Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rutherford B Hayes APUSH Quizlet
The effects of jim crow laws in the south
Reconstruction era full essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Rutherford B Hayes APUSH Quizlet
When the next election for president came in the year eighteen seventy-six, the nation was plunged into more political conflict in the Electoral college, which needed to be compromised on to determine who the nation’s next president would be. Rutherford B. Hayes, the Republican candidate, was running against Samuel Tilden, the Democratic candidate, but the election needed a compromise. The Democrats agreed that, with a few promised concessions, they would give their remaining electoral votes to Rutherford Hayes, letting the Republicans win, and making Hayes the new president of the United States. The Compromise of eighteen seventy-seven had a negative political, social, and economic impact on the reconstruction era foundation in the south, …show more content…
which resulted in the movement for equal rights among all races, or better known to most people as the Civil Rights Movement. The era of Reconstruction is the era that spawned into existence as a result from the so called “black codes”, which restricted the labor and movement of African American labor in the South. The citizens in the North despised the approach of Presidential Reconstruction, which led to more support for the Republican Party’s more radical wing. When the era of Radical Reconstruction started, it was the first time in American history that African Americans had any voice in the government, this was flipped back again after radical groups such as the Ku Klux Klan formed. The Compromise of eighteen seventy-seven had a very large impact on racial equality in the United States history.
During the era of Reconstruction, one of the closest election in the nation’s history, but also one of the most controversial, occured. Rutherford B. Hayes won the election by one electoral vote, but lost the popular vote to Samuel Tilden by two hundred sixty-four thousand, two hundred ninety-two votes. As Rutherford says himself to the people at a train station in columbus, “I understand very well that possibly next week I may be with you again to resume my place in the Governor’s office and as your fellow …show more content…
citizen.” The states of the South wanted Reconstruction to come to an end, so they asked for a few things for the promise of if he withdrew federal troops from the south, provided federal funding for improvements in the south, and name a prominent southerner to the cabinet. The Republicans agreed to do this if elected, so Florida voted Republican in the election, which gave the Republicans the victory. On the day of which the results were announced to the Senate, the National Republican says that the president of the convention said to abstain from any marks of approval or disapproval. The results were announced that Hayes had earned one hundred eighty-five of the electoral votes, and Tilden had earned one hundred eighty-four. One officer hissed, while at the same time, another officer clapped. The crowd surged forward, thus ending the hardest fought presidential victory in the United States of America’s history. Tilden did not think that there was any personal wrong in the transactions that took place. I disclaim any thought of the personal wrong involved in this transaction. Not by any act or word of mine shall that be dwarfed or degraded into a personal grievance, which is, in truth, the greatest wrong that has stained our national annals. To every man of the four and a quarter millions who were defrauded of the fruits of their elective franchise it is as great a wrong as it is to me. And no less to every man of the minority will the ultimate consequences extend. Evils in government grow by success and by impunity. They do not arrest their own progress. They can never be limited except by external forces. Part of the controversy of the deal was that in Florida, some of the residents resorted to violence to keep blacks from voting, so that they would not change the outcome of the election in the state. The Republicans resorted to fraud, which the Democrats countered be intimidating Black voters. In Florida, the election made things so tense, that some counties were guarded by armed men, so that the government could not collect the votes from those counties. There was also violence in South Carolina in the elections from eighteen seventy-four to eighteen seventy-seven. In the December before the election, Henry Van Ness Boynton detailed what was occuring in Washington D.C. at the time, It looks to me now as if enough Southern men could be induced to so declare themselves on the floor upon the general policy, as to give us the balance of power in the House at the time of the Joint Convention. It is not necessary that all who vote “no” Should place themselves where they would be even apparently acting with republicans. They could place their whole action upon the statement that by no act of theirs should the party with which they are connected adopt revolutionary measures. The author Keith Ian Polakoff states, “It is evident that Boynton, Smith, Garfield, and even Hayes were thinking about a second, long-range objective in addition to smoothing the way for a Republican succession.” Congress made a fifteen man commission in January of eighteen seventy-seven to try to decide to whom the disputed states electoral votes would go to.
