Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Explain contributory factors to crime
The relationship between poverty and crime
The effects of unemployment on crime rates
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Explain contributory factors to crime
This essay examines the phenomenon of crime by looking at the effects of income on crime through a proposed observational research design. To be precise, I am arguing that poverty causes crime. In the following, I will discuss my causal theory, before proposing an observational research design with a multiple linear regression model and addressing reverse causality, confounding variables, internal and external validity, and the overall advantages and disadvantages of my research design. Theory
Does income level affect crime? This is an important topic to research because it helps us understand what causes crime to be committed, which in turn, has important policy implications. For instance, crime can be reduced if policy actions directly
…show more content…
As my observed data is aggregated on a national level, my data is aggregate data rather than individual survey data. My independent variable can be operationalized into the poverty rate, “the ratio of the number of people whose income falls below the poverty line” (OECD, 2017). My dependent variable can be operationalized into the violent crime rate, the rate of violent crimes such as murder, assault, and theft per 1,000 people. Thus, my hypothesis is: countries with a greater poverty rate are more likely to have higher violent crime rates than countries with a lower poverty rate.
I am proposing to examine a period of ten years and all countries. By doing so, I will have a variation of different poverty rates and violent crime rates (whereas if I examined only countries in one particular region, the rates in poverty and violent crime might be very similar) as well as more data, which can help better determine if a correlation exists and how strong it is.
Multiple Linear Regression
…show more content…
Crime can lead to arrest and imprisonment, which affects employment opportunities and thus, income, potentially making poverty more likely. Unfortunately, my research design cannot eliminate the possibility of reverse causality because I cannot control for reverse causality in my multiple linear regression model since there is no clear temporal sequence between income and crime, and no way to determine the temporal sequence.
However, my causal theory has greater plausibility. Although having a criminal record may impact employment and income, prisons are meant to rehabilitate and often provide inmates with skills training in order to better prepare them for finding work once they are out of prison. Also, programs exist that help those formerly convicted find a job and thus, better income. On the other hand, those in poverty find it difficult to get out of poverty. For instance, they often cannot afford additional schooling or to take time off work in order to attend programs that provide skills training or help find another job, which makes resorting to crime more likely. Thus, since those in poverty often do not have access to the same resources as those in prison or the time to access possible resources, it is more plausible that low-income people turn to
In The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison by Jeffery Reiman and Paul Leighton, four multifaceted issues are focused on and examined. These issues are the Unites States high crime rates, efforts in explaining the high crime rates, where the high crime rates originally came from, and the success attained at a high price. The initial key issue that Reiman and Leighton discuss is America’s high rising crime rates with the understanding of the people that believe policy and regulations are the causes of the decrease in crime. The many graphs throughout the chapter represent information that undoubtedly illustrates that specific policy and regulation may cause rates to become stagnate or strike a plateau. While the rule makers make it appear as though their organization is functioning. Later guns and gun control policy are discussed. With the stern enforcement of the gun policy, at the time, crime appeared to decline, or become stagnate resulting in a plateau effect that is illustrated in the graphs. Countless arrests were made with large quantities of people being imprisoned. Du...
In the study, they neglect to factor in the financial needs of their subjects. The study of Broken Window was based on the results received from higher income neighborhoods; in those neighborhoods financial circumstances are not crucial to families. Financial factors vary from neighborhood to neighborhood and even from family to family within the same neighborhoods. Ignoring this financial need in the areas where the studies were done lead to fundamental misunderstandings in the theory. The study generalizes the outcome of one broken window. Having a broken window on any property does not automatically lead to more broken windows, like suggested by the results of the cars placed in California and the Bronx. The level of desperation of families due to their financial circumstances leads to increasing crime rates. When the economy is unstable, a lot of people become unemployed; people that still have the obligation of sustaining their families. This may lead them to turn to illegal activities for a fast extra source of income. In these situations, crimes involving robberies and drugs increase in
Boggess, S., & Bound, J. (1997). Did Criminal Activity Increase during the 1980s? Comparisons across Data Sources. Social Science Quarterly (University Of Texas Press), 78(3), 725-739.
Crime in this country is an everyday thing. Some people believe that crime is unnecessary. That people do it out of ignorance and that it really can be prevented. Honestly, since we live in a country where there is poverty, people living in the streets, or with people barely getting by, there will always be crime. Whether the crime is robbing food, money, or even hurting the people you love, your family. You will soon read about how being a criminal starts or even stops, where it begins, with whom it begins with and why crime seems to be the only way out sometimes for the poor.
Crime has always been a hot topic in sociology. There are many different reasons for people to commit criminal acts. There is no way to pinpoint the source of crime. I am going to show the relationship between race and crime. More specifically, I will be discussing the higher chances of minorities being involved in the criminal justice system than the majority population, discrimination, racial profiling and the environment criminals live in.
