting euthanasia in the United States was enacted in New York in 1828 (ProCon). Since then many more states have outlawed ...
The word “euthanasia” comes from the Ancient Greek “eu” - good and “thanatos” - death. Plato argued that suicide was against the will of the gods, and was therefore wrong. He does say that patients that are unable to live normally should be denied treatment. Aristotle believed that suicide is wrong because the law forbids it. Hippocrates, the father of medicine, was against active euthanasia. In his famous “Hippocratic oath”, a line forbids giving a “deadly drug” [9][11].
In the essay “The Morality of Euthanasia”, James Rachels uses what he calls the argument from mercy. Rachels states, “If one could end the suffering of another being—the kind from which we ourselves would recoil, about which we would refuse to read or imagine—wouldn’t one?” He cites a Stewart Alsop’s story in which he shares a room with a terminally ill cancer patient who he named Jack. At the end of the recounting, Alsop basically asks, “were this another animal, would not we see to it that it doesn’t suffer more than it should?” Which opens up the question of, “Why do humans receive special treatment when we too are animals?” We would not let animals suffer when there is a low chance of survival, so why is it different for us humans?
The famous dystopian novel, Brave New World by well recognized author Aldous Huxley is a very accurate description of society today. This novel was banned in many Countries, including Ireland and Australia in 1932 for good reason. This novel has many debatable motifs, one of the most underlying motifs is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma, or euthanasia. In this dystopian novel, Aldous Huxley creates a world called the World State.In the World State, people use Euthanasia for anyone who is no longer useful to the society. At 60 years old, people are no longer of use to society. In Brave New World, everyone undergoes “mental euthanasia,” because they are constantly fed
The history of Physician Assisted Suicide (P.A.S.), first known as the practice of active euthanasia., dates back as early as 500 B.C to Classical Greece (Osborn). From Classical Greece to today, the root of Greek medicine has stemmed from a Greek physician named Hippocrates. Hippocrates is famously known for creating the foundation of the Hippocratic Oath, which is a document physicians abide by to determine moral and ethical conduct (Tyson). The Hippocratic Oath is a promise physicians make “to do everything possible to help their patients” and to relieve patients of suffering (Cambridge University). Over the past 2,515 years, the controversial issue of Physician Assisted Suicide has continued to resurface. The question of whether or not
Euthanasia has been around long before Jack Kevorkian and so have laws against it. In the 500 BC-16th Century AD many ancient Greeks and Romans not only supported euthanasia but illegally practiced it:"Although the Hippocratic Oath prohibited doctors from giving 'a deadly drug to anybody, not even if asked for,' or from .,suggesting such a course of action, few ancient Greek or Roman physicians followed the oath faithfully" (ProCon.org). In fact one of the first recorded uses of euthanasia was in the 17th century. In the 17th century many early American colonies decided to make laws against euthanasia. For hundreds of years the Anglo American law is a law against suicide and assisted suicide and for the most part people followed
The ancient philosophers like Plato , Socrates and Aristotle have also expressed their concern regarding the legality of suicide . Plato opined that suicide is shameful and that the people engaged in such act should not have a proper burial. But Plato also predicted 4 exceptions to this rule that can allow a person to end his life. These rules were based on one’s morality, unattainability of salvation, grave misfortune, shame and guilt for unjust actions. Socrates believed that suicide was the act of liberating our soul from our bodies or “guard –post” without the permission of the gods who deliberately positioned us in it as a form of punishment. Aristotle only discussed that the act of suicide is an offence against the state or the society.