All three states were voted in Hayes favor by eight to seven. Little documentation of this commision was ever taken, so it is hard to find much more evidence for it. At this same time, other members of Congress tried to come up with a solution to break the tension between the sides of the election. The Republicans promised that, if elected, they would remove troops from the South. Hayes did this, which ended the era of Reconstruction, and the Republicans effort to protect African Americans. This brought upon the Jim Crow segregation in the South. This made it hard for the Republicans to support African American equality in the South. When the troops were in the South, they were really just there to protect African Americans rights, so many white southerners hated the troops presence.
The reason for which Hayes won the election was that both sides wanted it to end, so the Democrats agreed to elect Hayes on the conditions that he would withdraw the remaining federal troops that still occupied the South, provide the South with federal funding to help rebuild, and to name a prominent Southern Democrat to the president’s cabinet. The Republicans agreed to provide these concessions if they would give their electoral votes to Hayes. Hayes did actually accomplish these tasks during his term in the presidential
office. Once the troops were out of the South, they could no longer protect African American rights, so that started racial segregation, and the disenfranchisement of black voters. The final results were so unexpected, that Rutherford Birchard Hayes found out that he won through telegram on a train, and made last minute plans for a party after the news got out. The effects of the Compromise of eighteen seventy-seven are very apparent in today's society, and how it ended up taking away many peoples rights. Once the troops were removed from the South, Jim Crow laws were placed in the region. Jim Crow laws are any of the laws that permitted racial segregation, which is what started the movement for civil rights among minorities. The laws passed segregated the public transportation and school systems. The Civil Rights movement was the movement in the nineteen-fifties and the nineteen-sixties for equal rights among minorities in the United States of America. The United States government passed the Civil Rights Act of nineteen fifty-seven, which made it against the law for a local government to attempt to stop someone's ability, or right to vote. There are still groups formed by minorities to have more equal rights among them. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People , NAACP for short, is the oldest of the many current equal rights organizations, they are currently working to get more of the minorities to vote in elections, so that they can play their part. A more recently formed equal rights organization is the Black Lives Matter movement, it was organized after the murder of Trayvon Martin. There are currently more than forty chapters. They are fighting for equal treatment from the United States government, and for the ending of racism in the U.S. police system, which on average arrests more African-Americans than whites in the country. Another modern organization is Color of Change. Color of Change fights for equal treatment from the government towards the minorities in the United States of America. They fight for equality in the court, media, prisons, and freedom of speech. The organization started in September of the year two thousand five, three weeks after the hurricane, Hurricane Katrina, hit the states in the Gulf of Mexico. The government took less efforts to help the minorities in need of help, so this movement formed to help. The recently have been encouraging minorities to vote in elections so that their voices can be heard and recognized to political figures. The effects from the Compromise of eighteen seventy seven are still very apparent today. These effects are still extremely prevalent among the many movements fighting for equal treatment from the government towards the minorities among the citizens of the United States.
The Founding Fathers were a revolutionary group, diverse in personalities and ideologies but shared the common goal of American liberty. They understood that the citizens should have a say in their government, and the government only obtains its power from the citizen’s consent. In order to avoid endless debates on issues that needed to be solved immediately, the revolutionary leaders compromised their beliefs. Joseph J. Ellis writes of the compromises that changed the constitutional debate into the creation of political parties in, The Founding Brothers. The 3 main chapters that show cased The Founding Brothers’ compromises are The Dinner, The Silence, and The Collaborators.
First, the Missouri Compromise of 1820 established the slavery line that allowed slavery below it and forbid slavery above it. It also gave the South another slave state in Missouri and the north a free state in Maine. Although each region gained a state in the Senate, the south benefited most from the acquisition because Missouri was in such a pivotal position in the country, right on the border. Later on with the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854, Missouri had a big role in getting Kansas to vote south because many proslavery Missourians crossed the border into Kansas to vote slavery. The Missouri Compromise also helped slavery because the line that was formed to limit slavery had more land below the line than above it. Therefore, slavery was given more land to be slave and therefore more power in the Senate, when the territories became state. In effect, the north got the short end of the stick and the south was given the first hint of being able to push around the north. The interesting thing is, the north agreed to all these provisions that would clearly benefit the south.
