Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay about fame
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An essay about fame
Boethius examines the different factors that drive individuals to chase after celebrity among others by using the voice of philosophy to create dialogue, in which he discovers the futility of fame. The Consolation of Philosophy warns readers to shy away from the enticing tactics of fame by claiming that no matter the level of notoriety one achieves, an individual’s name will never be dispersed among all nations; furthermore, any fame attained will eventually prove fruitless as all people are mortal. Lady Philosophy asserts that people who fall into the trap of fame need to be reminded of their finite nature and she changes the reader’s perspective as she insists that incentives to succeed cannot be rooted in selfish desires for fame. In order …show more content…
He deems that although fortune determines much of one’s life, “she never associates with good men and does not turn into good men those with whom she associates” (Boethius 40). From this quote, one can determine that fortune is also interwoven into the backstory of an individual’s fame because fortune favors those who are not necessarily good people. Comparatively, Boethius continues his discussion of fortune following his conversation about fate. It is interesting to observe how Boethius’ opinion on fortune changes after exploring the influences concerning fame. He expounds upon his original interpretation of fame by stating that “bad fortune is more useful than good fortune,” as bad fortune is always truthful and people can learn from its teachings (Boethius 44). He realizes that good fortune could allow one to be highly recognized in society, yet allows that the individual becomes consumed with increasing his celebrity among peoples. For example, Nero was not expected to rise to the throne. Through a bout of good fortune and many unexpected family deaths, Nero was able to become emperor. Although this fortune brought him the crown, it also stripped him of his ability to reason as a man and Nero began to regard himself as a deity. He exhibited this mindset through poisoning people to stay in power, which shows that he was unwilling to let go of his fame as emperor. Good fortune brought Nero the throne, but also resulted in the loss of his reasoning as a man and led him to chase after empty fame. Comparatively, bad fortune can allow for one to have a realistic mindset and not be concerned with his reputation as he is not constantly in the limelight. Ultimately, this example and the dialogue surrounding the topic allows for a greater understanding of all the factors that come into play concerning
What follows is a further isolation of Plutarch's opinions and lessons from within The Lives of Crassus and Caesar. " Certainly the Romans say that in the case of Crassus many virtues were obscured by one vice, namely avarice; and it did seem that he had only one vice, since it was such a predominant one that other evil propensities which he may have had were scarcely noticeable. " Beginning the Life of Crassus with this statement, Plutarch starts the reader off with a negative feeling of who Crassus was. This statement is very strong because it not only points out Crassus's largest shortcoming, but also implies that it was so prevalent that it outweighed all his virtues as well as his other faults.
The choices we make define the destiny of our lives. Since the beginning of time, man has always been an imperfect being full of flaws. Man is faced with different situations that can end up bringing disgrace to himself and his family if the situations are not well handled. In the texts Book II of the Aeneid by Virgil, Antigone by Sophocles, Oedipus the king by Sophocles, and Book XXII from the Iliad by Homer; Creon, the Trojan people, Hector, Achilles, and Oedipus embody what can lead to a man’s downfall through their own choices. Through these texts we are able to learn from the mistakes people made in the past and lead good moral lives. The texts illustrate how pride, lack of empathy, and ignorance lead to the destruction of man.
In the Consolation of Philosophy, while wallowing in his sorrow, Boethius is interrupted by Lady Philosophy who seeks to help him in his hour of need. Driving away the Muses, Lady Philosophy begins her treatment of Boethius. She does this by walking Boethius through a series of discussions, eventually leading to conclusions that should comfort Boethius. While Lady Philosophy attempts to logically show that all fortune is good, in an effort to comfort Boethius, she also shows that humans are incapable of fully understanding this and therefore complete comfort in this knowledge is impossible without faith. She attempts to show Boethius, through the explanation of Providence and Fate, that their bad fortune does not exist but at the same time also gives him several reasons why he will not be able to understand it. She makes it very clear that man cannot understand Providence’s working out for good because man only sees confusion and disorder and they cannot know peoples inward motives and inclinations. This means that Boethius cannot find comfort in logic and reason alone, but must have some form of faith.
The idea of falling victim to one’s own flaws is often closely associated with the Aristotelian definition of tragedy, particularly the concepts of hamartia (a tragic or fatal flaw) and hubris (pride before a fall). Although The Winter’s Tale, The Great Gatsby and The Remains of the Day are not widely considered to be tragedies, yet there are elements of the definition that are relevant. This c...
A foundational belief in Christianity is the idea that God is perfectly good. God is unable to do anything evil and all his actions are motives are completely pure. This principle, however, leads to many questions concerning the apparent suffering and wrong-doing that is prevalent in the world that this perfect being created. Where did evil come from? Also, how can evil exist when the only eternal entity is the perfect, sinless, ultimately good God? This question with the principle of God's sovereignty leads to even more difficult problems, including human responsibility and free will. These problems are not limited to our setting, as church fathers and Christian philosophers are the ones who proposed some of the solutions people believe today. As Christianity begins to spread and establish itself across Europe in the centuries after Jesus' resurrection, Augustine and Boethius provide answers, although wordy and complex, to this problem of evil and exactly how humans are responsible in the midst of God's sovereignty and Providence.
