Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
About the election of 1860
Life after the compromise of 1850
The compromise of 1850 sample essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: About the election of 1860
South vs. North Back in the late 1800s there were many altercation between the north and the south involving slavery. Eventually these issues would lead to a point where our country would end up splitting up and having the south leave the Union. In my essay I'm going to focus on the Compromise of 1850 and the Election of 1860 leading up to the splitting of the Union. The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt to make everyone happy, which much to Henry Clay's dismay, would eventually backfire. The Compromise of 1850 wanted to please both the north and south so they decided to make California a free state and abolish slave trade in Washington DC (for the north). The north loved this idea in the beginning, they loved the
The United States began to dissatisfy some of its citizens and so the concerns of sectionalism, or the split of the country began to arise. There was a continuous riff between the south and the north over a few issues, a major one being slavery. The south argued that the slaves were necessary to support the southern economy. According to document A, the south were angry that the north was creating taxes that hurt the southern economy, thus increasing the need for slavery since they had to make up for the expense of the taxes. The south felt that the north was able...
The North and the South had been sectionalized for years on many issues, yet the majority of the congressmen had still come together when necessary for the good of the Nation, up until 1854. After Lincoln won the election in 1860, the nation was divided by sectionalism. Due to the Nation being divided and the Southerners being paranoid about the slaves being freed, I believe both issues were causes that led to the Civil War. Works Cited Brands, H. W.. American Stories: A History of the United States. New York: Routledge, 1998 2nd ed.
In 1860 Abraham Lincoln was elected as president of the United States of America, the repercussions of which led to civil war. However it was not only Lincoln’s election that led to civil war but also the slavery debate between the northern and southern states and the state of the economy in the United States. Together with the election of Lincoln these caused a split, both politically and ideologically, between the North and South states which manifested into what is now refereed to as the American Civil War.
There were several issues that contributed to the split between the northern and southern states. Among these were the deep social, economic and political differences. The split could be traced as far back as the early 1800’s, just as the industrial revolution was beginning. It’s effects on the north and the south caused the economic split. As the north was becoming more industrialized; the south began to rely heavily on slave labor. This was one of the main reasons, as the southern view on slavery differed greatly from the North. These views were based on drastically different interpretations of the constitution.
The Compromise of 1850 and Kansas-Nebraska Acts were very advantageous to the South. In both pieces of legislation the south gained things that would aid them in their campaign to expand slavery. The advantages the south included a stronger fugitive slave law, the possibility for slavery to exist in the remaining part of the Mexican Cession, the repeal of the Missouri Compromise, and the eventual plan to build the Southern Pacific Railroad.
The new territories and the discussion of whether they would be admitted to the Union free or slave-holding stirred up animosity. The Compromise of 1850 which offered stricter fugitive slave laws, admitted California as a free state, allowed slavery in Washington D.C., and allowed new territories to choose whether they wanted to be slave-holding or free was supposed to help ease tension between the North and South. Yet Southern states wanted more new territories to be slave-holders so the institution of it would continue to grow. They believed slavery was a way of life and as Larrabee said in his senate speech, “You cannot break apart this organization and this system that has intertwined itself into every social and political fiber of that great people who inhabit one-half of the Union.” (“There is a Conflict of Races”).
Tensions between the North and South had grown steadily since the anti slavery movement in 1830. Several compromises between the North and South regarding slavery had been passed such as the Nebraska-Kansas and the Missouri act; but this did little to relieve the strain. The election of President Lincoln in 1861 proved to be the boiling point for the South, and secession followed. This eventually sparked the civil war; which was viewed differently by the North and the South. The Northern goal was to keep the Union intact while the Southern goal was to separate from the Union. Southern leaders gave convincing arguments to justify secession. Exploring documents from South Carolina’s secession ordinance and a speech from the Georgia assembly speech will explain how the Southern leaders justify the secession from the United States.
The presidential elections of 1860 was one of the nation’s most memorable one. The north and the south sections of country had a completely different vision of how they envision their home land. What made this worst was that their view was completely opposite of each other. The north, mostly republican supporters, want America to be free; free of slaves and free from bondages. While on the other hand, the south supporters, mostly democratic states, wanted slavery in the country, because this is what they earned their daily living and profit from.
