Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gun control negative effect
Gun law controversy essay
Gun control negative effect
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gun control negative effect
Taking into account of the recent shooting sprees, the gun control debate has started again. However, people have contemplated: “Why does America need gun laws” and “Why are so many states disagreeing about the restrictions that need to be put in place for civilians looking to purchase firearms.” The reasoning for such contemplation is that the fluxuating strictness of gun laws have led to several incidences within states that have strict gun laws due to the fact that the perpetrators of these incidences have purchased their firearms either from black markets, or states where the severity of gun control is at minimal levels. One of the most important aspects of the debate centered on gun legislature is the distribution of illegal firearms to felons, criminals and American youth. Witemute’s article hints that there have been several illegal gun sales from unauthorized markets and to those under the legal ages of 18 or 21 depending on the type of firearm being sold. Unfortunately, these illegal sales have resulted in an increase in gun related injuries and deaths. (55) Another aspect of this debate is in fact, the lobbyists that are pushing for more lenient or tighter gun-laws. It seems that the lobbyists that wanted stricter firearm-related laws are the ones who have witnessed the damage that criminals and the mentally unstable can really do with a gun in their hand. Those pushing for leniency when it comes to gun legislature state that firearms are trying to protect their right to carry an essential tool for those who want to venture the countryside in search for animals to shoot down for food, clothing or sport. The last aspects of the controversy are the federal and state laws that have decided whether or not concealed wea... ... middle of paper ... ...ina in the other hand has prohibited the possession of any firearm to civilians other than sportsmen, hunters and security personnel. Even though rifles and shotguns are permitted, they require a time consuming licensing procedure in order to even possess one and the only citizens that can procure them are sportsmen who need these firearms to hunt and shoot skeet disks. Works Cited Wintemute, Garen J. "Where the Guns Come from: The Gun Industry and Gun Commerce." Princeton University 2002: 54-71. Web. 24 Nov. 2013. Jost, Kennth. “Remembering 9/11.” CQ Researcher 2 Sept. 2011: 701-732 Wright, Stephen E. “Gun Control Laws Will Not Save Lives.” Ed. Christine Watkins. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2012. At Issues. Rpt. From “Anti-Gun Group Common Sense Laws and Real Common Sense.” StephenEWright.com. 2010. Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 28 Oct 2013.
"The Controversy of Gun Control." Open Discussion about Various Controversies. N.p.. Web. 3 Dec 2013. .
In "The Effectiveness of Gun Control Laws:." the authors perform a surgical operation on the various views and issues as presented by the industry concerning gun regulation. The publication outlines the laws that have been enacted by congress concerning the regulation of firearms and shows their pros and cons. The authors suggest that there needs to be a more concerted effort by the executive as well as the judiciary so be able to enforce laws concerning firearm issuing and licensing.
As recent events and studies show, there is an obvious problem in this country with juvenile crime and the increasing number of these crimes that involve the use of firearms, but t say that guns are the problem is a failure to look at the big picture. Actors within the political community...
Wright, Stephen E. "Gun Control Laws Will Not Save Lives." Guns and Crime. Ed. Christine Watkins. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2012. At Issue. Rpt. from "Anti-Gun Group Common Sense Gun Laws and Real Common Sense." StephenEWright.com. 2010. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 28 Apr. 2014.
“Gun Control.” Opposing Viewpoints Online Collection. Detroit: Gale, 2013. Opposing Viewpoints In context. Web. 15 Sep 2013.
Opposing sides have for years fought over the laws that govern firearms. For the purposes of this paper "Gun Control" is defined as policies enacted by the government that limit the legal rights of gun owners to own, carry, or use firearms, with the intent of reducing gun crimes such as murder, armed robbery, aggravated rape, and the like. So defined, gun control understandably brings favorable responses from some, and angry objections from others. The gun control debate is generally publicized because of the efforts of the Pro-Gun Lobby or the Anti-Gun Lobby.
Lott, Jr. John R. More Gun Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000. Print.
In America guns have been a part of the country’s society since it’s birth. Throughout history the citizens of the US have used firearms to protect the nation, protect their families, hunt for food and engage in sporting activities. The issue of Guns and gun control is complex. Weighing the rights and liberties of the individual against the welfare and safety of the public has always been a precarious balancing act. In the United States, gun control is one of these tumultuous issues that has both sides firmly entrenched in their positions. Those parties in favor of gun ownership and the freedom to use and keep arms, rely on the fact that the provision for such rights is enshrined in their constitution. In this climate of growing violence, rife with turmoil and crime, gun advocates feel more than ever that their position is justified. As citizens of the “Land of the Free” possessing a gun is a fundamental right, and may even be a necessity... Anti- gun lobbyists point to the same growing violence and gun related crimes in an effort to call on the government to take action. By enacting more laws and stricter control, these people not in favor of guns feel society would be better safer.