Fate seems to lurk in the shadows of these characters very being and it is this force in which they acknowledge their mortality as human beings. Boethius wrote The Consolation of Philosophy, which may be very helpful in interpreting the meaning of fate in the epic poem Beowulf. Boethius creates fate as a female character that attempts to heal the mind of a troubled man. Richard Green translates some of Boethius’s work in the introduction and interprets this woman’s role as, “She represented fate as a random, uncontrollable force, to be feared or courted, opposed or despised” (xvi). Green is trying to unfold the meaning of fate and Boethius’s intent to illustrate its effects on a man’s life. Boethius himself says that, “Fate moves the heavens and the stars, governs the elements in their mixture, and transforms them by mutual change, it renews all things that are born and die by the reproduction of similar offspring and seeds. This same power binds the actions and fortunes of men in an unbreakable chain of causes and, since these causes have their own origins in an unchangeable providence, they too must necessarily be
Boethius was wrongfully accused of treason and imprisoned, leading him to question as to why God would allow bad things to happen to good people and how you can not be completely happy and there is never true happiness. The fear of losing happiness destroys happiness. "No man is so completely happy that something somewhere does not clash with his condition. It is the nature of human affairs to be fraught with anxiety; they never prosper perfectly and they never remain constant" Boethius (30). This quote represents the fear of losing happiness destroys happiness in my
Emperor Nero, infamously known as one of the most malevolent, oppressive, and tyrannical leader throughout history, was the last ruler of the Julio-Claudian Dynasty. He was born outside Rome in Antium and his mother married his great uncle, Emperor Claudius, in order for her son to be the next Emperor of Rome. It wasn’t apparent that her son was to become one of the most feared and cruel leaders in Roman history from 54 CE to 68 CE. By examining his achievements and failures as an emperor, his influences and changes over the entire economic, political and social spectrum are revealed.
A man has many defining characteristics - some positive and some negative. At times, a potentially positive characteristic may cause his eventual downfall. This concept can be directly related to the story Oedipus Rex. Aristotle stated, “the tragic hero falls into bad fortune because of some flaw in his character of the kind found in men of high reputation and good fortune such as Oedipus.” Essentially, he is telling us that Oedipus has a flaw that, under normal circumstances, would be a beneficial characteristic, but in his case, causes his demise. The defining characteristics of pride and determination can be attributed to the downfall of Oedipus.
Despite Boethius’s initial resistance, Lady Philosophy shows that because Boethius did not own his wealth or position, he was subject to Fortune’s transitory...
The ambition possessed by each character, leads Caesar, Brutus, and Cassius to power. It will be the same ambition, that quest for power, that makes each one susceptible to their own weakness. For Caesar, it will be his ego and inability to heed warnings, Brutus his love of Rome, and Cassius his dedication to power. These qualities prove that although intentions may be noble, ambition can make a person ruthless and blind them to their original goals. Ambition kills those who lose sight of their conscience and although it may prove beneficial in many instances, in this case, it leads the characters to lose all that they
" Dickinson point is that it’s better to be somebody than a nobody. In addition, she thinks being a famous celebrity would be dreary. When you are always in the public eye, you tend to lose yourself during the process. People who want to be someone are show offs. Not only that, but they are not true to their real selves.
Nero’s infatuation with building and acting was the mark of a man that exploited his role of emperor to pursue his passions and desires. It is possible that the ancient sources had sensationalised aspects of Nero’s life. However, the way his eccentricities were documented and seemingly affected his reign will be discussed. It will be argued that Nero was much more than an extravagant fantasist but an astute individual that used his power for his own gain. Yet, when analysing Nero’s decline it can be attributed to his eccentricities as well as a culmination of poor decisions that he had made.
Lady Fortune is described as luring many people into their ruin. The good fortune that Boethius had before this was a result of Fortune’s capricious deeds for the things he had gained were actually ‘loans’ described by Philosophy. Thus the argument posed is that bad fortune and the absence of good one is nothing to grieve about, as fortune is not something one can keep. She reasons this by saying that Boethius had come unto the world with no fortune and that he should never get attached to anything as will not be able to keep any of the gifts that Fortune had given him. Boethius finally acknowledges the logic Lady Philosophy’s argument but complains that the fact that he had experienced good fortune makes the current experiences even worse.
It is not good to haul your fellowmen in danger or do bad things to them if you don’t want chaos came rushing back on you and to the people important to you sooner or later than you’d expected. It is also hard to accept defeat because we all know that it’ll crush your pride out of your entire existence but we also know that it is one of the ways in which we can actually experience or feel acceptance and true happiness to what is and what’s not. Even so, I saw that the antagonists in the story didn’t realized it sooner and that their enviousness and plans have actually didn’t worked for an ignorant and feeble creature like Edmond Dantes whom had a very huge pot of luck hanging around with him. Yes, he’d managed to have some bloody and absurd kind of revenge over to those who’d done terrible things to him; sure you can also have revenge like he did but it will not do you any good because it’ll eat all your Christian values and standards and it’s like you’re putting yourself in a place where you took judgment in your hands all of a sudden where it shouldn’t