They passed the Reconstruction Act, which was the desperate act to establish newly freed slaves. The African Americans were only reconsidered for their voting right after the Republican majority congress implementing of radical Reconstruction plan. Despite the congress trying to provide equal rights among the freed slaves, southern states other hand was equally reluctant. Congress hardened on Confederate states to implement the mandatory including of the African American in the election process, guaranteeing their voting rights. “Congressional Reconstruction embodied the most sweeping peacetime legislation in American history to that point. It sought to ensure that freed slaves could participate in the creating of new state governments in the former Confederacy” (Shi and Tindall 591). Congress was desperate to provide political rights to freed slaves. As a result of that, they passed the military Reconstruction Act. The military Reconstruction Act guaranteed the right to vote for the African American make, encouraging them to participate in conventions. “The South Carolina constitutional convention -which included 58 men who were once enslaved” (Hillstrom 55). Many states have started eliminating discrimination against freed slaves, and providing equal rights as every white citizen. As more and more state law was more soft towards them, many African American populations were engaging in the election process electing their own people to represent them. “…every former Confederate state elected at least some black delegates, and most states elected African Americans in about the same proportion as their population. A few states even elected a majority if black delegates” (Hillstrom 55). Although, many states were electing African Americans, there were still wide discrimination against elected black officials, in which case Congress has to provide
For the most part, the connection between the Presidential election process of 1788 and the present Presidential election procedure are both determined through the Electoral College process. The Electoral College process made sure people played a crucial role in the selection of the President of the United States. As was previously stated, I have expounded on the process of how the President is elected; the vital role that people played in the election, and the responsibility of the House of Representatives in response to the
The South won in Reconstruction in many ways. Rebuilding the South was one of its major focuses. Several canals, bridges, and railroads were rebuilt with Reconstruction funds. The Republicans in Congress agreed with southern legislatures on how important business was. For this, a large amount of money was gathered to help the South’s reconstruction. Even though slavery was abolished with the passing of the 13th Amendment, it still existed in the South in the forms of “Black Codes” and cults like the Ku Klux Klan. In conclusion, Lincoln won the war for the North, but President Johnson won Reconstruction for the South by allowing them to create their own laws to keep the former slaves down and keeping their Southern lifestyles.
It was a dark time in the history of the United States. A crisis was shadowing the country and had locked the North and the South at each other’s throats. Tensions were escalating and civil war seemed imminent. One brave man stood up to the challenge of resolving the conflict – Congressman Henry Clay of Kentucky. Despite his old age and illness, he managed to develop a set of compromise measures and convinced both sides to agree to it. This compromise, the Compromise of 1850, may have held off the Civil War for a decade, giving the North ample time to prepare (Remini). But, it wasn’t the only compromise Clay played a part in. Clay is well-known for developing the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and the Compromise Tariff of 1833, as well as the aforementioned Compromise of 1850. These compromises earned Clay the name of the “Great Compromiser” (Van Deusen), and saved the Union from falling into discord.
After the Civil War ended in 1865, it was followed by an era known as Reconstruction that lasted until 1877, with the goal to rebuild the nation. Lincoln was the president at the beginning of this era, until his assassination caused his vice president, Andrew Johnson to take his place in 1865. Johnson was faced with numerous issues such as the reunification of the union and the unknown status of the ex-slaves, while compromising between the principles of the Republican Party and the Democratic Party. After the Election of 1868, Ulysses S. Grant, a former war hero with no political experience, became the nation’s new president, but was involved in numerous acts of corruption. Reconstruction successfully reintegrated the southern states into the Union through Lincoln and Johnson’s Reconstruction Plans, but was mostly a failure due to the continued discriminatory policies against African Americans, such as the Black Codes, Jim Crow laws, and sharecropping, as well as the widespread corruption of the elite in the North and the Panic of 1873,
This was one of the deeply anxious election outcomes for both, the Republican and Pro-war Democrats. They both joint together and formed the National Union Party, which re-nominated Lincoln and selected Andrew Johnson, of Tennessee a prominent War Democrats. The campaign of 1864 was noisy and abusive. The threat posed by the Democratic Party, which met in Chicago in August. The Democrats came forward boldly and proclaimed the Civil War a failure, demanded the immediate ending of hostilities, and called for the convening of a national convention to restore the Union by negotiation with the Confederate government (American President: A Reference Resource). The Democrats nominated General George B. McClellan, former commander of Union forces whom Lincoln had fired because of his failure to pursue Confederate General Robert E. Lee's army after the battle at Antietam in 1862. Some of the Radical Republicans were completely against Lincoln’s reelection (Mintz).