Crime and guns. The two seem to go hand in hand with one another. But are the two really associated? Do guns necessarily lead to crime? And if so do laws placing restrictions on firearm ownership and use stop the crime or protect the citizens? These are the questions many citizens and lawmakers are asking themselves when setting about to create gun control laws. The debate over gun control, however, is nothing new. In 1924, Presidential Candidate, Robert La Follete said, “our choice is not merely to support or oppose gun control but to decide who can own which guns under what conditions.” Clearly this debate still goes on today and is the very reason for the formation of gun control laws.
Every day some news related to gun violence are being heard all over the world. Shooting in driveway, public places, schools, homicide and suicide are some of different types of gun violence. Shooting on people and killing them is a big issue in the world and different comments are provided about that. One of the most important of them is about gun control laws. Stingl (2013) says “The term gun control as it is used in the United States refers to any action taken by the federal government or by state or local governments to regulate, through legislation, the sale, purchase, safety, and use of handguns and other types of firearms by individual citizens.” According to this idea gun control laws should be stricter and people should not be able to have access to guns easily. However, there are many other people who believe this idea is not a good solution and never help. This essay will demonstrate for and against views about the topic. People who agree with this idea consider: firstly, stricter laws will reduce violence and gun control means crime control. Secondly, some research shows people with gun are more at risks of getting shot. Thirdly, guns can always be misused by their owners and finally, stricter law is the best and the faster way to control crime and make community safe. While opponents say first of all, guns are necessary for people safety and protection. Secondly, guns are not the only tools for killing and violence; there are other weapons too and finally, gun ownership is human rights.
Many future laws in gun control that the United States will consider “concealed and open carry laws, licensing, and registration,” expressed William J. Vizzard, a writer for The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. In the same fashion, Vizzard elaborates on how politics will play a monumental role in decisions made, especially on the prohibition of the possession of firearms. Other laws within gun control will likely include rulings to regulate felons, minors, and those determined mentally ill. Similarly, the issue of military-style weapons, or assault weapons, will be on the table for future decisions about gun control (Vizzard 892). In his article, Vizzard points out three main goals for future policy: “Reduce gun possession and carrying by high-risk individuals, reduce access to firearms by prohibited persons, and utilize firearms laws to incapacitate violent, career offenders” (Vizzard 893). These goals that lawmakers hope to someday reach only shows the beginning of further complications and differences in opinion on gun
Gun policies and restrictions have always been a major debate when it comes down to violent acts and political issues regarding the firearm; people who value self-security and have jobs or hobbies pertaining to guns believe there should not be restrictions while others believe the laws need to be strengthened . It is important to know that gun laws and restrictions vary throughout the states, so it is necessary to search specifically for an individual state if needed. It is important for gun owners and people looking to buy guns to make sure they understand the policies in their states and follow them to be safe with their guns and aware of other people’s rights. The debate goes back and forth on determining the fate of gun restrictions. Many
Listverse,. '10 Arguments For Gun Control - Listverse '. N.p., 2014. Web. 30 Oct. 2014.
Enforcing laws which prevent those who are mentally unstable or irresponsible from obtaining guns are an extensive necessity to keep US citizens safe from arms. In addition, specific categories of guns should be banned from the common ground of societies in the U.S. and should be strictly handled by military use only. Finally, if stronger gun laws are placed, it could decrease the amount of mass shootings that occur. In conclusion, guns are becoming a reoccurring issue in America and without making a change in those laws, the safety and security of citizens’ homes will be corrupted by misuse of the weapon. So if you or a loved one you know have been or are considering getting a gun, please be wise and attentive with your choice because once you own one, you hold much responsibility and power over one’s
The regulation of firearms in America, particularly the despotic models found in major cities and incidentally murder capitals is still a major issue, despite all the lobbyist’s efforts for gun control in major cities like Chicago or Los Angeles. Gun control is not an anachronistic idea from what is now universally regarded as one of the latest, and controversial chapters in US domestic policy. In wake of the recent mass shootings, the topic has been revived and the prominent questions people are asking are: Does more gun control lead to less crime? Will more gun control lead to a safer community? What are alternative solutions to this issue? There are many factors to consider and perspectives to view. After looking at the data, and considering