The Compromise of 1850 was necessary because they were still trying to figure out if the lands they had gained in the Mexican-American War were going to be “free states” or slave states since they wanted it to be
The Civil War began on April 12, 1861 at Fort Sumter in Charleston Harbor when the Confederate army attacked Union soldier and ended on May 9, 1865 with a Union Victory. There are many events, laws, and people that provoked the Civil War. The two most important causes are slavery and the expansion of the United States causing an unbalance of free and slave states. This essay examines major events that initiated the war starting from the Compromise of 1820 to the election of 1860 and proves how the Civil War was inevitable.
The South did not want to lose slavery and wanted future territories to have slavery. Compromise is impossible to achieve. Going back to the quote, "The 1850's was a time of attempted compromise when compromise was no longer possible. " During the 1850's compromise was attempted by both the North and South and failed. It failed because both sides wanted different things, and this made compromise impossible.
The American Civil War was the bloodiest military conflict in American history leaving over 500 thousand dead and over 300 thousand wounded (Roark 543-543). One might ask, what caused such internal tension within the most powerful nation in the world? During the nineteenth century, America was an infant nation, but toppling the entire world with its social, political, and economic innovations. In addition, immigrants were migrating from their native land to live the American dream (Roark 405-407). Meanwhile, hundreds of thousand African slaves were being traded in the domestic slave trade throughout the American south. Separated from their family, living in inhumane conditions, and working countless hours for days straight, the issue of slavery was the core of the Civil War (Roark 493-494). The North’s growing dissent for slavery and the South’s dependence on slavery is the reason why the Civil War was an inevitable conflict. Throughout this essay we will discuss the issue of slavery, states’ rights, American expansion into western territories, economic differences and its effect on the inevitable Civil War.
By the year of 1860, the North and the South was developed into extremely different sections. There was opposing social, economic, and political points of view, starting back into colonial periods, and it slowly drove the two regions farther in separate directions. The two sections tried to force its point of view on the nation as a whole. Even though negotiations had kept the Union together for many years, in 1860 the condition was unstable. The presidential election of Abraham Lincoln was observed by the South as a risk to slavery and many believe it initiated the war.
In regards to California’s statehood, Mexico and the United States signed a treaty in February 1850 that not only ended the Mexican War, but yielded a vast portion of the Southwest to the United States; present day California was a part of this vast portion of land. Several days earlier, in January 25, 1848, gold had been discovered on the American River. As a result of the Gold Rush, California experienced an influx of settlers; the more the population of California increased, the more it became evident that a civil government was needed. Therefore, in 1849, Californians sought statehood, requesting admission into the Union as a free state. California’s admission into the Union fueled the tension in the national government. Conflict had already accumulated because the Anti-slavery faction of the North that promoted the Wilmot Proviso wanted to prohibit slavery in the lands acquired from Mexico; the Pro-slavery faction in the South vehemently argued against the prohibition of slavery in the new territories; advocates of Popular Sovereignty contended that the New Mexico and Utah territories had the right to decide whether or not slavery should be allowed; anti-slavery groups wanted the slave trade outlawed in the District of Columbia; and the Southern states complained that the Northern states were not enforcing the Fugitive Act of 1793. In hopes to appease this tension, Henry Clay presented a compromise in January 29, 1850, which, after eight months of heated debate in the U.S. Congress, became the Compromise of 1850 in September
Of all the factors that played a role in leading to Southern secession and eventually causing the Civil War, I think the most significant was the Compromise of 1850; even though this Comprise actually worked to stall physical conflict for an additional 10 years. The Compromise of 1850 came as a response to California seeking admission into the union, however, there was great division (between Northern and Southern states) over whether the newly acquired region (from the Mexican-American War) should be let in as a slave or free state. This issue regarding the status of new states seeking admission was supposed to be dealt with by the Missouri Comprise of 1820, but because the 36°30’ line