Many people have jobs that their salaries do not compare with what it takes to live in the society today. For instance, rent is out of control. A person making minimum wages cannot afford to pay rent on their salary alone. They don’t have money to get an education, so they are not able to get a high paying job. Once again, many people will turn to selling drugs or some other illegal acts to pay for their expenses. This increases crime.
Even excluding to consider the civil ramifications of imprisonment, the current standpoint neglects other measures effects. These incorporate damaging, faculty of crime and the crimes within the prison. Prison is a school of crime in which criminals first learn and then improve their skills at criminal behavior and create connections with other criminals. This account implies that incarceration removes prisoners from social networks connected with employment and instead connects them to associate with criminal activity. Some scholars have argued that incarceration does not necessarily reduce crime but merely relocates it behind bars. Increasing incarceration while ignoring more effective approaches will impose a heavy burden upon curst, corrections and communities, while providing a marginal impact on
For decades, researchers have tried to determine why crime rates are stronger and why different crimes occur more often in different locations. Certain crimes are more prevalent in urban areas for several reasons (Steven D. Levitt, 1998, 61). Population, ethnicity, and inequality all contribute to the more popular urban. Determining why certain crimes occur more often than others is important in Criminal Justice so researchers can find a trend and the police can find a solution (Rodrigo R. Soares, 2004, 851). The Uniform Crime Reports are a method in which the government collects data, and monitors criminal activity in the United States (Rodrigo R. Soares, 2004, 851). They have both positive and negative attributes that have influenced
There are many studies that point out some risk factors that could be responsible for criminality, but it would not be appropriate to say that is specifically poverty or the current economy. This field of study is uncertain about affirming this kind of assumption. But all this discussion about Broken Windows Theory leads us to reflect why not try to prevent crime instead of act after the crime has been committed?
This theory however as some have argued has emerged from social disorganisation theory, which sees the causes of crime as a matter of macro level disadvantage. Macro level disadvantage are the following: low socioeconomic status, ethnic or racial heterogeneity, these things they believe are the reasons for crime due to the knock on effect these factors have on the community network and schools. Consequently, if th...
Poverty has been known to affect how a child may be sentenced. According to Tamar Birckhead, a little boy was shopping for presents two days before Christmas at Macy’s and was caught stealing clothes. When the officer brought the boy back for questioning with his uncle, the office explained that if they paid the store $150 there would be not charges, and it would not be reported to the police. Due to the fact that the uncle was unemployed and in debt, they were unable to pay the $150. A report was then filed, and due to financial problems the little boy and his uncle had to move, which in turn caused them to not receive a notice of court in the mail. Once he was seen in front of the judge, the little boy ended up getting community service. The final piece in this ordeal was due to lack of money in his family they didn’t have reliable transportation. Due to lack of transportation he was unable to make all of his community service hours. Missing his hours meant he had violated his contract and he was then placed on level 2 probation, which meant if one more thing went wrong, the little boy would be put into a group home for delinquents (Birckhead 2012). This story just shows that because a child had a lack of money, it caused a trickle down effect which led to him becoming a delinquent. The story proves that illiteracy is linked to poverty and poverty is linked to
Drawing from tenets of Marxist theory, critical criminology believe that crime results from the mode of production by capitalist and the economic structures they have created. Social classes have been divided into two: those whose income is secured by property ownership; and those whose income is secured by their labor. The resultant class structure influences the opportunities of an individual to succeed in life and his propensity to engage in crime. Although it encompasses the macro-economic factors that are rarely included in micro-economic analysis of crime, it does not substitute those macro factors, like unemployment, to micro factors, like being jobless. However, it combines the macro and micro factors in analyzing how micro factors of crime are integrated into the macro structures.
Crime and criminalization are dependent on social inequality Social inequality there are four major forms of inequality, class gender race and age, all of which influence crime. In looking at social classes and relationship to crime, studies have shown that citizens of the lower class are more likely to commit crimes of property and violence than upper-class citizens: who generally commit political and economic crimes. In 2007 the National Crime Victimization Survey showed that families with an income of $15000 or less had a greater chance of being victimized; recalling that lower classes commit a majority of those crimes. We can conclude that crime generally happens within classes.
Regression is used to test whether or not a low-income setting or a geographical location plays a role to why motor vehicle theft is committed. The dependent variables in this study is motor vehicle theft rates and the independent variables are the criminals who commit motor vehicle theft. The total number of motor vehicle thefts being tested in this study is 7,301. The method for this research is questionnaires given to victims who have had their vehicles stolen to determine what they learned about the offenders’ intents for stealing their vehicles. This study is done over a six-month period. The results showed that settings or geographical locations do not play a role in motor vehicle theft. It depends if the offender is a temporary or permanent offender and what his intentions are when stealing the
Similarly, a study conducted by Ohio State Economics professor Bruce Weinberg found that no relationship exists between unemployment and violent crime. Weinberg notes that most violent crimes, especial...