... The cause was forfeited not by Republicans, who welcomed the African-American votes, but to the elite North who had concluded that the formal end of slavery was all the freed man needed and their unpreparedness for the ex-slaves to participate in the Southern commonwealth was evident. Racism, severe economic depression, an exhausted North and troubled South, and a campaign of organized violence toward the freed man, overturned Reconstruction. The North withdrew the last of the federal troops with the passing of The Compromise of 1877. The freed slaves continued to practice few voting rights until 1890, but they were soon stripped of all political, social and economic powers. Not until the civil rights movement in the 1950’s and 1960’s were the freedoms that were fought for by our Republican forefathers nearly 100 years before, finally seen through to fruition.
In order to understand and analyze the forces that shaped politics during this time period, political changes must first be examined. One of the biggest changes during this time period was the change in the number of voters. Between 1812 and 1840, the percentage of eligible voters in the United States presidential elections almost tripled, increasing from 26.9 to 80.2 percent while the percentage of states allowing voters to choose presidential electors more than doubled, rising from 44.4 to 95.8 percent, shown in Document A. By 1840, Rhode Island was the only state that didn’t allow all free men to vote.
The reconstruction of the Union began under President Lincoln before the end of the war, and carried on by President Johnson after the assassination of President Lincoln. After Lincoln’s death, the leadership of the nation bestowed upon Andrew Johnson of Tennessee. According to A. Brinkley (pg. 375), Johnson revealed his plan for reconstruction or “Restoration”, as he preferred to call it, soon after he took office and implemented it during the summer of 1865 when Congress was in recess. Like Lincoln, he offered some form of amnesty to Southerners who would take a pledge of loyalty to the Union. In most other respect, however, his plan resembled the Wade-Davis Bill. The next phase of reconstruction, known as the Congressional Plan or "Radical" modernization had begun, which undid everything started by Presidents Lincoln and Johnson. These radicals, mostly republicans, motivated by three main factors revenge, concern for the freedmen, and political concerns. The Radicals in Congress pushed through a number of measures designed to assist the freedmen, but also demonstrate the supremacy of Congress over the president. These events included the Civil Rights Act of 1866, the 14th Amendment, the Tenure of Office Act, and the Army Appropriations Act. The Radical Republicans prepared an effort in Congress to impeach the president Johnson as a payback for resisting their platforms. The vote in the Senate was 35-19 for conviction, one vote short of the necessary two-thirds. This was in turn to a few Republicans that had crossed over and voted with the Democrats, thus refuting the ultimate retaliation to the Radicals. If the removal of President Johnson had gone thru, it might have permanently weakened the executive branch. Congr...
The south was in economic and social chaos after its defeat in the war. 1865-1877 was a time period of reconstructing the south, however, it left an everlasting impression that kept the south behind for years to come. The political apprehension the south felt was due to the fact that there was no more authority and the new states had to deal with the northern states. The question was how the newly reelected Lincoln was going to bring these states back to the Union.
The presidential elections of 1860 was one of the nation’s most memorable one. The north and the south sections of country had a completely different vision of how they envision their home land. What made this worst was that their view was completely opposite of each other. The north, mostly republican supporters, want America to be free; free of slaves and free from bondages. While on the other hand, the south supporters, mostly democratic states, wanted slavery in the country, because this is what they earned their daily living and profit from.
The Compromise of 1877 was brought on by the disputed election of 1876. The Democrats had clearly won, but this was disputed by a few large states. This election was between Democrat Samuel J. Tilden and Republican Rutherford B. Hayes. Congress created a commission to try and resolve this dispute and the commission voted in favor of Hays giving him all of the electoral votes from the disputed states, which in turn gave Hayes the victory. This led to a series of compromises from the Republicans to the Southern Democrats which included: “The appointment of at least one southerner to the Hayes cabinet, control of federal patronage in their areas, generous internal improvements, federal aid for the Texas and Pacific Railroad, and most important, withdrawal of the remaining federal troops from the South” (Brinkley 363).
Ferling, John. “1796: The First Real Election.” In Visions of America’s Past, edited by William